fbpx
Wikipedia

Cavitation modelling

Cavitation modelling is a type of computational fluid dynamic (CFD) that represents the flow of fluid during cavitation. It covers a wide range of applications, such as pumps, water turbines, pump inducers, and fuel cavitation in orifices as commonly encountered in fuel injection systems.

Modelling categories edit

Modelling efforts can be divided into two broad categories: vapor transport models and discrete bubble models.

Vapor transport model edit

Vapor transport models are best suited to large-scale cavitation, like sheet cavitation that often occurs on rudders and propellers. These models include two-way interactions between the phases.

Discrete bubble model edit

The discrete bubble model includes the effects of the surrounding fluid on the bubbles. Discrete bubble models, e.g. the Rayleigh-Plesset,[1][2] Gilmore [3] and Keller-Miksis,[4] describe the relation between the external pressure, bubble radius and the velocity and acceleration of the bubble wall.

Two-phase modeling edit

Two-phase modeling is the modelling of the two phases, as in a free surface code. Two common types of two phase models are homogeneous mixture models and sharp interface models. The difference between both the models is in the treatment of the contents of cells containing both phases.

Homogeneous mixture models edit

Most recent cavitation modelling efforts have used homogeneous mixture models, in which the contents of individual cells are assumed to be uniform. This approach is best suited to modeling large numbers of bubbles that are much smaller than one cell. The disadvantage of this approach is that when the cavities are larger than one cell, the vapor fraction is diffused across neighboring cells by the vapor transport model.

This is different from the sharp interface models in that the vapor and liquid are modeled as distinct phases separated by an interface.

Sharp interface models edit

In sharp interface models, the interface is not diffused by advection. The model maintains a sharp interface. Naturally, this is only appropriate when the bubble size is at least on the order of a few cells.

Phase change models edit

Phase change models represent the mass transfer between the phases. In cavitation, pressure is responsible for the mass transfer between liquid and vapor phases. This is in contrast to boiling, in which the temperature causes the phase change. There are two general categories of phase change models used for cavitation: the barotropic models and equilibrium models. This section will briefly discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each type.

Barotropic model edit

If the pressure is greater than vapor pressure, then the fluid is liquid, otherwise vapor. This means density of liquid water is considered as the density of fluid if the pressure is greater than vapor pressure and the density of water vapor is considered when pressure is less than vapor pressure of water at the ambient temperature.

Equilibrium model edit

The equilibrium model requires the solution of the energy equation. The equation for state of water is used, with the energy absorbed or released by phase change creating local temperature gradients which control the rate of phase change.

Bubble dynamics models edit

Several models for the bubble dynamics have been proposed:

Rayleigh edit

The Rayleigh model is the oldest, dating from 1917. This model was derived by Lord Rayleigh[1] It describes an empty space in the water, influenced by a constant external pressure. His assumption of an empty space led to the name cavity still used. The Rayleigh equation, derived from the Navier-Stokes equation for a spherically symmetric bubble convected with the flow with constant external pressure, reads

 

Rayleigh-Plesset edit

Building on the work of Lord Rayleigh, Plesset[2] included the effects of viscosity, surface tension and a non-constant external pressure to the equation. This equation reads

 

Gilmore edit

The equation by Gilmore accounted for the compressibility of the liquid. In its derivation, the viscous term is only present as a product with the compressibility. This term is neglected. The resulting term is:

 

In which:

 
 
 

Others edit

Over the years, several other models have been developed by making different assumptions in the derivation of the Navier-Stokes equations.

References edit

  1. ^ a b Rayleigh, Lord (1917). "On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 34 (200): 94–98. doi:10.1080/14786440808635681.
  2. ^ a b Plesset, Milton; Prosperetti, Andrea (1977). "Bubble dynamics and cavitation". Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 9: 145–185. Bibcode:1977AnRFM...9..145P. doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.09.010177.001045.
  3. ^ Gilmore, Forrest (1952). "The growth or collapse of a spherical bubble in a viscous compressible liquid". Technical Report. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ Keller, Joseph; Miksis, Michel (1980). "Bubble oscillations of large amplitude" (PDF). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 68 (2): 628–633. Bibcode:1980ASAJ...68..628K. doi:10.1121/1.384720. from the original on September 24, 2017.

cavitation, modelling, type, computational, fluid, dynamic, that, represents, flow, fluid, during, cavitation, covers, wide, range, applications, such, pumps, water, turbines, pump, inducers, fuel, cavitation, orifices, commonly, encountered, fuel, injection, . Cavitation modelling is a type of computational fluid dynamic CFD that represents the flow of fluid during cavitation It covers a wide range of applications such as pumps water turbines pump inducers and fuel cavitation in orifices as commonly encountered in fuel injection systems Contents 1 Modelling categories 1 1 Vapor transport model 1 2 Discrete bubble model 2 Two phase modeling 2 1 Homogeneous mixture models 2 2 Sharp interface models 3 Phase change models 3 1 Barotropic model 3 2 Equilibrium model 4 Bubble dynamics models 4 1 Rayleigh 4 2 Rayleigh Plesset 4 3 Gilmore 4 4 Others 5 ReferencesModelling categories editModelling efforts can be divided into two broad categories vapor transport models and discrete bubble models Vapor transport model edit Vapor transport models are best suited to large scale cavitation like sheet cavitation that often occurs on rudders and propellers These models include two way interactions between the phases Discrete bubble model edit The discrete bubble model includes the effects of the surrounding fluid on the bubbles Discrete bubble models e g the Rayleigh Plesset 1 2 Gilmore 3 and Keller Miksis 4 describe the relation between the external pressure bubble radius and the velocity and acceleration of the bubble wall Two phase modeling editTwo phase modeling is the modelling of the two phases as in a free surface code Two common types of two phase models are homogeneous mixture models and sharp interface models The difference between both the models is in the treatment of the contents of cells containing both phases Homogeneous mixture models edit Most recent cavitation modelling efforts have used homogeneous mixture models in which the contents of individual cells are assumed to be uniform This approach is best suited to modeling large numbers of bubbles that are much smaller than one cell The disadvantage of this approach is that when the cavities are larger than one cell the vapor fraction is diffused across neighboring cells by the vapor transport model This is different from the sharp interface models in that the vapor and liquid are modeled as distinct phases separated by an interface Sharp interface models edit In sharp interface models the interface is not diffused by advection The model maintains a sharp interface Naturally this is only appropriate when the bubble size is at least on the order of a few cells Phase change models editPhase change models represent the mass transfer between the phases In cavitation pressure is responsible for the mass transfer between liquid and vapor phases This is in contrast to boiling in which the temperature causes the phase change There are two general categories of phase change models used for cavitation the barotropic models and equilibrium models This section will briefly discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each type Barotropic model edit If the pressure is greater than vapor pressure then the fluid is liquid otherwise vapor This means density of liquid water is considered as the density of fluid if the pressure is greater than vapor pressure and the density of water vapor is considered when pressure is less than vapor pressure of water at the ambient temperature Equilibrium model edit The equilibrium model requires the solution of the energy equation The equation for state of water is used with the energy absorbed or released by phase change creating local temperature gradients which control the rate of phase change Bubble dynamics models editSeveral models for the bubble dynamics have been proposed Rayleigh edit The Rayleigh model is the oldest dating from 1917 This model was derived by Lord Rayleigh 1 It describes an empty space in the water influenced by a constant external pressure His assumption of an empty space led to the name cavity still used The Rayleigh equation derived from the Navier Stokes equation for a spherically symmetric bubble convected with the flow with constant external pressure reads RR 32R 2 p R p rL displaystyle R ddot R frac 3 2 dot R 2 frac p R p infty rho L nbsp Rayleigh Plesset edit Building on the work of Lord Rayleigh Plesset 2 included the effects of viscosity surface tension and a non constant external pressure to the equation This equation reads RR 32R 2 pi p 2sR 4mRR rL displaystyle R ddot R frac 3 2 dot R 2 frac p i p infty frac 2 sigma R frac 4 mu R dot R rho L nbsp Gilmore edit The equation by Gilmore accounted for the compressibility of the liquid In its derivation the viscous term is only present as a product with the compressibility This term is neglected The resulting term is 1 R t c R R t R t 32 1 R t 3c R R 2 t 1 R t c R H R 1 R c R Rc R H R displaystyle 1 frac dot R t c R R t ddot R t frac 3 2 1 frac dot R t 3c R dot R 2 t 1 frac dot R t c R H R 1 frac dot R c R frac R c R dot H R nbsp In which H nn 1p t BrL P Bp t B n 1n 1 displaystyle H frac n n 1 frac p infty t B rho L left frac P B p infty t B frac n 1 n 1 right nbsp c c0 pg t 2s R Bp t B n 12n displaystyle c c 0 left frac p g t 2 sigma R B p infty t B right frac n 1 2n nbsp H Dp t BH Dr P Bp t B n 1n R rLR p t BP B 1n 2sR 3kpg t displaystyle dot H frac D p infty t B H frac D rho frac P B p infty t B frac n 1 n frac dot R rho L R left frac p infty t B P B right frac 1 n left frac 2 sigma R 3kp g t right nbsp Others edit Over the years several other models have been developed by making different assumptions in the derivation of the Navier Stokes equations References edit a b Rayleigh Lord 1917 On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity The London Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 34 200 94 98 doi 10 1080 14786440808635681 a b Plesset Milton Prosperetti Andrea 1977 Bubble dynamics and cavitation Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 9 145 185 Bibcode 1977AnRFM 9 145P doi 10 1146 annurev fl 09 010177 001045 Gilmore Forrest 1952 The growth or collapse of a spherical bubble in a viscous compressible liquid Technical Report a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Keller Joseph Miksis Michel 1980 Bubble oscillations of large amplitude PDF The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68 2 628 633 Bibcode 1980ASAJ 68 628K doi 10 1121 1 384720 Archived from the original on September 24 2017 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Cavitation modelling amp oldid 1102137635, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.