fbpx
Wikipedia

Conductor (class field theory)

In algebraic number theory, the conductor of a finite abelian extension of local or global fields provides a quantitative measure of the ramification in the extension. The definition of the conductor is related to the Artin map.

Local conductor

Let L/K be a finite abelian extension of non-archimedean local fields. The conductor of L/K, denoted  , is the smallest non-negative integer n such that the higher unit group

 

is contained in NL/K(L×), where NL/K is field norm map and   is the maximal ideal of K.[1] Equivalently, n is the smallest integer such that the local Artin map is trivial on  . Sometimes, the conductor is defined as   where n is as above.[2]

The conductor of an extension measures the ramification. Qualitatively, the extension is unramified if, and only if, the conductor is zero,[3] and it is tamely ramified if, and only if, the conductor is 1.[4] More precisely, the conductor computes the non-triviality of higher ramification groups: if s is the largest integer for which the "lower numbering" higher ramification group Gs is non-trivial, then  , where ηL/K is the function that translates from "lower numbering" to "upper numbering" of higher ramification groups.[5]

The conductor of L/K is also related to the Artin conductors of characters of the Galois group Gal(L/K). Specifically,[6]

 

where χ varies over all multiplicative complex characters of Gal(L/K),   is the Artin conductor of χ, and lcm is the least common multiple.

More general fields

The conductor can be defined in the same way for L/K a not necessarily abelian finite Galois extension of local fields.[7] However, it only depends on Lab/K, the maximal abelian extension of K in L, because of the "norm limitation theorem", which states that, in this situation,[8][9]

 

Additionally, the conductor can be defined when L and K are allowed to be slightly more general than local, namely if they are complete valued fields with quasi-finite residue field.[10]

Archimedean fields

Mostly for the sake of global conductors, the conductor of the trivial extension R/R is defined to be 0, and the conductor of the extension C/R is defined to be 1.[11]

Global conductor

Algebraic number fields

The conductor of an abelian extension L/K of number fields can be defined, similarly to the local case, using the Artin map. Specifically, let θ : Im → Gal(L/K) be the global Artin map where the modulus m is a defining modulus for L/K; we say that Artin reciprocity holds for m if θ factors through the ray class group modulo m. We define the conductor of L/K, denoted  , to be the highest common factor of all moduli for which reciprocity holds; in fact reciprocity holds for  , so it is the smallest such modulus.[12][13][14]

Example

  • Taking as base the field of rational numbers, the Kronecker–Weber theorem states that an algebraic number field K is abelian over Q if and only if it is a subfield of a cyclotomic field  , where   denotes a primitive nth root of unity.[15] If n is the smallest integer for which this holds, the conductor of K is then n if K is fixed by complex conjugation and   otherwise.
  • Let L/K be   where d is a squarefree integer. Then,[16]
     
where   is the discriminant of  .

Relation to local conductors and ramification

The global conductor is the product of local conductors:[17]

 

As a consequence, a finite prime is ramified in L/K if, and only if, it divides  .[18] An infinite prime v occurs in the conductor if, and only if, v is real and becomes complex in L.

Notes

  1. ^ Serre 1967, §4.2
  2. ^ As in Neukirch 1999, definition V.1.6
  3. ^ Neukirch 1999, proposition V.1.7
  4. ^ Milne 2008, I.1.9
  5. ^ Serre 1967, §4.2, proposition 1
  6. ^ Artin & Tate 2009, corollary to theorem XI.14, p. 100
  7. ^ As in Serre 1967, §4.2
  8. ^ Serre 1967, §2.5, proposition 4
  9. ^ Milne 2008, theorem III.3.5
  10. ^ As in Artin & Tate 2009, §XI.4. This is the situation in which the formalism of local class field theory works.
  11. ^ Cohen 2000, definition 3.4.1
  12. ^ Milne 2008, remark V.3.8
  13. ^ Janusz 1973, pp. 158, 168–169
  14. ^ Some authors omit infinite places from the conductor, e.g. Neukirch 1999, §VI.6
  15. ^ Manin, Yu. I.; Panchishkin, A. A. (2007). Introduction to Modern Number Theory. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Vol. 49 (Second ed.). pp. 155, 168. ISBN 978-3-540-20364-3. ISSN 0938-0396. Zbl 1079.11002.
  16. ^ Milne 2008, example V.3.11
  17. ^ For the finite part Neukirch 1999, proposition VI.6.5, and for the infinite part Cohen 2000, definition 3.4.1
  18. ^ Neukirch 1999, corollary VI.6.6

References

conductor, class, field, theory, algebraic, number, theory, conductor, finite, abelian, extension, local, global, fields, provides, quantitative, measure, ramification, extension, definition, conductor, related, artin, contents, local, conductor, more, general. In algebraic number theory the conductor of a finite abelian extension of local or global fields provides a quantitative measure of the ramification in the extension The definition of the conductor is related to the Artin map Contents 1 Local conductor 1 1 More general fields 1 2 Archimedean fields 2 Global conductor 2 1 Algebraic number fields 2 1 1 Example 2 1 2 Relation to local conductors and ramification 3 Notes 4 ReferencesLocal conductor EditLet L K be a finite abelian extension of non archimedean local fields The conductor of L K denoted f L K displaystyle mathfrak f L K is the smallest non negative integer n such that the higher unit group U n 1 m K n u O u 1 mod m K n displaystyle U n 1 mathfrak m K n left u in mathcal O times u equiv 1 left operatorname mod mathfrak m K n right right is contained in NL K L where NL K is field norm map and m K displaystyle mathfrak m K is the maximal ideal of K 1 Equivalently n is the smallest integer such that the local Artin map is trivial on U K n displaystyle U K n Sometimes the conductor is defined as m K n displaystyle mathfrak m K n where n is as above 2 The conductor of an extension measures the ramification Qualitatively the extension is unramified if and only if the conductor is zero 3 and it is tamely ramified if and only if the conductor is 1 4 More precisely the conductor computes the non triviality of higher ramification groups if s is the largest integer for which the lower numbering higher ramification group Gs is non trivial then f L K h L K s 1 displaystyle mathfrak f L K eta L K s 1 where hL K is the function that translates from lower numbering to upper numbering of higher ramification groups 5 The conductor of L K is also related to the Artin conductors of characters of the Galois group Gal L K Specifically 6 m K f L K lcm x m K f x displaystyle mathfrak m K mathfrak f L K operatorname lcm limits chi mathfrak m K mathfrak f chi where x varies over all multiplicative complex characters of Gal L K f x displaystyle mathfrak f chi is the Artin conductor of x and lcm is the least common multiple More general fields Edit The conductor can be defined in the same way for L K a not necessarily abelian finite Galois extension of local fields 7 However it only depends on Lab K the maximal abelian extension of K in L because of the norm limitation theorem which states that in this situation 8 9 N L K L N L ab K L ab displaystyle N L K left L times right N L text ab K left left L text ab right times right Additionally the conductor can be defined when L and K are allowed to be slightly more general than local namely if they are complete valued fields with quasi finite residue field 10 Archimedean fields Edit Mostly for the sake of global conductors the conductor of the trivial extension R R is defined to be 0 and the conductor of the extension C R is defined to be 1 11 Global conductor EditAlgebraic number fields Edit The conductor of an abelian extension L K of number fields can be defined similarly to the local case using the Artin map Specifically let 8 Im Gal L K be the global Artin map where the modulus m is a defining modulus for L K we say that Artin reciprocity holds for m if 8 factors through the ray class group modulo m We define the conductor of L K denoted f L K displaystyle mathfrak f L K to be the highest common factor of all moduli for which reciprocity holds in fact reciprocity holds for f L K displaystyle mathfrak f L K so it is the smallest such modulus 12 13 14 Example Edit Taking as base the field of rational numbers the Kronecker Weber theorem states that an algebraic number field K is abelian over Q if and only if it is a subfield of a cyclotomic field Q z n displaystyle mathbf Q left zeta n right where z n displaystyle zeta n denotes a primitive nth root of unity 15 If n is the smallest integer for which this holds the conductor of K is then n if K is fixed by complex conjugation and n displaystyle n infty otherwise Let L K be Q d Q displaystyle mathbf Q left sqrt d right mathbf Q where d is a squarefree integer Then 16 f Q d Q D Q d for d gt 0 D Q d for d lt 0 displaystyle mathfrak f left mathbf Q left sqrt d right mathbf Q right begin cases left Delta mathbf Q left sqrt d right right amp text for d gt 0 infty left Delta mathbf Q left sqrt d right right amp text for d lt 0 end cases where D Q d displaystyle Delta mathbf Q sqrt d is the discriminant of Q d Q displaystyle mathbf Q left sqrt d right mathbf Q Relation to local conductors and ramification Edit The global conductor is the product of local conductors 17 f L K p p f L p K p displaystyle mathfrak f L K prod mathfrak p mathfrak p mathfrak f left L mathfrak p K mathfrak p right As a consequence a finite prime is ramified in L K if and only if it divides f L K displaystyle mathfrak f L K 18 An infinite prime v occurs in the conductor if and only if v is real and becomes complex in L Notes Edit Serre 1967 4 2 As in Neukirch 1999 definition V 1 6 Neukirch 1999 proposition V 1 7 Milne 2008 I 1 9 Serre 1967 4 2 proposition 1 Artin amp Tate 2009 corollary to theorem XI 14 p 100 As in Serre 1967 4 2 Serre 1967 2 5 proposition 4 Milne 2008 theorem III 3 5 As in Artin amp Tate 2009 XI 4 This is the situation in which the formalism of local class field theory works Cohen 2000 definition 3 4 1 Milne 2008 remark V 3 8 Janusz 1973 pp 158 168 169 Some authors omit infinite places from the conductor e g Neukirch 1999 VI 6 Manin Yu I Panchishkin A A 2007 Introduction to Modern Number Theory Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences Vol 49 Second ed pp 155 168 ISBN 978 3 540 20364 3 ISSN 0938 0396 Zbl 1079 11002 Milne 2008 example V 3 11 For the finite part Neukirch 1999 proposition VI 6 5 and for the infinite part Cohen 2000 definition 3 4 1 Neukirch 1999 corollary VI 6 6References EditArtin Emil Tate John 2009 1967 Class field theory American Mathematical Society ISBN 978 0 8218 4426 7 MR 2467155 Cohen Henri 2000 Advanced topics in computational number theory Graduate Texts in Mathematics vol 193 Springer Verlag ISBN 978 0 387 98727 9 Janusz Gerald 1973 Algebraic Number Fields Pure and Applied Mathematics vol 55 Academic Press ISBN 0 12 380250 4 Zbl 0307 12001 Milne James 2008 Class field theory v4 0 ed retrieved 2010 02 22 Neukirch Jurgen 1999 Algebraische Zahlentheorie Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften Vol 322 Berlin Springer Verlag ISBN 978 3 540 65399 8 MR 1697859 Zbl 0956 11021 Serre Jean Pierre 1967 Local class field theory in Cassels J W S Frohlich Albrecht eds Algebraic Number Theory Proceedings of an instructional conference at the University of Sussex Brighton 1965 London Academic Press ISBN 0 12 163251 2 MR 0220701 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Conductor class field theory amp oldid 1045235320, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.