fbpx
Wikipedia

Lurking doubt

Lurking doubt, also known as the Cooper test, is a legal test allowing an appeal court in England and Wales to overturn a conviction on the basis that it disagrees with the jury's verdict.

It was introduced in R v Cooper[1] by Judge Widgery. In that case, the appeal was based on mistaken identity rather than any irregularity, as all the issues were before a properly-instructed jury. In overturning the conviction in the Criminal Division of the Court of Appeal, the judge wrote:

... in cases of this kind the Court must in the end ask itself a subjective question, whether we are content to let the matter stand as it is, or whether there is not some lurking doubt in our minds which makes us wonder whether an injustice has been done.

Appeals on this principle are rarely successful[2] and some regard it as problematic.[3] It has been criticised as allowing the Court of Appeal to overturn juries: a later appeal court judgement says "it is not the function of this court to decide whether or not the jury was right in reaching its verdicts,"[4] while others argue that a more formal method for overturning juries' mistakes needs to be found.[5]

The test was reaffirmed in R v B:[6] "There can be no doubt that the lurking doubt notion ... continues to be a tool available to this court" and it can set aside convictions in the interests of justice.[7]

The phrase also occurs in commentary on derived legal systems, such as New Zealand[8] and Jersey.[9]

References edit

  1. ^ R v Cooper [1969] 1 All ER 32.
  2. ^ Roberts, Stephanie (2004). "The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice and Factual Innocence: Remedying Wrongful Convictions in the Court of Appeal". Justice Journal. 1 (2): 86. SSRN 1296555.
  3. ^ Ashworth, Andrew; Redmayne, Mike (10 June 2010). The Criminal Process. Oxford University Press. pp. 379–380. ISBN 978-0-19-954728-9.
  4. ^ R v Bamber [2002] EWCA Crim 2912, para 513
  5. ^ Criticism http://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk/features/Lurking-Doubts-Remain
  6. ^ R v B [2005] EWCA Crim 63
  7. ^ Gillespie, Alisdair (18 April 2013). The English Legal System. Oxford University Press. p. 470. ISBN 978-0-19-965709-4.
  8. ^ Privy Council http://nzcriminallaw.blogspot.co.uk/2007/03/lurking-doubts.html
  9. ^ Jersey appeal reform . Archived from the original on 17 October 2014. Retrieved 17 October 2014.

lurking, doubt, also, known, cooper, test, legal, test, allowing, appeal, court, england, wales, overturn, conviction, basis, that, disagrees, with, jury, verdict, introduced, cooper, judge, widgery, that, case, appeal, based, mistaken, identity, rather, than,. Lurking doubt also known as the Cooper test is a legal test allowing an appeal court in England and Wales to overturn a conviction on the basis that it disagrees with the jury s verdict It was introduced in R v Cooper 1 by Judge Widgery In that case the appeal was based on mistaken identity rather than any irregularity as all the issues were before a properly instructed jury In overturning the conviction in the Criminal Division of the Court of Appeal the judge wrote in cases of this kind the Court must in the end ask itself a subjective question whether we are content to let the matter stand as it is or whether there is not some lurking doubt in our minds which makes us wonder whether an injustice has been done Appeals on this principle are rarely successful 2 and some regard it as problematic 3 It has been criticised as allowing the Court of Appeal to overturn juries a later appeal court judgement says it is not the function of this court to decide whether or not the jury was right in reaching its verdicts 4 while others argue that a more formal method for overturning juries mistakes needs to be found 5 The test was reaffirmed in R v B 6 There can be no doubt that the lurking doubt notion continues to be a tool available to this court and it can set aside convictions in the interests of justice 7 The phrase also occurs in commentary on derived legal systems such as New Zealand 8 and Jersey 9 References edit R v Cooper 1969 1 All ER 32 Roberts Stephanie 2004 The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice and Factual Innocence Remedying Wrongful Convictions in the Court of Appeal Justice Journal 1 2 86 SSRN 1296555 Ashworth Andrew Redmayne Mike 10 June 2010 The Criminal Process Oxford University Press pp 379 380 ISBN 978 0 19 954728 9 R v Bamber 2002 EWCA Crim 2912 para 513 Criticism http www criminallawandjustice co uk features Lurking Doubts Remain R v B 2005 EWCA Crim 63 Gillespie Alisdair 18 April 2013 The English Legal System Oxford University Press p 470 ISBN 978 0 19 965709 4 Privy Council http nzcriminallaw blogspot co uk 2007 03 lurking doubts html Jersey appeal reform Jersey Law Jersey Law Review Criminal Appeal Law Time for Change Archived from the original on 17 October 2014 Retrieved 17 October 2014 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Lurking doubt amp oldid 1105913466, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.