fbpx
Wikipedia

Burau representation

In mathematics the Burau representation is a representation of the braid groups, named after and originally studied by the German mathematician Werner Burau[1] during the 1930s. The Burau representation has two common and near-equivalent formulations, the reduced and unreduced Burau representations.

Definition edit

 
The covering space Cn may be thought of concretely as follows: cut the disk along lines from the boundary to the marked points. Take as many copies of the result as there are integers, stack them vertically, and connect them by ramps going from one side of the cut on one level to the other side of the cut on the level below. This procedure is shown here for n = 4; the covering transformations t±1 act by shifting the space vertically.

Consider the braid group Bn to be the mapping class group of a disc with n marked points Dn. The homology group H1(Dn) is free abelian of rank n. Moreover, the invariant subspace of H1(Dn) (under the action of Bn) is primitive and infinite cyclic. Let π : H1(Dn) → Z be the projection onto this invariant subspace. Then there is a covering space Cn corresponding to this projection map. Much like in the construction of the Alexander polynomial, consider H1(Cn) as a module over the group-ring of covering transformations Z[Z], which is isomorphic to the ring of Laurent polynomials Z[t, t−1]. As a Z[t, t−1]-module, H1(Cn) is free of rank n − 1. By the basic theory of covering spaces, Bn acts on H1(Cn), and this representation is called the reduced Burau representation.

The unreduced Burau representation has a similar definition, namely one replaces Dn with its (real, oriented) blow-up at the marked points. Then instead of considering H1(Cn) one considers the relative homology H1(Cn, Γ) where γDn is the part of the boundary of Dn corresponding to the blow-up operation together with one point on the disc's boundary. Γ denotes the lift of γ to Cn. As a Z[t, t−1]-module this is free of rank n.

By the homology long exact sequence of a pair, the Burau representations fit into a short exact sequence

0 → VrVuDZ[t, t−1] → 0,

where Vr (resp. Vu) is the reduced (resp. unreduced) Burau Bn-module and DZn is the complement to the diagonal subspace, in other words:

 

and Bn acts on Zn by the permutation representation.

Explicit matrices edit

Let σi denote the standard generators of the braid group Bn. Then the unreduced Burau representation may be given explicitly by mapping

 

for 1 ≤ in − 1, where Ik denotes the k × k identity matrix. Likewise, for n ≥ 3 the reduced Burau representation is given by

 
 
 

while for n = 2, it maps

 

Bowling alley interpretation edit

Vaughan Jones[2] gave the following interpretation of the unreduced Burau representation of positive braids for t in [0,1] – i.e. for braids that are words in the standard braid group generators containing no inverses – which follows immediately from the above explicit description:

Given a positive braid σ on n strands, interpret it as a bowling alley with n intertwining lanes. Now throw a bowling ball down one of the lanes and assume that at every crossing where its path crosses over another lane, it falls down with probability t and continues along the lower lane. Then the (i,j)'th entry of the unreduced Burau representation of σ is the probability that a ball thrown into the i'th lane ends up in the j'th lane.

Relation to the Alexander polynomial edit

If a knot K is the closure of a braid f in Bn, then, up to multiplication by a unit in Z[t, t−1], the Alexander polynomial ΔK(t) of K is given by

 

where f is the reduced Burau representation of the braid f.

For example, if f = σ1σ2 in B3, one finds by using the explicit matrices above that

 

and the closure of f* is the unknot whose Alexander polynomial is 1.

Faithfulness edit

The first nonfaithful Burau representations were found by John A. Moody without the use of computer, using a notion of winding number or contour integration.[3] A more conceptual understanding, due to Darren D. Long and Mark Paton[4] interprets the linking or winding as coming from Poincaré duality in first homology relative to the basepoint of a covering space, and uses the intersection form (traditionally called Squier's Form as Craig Squier was the first to explore its properties).[5] Stephen Bigelow combined computer techniques and the Long–Paton theorem to show that the Burau representation is not faithful for n ≥ 5.[6][7][8] Bigelow moreover provides an explicit non-trivial element in the kernel as a word in the standard generators of the braid group: let

 

Then an element of the kernel is given by the commutator

 

The Burau representation for n = 2, 3 has been known to be faithful for some time. The faithfulness of the Burau representation when n = 4 is an open problem. The Burau representation appears as a summand of the Jones representation, and for n = 4, the faithfulness of the Burau representation is equivalent to that of the Jones representation, which on the other hand is related to the question of whether or not the Jones polynomial is an unknot detector.[9]

Geometry edit

Craig Squier showed that the Burau representation preserves a sesquilinear form.[5] Moreover, when the variable t is chosen to be a transcendental unit complex number near 1, it is a positive-definite Hermitian pairing. Thus the Burau representation of the braid group Bn can be thought of as a map into the unitary group U(n).

References edit

  1. ^ Burau, Werner (1936). "Über Zopfgruppen und gleichsinnig verdrillte Verkettungen". Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg. 11: 179–186. doi:10.1007/bf02940722. S2CID 119576586.
  2. ^ Jones, Vaughan (1987). "Hecke algebra representations of Braid Groups and Link Polynomials". Annals of Mathematics. Second Series. 126 (2): 335–388. doi:10.2307/1971403. JSTOR 1971403.
  3. ^ Moody, John Atwell (1993), "The faithfulness question for the Burau representation", Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 119 (2): 671–679, doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1993-1158006-x, JSTOR 2159956, MR 1158006
  4. ^ Long, Darren D.; Paton, Mark (1993), "The Burau representation is not faithful for  ", Topology, 32 (2): 439–447, doi:10.1016/0040-9383(93)90030-Y, MR 1217079
  5. ^ a b Squier, Craig C (1984). "The Burau representation is unitary". Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 90 (2): 199–202. doi:10.2307/2045338. JSTOR 2045338.
  6. ^ Bigelow, Stephen (1999). "The Burau representation is not faithful for n = 5". Geometry & Topology. 3: 397–404. arXiv:math/9904100. doi:10.2140/gt.1999.3.397. S2CID 5967061.
  7. ^ S. Bigelow, International Congress of Mathematicians, Beijing, 2002
  8. ^ Vladimir Turaev, Faithful representations of the braid groups, Bourbaki 1999-2000
  9. ^ Bigelow, Stephen (2002). "Does the Jones polynomial detect the unknot?". Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications. 11 (4): 493–505. arXiv:math/0012086. doi:10.1142/s0218216502001779. S2CID 1353805.

External links edit

burau, representation, mathematics, representation, braid, groups, named, after, originally, studied, german, mathematician, werner, burau, during, 1930s, common, near, equivalent, formulations, reduced, unreduced, contents, definition, explicit, matrices, bow. In mathematics the Burau representation is a representation of the braid groups named after and originally studied by the German mathematician Werner Burau 1 during the 1930s The Burau representation has two common and near equivalent formulations the reduced and unreduced Burau representations Contents 1 Definition 2 Explicit matrices 2 1 Bowling alley interpretation 3 Relation to the Alexander polynomial 4 Faithfulness 5 Geometry 6 References 7 External linksDefinition edit nbsp The covering space Cn may be thought of concretely as follows cut the disk along lines from the boundary to the marked points Take as many copies of the result as there are integers stack them vertically and connect them by ramps going from one side of the cut on one level to the other side of the cut on the level below This procedure is shown here for n 4 the covering transformations t 1 act by shifting the space vertically Consider the braid group Bn to be the mapping class group of a disc with n marked points Dn The homology group H1 Dn is free abelian of rank n Moreover the invariant subspace of H1 Dn under the action of Bn is primitive and infinite cyclic Let p H1 Dn Z be the projection onto this invariant subspace Then there is a covering space Cn corresponding to this projection map Much like in the construction of the Alexander polynomial consider H1 Cn as a module over the group ring of covering transformations Z Z which is isomorphic to the ring of Laurent polynomials Z t t 1 As a Z t t 1 module H1 Cn is free of rank n 1 By the basic theory of covering spaces Bn acts on H1 Cn and this representation is called the reduced Burau representation The unreduced Burau representation has a similar definition namely one replaces Dn with its real oriented blow up at the marked points Then instead of considering H1 Cn one considers the relative homology H1 Cn G where g Dn is the part of the boundary of Dn corresponding to the blow up operation together with one point on the disc s boundary G denotes the lift of g to Cn As a Z t t 1 module this is free of rank n By the homology long exact sequence of a pair the Burau representations fit into a short exact sequence 0 Vr Vu D Z t t 1 0 where Vr resp Vu is the reduced resp unreduced Burau Bn module and D Zn is the complement to the diagonal subspace in other words D x 1 x n Z n x 1 x n 0 displaystyle D left left x 1 cdots x n right in mathbf Z n x 1 cdots x n 0 right nbsp and Bn acts on Zn by the permutation representation Explicit matrices editLet si denote the standard generators of the braid group Bn Then the unreduced Burau representation may be given explicitly by mapping s i I i 1 0 0 0 0 1 t t 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I n i 1 displaystyle sigma i mapsto left begin array c cc c I i 1 amp 0 amp 0 amp 0 hline 0 amp 1 t amp t amp 0 0 amp 1 amp 0 amp 0 hline 0 amp 0 amp 0 amp I n i 1 end array right nbsp for 1 i n 1 where Ik denotes the k k identity matrix Likewise for n 3 the reduced Burau representation is given by s 1 t 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 I n 3 displaystyle sigma 1 mapsto left begin array cc c t amp 1 amp 0 0 amp 1 amp 0 hline 0 amp 0 amp I n 3 end array right nbsp s i I i 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 t t 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I n i 2 2 i n 2 displaystyle sigma i mapsto left begin array c ccc c I i 2 amp 0 amp 0 amp 0 amp 0 hline 0 amp 1 amp 0 amp 0 amp 0 0 amp t amp t amp 1 amp 0 0 amp 0 amp 0 amp 1 amp 0 hline 0 amp 0 amp 0 amp 0 amp I n i 2 end array right quad 2 leq i leq n 2 nbsp s n 1 I n 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 t t displaystyle sigma n 1 mapsto left begin array c cc I n 3 amp 0 amp 0 hline 0 amp 1 amp 0 0 amp t amp t end array right nbsp while for n 2 it maps s 1 t displaystyle sigma 1 mapsto left t right nbsp Bowling alley interpretation edit Vaughan Jones 2 gave the following interpretation of the unreduced Burau representation of positive braids for t in 0 1 i e for braids that are words in the standard braid group generators containing no inverses which follows immediately from the above explicit description Given a positive braid s on n strands interpret it as a bowling alley with n intertwining lanes Now throw a bowling ball down one of the lanes and assume that at every crossing where its path crosses over another lane it falls down with probability t and continues along the lower lane Then the i j th entry of the unreduced Burau representation of s is the probability that a ball thrown into the i th lane ends up in the j th lane Relation to the Alexander polynomial editIf a knot K is the closure of a braid f in Bn then up to multiplication by a unit in Z t t 1 the Alexander polynomial DK t of K is given by 1 t 1 t n det I f displaystyle frac 1 t 1 t n det I f nbsp where f is the reduced Burau representation of the braid f For example if f s1s2 in B3 one finds by using the explicit matrices above that 1 t 1 t n det I f 1 displaystyle frac 1 t 1 t n det I f 1 nbsp and the closure of f is the unknot whose Alexander polynomial is 1 Faithfulness editThe first nonfaithful Burau representations were found by John A Moody without the use of computer using a notion of winding number or contour integration 3 A more conceptual understanding due to Darren D Long and Mark Paton 4 interprets the linking or winding as coming from Poincare duality in first homology relative to the basepoint of a covering space and uses the intersection form traditionally called Squier s Form as Craig Squier was the first to explore its properties 5 Stephen Bigelow combined computer techniques and the Long Paton theorem to show that the Burau representation is not faithful for n 5 6 7 8 Bigelow moreover provides an explicit non trivial element in the kernel as a word in the standard generators of the braid group let ps 1 s 3 1 s 2 s 1 2 s 2 s 4 3 s 3 s 2 ps 2 s 4 1 s 3 s 2 s 1 2 s 2 s 1 2 s 2 2 s 1 s 4 5 displaystyle psi 1 sigma 3 1 sigma 2 sigma 1 2 sigma 2 sigma 4 3 sigma 3 sigma 2 quad psi 2 sigma 4 1 sigma 3 sigma 2 sigma 1 2 sigma 2 sigma 1 2 sigma 2 2 sigma 1 sigma 4 5 nbsp Then an element of the kernel is given by the commutator ps 1 1 s 4 ps 1 ps 2 1 s 4 s 3 s 2 s 1 2 s 2 s 3 s 4 ps 2 displaystyle psi 1 1 sigma 4 psi 1 psi 2 1 sigma 4 sigma 3 sigma 2 sigma 1 2 sigma 2 sigma 3 sigma 4 psi 2 nbsp The Burau representation for n 2 3 has been known to be faithful for some time The faithfulness of the Burau representation when n 4 is an open problem The Burau representation appears as a summand of the Jones representation and for n 4 the faithfulness of the Burau representation is equivalent to that of the Jones representation which on the other hand is related to the question of whether or not the Jones polynomial is an unknot detector 9 Geometry editCraig Squier showed that the Burau representation preserves a sesquilinear form 5 Moreover when the variable t is chosen to be a transcendental unit complex number near 1 it is a positive definite Hermitian pairing Thus the Burau representation of the braid group Bn can be thought of as a map into the unitary group U n References edit Burau Werner 1936 Uber Zopfgruppen und gleichsinnig verdrillte Verkettungen Abh Math Sem Univ Hamburg 11 179 186 doi 10 1007 bf02940722 S2CID 119576586 Jones Vaughan 1987 Hecke algebra representations of Braid Groups and Link Polynomials Annals of Mathematics Second Series 126 2 335 388 doi 10 2307 1971403 JSTOR 1971403 Moody John Atwell 1993 The faithfulness question for the Burau representation Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 119 2 671 679 doi 10 1090 s0002 9939 1993 1158006 x JSTOR 2159956 MR 1158006 Long Darren D Paton Mark 1993 The Burau representation is not faithful for n 6 displaystyle n geq 6 nbsp Topology 32 2 439 447 doi 10 1016 0040 9383 93 90030 Y MR 1217079 a b Squier Craig C 1984 The Burau representation is unitary Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 90 2 199 202 doi 10 2307 2045338 JSTOR 2045338 Bigelow Stephen 1999 The Burau representation is not faithful for n 5 Geometry amp Topology 3 397 404 arXiv math 9904100 doi 10 2140 gt 1999 3 397 S2CID 5967061 S Bigelow International Congress of Mathematicians Beijing 2002 Vladimir Turaev Faithful representations of the braid groups Bourbaki 1999 2000 Bigelow Stephen 2002 Does the Jones polynomial detect the unknot Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications 11 4 493 505 arXiv math 0012086 doi 10 1142 s0218216502001779 S2CID 1353805 External links edit Burau s Theorem The Knot Atlas Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Burau representation amp oldid 1214817533, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.