fbpx
Wikipedia

Artin–Tate lemma

In algebra, the Artin–Tate lemma, named after Emil Artin and John Tate, states:[1]

Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring and commutative algebras over A. If C is of finite type over A and if C is finite over B, then B is of finite type over A.

(Here, "of finite type" means "finitely generated algebra" and "finite" means "finitely generated module".) The lemma was introduced by E. Artin and J. Tate in 1951[2] to give a proof of Hilbert's Nullstellensatz.

The lemma is similar to the Eakin–Nagata theorem, which says: if C is finite over B and C is a Noetherian ring, then B is a Noetherian ring.

Proof edit

The following proof can be found in Atiyah–MacDonald.[3] Let   generate   as an  -algebra and let   generate   as a  -module. Then we can write

 

with  . Then   is finite over the  -algebra   generated by the  . Using that   and hence   is Noetherian, also   is finite over  . Since   is a finitely generated  -algebra, also   is a finitely generated  -algebra.

Noetherian necessary edit

Without the assumption that A is Noetherian, the statement of the Artin–Tate lemma is no longer true. Indeed, for any non-Noetherian ring A we can define an A-algebra structure on   by declaring  . Then for any ideal   which is not finitely generated,   is not of finite type over A, but all conditions as in the lemma are satisfied.

References edit

  1. ^ Eisenbud, David, Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 150, Springer-Verlag, 1995, ISBN 0-387-94268-8, Exercise 4.32
  2. ^ E Artin, J.T Tate, "A note on finite ring extensions," J. Math. Soc Japan, Volume 3, 1951, pp. 74–77
  3. ^ M. Atiyah, I.G. Macdonald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison–Wesley, 1994. ISBN 0-201-40751-5. Proposition 7.8

External links edit

artin, tate, lemma, algebra, named, after, emil, artin, john, tate, states, commutative, noetherian, ring, displaystyle, subset, commutative, algebras, over, finite, type, over, finite, over, then, finite, type, over, here, finite, type, means, finitely, gener. In algebra the Artin Tate lemma named after Emil Artin and John Tate states 1 Let A be a commutative Noetherian ring and B C displaystyle B subset C commutative algebras over A If C is of finite type over A and if C is finite over B then B is of finite type over A Here of finite type means finitely generated algebra and finite means finitely generated module The lemma was introduced by E Artin and J Tate in 1951 2 to give a proof of Hilbert s Nullstellensatz The lemma is similar to the Eakin Nagata theorem which says if C is finite over B and C is a Noetherian ring then B is a Noetherian ring Contents 1 Proof 2 Noetherian necessary 3 References 4 External linksProof editThe following proof can be found in Atiyah MacDonald 3 Let x1 xm displaystyle x 1 ldots x m nbsp generate C displaystyle C nbsp as an A displaystyle A nbsp algebra and let y1 yn displaystyle y 1 ldots y n nbsp generate C displaystyle C nbsp as a B displaystyle B nbsp module Then we can write xi jbijyjandyiyj kbijkyk displaystyle x i sum j b ij y j quad text and quad y i y j sum k b ijk y k nbsp with bij bijk B displaystyle b ij b ijk in B nbsp Then C displaystyle C nbsp is finite over the A displaystyle A nbsp algebra B0 displaystyle B 0 nbsp generated by the bij bijk displaystyle b ij b ijk nbsp Using that A displaystyle A nbsp and hence B0 displaystyle B 0 nbsp is Noetherian also B displaystyle B nbsp is finite over B0 displaystyle B 0 nbsp Since B0 displaystyle B 0 nbsp is a finitely generated A displaystyle A nbsp algebra also B displaystyle B nbsp is a finitely generated A displaystyle A nbsp algebra Noetherian necessary editWithout the assumption that A is Noetherian the statement of the Artin Tate lemma is no longer true Indeed for any non Noetherian ring A we can define an A algebra structure on C A A displaystyle C A oplus A nbsp by declaring a x b y ab bx ay displaystyle a x b y ab bx ay nbsp Then for any ideal I A displaystyle I subset A nbsp which is not finitely generated B A I C displaystyle B A oplus I subset C nbsp is not of finite type over A but all conditions as in the lemma are satisfied References edit Eisenbud David Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry Graduate Texts in Mathematics 150 Springer Verlag 1995 ISBN 0 387 94268 8 Exercise 4 32 E Artin J T Tate A note on finite ring extensions J Math Soc Japan Volume 3 1951 pp 74 77 M Atiyah I G Macdonald Introduction to Commutative Algebra Addison Wesley 1994 ISBN 0 201 40751 5 Proposition 7 8External links edithttp commalg subwiki org wiki Artin Tate lemma Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Artin Tate lemma amp oldid 1149638530, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.