Ex Parte Bowman 61 U.S.P.Q.2d 1669 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 2001) was a decision by the U.S. Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences which asserted that in order to be patent-eligible, a process had to involve or promote the technological arts.[1] This decision was overruled by the Board's subsequent Ex Parte Lundgren decision, but the Board's and then the Federal Circuit's In re Bilski opinion then superseded Lundgren. In re Bilski, however, rejects use of "not in the technological arts" as a basis for a rejection, although it seems to accept the concept when differently named. Bilski was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Bilski v. Kappos.
^Bird, R.; Bird, Robert; Jain, Subhash C. (January 1, 2009). The Global Challenge of Intellectual Property Rights. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 19. ISBN978-1-84844-488-1.
This article relating to case law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
parte, bowman, parte, bowman, 1669, 2001, decision, board, patent, appeals, interferences, which, asserted, that, order, patent, eligible, process, involve, promote, technological, arts, this, decision, overruled, board, subsequent, parte, lundgren, decision, . Ex Parte Bowman 61 U S P Q 2d 1669 Bd Pat App amp Int 2001 was a decision by the U S Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences which asserted that in order to be patent eligible a process had to involve or promote the technological arts 1 This decision was overruled by the Board s subsequent Ex Parte Lundgren decision but the Board s and then the Federal Circuit s In re Bilski opinion then superseded Lundgren In re Bilski however rejects use of not in the technological arts as a basis for a rejection although it seems to accept the concept when differently named Bilski was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Bilski v Kappos See also editBusiness method patent Diamond v Diehr Freeman Walter Abele Test State Street Bank v Signature Financial Group Machine or transformation testReferences edit Bird R Bird Robert Jain Subhash C January 1 2009 The Global Challenge of Intellectual Property Rights Edward Elgar Publishing p 19 ISBN 978 1 84844 488 1 nbsp This article relating to case law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Ex parte Bowman amp oldid 1175142006, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
