This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in German. (April 2020) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
View a machine-translated version of the German article.
Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 9,106 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:COVID-19 Case-Cluster-Study]]; see its history for attribution.
You should also add the template {{Translated|de|COVID-19 Case-Cluster-Study}} to the talk page.
The COVID-19 Case-Cluster-Study – colloquially, Heinsberg study, also known as Heinsbergprotokoll and HEINSBERG PROTOKOLL. – is a study [1] about the COVID-19 pandemic in Gangelt.
The study was commissioned and is co-financed by the government of North Rhine-Westphalia and is led by Hendrik Streeck. In the public sphere, the marketing agency StoryMachine presented its results on Facebook and Twitter. Private enterprises also co-financed the study.[citation needed] The results of the study garnered cross-national media attention.[2]
The study aimed to determine lethality of and immunity to SARS-CoV-2; it also estimated the number of unrecorded cases.[3]
Despite the fact that sample size does not determine the representativeness of a study,[4] principal investigator Streeck claims, they examined more persons than recommended by the World Health Organization, the study would "thus be statistically absolutely representative".[5][6]
Criticism
One weakness of the study was the calculation of the IFR, which represents the lethality of COVID-19. The number of deaths were counted only for a period of 14 days. Because deaths accumulate over many weeks rather than directly after the infection, the study captured barely half the related deaths.[citation needed] This alone meant that the IFR was almost twice as high as calculated. When the study was published in Nature Communications in November 2020, the authors had not revised their calculation.[7]
References
^Streeck, Hendrik; Schulte, Bianca; Kümmerer, Beate M.; Richter, Enrico; Höller, Tobias; Fuhrmann, Christine; Bartok, Eva; Dolscheid, Ramona; Berger, Moritz; Wessendorf, Lukas; Eschbach-Bludau, Monika; Kellings, Angelika; Schwaiger, Astrid; Coenen, Martin; Hoffmann, Per; Stoffel-Wagner, Birgit; Nöthen, Markus M.; Eis-Hübinger, Anna-Maria; Exner, Martin; Schmithausen, Ricarda Maria; Schmid, Matthias; Hartmann, Gunther (2020). "Hendrik Streeck, Bianca Schulte, Beate Kuemmerer et al.: Infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a German community with a super-spreading event". doi:10.1101/2020.05.04.20090076. S2CID 218501199. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^Sydney, Philip Oltermann Helen Davidson in; Orleans, Oliver Laughland in New; Bangkok, Rebecca Ratcliffe in; Paris, Joanna Walters in New York Kim Willsher in; Palermo, Lorenzo Tondo in (2020-04-09). "The cluster effect: how social gatherings were rocket fuel for coronavirus". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2020-04-15.
^Burger, Reiner (2020-03-27). "Ergebnisse ab nächster Woche: Am Beispiel von Heinsberg die Pandemie verstehen". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. ISSN 0174-4909. Retrieved 2020-04-16.
^Kaplan, Robert M.; Chambers, David A.; Glasgow, Russell E. (August 2014). "Big Data and Large Sample Size: A Cautionary Note on the Potential for Bias". Clinical and Translational Science. 7 (4): 342–346. doi:10.1111/cts.12178. ISSN 1752-8054. PMC5439816. PMID 25043853.
^Matthias Jauch (2020-04-12). "Die Veröffentlichung zu Heinsberg war nicht leichtfertig" (Tagesspiegel). Retrieved 2020-04-16. original text: "also statistisch absolut repräsentativ"
^Schneider, Paula (2020-04-15). "Unwissenschaftlich: Statistikerin zerlegt Heinsberg-Studie, auf die sich Laschet stützt". Focus. Retrieved 2020-04-18.
^"Neuer Wirbel um Streecks Heinsberg-Studie". ntv. 27 November 2020. Retrieved 15 December 2020.
This article about the COVID-19 pandemic is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
covid, case, cluster, study, neutrality, this, article, disputed, relevant, discussion, found, talk, page, please, remove, this, message, until, conditions, january, 2021, learn, when, remove, this, template, message, this, article, expanded, with, text, trans. The neutrality of this article is disputed Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met January 2021 Learn how and when to remove this template message This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in German April 2020 Click show for important translation instructions View a machine translated version of the German article Machine translation like DeepL or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate rather than simply copy pasting machine translated text into the English Wikipedia Consider adding a topic to this template there are already 9 106 articles in the main category and specifying topic will aid in categorization Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low quality If possible verify the text with references provided in the foreign language article You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at de COVID 19 Case Cluster Study see its history for attribution You should also add the template Translated de COVID 19 Case Cluster Study to the talk page For more guidance see Wikipedia Translation The COVID 19 Case Cluster Study colloquially Heinsberg study also known as Heinsbergprotokoll and HEINSBERG PROTOKOLL is a study 1 about the COVID 19 pandemic in Gangelt Hendrik Streeck principal investigator The study was commissioned and is co financed by the government of North Rhine Westphalia and is led by Hendrik Streeck In the public sphere the marketing agency StoryMachine presented its results on Facebook and Twitter Private enterprises also co financed the study citation needed The results of the study garnered cross national media attention 2 The study aimed to determine lethality of and immunity to SARS CoV 2 it also estimated the number of unrecorded cases 3 Despite the fact that sample size does not determine the representativeness of a study 4 principal investigator Streeck claims they examined more persons than recommended by the World Health Organization the study would thus be statistically absolutely representative 5 6 Criticism EditOne weakness of the study was the calculation of the IFR which represents the lethality of COVID 19 The number of deaths were counted only for a period of 14 days Because deaths accumulate over many weeks rather than directly after the infection the study captured barely half the related deaths citation needed This alone meant that the IFR was almost twice as high as calculated When the study was published in Nature Communications in November 2020 the authors had not revised their calculation 7 References Edit Streeck Hendrik Schulte Bianca Kummerer Beate M Richter Enrico Holler Tobias Fuhrmann Christine Bartok Eva Dolscheid Ramona Berger Moritz Wessendorf Lukas Eschbach Bludau Monika Kellings Angelika Schwaiger Astrid Coenen Martin Hoffmann Per Stoffel Wagner Birgit Nothen Markus M Eis Hubinger Anna Maria Exner Martin Schmithausen Ricarda Maria Schmid Matthias Hartmann Gunther 2020 Hendrik Streeck Bianca Schulte Beate Kuemmerer et al Infection fatality rate of SARS CoV 2 infection in a German community with a super spreading event doi 10 1101 2020 05 04 20090076 S2CID 218501199 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Sydney Philip Oltermann Helen Davidson in Orleans Oliver Laughland in New Bangkok Rebecca Ratcliffe in Paris Joanna Walters in New York Kim Willsher in Palermo Lorenzo Tondo in 2020 04 09 The cluster effect how social gatherings were rocket fuel for coronavirus The Guardian ISSN 0261 3077 Retrieved 2020 04 15 Burger Reiner 2020 03 27 Ergebnisse ab nachster Woche Am Beispiel von Heinsberg die Pandemie verstehen Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung ISSN 0174 4909 Retrieved 2020 04 16 Kaplan Robert M Chambers David A Glasgow Russell E August 2014 Big Data and Large Sample Size A Cautionary Note on the Potential for Bias Clinical and Translational Science 7 4 342 346 doi 10 1111 cts 12178 ISSN 1752 8054 PMC 5439816 PMID 25043853 Matthias Jauch 2020 04 12 Die Veroffentlichung zu Heinsberg war nicht leichtfertig Tagesspiegel Retrieved 2020 04 16 original text also statistisch absolut reprasentativ Schneider Paula 2020 04 15 Unwissenschaftlich Statistikerin zerlegt Heinsberg Studie auf die sich Laschet stutzt Focus Retrieved 2020 04 18 Neuer Wirbel um Streecks Heinsberg Studie ntv 27 November 2020 Retrieved 15 December 2020 This article about the COVID 19 pandemic is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title COVID 19 Case Cluster Study amp oldid 1142406189, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
