fbpx
Wikipedia

Heinkel He 162

The Heinkel He 162 Volksjäger (German, "People's Fighter") was a German single-engine, jet-powered fighter aircraft fielded by the Luftwaffe in World War II. Developed under the Emergency Fighter Program, it was designed and built quickly and made primarily of wood as metals were in very short supply and prioritised for other aircraft. Volksjäger was the Reich Air Ministry's official name for the government design program competition won by the He 162 design. Other names given to the plane include Salamander, which was the codename of its wing-construction program, and Spatz ("Sparrow"), which was the name given to the plane by the Heinkel aviation firm.[1]

He 162
He 162A, WkNr. 120230, during post-war trials in the USA
Role Jet fighter
National origin Germany
Manufacturer Heinkel
First flight 6 December 1944
Introduction January 1945
Retired May 1945
Primary user Luftwaffe
Produced 1945
Number built About 320

The aircraft was notable for its small size; although almost the same length as a Bf 109, its wing was much shorter at 7.2 metres (24 ft) vs. 9.9 metres (32 ft) for the 109. Most distinctive was its top-mounted engine, which combined with the aircraft's ground-hugging landing gear allowed the engine to be easily accessed for maintenance. This made bailing out of the aircraft without hitting the engine difficult, and the He 162 is thus also notable as the first single-engine aircraft to mount an ejection seat in an operational setting. The small size left little room for fuel, which combined with the inefficient engine resulted in very low endurance on the order of 20 minutes, and it only had room to mount two autocannons, making it quite underarmed for the era.

A series of fatal accidents during testing required a series of refinements that delayed the program, but the aircraft eventually emerged in January 1945 as an excellent light fighter. Although production lines were set up and deliveries began, the state of Germany by that time made the effort pointless. Of just less than 1,000 examples on the assembly lines, only about 120 were delivered to the airfields and most of those never flew, usually due to shortages of parts, fuel, and pilots. Small numbers were used in development squadrons and these ultimately saw combat in a few cases during April 1945, yet the He 162 also proved to be quite dangerous to its own pilots as its tiny fuel load led to a number of aircraft crashing off field, while additional losses were attributed to structural failure.

Production was still ongoing when the conflict ended in May 1945. Numerous aircraft were captured by the Allied forces along with ample supplies of parts from the production lines. Eric Brown flew one just after the war and considered it a first-rate aircraft with few vices. Several He 162s have been preserved in museum collections around the world.

Development

State of the Luftwaffe fighter arm

Through 1943 the U.S. 8th Air Force and German Luftwaffe entered a period of rapid evolution as both forces attempted to gain an advantage. Having lost too many fighters to the bombers' defensive guns, the Germans invested in a series of heavy weapons that allowed them to attack from outside the American guns' effective range. The addition of heavy cannons like the 30mm calibre MK 108, and even heavier Bordkanone autoloading weapons in 37mm and 50mm calibres on their Zerstörer heavy fighters, and the spring-1943 adoption of the Werfer-Granate 21 unguided rockets, gave the German single and twin-engined defensive fighters a degree of firepower never seen previously by Allied fliers. Meanwhile, the single-engine aircraft like specially equipped Fw 190As added armor to protect their pilots from Allied bombers' defensive fire, allowing them to approach to distances where their heavy weapons could be used with some chance of hitting the bombers. All of this added greatly to the weight being carried by both the single and twin-engine fighters, seriously affecting their performance.[2][3]

When the 8th Air Force re-opened its bombing campaign in early 1944 with the Big Week offensive, the bombers returned to the skies with the long-range P-51 Mustang in escort. Unencumbered with the heavy weapons needed to down a bomber, the Mustangs (and longer-ranged versions of other aircraft) were able to fend off the Luftwaffe with relative ease. The Luftwaffe responded by changing tactics, forming in front of the bombers and making a single pass through the formations, giving the defense little time to react. The 8th Air Force responded with a change of its own; after Major General Jimmy Doolittle ordered the fighters to enter German airspace far ahead of the bomber formations and roam freely over Germany to hit the Luftwaffe's defensive fighters wherever they could be found.[4]

This change in tactics resulted in a sudden increase in the rate of irreplaceable losses to the Luftwaffe day fighter force, as their heavily laden aircraft were "bounced" long before reaching the bombers.[5] Within weeks, many of their aces were dead, along with hundreds of other pilots, and the training program could not replace their casualties quickly enough. The Luftwaffe put up little fight during the summer of 1944, allowing the Allied landings in France to go almost unopposed from the air. With few planes coming up to fight, Allied fighters were let loose on the German airbases, railways and truck traffic. Logistics soon became a serious problem for the Luftwaffe, as maintaining aircraft in fighting condition became almost impossible. Getting enough fuel was even more difficult because of a devastating campaign against German petroleum industry targets.[6][7]

Origins

 
He 162 120077, surrendered to the British at Leck, pictured at Freeman Field, Indiana, 1945

Addressing this posed a considerable problem for the Luftwaffe. Two camps quickly developed, both demanding the immediate introduction of large numbers of jet fighter aircraft. One group, led by General Adolf Galland, the Inspector of Fighters, reasoned that superior numbers had to be countered with superior technology, and demanded that all possible effort be put into increasing the production of the Messerschmitt Me 262 in its A-1a fighter version, even if that meant reducing production of other aircraft in the meantime.[8]

The second group pointed out that this would likely do little to address the problem; the Me 262 had notoriously unreliable powerplants and landing gear, and the existing logistics problems would mean there would merely be more of them on the ground waiting for parts that would never arrive, or for fuel that was not available.[9] Instead, they suggested that a new design be built – one so inexpensive that if a machine was damaged or worn out, it could simply be discarded and replaced with a fresh plane straight off the assembly line.[10] Thus was born the concept of the "throwaway fighter".[citation needed]

Galland and several other Luftwaffe senior officers expressed their vehement opposition to the light fighter concept,[8][11] while Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring and Armaments Minister Albert Speer fully supported the idea. Göring and Speer got their way; accordingly, a contract tender to supply a single-engine jet fighter that was suited for cheap and rapid mass production was established under the name Volksjäger ("People's Fighter").

Volksjäger

The official RLM Volksjäger design competition parameters specified a single-seat fighter, powered by a single BMW 003,[12][13] a slightly lower-thrust engine not in demand for either the Me 262 or the Ar 234, already in service.[14] The main structure of the Volksjäger competing airframe designs would use cheap and unsophisticated parts made of wood and other non-strategic materials and, more importantly, could be assembled by semi- and non-skilled labor, including slave labor.[15][16]

The specification stipulated various performance requirements, including a maximum weight of 2,000 kg (4,400 lb),[12] a maximum speed of 750 km/h (470 mph) at sea level, an operational endurance at least a half hour, while the takeoff distance was to be no greater than 500 m (1,640 ft).[14] Provisions for armour plating in areas such as the fuel tanks and around the pilot were also to be made, however, manufacturers were also asked to provide detail on the aircraft's performance both with and without armour installed. The armament was specified as either a pair of 20 mm (0.79 in) MG 151/20 cannons with 100 rounds each, or two 30 mm (1.2 in) MK 108 cannons with 50 rounds each.[17]

Furthermore, the Volksjäger needed to be easy to fly.[10] Some officials, such as Artur Axmann and Karl Saur, suggested even glider or student pilots should be able to fly the jet effectively in combat and, had the Volksjäger achieved widespread use, this would have been a likely occurrence.[18] After the war, Ernst Heinkel would say, "[The] unrealistic notion that this plane should be a 'people's fighter,' in which the Hitler Youth, after a short training regimen with clipped-wing two-seater gliders like the DFS Stummel-Habicht, could fly for the defense of Germany, displayed the unbalanced fanaticism of those days."[19][20] The clipped-wingspan DFS Habicht models had varying wingspans of both 8 m (26 ft 3 in) or 6 m (19 ft 8 in), and were used to prepare more experienced Luftwaffe pilots for the dangerous Me 163B Komet rocket fighter – the same sort of training approach would also be used for the Hitler Youth aviators chosen to fly the Volksjäger.[21]

On 8 September 1944, the requirement was issued to industry;[15][22] bidders were required to submit their basic designs within ten days while quantity production of the aircraft was to commence by 1 January 1945.[23] Because the winner of the new lightweight fighter design competition would be building huge numbers of the planes, nearly every German aircraft manufacturer expressed interest in the project, such as Blohm & Voss, and Focke-Wulf, whose Focke-Wulf Volksjäger 1 design contender, likewise meant for BMW 003 turbojet power bore a resemblance to their slightly later Ta 183 Huckebein jet fighter design. However, Heinkel had already been working on a series of "paper projects" for light single-engine fighters over the last year under the designation P.1073, with most design work being completed by Professor Benz, and had gone so far as to build and test several models and conduct some wind tunnel testing.[24]

As Heinkel had a head start on its design, some officials believed that the outcome was a largely foregone conclusion.[17] Nevertheless, many companies opted to produce responses; some of these competing designs were technically superior (in particular to the Blohm & Voss P 211 proposal). Messerschmitt did not submit any design, the company's founder, Willy Messerschmitt, dismissed the Volksjäger concept to be a delusional failure.[25] During October 1944, the competition's results were announced, only three weeks following the requirement being issued; to little surprise, Heinkel's submission was selected for production.[26] In order to confuse Allied intelligence, the RLM chose to reuse the 8-162 airframe designation (formerly that of a Messerschmitt fast bomber);[27] Heinkel had reportedly requested another designation, He 500, for the aircraft.[28][29]

Design

 
He 162 tail section

Heinkel had carried out some design work of a new twin-engine fighter with one engine placed on top of the aircraft and another under the nose, the highest point on the bottom of the fuselage. For the single-engine development, he removed the lower engine and repositioned the remaining upper engine just aft of the cockpit and centered directly over the wing's center section.[30] This arrangement simplified the overall balance of the aircraft, while also placing the engine in a convenient point for removal as it could be removed upward with a small crane.[31] The need for a crane to be present at every airfield that the aircraft would operate from was a point of contention of the aircraft from Heinkel's rivals.[32]

One consequence of the aircraft's basic configuration was that the jet exhaust would pass directly over the upper rear fuselage and the tail area. For this reason, the tail was constructed with two small vertical stabilizers positioned to either side of the exhaust's path, and the horizontal elevator mounted below it.[33] The horizontal section had considerable dihedral at 14º, raising the vertical stabilizers inline with the wing.[34]

The aircraft's relatively compact wing was mounted relatively high on the fuselage and was attached using four bolts.[12][33] The leading edge was straight while the trailing edge had a significant forward sweep. It was not possible to remove the wing without first removing the engine, an arrangement that would have hindered routine maintenance of the aircraft.[32] The combination of the engine being directly above the pilot and the wings on either side would make a conventional bailout very risky, so the aircraft was designed from the start to feature an ejection seat akin to the one used in the Heinkel He 219 night fighter.[citation needed]

The main landing gear retracted into the fuselage below the wing and were of the tricycle layout.[33] Heinkel had significant previous experience with this layout on earlier designs including the Heinkel He 280,[35][36] however, this was the first of their designs to use this layout from the start. A small window in the lower cockpit between the rudder pedals allowed the pilot to visually check whether the gear was down.[37][38][39] Partly due to the late-war period it was designed within, some of the He 162's landing gear components were "recycled" existing landing gear components from a contemporary German military aircraft to save development time: the main landing gear's oleo struts and wheel/brake units came from the Messerschmitt Bf 109K, as well as the double-acting hydraulic cylinders, one per side, used to raise and lower each maingear leg.[40]

Prototypes

The He 162 V1 first prototype flew within an astoundingly short period of time: the design was chosen on 25 September 1944 and first flew on 6 December,[31][41] less than 90 days later. This was despite the fact that the factory in Wuppertal making Tego film plywood glue — used in a substantial number of late-war German aviation designs whose airframes and/or major airframe components were meant to be constructed mostly from wood — had been bombed by the Royal Air Force and a replacement had to be quickly substituted, without realizing that the replacement adhesive was highly acidic and would disintegrate the wooden parts it was intended to be fastening.[42]

The first flight of the He 162 V1, by Flugkapitän Gotthold Peter – the first German jet fighter aircraft design to be jet-powered from its maiden flight onward – was fairly successful, but during a high-speed run at 840 km/h (520 mph), the highly acidic replacement glue attaching the nose gear strut door failed and the pilot was forced to land. Other problems were noted as well, notably a pitch instability and problems with sideslip due to the rudder design.[12][43] None were considered important enough to hold up the production schedule for even a day. On a second flight on 10 December, again with Peter at the controls, in front of various Nazi officials, the glue again caused a structural failure. This allowed the aileron to separate from the wing, causing the plane to roll over and crash, killing Peter.[31][44]

An investigation into the failure revealed that the wing structure had to be strengthened and some redesign was needed, as the glue bonding required for the wood parts was in many cases defective.[31][42] However, the schedule was so tight that testing was forced to continue with the current design. Speeds were limited to 500 km/h (310 mph) when the second prototype flew on 22 December. This time, the stability problems proved to be more serious, and were found to be related to phenomenon known as Dutch roll.[45] While this tendency could be resolved by reducing the dihedral, however, as the He 162 was supposed to enter production within weeks, there was no time to implement major design changes. Instead, a number of small changes were made, such as the addition of lead ballast in the nose to move the centre of gravity towards the front of the aircraft while the tail surfaces were also slightly increased in size.[citation needed] Despite these measures, some figures, such as Alexander Lippisch, declared the flying characteristics of the He 162 to be unsuitable for inexperienced pilots.[46]

The third and fourth prototypes, which used an "M" for "Muster" (model) number instead of "V" for "Versuchs" (experimental) number, as the He 162 M3 and M4, after being fitted with the strengthened wings, flew in mid-January 1945.[47][48] These versions also included – as possibly the pioneering example of their use on a production-line, military jet aircraft – small, anhedraled aluminium "drooped" wingtips, reportedly designed by Alexander Lippisch and known in German as Lippisch-Ohren ("Lippisch Ears"), in an attempt to cure the stability problems via effectively "decreasing" the main wing panels' marked three degree dihedral angle.[49] Both prototypes were equipped with two 30 mm (1.18 in) MK 108 cannons in the He 162 A-1 anti-bomber variant; in testing, the recoil from these guns proved to be too much for the lightweight fuselage to handle, and plans for production turned to the A-2 fighter with two 20 mm MG 151/20 cannons instead while a redesign for added strength started as the A-3. The shift to 20 mm guns was also undertaken because the smaller-calibre weapons would allow a much greater amount of ammunition to be carried.[citation needed]

The He 162 was originally built with the intention of being flown by the Hitler Youth, as the Luftwaffe was fast running out of pilots. However, the aircraft's complexity required more experienced pilots. Both a standard-fuselage length, unarmed BMW 003E-powered two-seat version (with the rear pilot's seat planned to have a ventral access hatch to access the cockpit) and an unpowered two-seat glider version, designated the He 162S (Schulen), were developed for training purposes.[50] Only a small number were built, and even fewer delivered to the sole He 162 Hitler Youth training unit to be activated (in March 1945) at an airbase at Sagan. The unit was in the process of formation when the war ended, and did not begin any training; it is doubtful that more than one or two He 162S gliders ever took to the air.[citation needed]

 
The Hinterbrühl underground production line for the He 162A was captured in April 1945

Various changes had raised the weight over the original 2,000 kg (4,410 lb) limit, but even at 2,800 kg (6,170 lb), the He 162 was still among the fastest aircraft in the air with a maximum airspeed of 790 km/h (427 kn; 491 mph) at sea level and 839 km/h (453 kn; 521 mph) at 6,000 m (20,000 ft),[51] but could reach 890 km/h (481 kn; 553 mph) at sea level and 905 km/h (489 kn; 562 mph) at 6,000 m (20,000 ft) using short burst extra thrust.[52] The short flight duration of barely 30 minutes was due to only having a single 695-litre (183 US gallon) capacity flexible-bladder fuel tank in the fuselage directly under the engine's intake.[53] The original Baubeschreibung document submittal for the He 162 dated mid-October 1944 showed a pair of fuel tanks for the original version of the Spatz's airframe as-designed: a single, smaller capacity 640 litre (169 US gal) fuselage main tank in approximately the same location as the later 695 litre tank was placed, with an additional wing centre-section tank just above and behind it, never produced for the production run, of some 325 litres (86 US gal) feeding by gravity into the main fuselage tank.[54] The A-2 version, in some examples (as the one flown by Royal Navy test pilot Captain Eric Brown postwar) had an emplacement of a pair of "impregnated" 180 litre (47.5 US gal) wing tanks, one built into each inner wing panel, within the first four wing ribs out from the root and between the spars, that fed into the main 695 litre fuselage tank in a similar manner to what the earlier 325 litre center-section tank had been proposed to do; but were themselves ungauged, their exhaustion of fuel only marked when the main fuel gauge began to fall during flight.[55] The production He 162A-2 was armed with a pair of 20mm MG 151/20 cannon.[51][56]

Multiple facilities were engaged in the production of the He 162, including the assembly lines in Salzburg, the Hinterbrühl, and the Mittelwerk.[51][57] By April 1945, it had been anticipated that output would reach 1,000 aircraft per month, which was double the rate achieved when the Mittelwerk plant commenced deliveries.[51] Furthermore, the Air Ministry expected that production were rise even beyond this figure in order to produce sufficient fighter coverage.[58][59]

Operational history

During January 1945, the Luftwaffe formed an Erprobungskommando 162 ("Test Unit 162") evaluation group to which the first 46 aircraft were delivered. The group was based at the Luftwaffe main test center, or Erprobungsstelle at Rechlin.

In February, deliveries of the He 162 commenced to its first operational unit, I./JG 1 (1st Group of Jagdgeschwader 1 Oesau — "1st Fighter Wing"), which had previously flown the Focke-Wulf Fw 190A. I./JG 1 was transferred to Parchim, which, at the time, was also a base for the Me 262-equipped Jagdgeschwader 7, some 80 km south-southwest of the Heinkel factory's coastal airfield at "Marienehe" (today known as Rostock-Schmarl, northwest of the Rostock city centre), where the pilots could pick up their new jets and start intensive training beginning in March 1945. This was all happening simultaneously with unrelenting Allied air attacks on the transportation network, aircraft production facilities and petroleum, oil, and lubrication (POL) product-making installations of the Third Reich – these had now begun to also target the Luftwaffe's jet and rocket fighter bases as well. On 6 April, the USAAF bombed the field at Parchim with 134 B-17 Flying Fortresses, inflicting serious losses and damage to the infrastructure.[60] Two days later, I./JG 1 moved to an airfield at nearby Ludwigslust and, less than a week later, moved again to an airfield at Leck, near the Danish border. On 8 April, II./JG 1 moved to Heinkel's aforementioned Rostock northwestern coastal suburban factory airfield and started converting from Fw 190As to He 162s. III./JG 1 was also scheduled to convert to the He 162, but the Gruppe disbanded on 24 April and its personnel were used to fill in the vacancies in other units.[citation needed]

The He 162 first saw combat in mid-April 1945. On 19 April, Feldwebel Günther Kirchner shot down a Royal Air Force fighter and, although the victory was credited to a flak unit, the British pilot confirmed during interrogation that he had been downed by an He 162.[61][62] The Heinkel and its pilot were both lost that same day as well, having been shot down over Husum by Flying Officer Geoffrey Walkington,[63][64] piloting an RAF Hawker Tempest. Though still in training, I./JG 1 began to score kills in mid-April, but went on to lose 13 He 162s and 10 pilots. Ten of the aircraft were operational losses, caused by flameouts and sporadic structural failures. Only two of the 13 aircraft were actually shot down. The He 162's 30-minute fuel capacity also caused problems, as at least two of JG 1's pilots were killed attempting emergency deadstick landings after exhausting their fuel.[citation needed]

During its exceedingly brief operational service career, the He 162's cartridge-type ejector seat was employed under combat conditions by JG 1's pilots at least four times. Fw. Günther Kirchner was the first to attempt an ejection on April 19, but he was too low and was killed when his parachute failed to open.[65][66] The second recorded use was by Lt Rudolf Schmidt on April 20, with Fw. Erwin Steeb ejecting from his He 162 the following day. Finally, Hptm. Paul-Heinrich Dähne attempted to eject from his aircraft on April 24, but was killed when the cockpit canopy failed to detach.[citation needed]

 
A captured He 162, circa 1945
 
Captured He 162 120230 in France, brought to the US by Operation Lusty

In the last days of April, as the Soviet troops approached, II./JG 1 evacuated from Marienehe and on 2 May joined the I./JG 1 at Leck. On 3 May, all of JG 1's surviving He 162s were restructured into two groups, I. Einsatz ("Combat") and II. Sammel ("Collection"). All JG 1's aircraft were grounded on 5 May, when General Admiral Hans-Georg von Friedeburg signed the surrender of all German armed forces in the Netherlands, Northwest Germany and Denmark. On 6 May, when the British reached their airfields, JG 1 turned their He 162s over to the Allies.[67] Numerous aircraft were shipped to the U.S., Britain, France, and the Soviet Union for further evaluation.[68][69]

Erprobungskommando 162 fighters, which had been passed on to JV 44, an elite jet unit under Adolf Galland a few weeks earlier, were all destroyed by their crews to keep them from falling into Allied hands. Heinkel did not resort to such measures, the company's engineers supplied the Americans with detailed designs for the He 162.[70] By the time of Germany's unconditional surrender on 8 May 1945, 120 He 162s had been delivered while a further 200 had been completed and were awaiting collection or flight-testing; an additional 600 or so aircraft were in various stages of production,[citation needed]

The difficulties experienced by the He 162 are believed to have been primarily a result of its rush into production, rather than any inherent design flaw.[71] One experienced Luftwaffe pilot who flew the He 162 called it a "first-class combat aircraft." Test pilot Eric Brown of the Fleet Air Arm, who flew a record 486 different types of aircraft, said the He 162 had "the lightest and most effective aerodynamically balanced controls" he had experienced.[72] Brown had been warned to treat the rudder with suspicion due to a number of in-flight failures. This warning was passed on by Brown to RAF pilot Flt Lt R A Marks, but was apparently not heeded. On 9 November 1945, during a demonstration flight from RAE Farnborough, one of the fin and rudder assemblies broke off at the start of a low-level roll causing the aircraft to crash into Oudenarde Barracks, Aldershot, killing Marks and a soldier on the ground.[73]

He 162 Mistel

The Mistel series of fighter/powered bomb composite ground-attack aircraft pre-dated the He 162 by over two years, and the Mistel 5 project study in early 1945 proposed the mating of an He 162A-2 to the Arado E.377A flying bomb.[31][74] The fighter would sit atop the bomb, which would itself be equipped with two underwing-mounted BMW 003 turbojets. This ungainly combination would take off on a sprung trolley fitted with tandem wheels on each side for the "main gear" equivalent, derived from that used on the first eight Arado Ar 234 prototypes, with all three jets running. Immediately after take-off, the trolley would be jettisoned, and the Mistel would then fly to within strike range of the designated target. Upon reaching this point, the bomb would be aimed squarely at the target and then released, with the jet turning back for home. The Mistel 5 remained a "paper project", as the Arado bomb never progressed beyond the blueprint stage.[citation needed]

Variants

  • He 162 A-0 — first ten pre-production aircraft.
  • He 162 A-1 — armed with two 30 mm (1.18 in) MK 108 cannons with 50 rounds per gun.
  • He 162 A-2 — armed with two 20 mm MG 151/20 cannons with 120 rounds per gun.
  • He 162 A-3 — proposed upgrade with reinforced nose mounting twin 30 mm MK 108 cannons.
  • He 162 A-8 — proposed upgrade with the more powerful Jumo 004D-4 engine of 10.3 kN (2,300 lbf) top thrust levels. Muster (model) prototype airframes M11 and M12's testing revealed a top speed of 885 km/h (550 mph) at sea level at normal thrust and 960 km/h (597 mph) with maximum thrust,[75] close to the Me 163B rocket fighter's top velocity figures.
  • He 162 B-1 — a proposed follow on planned for 1946, meant to use the Heinkel firm's own, more powerful 12 kN (2,700 lb) thrust Heinkel HeS 011A turbojet, a stretched fuselage to provide more fuel and endurance as well as increased wingspan, with reduced dihedral which allowed the omission of the anhedral wingtip devices. To be armed with twin 30 mm (1.18 in) MK 108s.
The He 162B airframe was also used as the basis for the Miniature Fighter Project design competition powered by one or two "square-intake" Argus As 044 pulsejet engines. The pulsejet, however didn't provide enough thrust for takeoff and neither Heinkel nor the OKL showed much enthusiasm for the project.[76]
  • He 162C — proposed upgrade featuring the B-series fuselage, Heinkel HeS 011A engine, swept-back, anhedraled outer wing panels forming a gull wing, a new V-tail stabilizing surface assembly, and upward-aimed twin 30 mm (1.18 in) MK 108s as a Schräge Musik weapons fitment,[citation needed] located right behind the cockpit.
  • He 162D — proposed upgrade with a configuration similar to C-series but a dihedraled forward-swept wing.[62][77]
  • He 162E — He 162A fitted with the BMW 003R mixed power plant, a BMW 003A turbojet with an integrated BMW 718 liquid-fuel rocket engine — mounted just above the exhaust orifice of the turbojet — for boost power. At least one prototype was built and flight-tested for a short time.
  • He 162S — two-seat training glider.

Operators

  Nazi Germany
  France
  United Kingdom

Aircraft on display

Reproduction

  • He 162, produced by George Lucas (Nunda, NY) displayed at National Warplane Museum, Geneseo NY (www.nationalwarplanemuseum.com)

Specifications (He 162A)

 
He 162A 3-view

Data from Hitler's Luftwaffe.[53]

General characteristics

  • Crew: 1
  • Length: 9.05 m (29 ft 8 in)
  • Wingspan: 7.2 m (23 ft 7 in)
  • Height: 2.6 m (8 ft 6 in)
  • Wing area: 11.16 m2 (120.1 sq ft)
  • Empty weight: 1,660 kg (3,660 lb)
  • Max takeoff weight: 2,800 kg (6,173 lb)
  • Fuel capacity: 695 L (184 US gal; 153 imp gal)
  • Powerplant: 1 × BMW 109-003E-1 or BMW 109-003E-2 turbojet engine, 7.85 kN (1,760 lbf) thrust

Performance

840 km/h (520 mph; 450 kn) at 6,000 m (20,000 ft) (normal thrust)
890 km/h (550 mph; 480 kn) at sea level (emergency boosted thrust)
905 km/h (562 mph; 489 kn) at 6,000 m (20,000 ft) (emergency boosted thrust)
  • Range: 975 km (606 mi, 526 nmi)
  • Service ceiling: 12,000 m (39,000 ft)
  • Rate of climb: 23.42 m/s (4,610 ft/min)
  • Wing loading: 252 kg/m2 (52 lb/sq ft)
  • Thrust/weight: 0.35 (normal thrust)
0.41 (emergency boosted thrust)

Armament

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

References

Citations

  1. ^ "Heinkel He 162 A-2 Spatz (Sparrow)". airandspace.si.edu. Smithsonian Institution National Air & Space Museum. Retrieved September 25, 2021. Pilots mastered some of the Spatz's nasty habits but the jet would always be a difficult, even dangerous, aircraft to fly, even for experienced pilots...the He 162 has often been erroneously referred to as the Salmander. The term is a codename for the wing structure, not the aircraft.
  2. ^ Weal 1996, p. 78.
  3. ^ Forsyth 2009, pp. 58–59.
  4. ^ McFarland and Newton 1991,[page needed].
  5. ^ Hess 1994, pp. 77–78.
  6. ^ Miller 2006, p. 320.
  7. ^ Williamson, Charles C.; Hughes, R. D.; Cabell, C. P.; Nazarro, J. J.; Bender, F. P.; Crigglesworth, W. J. (5 March 1944). Plan for Completion of Combined Bomber Offensive. Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library: Smith, Walter Bedell: Collection of World War II Documents, 1941–1945; Box No.: 48 (Report). HQ, U.S.S.T.A.F.
  8. ^ a b Dorr 2013, p. 153.
  9. ^ Forsyth 2016, p. 8.
  10. ^ a b Forsyth 2016, p. 7.
  11. ^ Uziel 2011, pp. 240–243.
  12. ^ a b c d Christopher 2013, p. 145.
  13. ^ LePage 2009, p. 38.
  14. ^ a b Forsyth 2016, pp. 8-9.
  15. ^ a b LePage 2009, p. 244.
  16. ^ Dorr 2013, p. 152.
  17. ^ a b Forsyth 2016, p. 10.
  18. ^ Forsyth 2016, pp. 17-18.
  19. ^ Excerpt from Lucas Arts' "Secret Weapons of Luftwaffe" CD-ROM's Text Manual.
  20. ^ Heath 2022, p. 223.
  21. ^ Forsyth 2016, pp. 7-8.
  22. ^ Dorr 2013, p. 151.
  23. ^ Forsyth 2016, p. 9.
  24. ^ Forsyth 2016, pp. 9-10.
  25. ^ Forsyth 2016, p. 11.
  26. ^ Forsyth 2016, p. 15.
  27. ^ Sharp 2020b, p. 16.
  28. ^ Sharp 2020b, p. 178.
  29. ^ Forsyth 2016, p. 22.
  30. ^ Sharp 2020b, pp. 177–178.
  31. ^ a b c d e Ford 2013, p. 224.
  32. ^ a b Forsyth 2016, p. 14.
  33. ^ a b c Dorr 2013, p. 150.
  34. ^ (PDF). deutsche-luftwaffe.de. Heinkel Flugzeugwerke. 15 October 1944. p. 40. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 August 2016. Retrieved 6 July 2016.
  35. ^ Christopher 2013, p. 58.
  36. ^ Sharp 2020b, p. 72.
  37. ^ a b Heinkel 162 (He162) landing gear test (YouTube) (YouTube). Le Bourget, Paris, France: memorialflight. 2008. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
  38. ^ Animation of He 162 nosegear retraction cycle
  39. ^ Animation of He 162 maingear retraction cycle
  40. ^ Sengfelder, Günther (1993). German Aircraft Landing Gear. Atglen, PA USA: Schiffer Publishing. pp. 136–137. ISBN 0-88740-470-7. The He 162's landing gear consisted partly of elements taken from other designs. The main landing gear legs and wheels were from the Bf 109K. The hydraulic jack used to raise and lower the landing gear was also taken from the Bf 109.
  41. ^ Forsyth 2016, pp. 24-25.
  42. ^ a b Dorr 2013, p. 156.
  43. ^ Forsyth 2016, pp. 25-29.
  44. ^ Sharp 2020b, p. 18.
  45. ^ Sharp 2020b, p. 155.
  46. ^ Sharp 2020b, p. 311.
  47. ^ Sharp 2020b, p. 11.
  48. ^ Forsyth 2016, pp. 30-32.
  49. ^ (PDF). deutsche-luftwaffe.de. Heinkel Flugzeugwerke. 15 October 1944. p. 39. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 August 2016. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
  50. ^ Forsyth 2016, p. 51.
  51. ^ a b c d Christopher 2013, p. 146.
  52. ^ Donald 1994, p. 119.
  53. ^ a b Wood and Gunston 1977, pp. 194–195.
  54. ^ (PDF). deutsche-luftwaffe.de. Heinkel Flugzeugwerke. 15 October 1944. p. 43. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 August 2016. Retrieved 6 July 2016.
  55. ^ Brown 2010, p. 137.
  56. ^ Dorr 2013, p. 159.
  57. ^ Dorr 2013, pp. 154-155.
  58. ^ LePage 2009, p. 267.
  59. ^ Sharp 2020b, p. 179.
  60. ^ Forsyth 2016, p. 62.
  61. ^ Mombeek 1992, p. 297.
  62. ^ a b Dorr 2013, p. 160.
  63. ^ Shores 2006, pp. 497–498.
  64. ^ Thomas and Holmes 2016, pp. 60–61.
  65. ^ Shores 2006, p. 498.
  66. ^ Thomas and Holmes 2016, p. 60.
  67. ^ Forsyth 2016, p. 81.
  68. ^ Dorr 2013, p. 161.
  69. ^ Forsyth 2016, pp. 6-7.
  70. ^ Sharp 2020b, p. 148.
  71. ^ LePage 2009, p. 266.
  72. ^ Brown, Eric. "Mastering Heinkel's Minimus; Air Enthusiast, 2:6, June 1972.
  73. ^ "Two Killed In Flying Accident". The Times. London, England. 10 November 1945. p. 2.
  74. ^ LePage 2009, pp. 160-161.
  75. ^ http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/he162/HE-162-F-TS-672-RE.pdf[bare URL PDF]
  76. ^ The Heinkel He-162 Volksjaeger
  77. ^ Sharp 2020b, p. 20.
  78. ^ "Individual History: Heinkel He162A-2 W/NR.120227/AIR MIN 65/VN679/8472M, Museum Accession Number 1990/0697/A" (PDF). Royal Air Force Museum London. Retrieved 30 November 2022.
  79. ^ Forsyth & Creek 2008, p. 180
  80. ^ "Heinkel He 162 A-2 Spatz (Sparrow)". Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved 30 November 2022.
  81. ^ "Heinkel He 162A-1 Volksjäger (120086) | Canada Aviation and Space Museum". ingeniumcanada.org. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  82. ^ Sharp 2020a, p. 133
  83. ^ . Archived from the original on 29 May 2012. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  84. ^ "Heinkel 162A-1 Salamander". Imperial War Museum. Retrieved 30 November 2022.
  85. ^ Forsyth & Creek 2008, p. 181

Bibliography

  • Brown, Eric (2010). Wings of the Luftwaffe: Flying Captured German Aircraft of World War II (Revised ed.). Manchester, UK: Hikoki Publications. ISBN 978-1-9021091-5-2.
  • Christopher, John (2013). The Race for Hitler's X-Planes. Stroud, UK: History Press. ISBN 978-0-7524-6457-2.
  • Donald, David (1994). Warplanes of the Luftwaffe. London, United Kingdom: Aerospace Publishing. ISBN 1-874023-56-5.
  • Dorr, Robert F. (2013). Fighting Hitler's Jets. Voyageur Press. ISBN 978-0-7603-4398-2.
  • Ford, Roger (2013). Germany's Secret Weapons of World War II. London, United Kingdom: Amber Books. ISBN 9781909160569.
  • Forsyth, Robert; Creek, Eddie J (2008). Heinkel He 162 Volksjager: From Drawing Board to Destruction: The Volksjäger. Vol. 17. Hersham, United Kingdom: Classic Publications. ISBN 978-1-90653-700-5.
  • Forsyth, Robert (2016). He 162 Volksjäger Units. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-47281-459-3.
  • Forsyth, Robert (2009). Fw 190 Sturmböck vs B-17 Flying Fortress: Europe 1944–1945. Oxford, United Kingdom: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84603-941-6.
  • Heath, Tim (2022). In Furious Skies: Flying with Hitler's Luftwaffe in the Second World War. Pen and Sword History. ISBN 978-1-5267-8526-8.
  • Hess, William. N. (1994). B-17 Flying Fortress - Combat and Development History. Motor books. ISBN 0-87938-881-1.
  • Lepage, Jean-Denis G. G. (2009). Aircraft of the Luftwaffe 1935–1945: An Illustrated History. Jefferson, North Carolina, US: McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-3937-9.
  • McFarland, Stephen L.; Newton, Wesley Philips (1991). To Command the Sky: The Battle for Air Superiority Over Germany, 1942–1944. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. ISBN 1-56098069-9.
  • Miller, Donald L. (2006). Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany. New York, US: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432-3544-0.
  • Mombeek, Eric (1992). Defending the Reich- The History of Jagdgeschwader 1 'Oesau'. Norfolk, UK: JAC Publications. ISBN 0-9515737-1-3.
  • Smith, J. Richard; Conway, William (1967). The Heinkel He 162 (Aircraft in Profile number 203). Leatherhead, United Kingdom: Profile Publications.
  • Smith, J., Richard; Creek, Eddie J (1982). Jet Planes of the Third Reich. Boylston, Massachusetts, US: Monogram Aviation Publications. ISBN 0-914144-27-8.
  • Sharp, Dan (2020a). Heinkel He 162. Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe. Vol. 1. Horncastle, UK: Tempest Books. ISBN 978-1-911658-24-5.
  • Sharp, Dan (2020b). Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe - Vol 1 - Jet Fighters 1939 -1945. Tempest Books. ISBN 978-1-911658-80-1.
  • Shores, Christopher (2006). 2nd Tactical Air Force. Volume III: From the Rhine to Victory: January to May 1945. Classic Publications. ISBN 1-90322-360-1.
  • Thomas, Chris; Holmes, Tony (2016). Tempest Squadrons of the RAF. Oxford, United Kingdom: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4728-1454-8. OCLC 933722337.
  • Uziel, Daniel (2011). Arming the Luftwaffe: The German Aviation Industry in World War II. Jefferson, US: McFarland. ISBN 9780786488797.
  • Weal, John (1996). Focke-Wulf Fw 190 Aces of the Western Front. Oxford, United Kingdom: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-85532-595-1.
  • Wood, Tony; Gunston, Bill (1977). Hitler's Luftwaffe: A pictorial history and technical encyclopaedia of Hitler's air power in World War II. London, UK: Salamander Books. ISBN 0-86101-005-1.

Further reading

  • Balous, Miroslav; Bílý, Miroslav (2004). Heinkel He 162 Spatz (Volksjäger) (in Czech and English). Prague, Czech Republic: MBI. ISBN 80-86524-06-X.
  • Couderchon, Philippe (April 2006). "The Salamander in France Part 1". Aeroplane Magazine.
  • Couderchon, Philippe (May 2006). "The Salamander in France Part". Aeroplane Magazine.
  • Green, William (1970). Warplanes of the Third Reich (Fourth impression (1979) ed.). London, UK: Macdonald and Jane's Publishers Ltd. ISBN 0-356-02382-6.
  • Griehl, Manfred (2007). The Luftwaffe Profile Series No.16: Heinkel He 162. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7643-1430-8.
  • Griehl, Manfred (2007). Heinkel Strahlflugzeug He 162 "Volksjäger" — Entwicklung, Produktion und Einsatz (in German). Lemwerder, Germany: Stedinger Verlag. ISBN 978-3-927697-50-8.
  • Hiller, Alfred (1984). Heinkel He 162 "Volksjäger" — Entwicklung, Produktion, Einsatz. Wien, Austria: Verlag Alfred Hiller.
  • Ledwoch, Janusz (1998). He-162 Volksjager (Wydawnictwo Militaria 49). Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo Militaria. ISBN 83-86209-68-2.
  • Müller, Peter (2006). Heinkel He 162 "Volksjäger": Letzter Versuch der Luftwaffe (in German and English). Andelfingen, Germany: Müller History Facts. ISBN 3-9522968-0-5.
  • Myhra, David (1999). X Planes of the Third Reich: Heinkel He 162. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing. ISBN 0-7643-0955-2.
  • Nowarra, Heinz J. (1993). Heinkel He 162 "Volksjager". Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing. ISBN 0-88740-478-2.
    • (Translation of: Der "Volksjäger" He 162 (in German). Friedberg, Germany: Podzun-Pallas Verlag. 1984. ISBN 3-7909-0216-0..)
  • Peter-Michel, Wolfgang (2011). Flugerfahrungen mit der Heinkel He 162;— Testpiloten berichten (in German). Norderstedt, Germany: BOD-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-8423-7048-7.
  • Smith, J. Richard; Creek, Eddie J. (1986). Heinkel He 162 Volksjager (Monogram Close-Up 11). Acton, MA: Monogram Aviation Publications. ISBN 0-914144-11-1.
  • Smith, J. Richard; Kay, Anthony (1972). German Aircraft of the Second World War (Third (1978) ed.). London, UK: Putnam & Company. ISBN 0-370-00024-2.

External links

  • The NASM's Heinkel He 162A Spatz, to be restored 2019-12-23 at the Wayback Machine
  • The Heinkel He 162 Volksjäger at Greg Goebel's AIR VECTORS
  • Heinkel He 162 Volksjäger in Detail 2008-09-04 at the Wayback Machine
  • (in German) Heinkel He 162 "Volksjäger"
  • He 162 "Salamander" Russian training film, 9 minutes (in Russian)
  • Video of restored He 162A retractable landing gear testing for the Musee de l'Air's example
  • The Memorial Flight's (France) restoration of He 162A WkNr. 120 015 Page
  • December 2012 Interview with Harald Bauer, a surviving He 162A test pilot
  • He 162 Mistel 5
  • "Heinkel He 162 A-2 ("FE-504" c/n 120230) US Army Air Forces" photo of He 162 120230 with aircraft history
  • "Heinkel He 162 A-2 ("T2-489" c/n 120077) US Army Air Forces "Nervenklau" 2014-10-06 at the Wayback Machine photo of He 162 120077 with aircraft history

heinkel, volksjäger, redirects, here, focke, wulf, project, focke, wulf, volksjäger, this, article, needs, additional, citations, verification, please, help, improve, this, article, adding, citations, reliable, sources, unsourced, material, challenged, removed. Volksjager redirects here For the Focke Wulf project see Focke Wulf Volksjager This article needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources Unsourced material may be challenged and removed Find sources Heinkel He 162 news newspapers books scholar JSTOR February 2008 Learn how and when to remove this template message The Heinkel He 162 Volksjager German People s Fighter was a German single engine jet powered fighter aircraft fielded by the Luftwaffe in World War II Developed under the Emergency Fighter Program it was designed and built quickly and made primarily of wood as metals were in very short supply and prioritised for other aircraft Volksjager was the Reich Air Ministry s official name for the government design program competition won by the He 162 design Other names given to the plane include Salamander which was the codename of its wing construction program and Spatz Sparrow which was the name given to the plane by the Heinkel aviation firm 1 He 162He 162A WkNr 120230 during post war trials in the USARole Jet fighterNational origin GermanyManufacturer HeinkelFirst flight 6 December 1944Introduction January 1945Retired May 1945Primary user LuftwaffeProduced 1945Number built About 320The aircraft was notable for its small size although almost the same length as a Bf 109 its wing was much shorter at 7 2 metres 24 ft vs 9 9 metres 32 ft for the 109 Most distinctive was its top mounted engine which combined with the aircraft s ground hugging landing gear allowed the engine to be easily accessed for maintenance This made bailing out of the aircraft without hitting the engine difficult and the He 162 is thus also notable as the first single engine aircraft to mount an ejection seat in an operational setting The small size left little room for fuel which combined with the inefficient engine resulted in very low endurance on the order of 20 minutes and it only had room to mount two autocannons making it quite underarmed for the era A series of fatal accidents during testing required a series of refinements that delayed the program but the aircraft eventually emerged in January 1945 as an excellent light fighter Although production lines were set up and deliveries began the state of Germany by that time made the effort pointless Of just less than 1 000 examples on the assembly lines only about 120 were delivered to the airfields and most of those never flew usually due to shortages of parts fuel and pilots Small numbers were used in development squadrons and these ultimately saw combat in a few cases during April 1945 yet the He 162 also proved to be quite dangerous to its own pilots as its tiny fuel load led to a number of aircraft crashing off field while additional losses were attributed to structural failure Production was still ongoing when the conflict ended in May 1945 Numerous aircraft were captured by the Allied forces along with ample supplies of parts from the production lines Eric Brown flew one just after the war and considered it a first rate aircraft with few vices Several He 162s have been preserved in museum collections around the world Contents 1 Development 1 1 State of the Luftwaffe fighter arm 1 2 Origins 1 3 Volksjager 2 Design 2 1 Prototypes 3 Operational history 4 He 162 Mistel 5 Variants 6 Operators 7 Aircraft on display 8 Reproduction 9 Specifications He 162A 10 See also 11 References 11 1 Citations 11 2 Bibliography 12 Further reading 13 External linksDevelopment EditState of the Luftwaffe fighter arm Edit Through 1943 the U S 8th Air Force and German Luftwaffe entered a period of rapid evolution as both forces attempted to gain an advantage Having lost too many fighters to the bombers defensive guns the Germans invested in a series of heavy weapons that allowed them to attack from outside the American guns effective range The addition of heavy cannons like the 30mm calibre MK 108 and even heavier Bordkanone autoloading weapons in 37mm and 50mm calibres on their Zerstorer heavy fighters and the spring 1943 adoption of the Werfer Granate 21 unguided rockets gave the German single and twin engined defensive fighters a degree of firepower never seen previously by Allied fliers Meanwhile the single engine aircraft like specially equipped Fw 190As added armor to protect their pilots from Allied bombers defensive fire allowing them to approach to distances where their heavy weapons could be used with some chance of hitting the bombers All of this added greatly to the weight being carried by both the single and twin engine fighters seriously affecting their performance 2 3 When the 8th Air Force re opened its bombing campaign in early 1944 with the Big Week offensive the bombers returned to the skies with the long range P 51 Mustang in escort Unencumbered with the heavy weapons needed to down a bomber the Mustangs and longer ranged versions of other aircraft were able to fend off the Luftwaffe with relative ease The Luftwaffe responded by changing tactics forming in front of the bombers and making a single pass through the formations giving the defense little time to react The 8th Air Force responded with a change of its own after Major General Jimmy Doolittle ordered the fighters to enter German airspace far ahead of the bomber formations and roam freely over Germany to hit the Luftwaffe s defensive fighters wherever they could be found 4 This change in tactics resulted in a sudden increase in the rate of irreplaceable losses to the Luftwaffe day fighter force as their heavily laden aircraft were bounced long before reaching the bombers 5 Within weeks many of their aces were dead along with hundreds of other pilots and the training program could not replace their casualties quickly enough The Luftwaffe put up little fight during the summer of 1944 allowing the Allied landings in France to go almost unopposed from the air With few planes coming up to fight Allied fighters were let loose on the German airbases railways and truck traffic Logistics soon became a serious problem for the Luftwaffe as maintaining aircraft in fighting condition became almost impossible Getting enough fuel was even more difficult because of a devastating campaign against German petroleum industry targets 6 7 Origins Edit He 162 120077 surrendered to the British at Leck pictured at Freeman Field Indiana 1945 Addressing this posed a considerable problem for the Luftwaffe Two camps quickly developed both demanding the immediate introduction of large numbers of jet fighter aircraft One group led by General Adolf Galland the Inspector of Fighters reasoned that superior numbers had to be countered with superior technology and demanded that all possible effort be put into increasing the production of the Messerschmitt Me 262 in its A 1a fighter version even if that meant reducing production of other aircraft in the meantime 8 The second group pointed out that this would likely do little to address the problem the Me 262 had notoriously unreliable powerplants and landing gear and the existing logistics problems would mean there would merely be more of them on the ground waiting for parts that would never arrive or for fuel that was not available 9 Instead they suggested that a new design be built one so inexpensive that if a machine was damaged or worn out it could simply be discarded and replaced with a fresh plane straight off the assembly line 10 Thus was born the concept of the throwaway fighter citation needed Galland and several other Luftwaffe senior officers expressed their vehement opposition to the light fighter concept 8 11 while Reichsmarschall Hermann Goring and Armaments Minister Albert Speer fully supported the idea Goring and Speer got their way accordingly a contract tender to supply a single engine jet fighter that was suited for cheap and rapid mass production was established under the name Volksjager People s Fighter Volksjager Edit See also Emergency Fighter Program The official RLM Volksjager design competition parameters specified a single seat fighter powered by a single BMW 003 12 13 a slightly lower thrust engine not in demand for either the Me 262 or the Ar 234 already in service 14 The main structure of the Volksjager competing airframe designs would use cheap and unsophisticated parts made of wood and other non strategic materials and more importantly could be assembled by semi and non skilled labor including slave labor 15 16 The specification stipulated various performance requirements including a maximum weight of 2 000 kg 4 400 lb 12 a maximum speed of 750 km h 470 mph at sea level an operational endurance at least a half hour while the takeoff distance was to be no greater than 500 m 1 640 ft 14 Provisions for armour plating in areas such as the fuel tanks and around the pilot were also to be made however manufacturers were also asked to provide detail on the aircraft s performance both with and without armour installed The armament was specified as either a pair of 20 mm 0 79 in MG 151 20 cannons with 100 rounds each or two 30 mm 1 2 in MK 108 cannons with 50 rounds each 17 Furthermore the Volksjager needed to be easy to fly 10 Some officials such as Artur Axmann and Karl Saur suggested even glider or student pilots should be able to fly the jet effectively in combat and had the Volksjager achieved widespread use this would have been a likely occurrence 18 After the war Ernst Heinkel would say The unrealistic notion that this plane should be a people s fighter in which the Hitler Youth after a short training regimen with clipped wing two seater gliders like the DFS Stummel Habicht could fly for the defense of Germany displayed the unbalanced fanaticism of those days 19 20 The clipped wingspan DFS Habicht models had varying wingspans of both 8 m 26 ft 3 in or 6 m 19 ft 8 in and were used to prepare more experienced Luftwaffe pilots for the dangerous Me 163B Komet rocket fighter the same sort of training approach would also be used for the Hitler Youth aviators chosen to fly the Volksjager 21 On 8 September 1944 the requirement was issued to industry 15 22 bidders were required to submit their basic designs within ten days while quantity production of the aircraft was to commence by 1 January 1945 23 Because the winner of the new lightweight fighter design competition would be building huge numbers of the planes nearly every German aircraft manufacturer expressed interest in the project such as Blohm amp Voss and Focke Wulf whose Focke Wulf Volksjager 1 design contender likewise meant for BMW 003 turbojet power bore a resemblance to their slightly later Ta 183 Huckebein jet fighter design However Heinkel had already been working on a series of paper projects for light single engine fighters over the last year under the designation P 1073 with most design work being completed by Professor Benz and had gone so far as to build and test several models and conduct some wind tunnel testing 24 As Heinkel had a head start on its design some officials believed that the outcome was a largely foregone conclusion 17 Nevertheless many companies opted to produce responses some of these competing designs were technically superior in particular to the Blohm amp Voss P 211 proposal Messerschmitt did not submit any design the company s founder Willy Messerschmitt dismissed the Volksjager concept to be a delusional failure 25 During October 1944 the competition s results were announced only three weeks following the requirement being issued to little surprise Heinkel s submission was selected for production 26 In order to confuse Allied intelligence the RLM chose to reuse the 8 162 airframe designation formerly that of a Messerschmitt fast bomber 27 Heinkel had reportedly requested another designation He 500 for the aircraft 28 29 Design Edit He 162 tail section Heinkel had carried out some design work of a new twin engine fighter with one engine placed on top of the aircraft and another under the nose the highest point on the bottom of the fuselage For the single engine development he removed the lower engine and repositioned the remaining upper engine just aft of the cockpit and centered directly over the wing s center section 30 This arrangement simplified the overall balance of the aircraft while also placing the engine in a convenient point for removal as it could be removed upward with a small crane 31 The need for a crane to be present at every airfield that the aircraft would operate from was a point of contention of the aircraft from Heinkel s rivals 32 One consequence of the aircraft s basic configuration was that the jet exhaust would pass directly over the upper rear fuselage and the tail area For this reason the tail was constructed with two small vertical stabilizers positioned to either side of the exhaust s path and the horizontal elevator mounted below it 33 The horizontal section had considerable dihedral at 14º raising the vertical stabilizers inline with the wing 34 The aircraft s relatively compact wing was mounted relatively high on the fuselage and was attached using four bolts 12 33 The leading edge was straight while the trailing edge had a significant forward sweep It was not possible to remove the wing without first removing the engine an arrangement that would have hindered routine maintenance of the aircraft 32 The combination of the engine being directly above the pilot and the wings on either side would make a conventional bailout very risky so the aircraft was designed from the start to feature an ejection seat akin to the one used in the Heinkel He 219 night fighter citation needed The main landing gear retracted into the fuselage below the wing and were of the tricycle layout 33 Heinkel had significant previous experience with this layout on earlier designs including the Heinkel He 280 35 36 however this was the first of their designs to use this layout from the start A small window in the lower cockpit between the rudder pedals allowed the pilot to visually check whether the gear was down 37 38 39 Partly due to the late war period it was designed within some of the He 162 s landing gear components were recycled existing landing gear components from a contemporary German military aircraft to save development time the main landing gear s oleo struts and wheel brake units came from the Messerschmitt Bf 109K as well as the double acting hydraulic cylinders one per side used to raise and lower each maingear leg 40 Prototypes Edit The He 162 V1 first prototype flew within an astoundingly short period of time the design was chosen on 25 September 1944 and first flew on 6 December 31 41 less than 90 days later This was despite the fact that the factory in Wuppertal making Tego film plywood glue used in a substantial number of late war German aviation designs whose airframes and or major airframe components were meant to be constructed mostly from wood had been bombed by the Royal Air Force and a replacement had to be quickly substituted without realizing that the replacement adhesive was highly acidic and would disintegrate the wooden parts it was intended to be fastening 42 The first flight of the He 162 V1 by Flugkapitan Gotthold Peter the first German jet fighter aircraft design to be jet powered from its maiden flight onward was fairly successful but during a high speed run at 840 km h 520 mph the highly acidic replacement glue attaching the nose gear strut door failed and the pilot was forced to land Other problems were noted as well notably a pitch instability and problems with sideslip due to the rudder design 12 43 None were considered important enough to hold up the production schedule for even a day On a second flight on 10 December again with Peter at the controls in front of various Nazi officials the glue again caused a structural failure This allowed the aileron to separate from the wing causing the plane to roll over and crash killing Peter 31 44 An investigation into the failure revealed that the wing structure had to be strengthened and some redesign was needed as the glue bonding required for the wood parts was in many cases defective 31 42 However the schedule was so tight that testing was forced to continue with the current design Speeds were limited to 500 km h 310 mph when the second prototype flew on 22 December This time the stability problems proved to be more serious and were found to be related to phenomenon known as Dutch roll 45 While this tendency could be resolved by reducing the dihedral however as the He 162 was supposed to enter production within weeks there was no time to implement major design changes Instead a number of small changes were made such as the addition of lead ballast in the nose to move the centre of gravity towards the front of the aircraft while the tail surfaces were also slightly increased in size citation needed Despite these measures some figures such as Alexander Lippisch declared the flying characteristics of the He 162 to be unsuitable for inexperienced pilots 46 The third and fourth prototypes which used an M for Muster model number instead of V for Versuchs experimental number as the He 162 M3 and M4 after being fitted with the strengthened wings flew in mid January 1945 47 48 These versions also included as possibly the pioneering example of their use on a production line military jet aircraft small anhedraled aluminium drooped wingtips reportedly designed by Alexander Lippisch and known in German as Lippisch Ohren Lippisch Ears in an attempt to cure the stability problems via effectively decreasing the main wing panels marked three degree dihedral angle 49 Both prototypes were equipped with two 30 mm 1 18 in MK 108 cannons in the He 162 A 1 anti bomber variant in testing the recoil from these guns proved to be too much for the lightweight fuselage to handle and plans for production turned to the A 2 fighter with two 20 mm MG 151 20 cannons instead while a redesign for added strength started as the A 3 The shift to 20 mm guns was also undertaken because the smaller calibre weapons would allow a much greater amount of ammunition to be carried citation needed The He 162 was originally built with the intention of being flown by the Hitler Youth as the Luftwaffe was fast running out of pilots However the aircraft s complexity required more experienced pilots Both a standard fuselage length unarmed BMW 003E powered two seat version with the rear pilot s seat planned to have a ventral access hatch to access the cockpit and an unpowered two seat glider version designated the He 162S Schulen were developed for training purposes 50 Only a small number were built and even fewer delivered to the sole He 162 Hitler Youth training unit to be activated in March 1945 at an airbase at Sagan The unit was in the process of formation when the war ended and did not begin any training it is doubtful that more than one or two He 162S gliders ever took to the air citation needed The Hinterbruhl underground production line for the He 162A was captured in April 1945 Various changes had raised the weight over the original 2 000 kg 4 410 lb limit but even at 2 800 kg 6 170 lb the He 162 was still among the fastest aircraft in the air with a maximum airspeed of 790 km h 427 kn 491 mph at sea level and 839 km h 453 kn 521 mph at 6 000 m 20 000 ft 51 but could reach 890 km h 481 kn 553 mph at sea level and 905 km h 489 kn 562 mph at 6 000 m 20 000 ft using short burst extra thrust 52 The short flight duration of barely 30 minutes was due to only having a single 695 litre 183 US gallon capacity flexible bladder fuel tank in the fuselage directly under the engine s intake 53 The original Baubeschreibung document submittal for the He 162 dated mid October 1944 showed a pair of fuel tanks for the original version of the Spatz s airframe as designed a single smaller capacity 640 litre 169 US gal fuselage main tank in approximately the same location as the later 695 litre tank was placed with an additional wing centre section tank just above and behind it never produced for the production run of some 325 litres 86 US gal feeding by gravity into the main fuselage tank 54 The A 2 version in some examples as the one flown by Royal Navy test pilot Captain Eric Brown postwar had an emplacement of a pair of impregnated 180 litre 47 5 US gal wing tanks one built into each inner wing panel within the first four wing ribs out from the root and between the spars that fed into the main 695 litre fuselage tank in a similar manner to what the earlier 325 litre center section tank had been proposed to do but were themselves ungauged their exhaustion of fuel only marked when the main fuel gauge began to fall during flight 55 The production He 162A 2 was armed with a pair of 20mm MG 151 20 cannon 51 56 Multiple facilities were engaged in the production of the He 162 including the assembly lines in Salzburg the Hinterbruhl and the Mittelwerk 51 57 By April 1945 it had been anticipated that output would reach 1 000 aircraft per month which was double the rate achieved when the Mittelwerk plant commenced deliveries 51 Furthermore the Air Ministry expected that production were rise even beyond this figure in order to produce sufficient fighter coverage 58 59 Operational history EditDuring January 1945 the Luftwaffe formed an Erprobungskommando 162 Test Unit 162 evaluation group to which the first 46 aircraft were delivered The group was based at the Luftwaffe main test center or Erprobungsstelle at Rechlin In February deliveries of the He 162 commenced to its first operational unit I JG 1 1st Group of Jagdgeschwader 1 Oesau 1st Fighter Wing which had previously flown the Focke Wulf Fw 190A I JG 1 was transferred to Parchim which at the time was also a base for the Me 262 equipped Jagdgeschwader 7 some 80 km south southwest of the Heinkel factory s coastal airfield at Marienehe today known as Rostock Schmarl northwest of the Rostock city centre where the pilots could pick up their new jets and start intensive training beginning in March 1945 This was all happening simultaneously with unrelenting Allied air attacks on the transportation network aircraft production facilities and petroleum oil and lubrication POL product making installations of the Third Reich these had now begun to also target the Luftwaffe s jet and rocket fighter bases as well On 6 April the USAAF bombed the field at Parchim with 134 B 17 Flying Fortresses inflicting serious losses and damage to the infrastructure 60 Two days later I JG 1 moved to an airfield at nearby Ludwigslust and less than a week later moved again to an airfield at Leck near the Danish border On 8 April II JG 1 moved to Heinkel s aforementioned Rostock northwestern coastal suburban factory airfield and started converting from Fw 190As to He 162s III JG 1 was also scheduled to convert to the He 162 but the Gruppe disbanded on 24 April and its personnel were used to fill in the vacancies in other units citation needed The He 162 first saw combat in mid April 1945 On 19 April Feldwebel Gunther Kirchner shot down a Royal Air Force fighter and although the victory was credited to a flak unit the British pilot confirmed during interrogation that he had been downed by an He 162 61 62 The Heinkel and its pilot were both lost that same day as well having been shot down over Husum by Flying Officer Geoffrey Walkington 63 64 piloting an RAF Hawker Tempest Though still in training I JG 1 began to score kills in mid April but went on to lose 13 He 162s and 10 pilots Ten of the aircraft were operational losses caused by flameouts and sporadic structural failures Only two of the 13 aircraft were actually shot down The He 162 s 30 minute fuel capacity also caused problems as at least two of JG 1 s pilots were killed attempting emergency deadstick landings after exhausting their fuel citation needed During its exceedingly brief operational service career the He 162 s cartridge type ejector seat was employed under combat conditions by JG 1 s pilots at least four times Fw Gunther Kirchner was the first to attempt an ejection on April 19 but he was too low and was killed when his parachute failed to open 65 66 The second recorded use was by Lt Rudolf Schmidt on April 20 with Fw Erwin Steeb ejecting from his He 162 the following day Finally Hptm Paul Heinrich Dahne attempted to eject from his aircraft on April 24 but was killed when the cockpit canopy failed to detach citation needed A captured He 162 circa 1945 Captured He 162 120230 in France brought to the US by Operation Lusty In the last days of April as the Soviet troops approached II JG 1 evacuated from Marienehe and on 2 May joined the I JG 1 at Leck On 3 May all of JG 1 s surviving He 162s were restructured into two groups I Einsatz Combat and II Sammel Collection All JG 1 s aircraft were grounded on 5 May when General Admiral Hans Georg von Friedeburg signed the surrender of all German armed forces in the Netherlands Northwest Germany and Denmark On 6 May when the British reached their airfields JG 1 turned their He 162s over to the Allies 67 Numerous aircraft were shipped to the U S Britain France and the Soviet Union for further evaluation 68 69 Erprobungskommando 162 fighters which had been passed on to JV 44 an elite jet unit under Adolf Galland a few weeks earlier were all destroyed by their crews to keep them from falling into Allied hands Heinkel did not resort to such measures the company s engineers supplied the Americans with detailed designs for the He 162 70 By the time of Germany s unconditional surrender on 8 May 1945 120 He 162s had been delivered while a further 200 had been completed and were awaiting collection or flight testing an additional 600 or so aircraft were in various stages of production citation needed The difficulties experienced by the He 162 are believed to have been primarily a result of its rush into production rather than any inherent design flaw 71 One experienced Luftwaffe pilot who flew the He 162 called it a first class combat aircraft Test pilot Eric Brown of the Fleet Air Arm who flew a record 486 different types of aircraft said the He 162 had the lightest and most effective aerodynamically balanced controls he had experienced 72 Brown had been warned to treat the rudder with suspicion due to a number of in flight failures This warning was passed on by Brown to RAF pilot Flt Lt R A Marks but was apparently not heeded On 9 November 1945 during a demonstration flight from RAE Farnborough one of the fin and rudder assemblies broke off at the start of a low level roll causing the aircraft to crash into Oudenarde Barracks Aldershot killing Marks and a soldier on the ground 73 He 162 Mistel EditThe Mistel series of fighter powered bomb composite ground attack aircraft pre dated the He 162 by over two years and the Mistel 5 project study in early 1945 proposed the mating of an He 162A 2 to the Arado E 377A flying bomb 31 74 The fighter would sit atop the bomb which would itself be equipped with two underwing mounted BMW 003 turbojets This ungainly combination would take off on a sprung trolley fitted with tandem wheels on each side for the main gear equivalent derived from that used on the first eight Arado Ar 234 prototypes with all three jets running Immediately after take off the trolley would be jettisoned and the Mistel would then fly to within strike range of the designated target Upon reaching this point the bomb would be aimed squarely at the target and then released with the jet turning back for home The Mistel 5 remained a paper project as the Arado bomb never progressed beyond the blueprint stage citation needed Variants EditHe 162 A 0 first ten pre production aircraft He 162 A 1 armed with two 30 mm 1 18 in MK 108 cannons with 50 rounds per gun He 162 A 2 armed with two 20 mm MG 151 20 cannons with 120 rounds per gun He 162 A 3 proposed upgrade with reinforced nose mounting twin 30 mm MK 108 cannons He 162 A 8 proposed upgrade with the more powerful Jumo 004D 4 engine of 10 3 kN 2 300 lbf top thrust levels Muster model prototype airframes M11 and M12 s testing revealed a top speed of 885 km h 550 mph at sea level at normal thrust and 960 km h 597 mph with maximum thrust 75 close to the Me 163B rocket fighter s top velocity figures He 162 B 1 a proposed follow on planned for 1946 meant to use the Heinkel firm s own more powerful 12 kN 2 700 lb thrust Heinkel HeS 011A turbojet a stretched fuselage to provide more fuel and endurance as well as increased wingspan with reduced dihedral which allowed the omission of the anhedral wingtip devices To be armed with twin 30 mm 1 18 in MK 108s The He 162B airframe was also used as the basis for the Miniature Fighter Project design competition powered by one or two square intake Argus As 044 pulsejet engines The pulsejet however didn t provide enough thrust for takeoff and neither Heinkel nor the OKL showed much enthusiasm for the project 76 He 162C proposed upgrade featuring the B series fuselage Heinkel HeS 011A engine swept back anhedraled outer wing panels forming a gull wing a new V tail stabilizing surface assembly and upward aimed twin 30 mm 1 18 in MK 108s as a Schrage Musik weapons fitment citation needed located right behind the cockpit He 162D proposed upgrade with a configuration similar to C series but a dihedraled forward swept wing 62 77 He 162E He 162A fitted with the BMW 003R mixed power plant a BMW 003A turbojet with an integrated BMW 718 liquid fuel rocket engine mounted just above the exhaust orifice of the turbojet for boost power At least one prototype was built and flight tested for a short time He 162S two seat training glider Operators Edit Nazi GermanyLuftwaffe FranceFrench Air Force Test aircraft United KingdomRoyal Aircraft EstablishmentAircraft on display EditAn He 162 A 2 Werknummer 120227 of JG 1 is on display at the Royal Air Force Museum London Hendon London UK 78 An He 162 A 2 Werknummer 120077 is displayed at the Planes of Fame Museum on static display in Chino California USA This aircraft was captured by the British at Leck and sent to the United States in 1945 where it was given the designation FE 489 Foreign Equipment 489 and later T 2 489 79 An He 162 A 2 Werknummer 120230 thought to have been flown by Oberst Herbert Ihlefeld of 1 JG 1 is currently owned by the American Smithsonian Institution s National Air and Space Museum USA 80 This He 162A after being captured by the British at Leck and sent to the US on board HMS Reaper an escort carrier is currently fitted with the tail unit from Werknummer 120222 An He 162 A 2 Werknummer 120086 is on display at the Canada Aviation and Space Museum 81 An He 176A 2 82 Werknummer 120076 is displayed at the Deutsches Technikmuseum Berlin 83 An He 162 A 1 Werknummer 120235 is in Hangar 5 of The Imperial War Museum Duxford UK 84 An He 162 A 2 Werknummer 120015 formerly of III JG1 is currently under restoration at the Musee de l Air et de l Espace near Paris France with a fully restored and operable retracting landing gear 37 An He 162 is most likely in storage at the US Smithsonian s National Air and Space Museum Werk Nummer 120222 Air Force number T 2 504 85 Wk Nr 120227 RAF Museum London Wk Nr 120235 Imperial War Museum London now moved to Duxford Wk Nr 120086 Canada Aviation and Space Museum OttawaReproduction EditHe 162 produced by George Lucas Nunda NY displayed at National Warplane Museum Geneseo NY www nationalwarplanemuseum com Specifications He 162A Edit He 162A 3 view Data from Hitler s Luftwaffe 53 General characteristicsCrew 1 Length 9 05 m 29 ft 8 in Wingspan 7 2 m 23 ft 7 in Height 2 6 m 8 ft 6 in Wing area 11 16 m2 120 1 sq ft Empty weight 1 660 kg 3 660 lb Max takeoff weight 2 800 kg 6 173 lb Fuel capacity 695 L 184 US gal 153 imp gal Powerplant 1 BMW 109 003E 1 or BMW 109 003E 2 turbojet engine 7 85 kN 1 760 lbf thrustPerformance Maximum speed 790 km h 490 mph 430 kn at sea level normal thrust 840 km h 520 mph 450 kn at 6 000 m 20 000 ft normal thrust 890 km h 550 mph 480 kn at sea level emergency boosted thrust 905 km h 562 mph 489 kn at 6 000 m 20 000 ft emergency boosted thrust dd dd Range 975 km 606 mi 526 nmi Service ceiling 12 000 m 39 000 ft Rate of climb 23 42 m s 4 610 ft min Wing loading 252 kg m2 52 lb sq ft Thrust weight 0 35 normal thrust 0 41 emergency boosted thrust dd dd Armament Guns 2 20 mm 0 787 in MG 151 20 autocannon with 120 rpg He 162 A 2 or 2 30 mm 1 181 in MK 108 cannon with 50 rpg He 162 A 0 A 1 See also EditAircraft of comparable role configuration and era de Havilland Vampire Henschel Hs 132 Messerschmitt Me 262Related lists List of aircraft of World War II List of fighter aircraft List of jet aircraft of World War II List of World War II military aircraft of Germany WunderwaffeReferences EditCitations Edit Heinkel He 162 A 2 Spatz Sparrow airandspace si edu Smithsonian Institution National Air amp Space Museum Retrieved September 25 2021 Pilots mastered some of the Spatz s nasty habits but the jet would always be a difficult even dangerous aircraft to fly even for experienced pilots the He 162 has often been erroneously referred to as the Salmander The term is a codename for the wing structure not the aircraft Weal 1996 p 78 Forsyth 2009 pp 58 59 McFarland and Newton 1991 page needed Hess 1994 pp 77 78 Miller 2006 p 320 Williamson Charles C Hughes R D Cabell C P Nazarro J J Bender F P Crigglesworth W J 5 March 1944 Plan for Completion of Combined Bomber Offensive Dwight D Eisenhower Presidential Library Smith Walter Bedell Collection of World War II Documents 1941 1945 Box No 48 Report HQ U S S T A F a b Dorr 2013 p 153 Forsyth 2016 p 8 a b Forsyth 2016 p 7 Uziel 2011 pp 240 243 a b c d Christopher 2013 p 145 LePage 2009 p 38 a b Forsyth 2016 pp 8 9 a b LePage 2009 p 244 Dorr 2013 p 152 a b Forsyth 2016 p 10 Forsyth 2016 pp 17 18 Excerpt from Lucas Arts Secret Weapons of Luftwaffe CD ROM s Text Manual Heath 2022 p 223 Forsyth 2016 pp 7 8 Dorr 2013 p 151 Forsyth 2016 p 9 Forsyth 2016 pp 9 10 Forsyth 2016 p 11 Forsyth 2016 p 15 Sharp 2020b p 16 Sharp 2020b p 178 Forsyth 2016 p 22 Sharp 2020b pp 177 178 a b c d e Ford 2013 p 224 a b Forsyth 2016 p 14 a b c Dorr 2013 p 150 Baubeschreibung des einmotorigen Jagdeinsitzers Baumuster 162 mit TL Triebwerk BMW 003 E 1 in German PDF deutsche luftwaffe de Heinkel Flugzeugwerke 15 October 1944 p 40 Archived from the original PDF on 4 August 2016 Retrieved 6 July 2016 Christopher 2013 p 58 Sharp 2020b p 72 a b Heinkel 162 He162 landing gear test YouTube YouTube Le Bourget Paris France memorialflight 2008 Retrieved 9 July 2013 Animation of He 162 nosegear retraction cycle Animation of He 162 maingear retraction cycle Sengfelder Gunther 1993 German Aircraft Landing Gear Atglen PA USA Schiffer Publishing pp 136 137 ISBN 0 88740 470 7 The He 162 s landing gear consisted partly of elements taken from other designs The main landing gear legs and wheels were from the Bf 109K The hydraulic jack used to raise and lower the landing gear was also taken from the Bf 109 Forsyth 2016 pp 24 25 a b Dorr 2013 p 156 Forsyth 2016 pp 25 29 Sharp 2020b p 18 Sharp 2020b p 155 Sharp 2020b p 311 Sharp 2020b p 11 Forsyth 2016 pp 30 32 Baubeschreibung des einmotorigen Jagdeinsitzers Baumuster 162 mit TL Triebwerk BMW 003 E 1 in German PDF deutsche luftwaffe de Heinkel Flugzeugwerke 15 October 1944 p 39 Archived from the original PDF on 4 August 2016 Retrieved July 6 2016 Forsyth 2016 p 51 a b c d Christopher 2013 p 146 Donald 1994 p 119 a b Wood and Gunston 1977 pp 194 195 Baubeschreibung des einmotorigen Jagdeinsitzers Baumuster 162 mit TL Triebwerk BMW 003 E 1 in German PDF deutsche luftwaffe de Heinkel Flugzeugwerke 15 October 1944 p 43 Archived from the original PDF on 4 August 2016 Retrieved 6 July 2016 Brown 2010 p 137 Dorr 2013 p 159 Dorr 2013 pp 154 155 LePage 2009 p 267 Sharp 2020b p 179 Forsyth 2016 p 62 Mombeek 1992 p 297 a b Dorr 2013 p 160 Shores 2006 pp 497 498 Thomas and Holmes 2016 pp 60 61 Shores 2006 p 498 Thomas and Holmes 2016 p 60 Forsyth 2016 p 81 Dorr 2013 p 161 Forsyth 2016 pp 6 7 Sharp 2020b p 148 LePage 2009 p 266 Brown Eric Mastering Heinkel s Minimus Air Enthusiast 2 6 June 1972 Two Killed In Flying Accident The Times London England 10 November 1945 p 2 LePage 2009 pp 160 161 http www wwiiaircraftperformance org he162 HE 162 F TS 672 RE pdf bare URL PDF The Heinkel He 162 Volksjaeger Sharp 2020b p 20 Individual History Heinkel He162A 2 W NR 120227 AIR MIN 65 VN679 8472M Museum Accession Number 1990 0697 A PDF Royal Air Force Museum London Retrieved 30 November 2022 Forsyth amp Creek 2008 p 180 Heinkel He 162 A 2 Spatz Sparrow Smithsonian Institution Retrieved 30 November 2022 Heinkel He 162A 1 Volksjager 120086 Canada Aviation and Space Museum ingeniumcanada org Retrieved 5 February 2023 Sharp 2020a p 133 Deutsches Technikmuseum Berlin Medieninfo Heinkel He 162 Archived from the original on 29 May 2012 Retrieved 26 November 2011 Heinkel 162A 1 Salamander Imperial War Museum Retrieved 30 November 2022 Forsyth amp Creek 2008 p 181 Bibliography Edit Brown Eric 2010 Wings of the Luftwaffe Flying Captured German Aircraft of World War II Revised ed Manchester UK Hikoki Publications ISBN 978 1 9021091 5 2 Christopher John 2013 The Race for Hitler s X Planes Stroud UK History Press ISBN 978 0 7524 6457 2 Donald David 1994 Warplanes of the Luftwaffe London United Kingdom Aerospace Publishing ISBN 1 874023 56 5 Dorr Robert F 2013 Fighting Hitler s Jets Voyageur Press ISBN 978 0 7603 4398 2 Ford Roger 2013 Germany s Secret Weapons of World War II London United Kingdom Amber Books ISBN 9781909160569 Forsyth Robert Creek Eddie J 2008 Heinkel He 162 Volksjager From Drawing Board to Destruction TheVolksjager Vol 17 Hersham United Kingdom Classic Publications ISBN 978 1 90653 700 5 Forsyth Robert 2016 He 162 Volksjager Units Bloomsbury Publishing ISBN 978 1 47281 459 3 Forsyth Robert 2009 Fw 190 Sturmbock vs B 17 Flying Fortress Europe 1944 1945 Oxford United Kingdom Osprey Publishing ISBN 978 1 84603 941 6 Heath Tim 2022 In Furious Skies Flying with Hitler s Luftwaffe in the Second World War Pen and Sword History ISBN 978 1 5267 8526 8 Hess William N 1994 B 17 Flying Fortress Combat and Development History Motor books ISBN 0 87938 881 1 Lepage Jean Denis G G 2009 Aircraft of the Luftwaffe 1935 1945 An Illustrated History Jefferson North Carolina US McFarland ISBN 978 0 7864 3937 9 McFarland Stephen L Newton Wesley Philips 1991 To Command the Sky The Battle for Air Superiority Over Germany 1942 1944 Washington D C Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN 1 56098069 9 Miller Donald L 2006 Masters of the Air America s Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany New York US Simon amp Schuster ISBN 978 0 7432 3544 0 Mombeek Eric 1992 Defending the Reich The History of Jagdgeschwader 1 Oesau Norfolk UK JAC Publications ISBN 0 9515737 1 3 Smith J Richard Conway William 1967 The Heinkel He 162 Aircraft in Profile number 203 Leatherhead United Kingdom Profile Publications Smith J Richard Creek Eddie J 1982 Jet Planes of the Third Reich Boylston Massachusetts US Monogram Aviation Publications ISBN 0 914144 27 8 Sharp Dan 2020a Heinkel He 162 Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe Vol 1 Horncastle UK Tempest Books ISBN 978 1 911658 24 5 Sharp Dan 2020b Secret Projects of the Luftwaffe Vol 1 Jet Fighters 1939 1945 Tempest Books ISBN 978 1 911658 80 1 Shores Christopher 2006 2nd Tactical Air Force Volume III From the Rhine to Victory January to May 1945 Classic Publications ISBN 1 90322 360 1 Thomas Chris Holmes Tony 2016 Tempest Squadrons of the RAF Oxford United Kingdom Osprey Publishing ISBN 978 1 4728 1454 8 OCLC 933722337 Uziel Daniel 2011 Arming the Luftwaffe The German Aviation Industry in World War II Jefferson US McFarland ISBN 9780786488797 Weal John 1996 Focke Wulf Fw 190 Aces of the Western Front Oxford United Kingdom Osprey Publishing ISBN 978 1 85532 595 1 Wood Tony Gunston Bill 1977 Hitler s Luftwaffe A pictorial history and technical encyclopaedia of Hitler s air power in World War II London UK Salamander Books ISBN 0 86101 005 1 Further reading EditBalous Miroslav Bily Miroslav 2004 Heinkel He 162 Spatz Volksjager in Czech and English Prague Czech Republic MBI ISBN 80 86524 06 X Couderchon Philippe April 2006 The Salamander in France Part 1 Aeroplane Magazine Couderchon Philippe May 2006 The Salamander in France Part Aeroplane Magazine Green William 1970 Warplanes of the Third Reich Fourth impression 1979 ed London UK Macdonald and Jane s Publishers Ltd ISBN 0 356 02382 6 Griehl Manfred 2007 The Luftwaffe Profile Series No 16 Heinkel He 162 Atglen PA Schiffer Publishing ISBN 978 0 7643 1430 8 Griehl Manfred 2007 Heinkel Strahlflugzeug He 162 Volksjager Entwicklung Produktion und Einsatz in German Lemwerder Germany Stedinger Verlag ISBN 978 3 927697 50 8 Hiller Alfred 1984 Heinkel He 162 Volksjager Entwicklung Produktion Einsatz Wien Austria Verlag Alfred Hiller Ledwoch Janusz 1998 He 162 Volksjager Wydawnictwo Militaria 49 Warszawa Poland Wydawnictwo Militaria ISBN 83 86209 68 2 Muller Peter 2006 Heinkel He 162 Volksjager Letzter Versuch der Luftwaffe in German and English Andelfingen Germany Muller History Facts ISBN 3 9522968 0 5 Myhra David 1999 X Planes of the Third Reich Heinkel He 162 Atglen PA Schiffer Publishing ISBN 0 7643 0955 2 Nowarra Heinz J 1993 Heinkel He 162 Volksjager Atglen PA Schiffer Publishing ISBN 0 88740 478 2 Translation of Der Volksjager He 162 in German Friedberg Germany Podzun Pallas Verlag 1984 ISBN 3 7909 0216 0 Peter Michel Wolfgang 2011 Flugerfahrungen mit der Heinkel He 162 Testpiloten berichten in German Norderstedt Germany BOD Verlag ISBN 978 3 8423 7048 7 Smith J Richard Creek Eddie J 1986 Heinkel He 162 Volksjager Monogram Close Up 11 Acton MA Monogram Aviation Publications ISBN 0 914144 11 1 Smith J Richard Kay Anthony 1972 German Aircraft of the Second World War Third 1978 ed London UK Putnam amp Company ISBN 0 370 00024 2 External links Edit Wikimedia Commons has media related to Heinkel He 162 The NASM s Heinkel He 162A Spatz to be restored Archived 2019 12 23 at the Wayback Machine The Heinkel He 162 Volksjager at Greg Goebel s AIR VECTORS Heinkel He 162 Volksjager in Detail Archived 2008 09 04 at the Wayback Machine in German Heinkel He 162 Volksjager Heinkel 162 Ejection Seat He 162 Salamander Russian training film 9 minutes in Russian Video of restored He 162A retractable landing gear testing for the Musee de l Air s example The Memorial Flight s France restoration of He 162A WkNr 120 015 Page December 2012 Interview with Harald Bauer a surviving He 162A test pilot He 162 Mistel 5 Heinkel He 162 A 2 FE 504 c n 120230 US Army Air Forces photo of He 162 120230 with aircraft history Heinkel He 162 A 2 T2 489 c n 120077 US Army Air Forces Nervenklau Archived 2014 10 06 at the Wayback Machine photo of He 162 120077 with aircraft history Portals Aviation Military of Germany World War II Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Heinkel He 162 amp oldid 1140629010, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.