fbpx
Wikipedia

D.H. and Others v Czech Republic

D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic (No. 57325/00) was a case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerning discrimination of Romani children in the education system of the Czech Republic. It was the first case of racial segregation in education to be considered by the ECtHR.[1] As of 2021 the case is still pending at the Committee of Ministers and has not been resolved by the Czech authorities.[2]

Facts and proceedings edit

Most children from the Roma minority in Ostrava attended special schools with simplified curriculum, forming majority of their students.

The applicants — 18 Romani students, former and then-attendants of special schools, represented by the European Roma Rights Centre — submitted an application to ECtHR in 2000.[3]

The Court has declared in 2005 the application admissible in part on Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination), combined with Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (right to education) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The application in part concerning Articles 3 and 6 was declared inadmissible.[4]

Chamber judgment edit

In 2006, the Second Section of the Court has found no violation in the case, by six votes to one. Judge Costa filed a concurring opinion, agreeing with the majority while saying that "I came to that conclusion only after some hesitation".[5] Judge Cabral Barreto filed a dissenting opinion, finding a violation of Article 14, taken together with Article 2 of Protocol No. 1.

The applicants appealed to the Grand Chamber.[6]

Grand Chamber judgment edit

In 2007, the Grand Chamber has found in the case a violation of Article 14, taken together with Article 2 of Protocol No. 1, by 13 votes to 4. Judges Zupančič, Jungwiert, Borrego Borrego and Šikuta have filed dissenting opinions, finding no violation.

The Grand Chamber found that there was an indirect form of discrimination since Roma children de facto received inferior education because of their ethnic origin.

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ "D.H. and Others v. Czech Republic". www.justiceinitiative.org. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
  2. ^ "Hudoc-Exec".
  3. ^ Application
  4. ^ Admissibility decision
  5. ^ Concurring opinion of Judge Costa, Para. 1
  6. ^ Request for referral to the Grand Chamber

External links edit

  • Collection of documents of the case on ERRC website
  • Chamber judgment
  • Grand Chamber judgment

others, czech, republic, others, czech, republic, 57325, case, decided, european, court, human, rights, ecthr, concerning, discrimination, romani, children, education, system, czech, republic, first, case, racial, segregation, education, considered, ecthr, 202. D H and Others v the Czech Republic No 57325 00 was a case decided by the European Court of Human Rights ECtHR concerning discrimination of Romani children in the education system of the Czech Republic It was the first case of racial segregation in education to be considered by the ECtHR 1 As of 2021 the case is still pending at the Committee of Ministers and has not been resolved by the Czech authorities 2 Contents 1 Facts and proceedings 2 Chamber judgment 3 Grand Chamber judgment 4 See also 5 References 6 External linksFacts and proceedings editMost children from the Roma minority in Ostrava attended special schools with simplified curriculum forming majority of their students The applicants 18 Romani students former and then attendants of special schools represented by the European Roma Rights Centre submitted an application to ECtHR in 2000 3 The Court has declared in 2005 the application admissible in part on Article 14 prohibition of discrimination combined with Article 2 of Protocol No 1 right to education of the European Convention on Human Rights The application in part concerning Articles 3 and 6 was declared inadmissible 4 Chamber judgment editIn 2006 the Second Section of the Court has found no violation in the case by six votes to one Judge Costa filed a concurring opinion agreeing with the majority while saying that I came to that conclusion only after some hesitation 5 Judge Cabral Barreto filed a dissenting opinion finding a violation of Article 14 taken together with Article 2 of Protocol No 1 The applicants appealed to the Grand Chamber 6 Grand Chamber judgment editIn 2007 the Grand Chamber has found in the case a violation of Article 14 taken together with Article 2 of Protocol No 1 by 13 votes to 4 Judges Zupancic Jungwiert Borrego Borrego and Sikuta have filed dissenting opinions finding no violation The Grand Chamber found that there was an indirect form of discrimination since Roma children de facto received inferior education because of their ethnic origin See also editRelations between ethnic Czechs and Roma List of Romani rights cases before international courts and quasi judicial bodiesReferences edit D H and Others v Czech Republic www justiceinitiative org Retrieved 14 August 2021 Hudoc Exec Application Admissibility decision Concurring opinion of Judge Costa Para 1 Request for referral to the Grand ChamberExternal links editCollection of documents of the case on ERRC website Chamber judgment Grand Chamber judgment Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title D H and Others v Czech Republic amp oldid 1147879639, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.