Forbidden graph characterization

"Forbidden minors" redirects here. The term may also refer to age restrictions.

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, many important families of graphs can be described by a finite set of individual graphs that do not belong to the family and further exclude all graphs from the family which contain any of these forbidden graphs as (induced) subgraph or minor.

A prototypical example of this phenomenon is Kuratowski's theorem, which states that a graph is planar (can be drawn without crossings in the plane) if and only if it does not contain either of two forbidden graphs, the complete graph K₅ and the complete bipartite graph K_3,3. For Kuratowski's theorem, the notion of containment is that of graph homeomorphism, in which a subdivision of one graph appears as a subgraph of the other. Thus, every graph either has a planar drawing (in which case it belongs to the family of planar graphs) or it has a subdivision of at least one of these two graphs as a subgraph (in which case it does not belong to the planar graphs).

Definition

More generally, a forbidden graph characterization is a method of specifying a family of graph, or hypergraph, structures, by specifying substructures that are forbidden to exist within any graph in the family. Different families vary in the nature of what is forbidden. In general, a structure G is a member of a family ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}}$  if and only if a forbidden substructure is not contained in G. The forbidden substructure might be one of:

• subgraphs, smaller graphs obtained from subsets of the vertices and edges of a larger graph,
• induced subgraphs, smaller graphs obtained by selecting a subset of the vertices and using all edges with both endpoints in that subset,
• homeomorphic subgraphs (also called topological minors), smaller graphs obtained from subgraphs by collapsing paths of degree-two vertices to single edges, or
• graph minors, smaller graphs obtained from subgraphs by arbitrary edge contractions.

The set of structures that are forbidden from belonging to a given graph family can also be called an obstruction set for that family.

Forbidden graph characterizations may be used in algorithms for testing whether a graph belongs to a given family. In many cases, it is possible to test in polynomial time whether a given graph contains any of the members of the obstruction set, and therefore whether it belongs to the family defined by that obstruction set.

In order for a family to have a forbidden graph characterization, with a particular type of substructure, the family must be closed under substructures. That is, every substructure (of a given type) of a graph in the family must be another graph in the family. Equivalently, if a graph is not part of the family, all larger graphs containing it as a substructure must also be excluded from the family. When this is true, there always exists an obstruction set (the set of graphs that are not in the family but whose smaller substructures all belong to the family). However, for some notions of what a substructure is, this obstruction set could be infinite. The Robertson–Seymour theorem proves that, for the particular case of graph minors, a family that is closed under minors always has a finite obstruction set.

List of forbidden characterizations for graphs and hypergraphs

Family	Obstructions	Relation	Reference
Forests	Loops, pairs of parallel edges, and cycles of all lengths	Subgraph	Definition
	A loop (for multigraphs) or triangle K3 (for simple graphs)	Graph minor	Definition
Linear forests	[A loop / triangle K3 (see above)] and star K1,3	Graph minor	Definition
Claw-free graphs	Star K1,3	Induced subgraph	Definition
Comparability graphs		Induced subgraph
Triangle-free graphs	Triangle K3	Induced subgraph	Definition
Planar graphs	K5 and K3,3	Homeomorphic subgraph	Kuratowski's theorem
	K5 and K3,3	Graph minor	Wagner's theorem
Outerplanar graphs	K4 and K2,3	Graph minor	Diestel (2000),^[1] p. 107
Outer 1-planar graphs	Six forbidden minors	Graph minor	Auer et al. (2013)^[2]
Graphs of fixed genus	A finite obstruction set	Graph minor	Diestel (2000),^[1] p. 275
Apex graphs	A finite obstruction set	Graph minor	^[3]
Linklessly embeddable graphs	The Petersen family	Graph minor	^[4]
Bipartite graphs	Odd cycles	Subgraph	^[5]
Chordal graphs	Cycles of length 4 or more	Induced subgraph	^[6]
Perfect graphs	Cycles of odd length 5 or more or their complements	Induced subgraph	^[7]
Line graph of graphs	9 forbidden subgraphs	Induced subgraph	^[8]
Graph unions of cactus graphs	The four-vertex diamond graph formed by removing an edge from the complete graph K4	Graph minor	^[9]
Ladder graphs	K2,3 and its dual graph	Homeomorphic subgraph	^[10]
Split graphs	${\displaystyle C_{4},C_{5},{\bar {C}}_{4}\left(=K_{2}+K_{2}\right)}$	Induced subgraph	^[11]
2-connected series–parallel (treewidth ≤ 2, branchwidth ≤ 2)	K4	Graph minor	Diestel (2000),^[1] p. 327
Treewidth ≤ 3	K5, octahedron, pentagonal prism, Wagner graph	Graph minor	^[12]
Branchwidth ≤ 3	K5, octahedron, cube, Wagner graph	Graph minor	^[13]
Complement-reducible graphs (cographs)	4-vertex path P4	Induced subgraph	^[14]
Trivially perfect graphs	4-vertex path P4 and 4-vertex cycle C4	Induced subgraph	^[15]
Threshold graphs	4-vertex path P4, 4-vertex cycle C4, and complement of C4	Induced subgraph	^[15]
Line graph of 3-uniform linear hypergraphs	A finite list of forbidden induced subgraphs with minimum degree at least 19	Induced subgraph	^[16]
Line graph of k-uniform linear hypergraphs, k > 3	A finite list of forbidden induced subgraphs with minimum edge degree at least 2k^2 − 3k + 1	Induced subgraph	^[17]^[18]
Graphs ΔY-reducible to a single vertex	A finite list of at least 68 billion distinct (1,2,3)-clique sums	Graph minor	^[19]
Graphs of spectral radius at most ${\displaystyle \lambda }$	A finite obstruction set exists if and only if ${\displaystyle \lambda <{\sqrt {2+{\sqrt {5}}}}}$  and ${\displaystyle \lambda \neq \beta _{m}^{1/2}+\beta _{m}^{-1/2}}$  for any ${\displaystyle m\geq 2}$ , where ${\displaystyle \beta _{m}}$  is the largest root of ${\displaystyle x^{m+1}=1+x+\dots +x^{m-1}}$ .	Subgraph / induced subgraph	^[20]
Cluster graphs	three-vertex path graph	Induced subgraph
General theorems
A family defined by an induced-hereditary property	A, possibly non-finite, obstruction set	Induced subgraph
A family defined by a minor-hereditary property	A finite obstruction set	Graph minor	Robertson–Seymour theorem

See also

• Erdős–Hajnal conjecture
• Forbidden subgraph problem
• Matroid minor
• Zarankiewicz problem

References

1. Diestel, Reinhard (2000), Graph Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 173, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-98976-5.
2. Auer, Christopher; Bachmaier, Christian; Brandenburg, Franz J.; Gleißner, Andreas; Hanauer, Kathrin; Neuwirth, Daniel; Reislhuber, Josef (2013), "Recognizing outer 1-planar graphs in linear time", in Wismath, Stephen; Wolff, Alexander (eds.), 21st International Symposium, GD 2013, Bordeaux, France, September 23-25, 2013, Revised Selected Papers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8242, pp. 107–118, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03841-4_10.
3. Gupta, A.; Impagliazzo, R. (1991), "Computing planar intertwines", Proc. 32nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS '91), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 802–811, doi:10.1109/SFCS.1991.185452, S2CID 209133.
4. Robertson, Neil; Seymour, P. D.; Thomas, Robin (1993), "Linkless embeddings of graphs in 3-space", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 28 (1): 84–89, arXiv:math/9301216, doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-1993-00335-5, MR 1164063, S2CID 1110662.
5. Béla Bollobás (1998) "Modern Graph Theory", Springer, ISBN 0-387-98488-7 p. 9
6. Kashiwabara, Toshinobu (1981), "Algorithms for some intersection graphs", in Saito, Nobuji; Nishizeki, Takao (eds.), Graph Theory and Algorithms, 17th Symposium of Research Institute of Electric Communication, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, October 24-25, 1980, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 108, Springer-Verlag, pp. 171–181, doi:10.1007/3-540-10704-5_15.
7. Chudnovsky, Maria; Robertson, Neil; Seymour, Paul; Thomas, Robin (2006), "The strong perfect graph theorem" (PDF), Annals of Mathematics, 164 (1): 51–229, arXiv:math/0212070v1, doi:10.4007/annals.2006.164.51, S2CID 119151552.
8. Beineke, L. W. (1968), "Derived graphs of digraphs", in Sachs, H.; Voss, H.-J.; Walter, H.-J. (eds.), Beiträge zur Graphentheorie, Leipzig: Teubner, pp. 17–33.
9. El-Mallah, Ehab; Colbourn, Charles J. (1988), "The complexity of some edge deletion problems", IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 35 (3): 354–362, doi:10.1109/31.1748.
10. Takamizawa, K.; Nishizeki, Takao; Saito, Nobuji (1981), "Combinatorial problems on series–parallel graphs", Discrete Applied Mathematics, 3 (1): 75–76, doi:10.1016/0166-218X(81)90031-7.
11. Földes, Stéphane; Hammer, Peter Ladislaw (1977a), "Split graphs", Proceedings of the Eighth Southeastern Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Computing (Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, La., 1977), Congressus Numerantium, vol. XIX, Winnipeg: Utilitas Math., pp. 311–315, MR 0505860
12. Bodlaender, Hans L. (1998), "A partial k-arboretum of graphs with bounded treewidth", Theoretical Computer Science, 209 (1–2): 1–45, doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(97)00228-4, hdl:1874/18312.
13. Bodlaender, Hans L.; Thilikos, Dimitrios M. (1999), "Graphs with branchwidth at most three", Journal of Algorithms, 32 (2): 167–194, doi:10.1006/jagm.1999.1011, hdl:1874/2734.
14. Seinsche, D. (1974), "On a property of the class of n-colorable graphs", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 16 (2): 191–193, doi:10.1016/0095-8956(74)90063-X, MR 0337679
15. Golumbic, Martin Charles (1978), "Trivially perfect graphs", Discrete Mathematics, 24 (1): 105–107, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(78)90178-4.
16. Metelsky, Yury; Tyshkevich, Regina (1997), "On line graphs of linear 3-uniform hypergraphs", Journal of Graph Theory, 25 (4): 243–251, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0118(199708)25:4<243::AID-JGT1>3.0.CO;2-K, MR 1459889
17. Jacobson, M. S.; Kézdy, Andre E.; Lehel, Jeno (1997), "Recognizing intersection graphs of linear uniform hypergraphs", Graphs and Combinatorics, 13 (4): 359–367, doi:10.1007/BF03353014, MR 1485929, S2CID 9173731
18. Naik, Ranjan N.; Rao, S. B.; Shrikhande, S. S.; Singhi, N. M. (1982), "Intersection graphs of k-uniform hypergraphs", European Journal of Combinatorics, 3: 159–172, doi:10.1016/s0195-6698(82)80029-2, MR 0670849
19. Yu, Yanming (2006), "More forbidden minors for wye-delta-wye reducibility", The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 13, doi:10.37236/1033 Website
20. Jiang, Zilin; Polyanskii, Alexandr (2020-03-01). "Forbidden Subgraphs for Graphs of Bounded Spectral Radius, with Applications to Equiangular Lines". Israel Journal of Mathematics. 236 (1): 393–421. arXiv:1708.02317. doi:10.1007/s11856-020-1983-2. ISSN 1565-8511.