fbpx
Wikipedia

Hamilton v. Alabama (1961)

Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52 (1961), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. Hamilton was charged in an Alabama court with breaking and entering a dwelling at night with intent to ravish, and had pleaded not guilty. He had then been convicted and sentenced to death. The Court ruled unanimously that the absence of counsel at the time of his arraignment violated Hamilton's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Hamilton v. Alabama
Argued October 17, 1961
Decided November 13, 1961
Full case nameHamilton v. Alabama
Citations368 U.S. 52 (more)
82 S. Ct. 157; 7 L. Ed. 2d 114; 1961 U.S. LEXIS 167
Case history
PriorEx parte Hamilton, 271 Ala. 88, 122 So. 2d 602 (1960), cert. granted, 364 U.S. 931 (1961).
Holding
Absence of counsel for petitioner at the time of his arraignment violated his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Charles E. Whittaker · Potter Stewart
Case opinion
MajorityDouglas, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

See also edit

External links edit

  •   Works related to Hamilton v. Alabama (1961) at Wikisource
  • Text of Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52 (1961) is available from: Findlaw  Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio) 


hamilton, alabama, 1961, other, uses, hamilton, alabama, disambiguation, hamilton, alabama, 1961, case, heard, supreme, court, united, states, hamilton, charged, alabama, court, with, breaking, entering, dwelling, night, with, intent, ravish, pleaded, guilty, . For other uses see Hamilton v Alabama disambiguation Hamilton v Alabama 368 U S 52 1961 was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States Hamilton was charged in an Alabama court with breaking and entering a dwelling at night with intent to ravish and had pleaded not guilty He had then been convicted and sentenced to death The Court ruled unanimously that the absence of counsel at the time of his arraignment violated Hamilton s due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment Hamilton v AlabamaSupreme Court of the United StatesArgued October 17 1961Decided November 13 1961Full case nameHamilton v AlabamaCitations368 U S 52 more 82 S Ct 157 7 L Ed 2d 114 1961 U S LEXIS 167Case historyPriorEx parte Hamilton 271 Ala 88 122 So 2d 602 1960 cert granted 364 U S 931 1961 HoldingAbsence of counsel for petitioner at the time of his arraignment violated his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Court membershipChief Justice Earl Warren Associate Justices Hugo Black Felix FrankfurterWilliam O Douglas Tom C ClarkJohn M Harlan II William J Brennan Jr Charles E Whittaker Potter StewartCase opinionMajorityDouglas joined by unanimousLaws appliedU S Const amend XIVSee also editList of United States Supreme Court cases volume 368 Alabama State MercenariesExternal links edit nbsp Works related to Hamilton v Alabama 1961 at Wikisource Text of Hamilton v Alabama 368 U S 52 1961 is available from Findlaw Justia Library of Congress Oyez oral argument audio nbsp This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Hamilton v Alabama 1961 amp oldid 1175143276, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.