The examples and perspective in this presently US-centric article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this presently US-centric article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new presently US-centric article, as appropriate.(December 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
A legal debate is a discussion between lawyers, legal academics, jurists, politicians, and others who might have an interest or expertise in the law, about a particular legal issue.
Legal debates can take many forms, and do not necessarily need to be face-to-face debates. Most legal debates take place on paper—judges within a court, for example, might debate each other most effectively when the court publishes a decision. Legal debates include (but are not limited to) the following:
Debates between judges. These debates, as well, will often occur face to face during judicial conferences, but they find their most prominent voice in written opinions. Splintered U.S. Supreme Court decisions present a prominent example. Antonin Scalia's dissents with the majority epitomize the nature of judicial legal debate—a debate that often centers around the proper means of interpreting federal statutes or the Constitution.
Debate between politicians. An example of this debate is that between the President of the United States and the United States Congress over the ability of the executive power to issue clandestine wiretaps without seeking a warrant. The legal debate at issue is the scope of executive power vis-a-vis the other branches of government.
General debate within society. Societies always debate the legal order. The process of electing politicians and lobbying is a form of legal debate: the majority tends to become part of a coalition that agrees on the laws that will be implemented.
Contemporary issues in legal debates
Debates in Western societies often follow broad themes, including
The balance between state power and civil liberties
The proper breadth of civil liberties relative to social norms and moral expectations
In the United States, legal debates over the past decade have concerned the following important topics:
In general, the variety of debates—ranging from basic social policy to grander theory about constitutional design and democratic theory—suggests that legal debates overlap with several other social institutions and expectations.
legal, debate, examples, perspective, this, presently, centric, article, represent, worldwide, view, subject, improve, this, presently, centric, article, discuss, issue, talk, page, create, presently, centric, article, appropriate, december, 2010, learn, when,. The examples and perspective in this presently US centric article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject You may improve this presently US centric article discuss the issue on the talk page or create a new presently US centric article as appropriate December 2010 Learn how and when to remove this template message A legal debate is a discussion between lawyers legal academics jurists politicians and others who might have an interest or expertise in the law about a particular legal issue Contents 1 Overview 2 Contemporary issues in legal debates 3 References 4 See alsoOverview EditLegal debates can take many forms and do not necessarily need to be face to face debates Most legal debates take place on paper judges within a court for example might debate each other most effectively when the court publishes a decision Legal debates include but are not limited to the following Debates between judges These debates as well will often occur face to face during judicial conferences but they find their most prominent voice in written opinions Splintered U S Supreme Court decisions present a prominent example Antonin Scalia s dissents with the majority epitomize the nature of judicial legal debate a debate that often centers around the proper means of interpreting federal statutes or the Constitution Debate between politicians An example of this debate is that between the President of the United States and the United States Congress over the ability of the executive power to issue clandestine wiretaps without seeking a warrant The legal debate at issue is the scope of executive power vis a vis the other branches of government General debate within society Societies always debate the legal order The process of electing politicians and lobbying is a form of legal debate the majority tends to become part of a coalition that agrees on the laws that will be implemented Contemporary issues in legal debates EditDebates in Western societies often follow broad themes including The balance between state power and civil liberties The proper breadth of civil liberties relative to social norms and moral expectationsIn the United States legal debates over the past decade have concerned the following important topics The right to privacy including the right to have an abortion 1 The balance between civil rights and the need for greater security after September 11 2001 2 The proper method of interpreting the Constitution Affirmative Action Welfare reform The right to a childIn general the variety of debates ranging from basic social policy to grander theory about constitutional design and democratic theory suggests that legal debates overlap with several other social institutions and expectations References Edit The Abortion Debate Finding a Forum Policy Today 2006 06 01 Retrieved 2008 02 23 Godoy Maria 2008 02 23 NSA Wiretapping The Legal Debate National Public Radio Retrieved 2008 02 23 See also EditConstitutional law Jurisprudence United States Supreme Court Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Legal debate amp oldid 1110176573, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
