fbpx
Wikipedia

California Senate Bill 531 (2019)

In the 2019-2020 regular session of the California State Legislature, SB 531 was introduced to ban local governments from providing sales tax kickbacks to e-commerce businesses for using that jurisdiction as the point of sale. The bill passed both houses of the legislature, but was vetoed by Governor Gavin Newsom.[1]

California Senate Bill 531 (2019)
California State Legislature
IntroducedFebruary 21, 2019
Assembly votedSeptember 5, 2019 (48-21)
Senate votedMay 16, 2019 (27-8)
Sponsor(s)Steve Glazer, Robert Hertzberg
GovernorGavin Newsom
CodeGovernment Code
Section§ 53084.5
BillSB 531
Associated billsAB 485 (2019)
WebsiteText
Status: Not passed
(Vetoed)

Background edit

The California State Board of Equalization generally requires that online sales be taxed according to a seller's location. Companies can consolidate all of their online sales into a single location, giving its local jurisdiction the benefit of all online sales taxes collected by the company statewide.[2] In order to redirect local tax revenues into their own treasuries, cities have created revenue-sharing incentives for companies to use their jurisdictions as the point of sale. The companies typically receive half of the city's sales tax revenue as a rebate, which is therefore lost from being spent on public services statewide. Examples of such arrangements include:[3][4]

References edit

  1. ^ Veto message
  2. ^ Allocating Local Sales Taxes: Issues and Options, Legislative Analyst's Office, 2007, As noted earlier, in cases where companies have multiple operations in California, sales taxes are allocated to the place where the principal sales negotiation takes place. For some businesses, such as cement manufacturers, Internet or mail order franchises, or suppliers of large computer systems, the sales offices may be located with other operations of the business or may be located in a separate location. If a company that has multiple places of business decides to consolidate all of its sales into just one office, the local jurisdiction which has that consolidated office can benefit from all the statewide sales of the business
  3. ^ "Apple's 22-Year Tax Break Part of Billions in California Bounty". news.bloombergtax.com. April 24, 2019. Retrieved February 26, 2023.
  4. ^ "Big Tech's California Tax Deals Pit Have-Not Cities Versus Haves". news.bloombergtax.com. February 24, 2023. Retrieved February 26, 2023.

california, senate, bill, 2019, 2019, 2020, regular, session, california, state, legislature, introduced, local, governments, from, providing, sales, kickbacks, commerce, businesses, using, that, jurisdiction, point, sale, bill, passed, both, houses, legislatu. In the 2019 2020 regular session of the California State Legislature SB 531 was introduced to ban local governments from providing sales tax kickbacks to e commerce businesses for using that jurisdiction as the point of sale The bill passed both houses of the legislature but was vetoed by Governor Gavin Newsom 1 California Senate Bill 531 2019 California State LegislatureIntroducedFebruary 21 2019Assembly votedSeptember 5 2019 48 21 Senate votedMay 16 2019 27 8 Sponsor s Steve Glazer Robert HertzbergGovernorGavin NewsomCodeGovernment CodeSection 53084 5BillSB 531Associated billsAB 485 2019 WebsiteTextStatus Not passed Vetoed Background editThe California State Board of Equalization generally requires that online sales be taxed according to a seller s location Companies can consolidate all of their online sales into a single location giving its local jurisdiction the benefit of all online sales taxes collected by the company statewide 2 In order to redirect local tax revenues into their own treasuries cities have created revenue sharing incentives for companies to use their jurisdictions as the point of sale The companies typically receive half of the city s sales tax revenue as a rebate which is therefore lost from being spent on public services statewide Examples of such arrangements include 3 4 Ontario QVC and Nike Inc Dinuba Best Buy Fresno Ulta Beauty Sacramento Macy s Cupertino Apple Inc San Bruno WalmartReferences edit Veto message Allocating Local Sales Taxes Issues and Options Legislative Analyst s Office 2007 As noted earlier in cases where companies have multiple operations in California sales taxes are allocated to the place where the principal sales negotiation takes place For some businesses such as cement manufacturers Internet or mail order franchises or suppliers of large computer systems the sales offices may be located with other operations of the business or may be located in a separate location If a company that has multiple places of business decides to consolidate all of its sales into just one office the local jurisdiction which has that consolidated office can benefit from all the statewide sales of the business Apple s 22 Year Tax Break Part of Billions in California Bounty news bloombergtax com April 24 2019 Retrieved February 26 2023 Big Tech s California Tax Deals Pit Have Not Cities Versus Haves news bloombergtax com February 24 2023 Retrieved February 26 2023 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title California Senate Bill 531 2019 amp oldid 1142170134, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.