fbpx
Wikipedia

Brown v. Van Braam

Brown v. Van Braam, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 344 (1797), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that: "Under the practice of the courts of Rhode Island, as adopted by the judiciary act, (1 U. S. Stats, at Large, 73,) the entry of a default, after a plea of the general issue, no similar being on the record, does not operate a discontinuance, and a judgment on the default is valid. Under the same practice the court may assess the damages in an action of assumpsit on a foreign bill payable in pounds sterling. Interest on affirmance is to be calculated on the aggregate sum of principal and interest in the judgment below, to the time of affirmance, but no further.."[1]

Brown v. Van Braam
Argued February 9–10, 1797
Decided February 13, 1797
Full case nameBrown v. Van Braam
Citations3 U.S. 344 (more)
3 Dall. 344; 1 L. Ed. 629; 1797 U.S. LEXIS 203
Court membership
Chief Justice
Oliver Ellsworth
Associate Justices
James Wilson · William Cushing
James Iredell · William Paterson
Samuel Chase

See also

References

  1. ^ Reports of decisions in the Supreme Court of the United States: with notes, and a digest, Volume 1 (Little, Brown, and Co., 1870) pg. 254 https://books.google.com/books?id=NEQPAAAAYAAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s

External links

  • Text of Brown v. Van Braam, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 344 (1797) is available from: CourtListener  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress  OpenJurist 

brown, braam, dall, 1797, united, states, supreme, court, case, holding, that, under, practice, courts, rhode, island, adopted, judiciary, stats, large, entry, default, after, plea, general, issue, similar, being, record, does, operate, discontinuance, judgmen. Brown v Van Braam 3 U S 3 Dall 344 1797 was a United States Supreme Court case holding that Under the practice of the courts of Rhode Island as adopted by the judiciary act 1 U S Stats at Large 73 the entry of a default after a plea of the general issue no similar being on the record does not operate a discontinuance and a judgment on the default is valid Under the same practice the court may assess the damages in an action of assumpsit on a foreign bill payable in pounds sterling Interest on affirmance is to be calculated on the aggregate sum of principal and interest in the judgment below to the time of affirmance but no further 1 Brown v Van BraamSupreme Court of the United StatesArgued February 9 10 1797Decided February 13 1797Full case nameBrown v Van BraamCitations3 U S 344 more 3 Dall 344 1 L Ed 629 1797 U S LEXIS 203Court membershipChief Justice Oliver Ellsworth Associate Justices James Wilson William CushingJames Iredell William PatersonSamuel ChaseSee also EditList of United States Supreme Court cases volume 3References Edit Reports of decisions in the Supreme Court of the United States with notes and a digest Volume 1 Little Brown and Co 1870 pg 254 https books google com books id NEQPAAAAYAAJ amp source gbs navlinks sExternal links EditText of Brown v Van Braam 3 U S 3 Dall 344 1797 is available from CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Brown v Van Braam amp oldid 895895556, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.