Liouville function

The Liouville lambda function, denoted by λ(n) and named after Joseph Liouville, is an important arithmetic function. Its value is +1 if n is the product of an even number of prime numbers, and −1 if it is the product of an odd number of primes.

Explicitly, the fundamental theorem of arithmetic states that any positive integer n can be represented uniquely as a product of powers of primes:   ${\displaystyle n=p_{1}^{a_{1}}\cdots p_{k}^{a_{k}}}$   where p₁ < p₂ < ... < p_k are primes and the a_j are positive integers. (1 is given by the empty product.) The prime omega functions count the number of primes, with (Ω) or without (ω) multiplicity:

ω(n) = k,

Ω(n) = a₁ + a₂ + ... + a_k.

λ(n) is defined by the formula

${\displaystyle \lambda (n)=(-1)^{\Omega (n)}.}$ (sequence A008836 in the OEIS).

λ is completely multiplicative since Ω(n) is completely additive, i.e.: Ω(ab) = Ω(a) + Ω(b). Since 1 has no prime factors, Ω(1) = 0 so λ(1) = 1.

It is related to the Möbius function μ(n). Write n as n = a²b where b is squarefree, i.e., ω(b) = Ω(b). Then

${\displaystyle \lambda (n)=\mu (b).}$

The sum of the Liouville function over the divisors of n is the characteristic function of the squares:

${\displaystyle \sum _{d|n}\lambda (d)={\begin{cases}1&{\text{if }}n{\text{ is a perfect square,}}\\0&{\text{otherwise.}}\end{cases}}}$

Möbius inversion of this formula yields

${\displaystyle \lambda (n)=\sum _{d^{2}|n}\mu \left({\frac {n}{d^{2}}}\right).}$

The Dirichlet inverse of Liouville function is the absolute value of the Möbius function, ${\displaystyle \lambda ^{-1}(n)=|\mu (n)|=\mu ^{2}(n),}$ the characteristic function of the squarefree integers. We also have that ${\displaystyle \lambda (n)\mu (n)=\mu ^{2}(n)}$.

Series

The Dirichlet series for the Liouville function is related to the Riemann zeta function by

${\displaystyle {\frac {\zeta (2s)}{\zeta (s)}}=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\lambda (n)}{n^{s}}}.}$ 

Also:

${\displaystyle \sum \limits _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\lambda (n)\ln n}{n}}=-\zeta (2)=-{\frac {\pi ^{2}}{6}}.}$ 

The Lambert series for the Liouville function is

${\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\lambda (n)q^{n}}{1-q^{n}}}=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }q^{n^{2}}={\frac {1}{2}}\left(\vartheta _{3}(q)-1\right),}$ 

where ${\displaystyle \vartheta _{3}(q)}$  is the Jacobi theta function.

Conjectures on weighted summatory functions

 

Summatory Liouville function L(n) up to n = 10⁴. The readily visible oscillations are due to the first non-trivial zero of the Riemann zeta function.

 

Summatory Liouville function L(n) up to n = 10⁷. Note the apparent scale invariance of the oscillations.

 

Logarithmic graph of the negative of the summatory Liouville function L(n) up to n = 2 × 10⁹. The green spike shows the function itself (not its negative) in the narrow region where the Pólya conjecture fails; the blue curve shows the oscillatory contribution of the first Riemann zero.

 

Harmonic Summatory Liouville function T(n) up to n = 10³

The Pólya problem is a question raised made by George Pólya in 1919. Defining

${\displaystyle L(n)=\sum _{k=1}^{n}\lambda (k)}$  (sequence A002819 in the OEIS),

the problem asks whether ${\displaystyle L(n)\leq 0}$  for n > 1. The answer turns out to be no. The smallest counter-example is n = 906150257, found by Minoru Tanaka in 1980. It has since been shown that L(n) > 0.0618672√n for infinitely many positive integers n,^[1] while it can also be shown via the same methods that L(n) < -1.3892783√n for infinitely many positive integers n.^[2]

For any ${\displaystyle \varepsilon >0}$ , assuming the Riemann hypothesis, we have that the summatory function ${\displaystyle L(x)\equiv L_{0}(x)}$  is bounded by

${\displaystyle L(x)=O\left({\sqrt {x}}\exp \left(C\cdot \log ^{1/2}(x)\left(\log \log x\right)^{5/2+\varepsilon }\right)\right),}$ 

where the ${\displaystyle C>0}$  is some absolute limiting constant.^[2]

Define the related sum

${\displaystyle T(n)=\sum _{k=1}^{n}{\frac {\lambda (k)}{k}}.}$ 

It was open for some time whether T(n) ≥ 0 for sufficiently big n ≥ n₀ (this conjecture is occasionally–though incorrectly–attributed to Pál Turán). This was then disproved by Haselgrove (1958), who showed that T(n) takes negative values infinitely often. A confirmation of this positivity conjecture would have led to a proof of the Riemann hypothesis, as was shown by Pál Turán.

Generalizations

More generally, we can consider the weighted summatory functions over the Liouville function defined for any ${\displaystyle \alpha \in \mathbb {R} }$  as follows for positive integers x where (as above) we have the special cases ${\displaystyle L(x):=L_{0}(x)}$  and ${\displaystyle T(x)=L_{1}(x)}$  ^[2]

${\displaystyle L_{\alpha }(x):=\sum _{n\leq x}{\frac {\lambda (n)}{n^{\alpha }}}.}$ 

These ${\displaystyle \alpha ^{-1}}$ -weighted summatory functions are related to the Mertens function, or weighted summatory functions of the Moebius function. In fact, we have that the so-termed non-weighted, or ordinary function ${\displaystyle L(x)}$  precisely corresponds to the sum

${\displaystyle L(x)=\sum _{d^{2}\leq x}M\left({\frac {x}{d^{2}}}\right)=\sum _{d^{2}\leq x}\sum _{n\leq {\frac {x}{d^{2}}}}\mu (n).}$ 

Moreover, these functions satisfy similar bounding asymptotic relations.^[2] For example, whenever ${\displaystyle 0\leq \alpha \leq {\frac {1}{2}}}$ , we see that there exists an absolute constant ${\displaystyle C_{\alpha }>0}$  such that

${\displaystyle L_{\alpha }(x)=O\left(x^{1-\alpha }\exp \left(-C_{\alpha }{\frac {(\log x)^{3/5}}{(\log \log x)^{1/5}}}\right)\right).}$ 

By an application of Perron's formula, or equivalently by a key (inverse) Mellin transform, we have that

${\displaystyle {\frac {\zeta (2\alpha +2s)}{\zeta (\alpha +s)}}=s\cdot \int _{1}^{\infty }{\frac {L_{\alpha }(x)}{x^{s+1}}}dx,}$ 

which then can be inverted via the inverse transform to show that for ${\displaystyle x>1}$ , ${\displaystyle T\geq 1}$  and ${\displaystyle 0\leq \alpha <{\frac {1}{2}}}$ 

${\displaystyle L_{\alpha }(x)={\frac {1}{2\pi \imath }}\int _{\sigma _{0}-\imath T}^{\sigma _{0}+\imath T}{\frac {\zeta (2\alpha +2s)}{\zeta (\alpha +s)}}\cdot {\frac {x^{s}}{s}}ds+E_{\alpha }(x)+R_{\alpha }(x,T),}$ 

where we can take ${\displaystyle \sigma _{0}:=1-\alpha +1/\log(x)}$ , and with the remainder terms defined such that ${\displaystyle E_{\alpha }(x)=O(x^{-\alpha })}$  and ${\displaystyle R_{\alpha }(x,T)\rightarrow 0}$  as ${\displaystyle T\rightarrow \infty }$ .

In particular, if we assume that the Riemann hypothesis (RH) is true and that all of the non-trivial zeros, denoted by ${\displaystyle \rho ={\frac {1}{2}}+\imath \gamma }$ , of the Riemann zeta function are simple, then for any ${\displaystyle 0\leq \alpha <{\frac {1}{2}}}$  and ${\displaystyle x\geq 1}$  there exists an infinite sequence of ${\displaystyle \{T_{v}\}_{v\geq 1}}$  which satisfies that ${\displaystyle v\leq T_{v}\leq v+1}$  for all v such that

${\displaystyle L_{\alpha }(x)={\frac {x^{1/2-\alpha }}{(1-2\alpha )\zeta (1/2)}}+\sum _{|\gamma |<T_{v}}{\frac {\zeta (2\rho )}{\zeta ^{\prime }(\rho )}}\cdot {\frac {x^{\rho -\alpha }}{(\rho -\alpha )}}+E_{\alpha }(x)+R_{\alpha }(x,T_{v})+I_{\alpha }(x),}$ 

where for any increasingly small ${\displaystyle 0<\varepsilon <{\frac {1}{2}}-\alpha }$  we define

${\displaystyle I_{\alpha }(x):={\frac {1}{2\pi \imath \cdot x^{\alpha }}}\int _{\varepsilon +\alpha -\imath \infty }^{\varepsilon +\alpha +\imath \infty }{\frac {\zeta (2s)}{\zeta (s)}}\cdot {\frac {x^{s}}{(s-\alpha )}}ds,}$ 

and where the remainder term

${\displaystyle R_{\alpha }(x,T)\ll x^{-\alpha }+{\frac {x^{1-\alpha }\log(x)}{T}}+{\frac {x^{1-\alpha }}{T^{1-\varepsilon }\log(x)}},}$ 

which of course tends to 0 as ${\displaystyle T\rightarrow \infty }$ . These exact analytic formula expansions again share similar properties to those corresponding to the weighted Mertens function cases. Additionally, since ${\displaystyle \zeta (1/2)<0}$  we have another similarity in the form of ${\displaystyle L_{\alpha }(x)}$  to ${\displaystyle M(x)}$  in so much as the dominant leading term in the previous formulas predicts a negative bias in the values of these functions over the positive natural numbers x.

References

1. Borwein, P.; Ferguson, R.; Mossinghoff, M. J. (2008). "Sign Changes in Sums of the Liouville Function". Mathematics of Computation. 77 (263): 1681–1694. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-08-02036-X.
2. Humphries, Peter (2013). "The distribution of weighted sums of the Liouville function and Pólyaʼs conjecture". Journal of Number Theory. 133 (2): 545–582. arXiv:1108.1524. doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2012.08.011.

• Pólya, G. (1919). "Verschiedene Bemerkungen zur Zahlentheorie". Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 28: 31–40.
• Haselgrove, C. Brian (1958). "A disproof of a conjecture of Pólya". Mathematika. 5 (2): 141–145. doi:10.1112/S0025579300001480. ISSN 0025-5793. MR 0104638. Zbl 0085.27102.
• Lehman, R. (1960). "On Liouville's function". Mathematics of Computation. 14 (72): 311–320. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1960-0120198-5. MR 0120198.
• Tanaka, Minoru (1980). "A Numerical Investigation on Cumulative Sum of the Liouville Function". Tokyo Journal of Mathematics. 3 (1): 187–189. doi:10.3836/tjm/1270216093. MR 0584557.
• Weisstein, Eric W. "Liouville Function". MathWorld.
• A.F. Lavrik (2001) [1994], "Liouville function", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press