fbpx
Wikipedia

Borel–Weil–Bott theorem

In mathematics, the Borel–Weil–Bott theorem is a basic result in the representation theory of Lie groups, showing how a family of representations can be obtained from holomorphic sections of certain complex vector bundles, and, more generally, from higher sheaf cohomology groups associated to such bundles. It is built on the earlier Borel–Weil theorem of Armand Borel and André Weil, dealing just with the space of sections (the zeroth cohomology group), the extension to higher cohomology groups being provided by Raoul Bott. One can equivalently, through Serre's GAGA, view this as a result in complex algebraic geometry in the Zariski topology.

Formulation

Let G be a semisimple Lie group or algebraic group over  , and fix a maximal torus T along with a Borel subgroup B which contains T. Let λ be an integral weight of T; λ defines in a natural way a one-dimensional representation Cλ of B, by pulling back the representation on T = B/U, where U is the unipotent radical of B. Since we can think of the projection map GG/B as a principal B-bundle, for each Cλ we get an associated fiber bundle L−λ on G/B (note the sign), which is obviously a line bundle. Identifying Lλ with its sheaf of holomorphic sections, we consider the sheaf cohomology groups  . Since G acts on the total space of the bundle   by bundle automorphisms, this action naturally gives a G-module structure on these groups; and the Borel–Weil–Bott theorem gives an explicit description of these groups as G-modules.

We first need to describe the Weyl group action centered at  . For any integral weight λ and w in the Weyl group W, we set  , where ρ denotes the half-sum of positive roots of G. It is straightforward to check that this defines a group action, although this action is not linear, unlike the usual Weyl group action. Also, a weight μ is said to be dominant if   for all simple roots α. Let denote the length function on W.

Given an integral weight λ, one of two cases occur:

  1. There is no   such that   is dominant, equivalently, there exists a nonidentity   such that  ; or
  2. There is a unique   such that   is dominant.

The theorem states that in the first case, we have

  for all i;

and in the second case, we have

  for all  , while
  is the dual of the irreducible highest-weight representation of G with highest weight  .

It is worth noting that case (1) above occurs if and only if   for some positive root β. Also, we obtain the classical Borel–Weil theorem as a special case of this theorem by taking λ to be dominant and w to be the identity element  .

Example

For example, consider G = SL2(C), for which G/B is the Riemann sphere, an integral weight is specified simply by an integer n, and ρ = 1. The line bundle Ln is  , whose sections are the homogeneous polynomials of degree n (i.e. the binary forms). As a representation of G, the sections can be written as Symn(C2)*, and is canonically isomorphic to Symn(C2).

This gives us at a stroke the representation theory of  :   is the standard representation, and   is its nth symmetric power. We even have a unified description of the action of the Lie algebra, derived from its realization as vector fields on the Riemann sphere: if H, X, Y are the standard generators of  , then

 

Positive characteristic

One also has a weaker form of this theorem in positive characteristic. Namely, let G be a semisimple algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of characteristic  . Then it remains true that   for all i if λ is a weight such that   is non-dominant for all   as long as λ is "close to zero".[1] This is known as the Kempf vanishing theorem. However, the other statements of the theorem do not remain valid in this setting.

More explicitly, let λ be a dominant integral weight; then it is still true that   for all  , but it is no longer true that this G-module is simple in general, although it does contain the unique highest weight module of highest weight λ as a G-submodule. If λ is an arbitrary integral weight, it is in fact a large unsolved problem in representation theory to describe the cohomology modules   in general. Unlike over  , Mumford gave an example showing that it need not be the case for a fixed λ that these modules are all zero except in a single degree i.

Borel–Weil theorem

The Borel–Weil theorem provides a concrete model for irreducible representations of compact Lie groups and irreducible holomorphic representations of complex semisimple Lie groups. These representations are realized in the spaces of global sections of holomorphic line bundles on the flag manifold of the group. The Borel–Weil–Bott theorem is its generalization to higher cohomology spaces. The theorem dates back to the early 1950s and can be found in Serre (1954) and Tits (1955).

Statement of the theorem

The theorem can be stated either for a complex semisimple Lie group G or for its compact form K. Let G be a connected complex semisimple Lie group, B a Borel subgroup of G, and X = G/B the flag variety. In this scenario, X is a complex manifold and a nonsingular algebraic G-variety. The flag variety can also be described as a compact homogeneous space K/T, where T = KB is a (compact) Cartan subgroup of K. An integral weight λ determines a G-equivariant holomorphic line bundle Lλ on X and the group G acts on its space of global sections,

 

The Borel–Weil theorem states that if λ is a dominant integral weight then this representation is a holomorphic irreducible highest weight representation of G with highest weight λ. Its restriction to K is an irreducible unitary representation of K with highest weight λ, and each irreducible unitary representations of K is obtained in this way for a unique value of λ. (A holomorphic representation of a complex Lie group is one for which the corresponding Lie algebra representation is complex linear.)

Concrete description

The weight λ gives rise to a character (one-dimensional representation) of the Borel subgroup B, which is denoted χλ. Holomorphic sections of the holomorphic line bundle Lλ over G/B may be described more concretely as holomorphic maps

 

for all gG and bB.

The action of G on these sections is given by

 

for g, hG.

Example

Let G be the complex special linear group SL(2, C), with a Borel subgroup consisting of upper triangular matrices with determinant one. Integral weights for G may be identified with integers, with dominant weights corresponding to nonnegative integers, and the corresponding characters χn of B have the form

 

The flag variety G/B may be identified with the complex projective line CP1 with homogeneous coordinates X, Y and the space of the global sections of the line bundle Ln is identified with the space of homogeneous polynomials of degree n on C2. For n ≥ 0, this space has dimension n + 1 and forms an irreducible representation under the standard action of G on the polynomial algebra C[X, Y]. Weight vectors are given by monomials

 

of weights 2in, and the highest weight vector Xn has weight n.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Jantzen, Jens Carsten (2003). Representations of algebraic groups (second ed.). American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-3527-2.

References

  • Fulton, William; Harris, Joe (1991). Representation theory. A first course. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Readings in Mathematics. Vol. 129. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9. ISBN 978-0-387-97495-8. MR 1153249. OCLC 246650103..
  • Baston, Robert J.; Eastwood, Michael G. (1989), The Penrose Transform: its Interaction with Representation Theory, Oxford University Press. (reprinted by Dover)
  • "Bott–Borel–Weil theorem", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
  • A Proof of the Borel–Weil–Bott Theorem, by Jacob Lurie. Retrieved on Jul. 13, 2014.
  • Serre, Jean-Pierre (1954) [1951], "Représentations linéaires et espaces homogènes kählériens des groupes de Lie compacts (d'après Armand Borel et André Weil)" [Linear representations and Kähler homogeneous spaces of compact Lie groups (after Armand Borel and André Weil)], Séminaire Bourbaki (in French), 2 (100): 447–454.
  • Tits, Jacques (1955), Sur certaines classes d'espaces homogènes de groupes de Lie, Acad. Roy. Belg. Cl. Sci. Mém. Coll. (in French), vol. 29.
  • Sepanski, Mark R. (2007), Compact Lie groups., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 235, New York: Springer, ISBN 9780387302638.
  • Knapp, Anthony W. (2001), Representation theory of semisimple groups: An overview based on examples, Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Reprint of the 1986 original.

Further reading

  • Teleman, Constantin (1998). "Borel–Weil–Bott theory on the moduli stack of G-bundles over a curve". Inventiones Mathematicae. 134 (1): 1–57. doi:10.1007/s002220050257. MR 1646586.

This article incorporates material from Borel–Bott–Weil theorem on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

borel, weil, bott, theorem, mathematics, basic, result, representation, theory, groups, showing, family, representations, obtained, from, holomorphic, sections, certain, complex, vector, bundles, more, generally, from, higher, sheaf, cohomology, groups, associ. In mathematics the Borel Weil Bott theorem is a basic result in the representation theory of Lie groups showing how a family of representations can be obtained from holomorphic sections of certain complex vector bundles and more generally from higher sheaf cohomology groups associated to such bundles It is built on the earlier Borel Weil theorem of Armand Borel and Andre Weil dealing just with the space of sections the zeroth cohomology group the extension to higher cohomology groups being provided by Raoul Bott One can equivalently through Serre s GAGA view this as a result in complex algebraic geometry in the Zariski topology Contents 1 Formulation 2 Example 3 Positive characteristic 4 Borel Weil theorem 4 1 Statement of the theorem 4 2 Concrete description 4 3 Example 5 See also 6 Notes 7 References 8 Further readingFormulation EditLet G be a semisimple Lie group or algebraic group over C displaystyle mathbb C and fix a maximal torus T along with a Borel subgroup B which contains T Let l be an integral weight of T l defines in a natural way a one dimensional representation Cl of B by pulling back the representation on T B U where U is the unipotent radical of B Since we can think of the projection map G G B as a principal B bundle for each Cl we get an associated fiber bundle L l on G B note the sign which is obviously a line bundle Identifying Ll with its sheaf of holomorphic sections we consider the sheaf cohomology groups H i G B L l displaystyle H i G B L lambda Since G acts on the total space of the bundle L l displaystyle L lambda by bundle automorphisms this action naturally gives a G module structure on these groups and the Borel Weil Bott theorem gives an explicit description of these groups as G modules We first need to describe the Weyl group action centered at r displaystyle rho For any integral weight l and w in the Weyl group W we set w l w l r r displaystyle w lambda w lambda rho rho where r denotes the half sum of positive roots of G It is straightforward to check that this defines a group action although this action is not linear unlike the usual Weyl group action Also a weight m is said to be dominant if m a 0 displaystyle mu alpha vee geq 0 for all simple roots a Let ℓ denote the length function on W Given an integral weight l one of two cases occur There is no w W displaystyle w in W such that w l displaystyle w lambda is dominant equivalently there exists a nonidentity w W displaystyle w in W such that w l l displaystyle w lambda lambda or There is a unique w W displaystyle w in W such that w l displaystyle w lambda is dominant The theorem states that in the first case we have H i G B L l 0 displaystyle H i G B L lambda 0 for all i and in the second case we have H i G B L l 0 displaystyle H i G B L lambda 0 for all i ℓ w displaystyle i neq ell w whileH ℓ w G B L l displaystyle H ell w G B L lambda is the dual of the irreducible highest weight representation of G with highest weight w l displaystyle w lambda It is worth noting that case 1 above occurs if and only if l r b 0 displaystyle lambda rho beta vee 0 for some positive root b Also we obtain the classical Borel Weil theorem as a special case of this theorem by taking l to be dominant and w to be the identity element e W displaystyle e in W Example EditFor example consider G SL2 C for which G B is the Riemann sphere an integral weight is specified simply by an integer n and r 1 The line bundle Ln is O n displaystyle mathcal O n whose sections are the homogeneous polynomials of degree n i e the binary forms As a representation of G the sections can be written as Symn C2 and is canonically isomorphic to Symn C2 This gives us at a stroke the representation theory of s l 2 C displaystyle mathfrak sl 2 mathbf C G O 1 displaystyle Gamma mathcal O 1 is the standard representation and G O n displaystyle Gamma mathcal O n is its n th symmetric power We even have a unified description of the action of the Lie algebra derived from its realization as vector fields on the Riemann sphere if H X Y are the standard generators of s l 2 C displaystyle mathfrak sl 2 mathbf C then H x x y y X x y Y y x displaystyle begin aligned H amp x frac partial partial x y frac partial partial y 5pt X amp x frac partial partial y 5pt Y amp y frac partial partial x end aligned Further information Jordan mapPositive characteristic EditOne also has a weaker form of this theorem in positive characteristic Namely let G be a semisimple algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of characteristic p gt 0 displaystyle p gt 0 Then it remains true that H i G B L l 0 displaystyle H i G B L lambda 0 for all i if l is a weight such that w l displaystyle w lambda is non dominant for all w W displaystyle w in W as long as l is close to zero 1 This is known as the Kempf vanishing theorem However the other statements of the theorem do not remain valid in this setting More explicitly let l be a dominant integral weight then it is still true that H i G B L l 0 displaystyle H i G B L lambda 0 for all i gt 0 displaystyle i gt 0 but it is no longer true that this G module is simple in general although it does contain the unique highest weight module of highest weight l as a G submodule If l is an arbitrary integral weight it is in fact a large unsolved problem in representation theory to describe the cohomology modules H i G B L l displaystyle H i G B L lambda in general Unlike over C displaystyle mathbb C Mumford gave an example showing that it need not be the case for a fixed l that these modules are all zero except in a single degree i Borel Weil theorem EditThe Borel Weil theorem provides a concrete model for irreducible representations of compact Lie groups and irreducible holomorphic representations of complex semisimple Lie groups These representations are realized in the spaces of global sections of holomorphic line bundles on the flag manifold of the group The Borel Weil Bott theorem is its generalization to higher cohomology spaces The theorem dates back to the early 1950s and can be found in Serre 1954 and Tits 1955 Statement of the theorem Edit The theorem can be stated either for a complex semisimple Lie group G or for its compact form K Let G be a connected complex semisimple Lie group B a Borel subgroup of G and X G B the flag variety In this scenario X is a complex manifold and a nonsingular algebraic G variety The flag variety can also be described as a compact homogeneous space K T where T K B is a compact Cartan subgroup of K An integral weight l determines a G equivariant holomorphic line bundle Ll on X and the group G acts on its space of global sections G G B L l displaystyle Gamma G B L lambda The Borel Weil theorem states that if l is a dominant integral weight then this representation is a holomorphic irreducible highest weight representation of G with highest weight l Its restriction to K is an irreducible unitary representation of K with highest weight l and each irreducible unitary representations of K is obtained in this way for a unique value of l A holomorphic representation of a complex Lie group is one for which the corresponding Lie algebra representation is complex linear Concrete description Edit The weight l gives rise to a character one dimensional representation of the Borel subgroup B which is denoted xl Holomorphic sections of the holomorphic line bundle Ll over G B may be described more concretely as holomorphic maps f G C l f g b x l b 1 f g displaystyle f G to mathbb C lambda f gb chi lambda b 1 f g for all g G and b B The action of G on these sections is given by g f h f g 1 h displaystyle g cdot f h f g 1 h for g h G Example Edit Let G be the complex special linear group SL 2 C with a Borel subgroup consisting of upper triangular matrices with determinant one Integral weights for G may be identified with integers with dominant weights corresponding to nonnegative integers and the corresponding characters xn of B have the form x n a b 0 a 1 a n displaystyle chi n begin pmatrix a amp b 0 amp a 1 end pmatrix a n The flag variety G B may be identified with the complex projective line CP1 with homogeneous coordinates X Y and the space of the global sections of the line bundle Ln is identified with the space of homogeneous polynomials of degree n on C2 For n 0 this space has dimension n 1 and forms an irreducible representation under the standard action of G on the polynomial algebra C X Y Weight vectors are given by monomials X i Y n i 0 i n displaystyle X i Y n i quad 0 leq i leq n of weights 2i n and the highest weight vector Xn has weight n See also EditTheorem of the highest weightNotes Edit Jantzen Jens Carsten 2003 Representations of algebraic groups second ed American Mathematical Society ISBN 978 0 8218 3527 2 References EditFulton William Harris Joe 1991 Representation theory A first course Graduate Texts in Mathematics Readings in Mathematics Vol 129 New York Springer Verlag doi 10 1007 978 1 4612 0979 9 ISBN 978 0 387 97495 8 MR 1153249 OCLC 246650103 Baston Robert J Eastwood Michael G 1989 The Penrose Transform its Interaction with Representation Theory Oxford University Press reprinted by Dover Bott Borel Weil theorem Encyclopedia of Mathematics EMS Press 2001 1994 A Proof of the Borel Weil Bott Theorem by Jacob Lurie Retrieved on Jul 13 2014 Serre Jean Pierre 1954 1951 Representations lineaires et espaces homogenes kahleriens des groupes de Lie compacts d apres Armand Borel et Andre Weil Linear representations and Kahler homogeneous spaces of compact Lie groups after Armand Borel and Andre Weil Seminaire Bourbaki in French 2 100 447 454 Tits Jacques 1955 Sur certaines classes d espaces homogenes de groupes de Lie Acad Roy Belg Cl Sci Mem Coll in French vol 29 Sepanski Mark R 2007 Compact Lie groups Graduate Texts in Mathematics vol 235 New York Springer ISBN 9780387302638 Knapp Anthony W 2001 Representation theory of semisimple groups An overview based on examples Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics Princeton NJ Princeton University Press Reprint of the 1986 original Further reading EditTeleman Constantin 1998 Borel Weil Bott theory on the moduli stack of G bundles over a curve Inventiones Mathematicae 134 1 1 57 doi 10 1007 s002220050257 MR 1646586 This article incorporates material from Borel Bott Weil theorem on PlanetMath which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike License Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Borel Weil Bott theorem amp oldid 1135745598 Borel Weil theorem, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.