fbpx
Wikipedia

Wedderburn–Artin theorem

In algebra, the Wedderburn–Artin theorem is a classification theorem for semisimple rings and semisimple algebras. The theorem states that an (Artinian)[a] semisimple ring R is isomorphic to a product of finitely many ni-by-ni matrix rings over division rings Di, for some integers ni, both of which are uniquely determined up to permutation of the index i. In particular, any simple left or right Artinian ring is isomorphic to an n-by-n matrix ring over a division ring D, where both n and D are uniquely determined.[1]

Theorem edit

Let R be a (Artinian) semisimple ring. Then the Wedderburn–Artin theorem states that R is isomorphic to a product of finitely many ni-by-ni matrix rings   over division rings Di, for some integers ni, both of which are uniquely determined up to permutation of the index i.

There is also a version of the Wedderburn–Artin theorem for algebras over a field k. If R is a finite-dimensional semisimple k-algebra, then each Di in the above statement is a finite-dimensional division algebra over k. The center of each Di need not be k; it could be a finite extension of k.

Note that if R is a finite-dimensional simple algebra over a division ring E, D need not be contained in E. For example, matrix rings over the complex numbers are finite-dimensional simple algebras over the real numbers.

Proof edit

There are various proofs of the Wedderburn–Artin theorem.[2][3] A common modern one[4] takes the following approach.

Suppose the ring   is semisimple. Then the right  -module   is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of simple modules (which are the same as minimal right ideals of  ). Write this direct sum as

 

where the   are mutually nonisomorphic simple right  -modules, the ith one appearing with multiplicity  . This gives an isomorphism of endomorphism rings

 

and we can identify   with a ring of matrices

 

where the endomorphism ring   of   is a division ring by Schur's lemma, because   is simple. Since   we conclude

 

Here we used right modules because  ; if we used left modules   would be isomorphic to the opposite algebra of  , but the proof would still go through. To see this proof in a larger context, see Decomposition of a module. For the proof of an important special case, see Simple Artinian ring.

Consequences edit

Since a finite-dimensional algebra over a field is Artinian, the Wedderburn–Artin theorem implies that every finite-dimensional simple algebra over a field is isomorphic to an n-by-n matrix ring over some finite-dimensional division algebra D over  , where both n and D are uniquely determined.[1] This was shown by Joseph Wedderburn. Emil Artin later generalized this result to the case of simple left or right Artinian rings.

Since the only finite-dimensional division algebra over an algebraically closed field is the field itself, the Wedderburn–Artin theorem has strong consequences in this case. Let R be a semisimple ring that is a finite-dimensional algebra over an algebraically closed field  . Then R is a finite product   where the   are positive integers and   is the algebra of   matrices over  .

Furthermore, the Wedderburn–Artin theorem reduces the problem of classifying finite-dimensional central simple algebras over a field   to the problem of classifying finite-dimensional central division algebras over  : that is, division algebras over   whose center is  . It implies that any finite-dimensional central simple algebra over   is isomorphic to a matrix algebra   where   is a finite-dimensional central division algebra over  .

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ By the definition used here, semisimple rings are automatically Artinian rings. However, some authors use "semisimple" differently, to mean that the ring has a trivial Jacobson radical. For Artinian rings, the two notions are equivalent, so "Artinian" is included here to eliminate that ambiguity.

Citations edit

References edit

  • Beachy, John A. (1999). Introductory Lectures on Rings and Modules. Cambridge University Press. p. 156. ISBN 978-0-521-64407-5.
  • Cohn, P. M. (2003). Basic Algebra: Groups, Rings, and Fields. pp. 137–139.
  • Henderson, D.W. (1965). "A short proof of Wedderburn's theorem". The American Mathematical Monthly. 72 (4): 385–386. doi:10.2307/2313499. JSTOR 2313499.
  • Nicholson, William K. (1993). "A short proof of the Wedderburn–Artin theorem" (PDF). New Zealand J. Math. 22: 83–86.
  • Wedderburn, J.H.M. (1908). "On Hypercomplex Numbers". Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. 6: 77–118. doi:10.1112/plms/s2-6.1.77.
  • Artin, E. (1927). "Zur Theorie der hyperkomplexen Zahlen". Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg. 5: 251–260. doi:10.1007/BF02952526. JFM 53.0114.03.

wedderburn, artin, theorem, algebra, classification, theorem, semisimple, rings, semisimple, algebras, theorem, states, that, artinian, semisimple, ring, isomorphic, product, finitely, many, matrix, rings, over, division, rings, some, integers, both, which, un. In algebra the Wedderburn Artin theorem is a classification theorem for semisimple rings and semisimple algebras The theorem states that an Artinian a semisimple ring R is isomorphic to a product of finitely many ni by ni matrix rings over division rings Di for some integers ni both of which are uniquely determined up to permutation of the index i In particular any simple left or right Artinian ring is isomorphic to an n by n matrix ring over a division ring D where both n and D are uniquely determined 1 Contents 1 Theorem 2 Proof 3 Consequences 4 See also 5 Notes 6 Citations 7 ReferencesTheorem editLet R be a Artinian semisimple ring Then the Wedderburn Artin theorem states that R is isomorphic to a product of finitely many ni by ni matrix rings M n i D i displaystyle M n i D i nbsp over division rings Di for some integers ni both of which are uniquely determined up to permutation of the index i There is also a version of the Wedderburn Artin theorem for algebras over a field k If R is a finite dimensional semisimple k algebra then each Di in the above statement is a finite dimensional division algebra over k The center of each Di need not be k it could be a finite extension of k Note that if R is a finite dimensional simple algebra over a division ring E D need not be contained in E For example matrix rings over the complex numbers are finite dimensional simple algebras over the real numbers Proof editThere are various proofs of the Wedderburn Artin theorem 2 3 A common modern one 4 takes the following approach Suppose the ring R displaystyle R nbsp is semisimple Then the right R displaystyle R nbsp module R R displaystyle R R nbsp is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of simple modules which are the same as minimal right ideals of R displaystyle R nbsp Write this direct sum as R R i 1 m I i n i displaystyle R R cong bigoplus i 1 m I i oplus n i nbsp where the I i displaystyle I i nbsp are mutually nonisomorphic simple right R displaystyle R nbsp modules the i th one appearing with multiplicity n i displaystyle n i nbsp This gives an isomorphism of endomorphism rings E n d R R i 1 m E n d I i n i displaystyle mathrm End R R cong bigoplus i 1 m mathrm End big I i oplus n i big nbsp and we can identify E n d I i n i displaystyle mathrm End big I i oplus n i big nbsp with a ring of matrices E n d I i n i M n i E n d I i displaystyle mathrm End big I i oplus n i big cong M n i big mathrm End I i big nbsp where the endomorphism ring E n d I i displaystyle mathrm End I i nbsp of I i displaystyle I i nbsp is a division ring by Schur s lemma because I i displaystyle I i nbsp is simple Since R E n d R R displaystyle R cong mathrm End R R nbsp we conclude R i 1 m M n i E n d I i displaystyle R cong bigoplus i 1 m M n i big mathrm End I i big nbsp Here we used right modules because R E n d R R displaystyle R cong mathrm End R R nbsp if we used left modules R displaystyle R nbsp would be isomorphic to the opposite algebra of E n d R R displaystyle mathrm End R R nbsp but the proof would still go through To see this proof in a larger context see Decomposition of a module For the proof of an important special case see Simple Artinian ring Consequences editSince a finite dimensional algebra over a field is Artinian the Wedderburn Artin theorem implies that every finite dimensional simple algebra over a field is isomorphic to an n by n matrix ring over some finite dimensional division algebra D over k displaystyle k nbsp where both n and D are uniquely determined 1 This was shown by Joseph Wedderburn Emil Artin later generalized this result to the case of simple left or right Artinian rings Since the only finite dimensional division algebra over an algebraically closed field is the field itself the Wedderburn Artin theorem has strong consequences in this case Let R be a semisimple ring that is a finite dimensional algebra over an algebraically closed field k displaystyle k nbsp Then R is a finite product i 1 r M n i k displaystyle textstyle prod i 1 r M n i k nbsp where the n i displaystyle n i nbsp are positive integers and M n i k displaystyle M n i k nbsp is the algebra of n i n i displaystyle n i times n i nbsp matrices over k displaystyle k nbsp Furthermore the Wedderburn Artin theorem reduces the problem of classifying finite dimensional central simple algebras over a field k displaystyle k nbsp to the problem of classifying finite dimensional central division algebras over k displaystyle k nbsp that is division algebras over k displaystyle k nbsp whose center is k displaystyle k nbsp It implies that any finite dimensional central simple algebra over k displaystyle k nbsp is isomorphic to a matrix algebra M n D displaystyle textstyle M n D nbsp where D displaystyle D nbsp is a finite dimensional central division algebra over k displaystyle k nbsp See also editMaschke s theorem Brauer group Jacobson density theorem Hypercomplex number Emil Artin Joseph WedderburnNotes edit By the definition used here semisimple rings are automatically Artinian rings However some authors use semisimple differently to mean that the ring has a trivial Jacobson radical For Artinian rings the two notions are equivalent so Artinian is included here to eliminate that ambiguity Citations edit a b Beachy 1999 Henderson 1965 Nicholson 1993 Cohn 2003References editBeachy John A 1999 Introductory Lectures on Rings and Modules Cambridge University Press p 156 ISBN 978 0 521 64407 5 Cohn P M 2003 Basic Algebra Groups Rings and Fields pp 137 139 Henderson D W 1965 A short proof of Wedderburn s theorem The American Mathematical Monthly 72 4 385 386 doi 10 2307 2313499 JSTOR 2313499 Nicholson William K 1993 A short proof of the Wedderburn Artin theorem PDF New Zealand J Math 22 83 86 Wedderburn J H M 1908 On Hypercomplex Numbers Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 6 77 118 doi 10 1112 plms s2 6 1 77 Artin E 1927 Zur Theorie der hyperkomplexen Zahlen Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universitat Hamburg 5 251 260 doi 10 1007 BF02952526 JFM 53 0114 03 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Wedderburn Artin theorem amp oldid 1222279214, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.