fbpx
Wikipedia

Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles

Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles, 261 U.S. 326 (1923), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the statute intends that an executor, there being no widow, widower, or child, shall have the same right to renew a copyright for a second term as his testator might have exercised had he continued to survive.[1]

Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles
Argued February 27, 1923
Decided March 12, 1923
Full case nameFox Film Corp. v. Knowles
Citations261 U.S. 326 (more)
43 S. Ct. 365; 67 L. Ed. 680
Case history
Prior279 F. 1018 (2d Cir. 1922)
Holding
The statute intends that an executor, there being no widow, widower, or child, shall have the same right to renew a copyright for a second term as his testator might have exercised were he still alive.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William H. Taft
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
Willis Van Devanter · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · George Sutherland
Pierce Butler · Edward T. Sanford
Case opinion
MajorityHolmes, joined by a unanimous court
Laws applied
Copyright Act of 1909

This case was reaffirmed in Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc..[2]

References edit

  1. ^ Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles, 261 U.S. 326 (1923).
  2. ^ Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc., 362 U.S. 373 (1960).

External links edit

  • Text of Fox Film Corp. v. Knowles, 261 U.S. 326 (1923) is available from: Cornell  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress 


film, corp, knowles, 1923, united, states, supreme, court, case, which, court, held, statute, intends, that, executor, there, being, widow, widower, child, shall, have, same, right, renew, copyright, second, term, testator, might, have, exercised, continued, s. Fox Film Corp v Knowles 261 U S 326 1923 was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the statute intends that an executor there being no widow widower or child shall have the same right to renew a copyright for a second term as his testator might have exercised had he continued to survive 1 Fox Film Corp v KnowlesSupreme Court of the United StatesArgued February 27 1923Decided March 12 1923Full case nameFox Film Corp v KnowlesCitations261 U S 326 more 43 S Ct 365 67 L Ed 680Case historyPrior279 F 1018 2d Cir 1922 HoldingThe statute intends that an executor there being no widow widower or child shall have the same right to renew a copyright for a second term as his testator might have exercised were he still alive Court membershipChief Justice William H Taft Associate Justices Joseph McKenna Oliver W Holmes Jr Willis Van Devanter James C McReynoldsLouis Brandeis George SutherlandPierce Butler Edward T SanfordCase opinionMajorityHolmes joined by a unanimous courtLaws appliedCopyright Act of 1909This case was reaffirmed in Miller Music Corp v Charles N Daniels Inc 2 References edit Fox Film Corp v Knowles 261 U S 326 1923 Miller Music Corp v Charles N Daniels Inc 362 U S 373 1960 External links editText of Fox Film Corp v Knowles 261 U S 326 1923 is available from Cornell Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress nbsp This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Fox Film Corp v Knowles amp oldid 1175142515, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.