fbpx
Wikipedia

2020 Missouri Amendment 2

2020 Missouri Amendment 2, also known as the Medicaid Expansion Initiative, was a ballot measure to amend the Constitution of Missouri to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. The initiative was on the August 4, 2020 primary ballot and passed with 53.27% of the vote.[1] Following similar successful ballot initiatives in other states, Republican lawmakers added work requirements to Medicaid expansions, which supporters aimed to prevent through proposing state constitutional amendments for future Medicaid expansions. Opponents sued to prevent the measure from being voted on, but courts ruled in favor of it. The measure was supported most in urban areas and opposed by conservatives. After a delay due to a lack of funding and resulting litigation, the initiative was implemented in October 2021. Implementation was slow and Republican lawmakers attempted to roll back the program and add a work requirement through a state constitutional amendment, which failed after a related Supreme Court decision seemed to prevent its implementation.

Constitutional Amendment 2
Medicaid Expansion Initiative
Results
Choice
Votes %
Yes 676,687 53.27%
No 593,491 46.73%
Total votes 1,270,178 100.00%
Source: Missouri Secretary of State,[1] The New York Times[2]

Background

The Affordable Care Act, passed in 2010, initially required states to expand Medicaid coverage to continue receiving federal Medicaid funding, but the Supreme Court ruled in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius that it would be unconstitutional to remove funding from states which did not wish to opt in.[3] In 2018, the Fairness Project supported successful ballot initiatives to expand Medicaid in conservative states such as Nebraska, Utah, and Idaho, where Republican leaders were unwilling to. However, Nebraska and Utah added a work requirement despite such a requirement not being part of the ballot initiative.[4][5] Due to such resistance from Republican lawmakers, Medicaid expansion supporters began supporting constitutional amendment proposals to prevent similar restrictions from being implemented.[4]

After a petition gained 346,000 signatures, Governor Mike Parson scheduled the initiative to appear on the August primary ballot.[6] United for Missouri and the Missouri branch of Americans for Prosperity filed lawsuits to prevent the expansion from appearing on the ballot, arguing the initiative violated a constitutional requirement to cite a funding source in ballot initiatives. The Cole County Circuit Court ruled in favor of the proposal, stating the initiative itself does not fund anything.[6][7] They appealed the decision, additionally arguing that it violated a constitutional requirement that all petitions for ballot initiatives must contain the initiative's full text. On June 8, 2020, the Western District Missouri Court of Appeals unanimously upheld the lower court's ruling, allowing the initiative to remain on the ballot.[6][7]

Contents

The amendment appeared on the ballot as follows:[8]

Do you want to amend the Missouri Constitution to:

  • adopt Medicaid Expansion for persons 19 to 64 years old with an income level at or below 133% of the federal poverty level, as set forth in the Affordable Care Act;
  • prohibit placing greater or additional burdens on eligibility or enrollment standards, methodologies or practices on persons covered under Medicaid Expansion than on any other population eligible for Medicaid; and
  • require state agencies to take all actions necessary to maximize federal financial participation in funding medical assistance under Medicaid Expansion?

State government entities are estimated to have one-time costs of approximately $6.4 million and an unknown annual net fiscal impact by 2026 ranging from increased costs of at least $200 million to savings of $1 billion. Local governments expect costs to decrease by an unknown amount.

The deadline for the state to implement the specified Medicaid expansion would be July 1, 2021.[6]

Campaign

The initiative was campaigned for by YES on 2, which was supported by the Missouri Chamber of Commerce, the Missouri Hospital Association, the NAACP, the AARP, the AFL-CIO, and Catholic Charities of St. Louis, among others.[5] The YES on 2 campaign rarely mentioned Obamacare, a law unpopular in the state, and some campaign material did not refer to a "Medicaid expansion".[5] Instead, supporters noted the federal funding the state's rural hospitals would receive as a result of the proposal's passage and stated it would prevent more hospitals from closing, as 15 in the state had done since 2014.[6][9] Supporters said most hospital closures were in states which did not opt into the Medicaid expansion.[6]

No on 2 in August campaigned against the initiative. The initiative was opposed by state Republican politicians such as Governor Mike Parson, who stated that the state could not afford its share of the Medicaid expansion's cost.[9] Other groups opposing the initiative included Missouri Right to Life, the Missouri Farm Bureau, and Americans for Prosperity.[5] Other conservatives and opponents said that at the time, Medicaid had taken up 40 percent of the state budget and noted that the state requires its budget to be balanced, so the cost of the expansion would need to come from other state programs such as education.[5][6] Prior to the vote, No on 2 in August mailed campaign material suggesting illegal immigrants would come to the state looking for Medicaid coverage, despite them not being elgible for Medicaid.[5]

Democrats accused Governor Parson of scheduling the vote for the August primary elections instead of the higher-turnout general election to prevent the proposal from passing. Parson stated he scheduled it in August to allow the state to understand, as soon as possible, whether it would need to account for extra spending in its budget assuming the initiative passes.[6][9]

Results

The measure was approved with 53% of the vote. Support was most heavily concentrated in urban areas while conservative, rural areas voted against the measure, including in counties with large numbers of uninsured residents.[5] It has been cited as an example of the popularity of Medicaid expansion, occurring weeks following the success of a similar ballot initiative in Oklahoma.[9]

Constitutional Amendment 2[1]
Choice Votes %
  Yes 676,687 53.27
No 593,491 46.73
Total votes 1,270,178 100.00

Aftermath

In 2021, Governor Parson claimed the state legislature refused to fund the expansion in that year's state budget so it would not be implemented by the July 1 deadline.[10][11] The state was then sued for not complying with the results of the ballot initiative. The initiative itself was ruled unconstitutional by a Cole County Circuit Court judge before being appealed to the Missouri Supreme Court, which overturned the lower court's ruling in a 7–0 decision.[11][12]

Enrollment in the Medicaid expansion began in October 2021, with Missouri becoming the 38th state to opt into the Medicaid expansion.[13] Implementation was slow, with only 7% of newly eligible Missourians enrolling in the expansion's first month, compared to about half in Idaho and Montana. The state's outreach efforts regarding the expansion had been much slower than in other states such as Oklahoma.[14] In early 2022, the state found it was taking 70 days to process an average Medicaid application, even though federal law mandated wait times be under 45 days.[15]

In 2022, state Republican lawmakers proposed a constitutional amendment to allow the state legislature to decide how much it could fund the expansion and to implement a work requirement for it, claiming increases in the state's Medicaid budget following the passage of the initiative are unsustainable.[16][17] However, after a Supreme Court decision which seemed to prevent the state from being allowed to enforce a work requirement, Republicans gave up on the proposed amendment.[18]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c "All Results 2020 Primary 8/4/2020" (PDF). Missouri Secretary of State. (PDF) from the original on November 26, 2020. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  2. ^ "Live Results: Missouri Medicaid Expansion Amendment". The New York Times. August 7, 2020. from the original on November 27, 2020. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  3. ^ Edquist, David J.; Mark, Jeffrey E. (June 29, 2012). "Analysis: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds the Affordable Care Act: Roberts Rules?". National Law Review. National Law Forum. from the original on April 6, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  4. ^ a b Kiff, Sarah (August 4, 2020). "How Progressives Flipped the Script on Medicaid Expansion". The New York Times. from the original on April 10, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g Smith, Alex (August 5, 2020). "Missouri Voters Approve Medicaid Expansion Despite Resistance From Republican Leaders". NPR. from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h Gerber, Cameron (August 3, 2020). "Amendment 2, Medicaid expansion, explained". The Missouri Times. from the original on May 25, 2022. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  7. ^ a b Greber, Cameron (June 8, 2020). "Medicaid expansion ballot measure allowed to continue after appeals court ruling". The Missouri Times. from the original on June 29, 2022. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  8. ^ Ashcroft, John R. (June 13, 2019). "2020 Initiative Petitions Approved for Circulation in Missouri". Missouri Secretary of State. Missouri Secretary of State. from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  9. ^ a b c d Rouebin, Rachel (August 5, 2020). "Missouri voters latest to approve Medicaid expansion". Politico. from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  10. ^ McCausland, Phil (May 13, 2021). "Missouri governor won't fund Medicaid expansion, flouting state Constitution and voters". NBC News. NBCUniversal. from the original on December 23, 2022. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  11. ^ a b Luhby, Tami (June 23, 2021). "Judge blocks Medicaid expansion in Missouri". CNN. Cable News Network. from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  12. ^ Luhby, Tami (July 22, 2021). "Missouri Supreme Court rules in favor of Medicaid expansion". CNN. Cable News Network. from the original on August 8, 2022. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  13. ^ Desjardins, Lisa (October 15, 2021). "Missouri's Medicaid expansion aims to benefit low-income workers, but sign-ups still lag". PBS Newshour. Public Broadcasting Service. from the original on May 7, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  14. ^ Kaiser Health News (December 3, 2021). "A Tale of Two Medicaid Expansions: Oklahoma Jumps in, While Missouri Lags". U.S. News & World Report. from the original on January 23, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  15. ^ Sable-Smith, Baram; Galewitz, Phil (February 18, 2022). "Missouri takes months to process Medicaid applications, longer than federal law allows". St. Louis Public Radio. National Public Radio. from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  16. ^ Duclos, Danielle (February 7, 2022). "Proposed constitutional amendment could reverse Medicaid expansion". The Columbia Missourian. from the original on March 10, 2022. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  17. ^ Keller, Rudi (April 13, 2022). "Senate committee approves bill that could overturn Missouri Medicaid expansion". The Missouri Independent. from the original on May 7, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  18. ^ Erickson, Kurt (April 18, 2022). "Supreme Court decision may kill Missouri GOP attempt to dump Medicaid expansion". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. from the original on May 12, 2022. Retrieved May 7, 2023.

External links

  • , which campaigned in favor of the initiative.
  • , which campaigned against the initiative.
  • 2020 Missouri Amendment 2 at Ballotpedia

2020, missouri, amendment, also, known, medicaid, expansion, initiative, ballot, measure, amend, constitution, missouri, expand, medicaid, under, affordable, care, initiative, august, 2020, primary, ballot, passed, with, vote, following, similar, successful, b. 2020 Missouri Amendment 2 also known as the Medicaid Expansion Initiative was a ballot measure to amend the Constitution of Missouri to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act The initiative was on the August 4 2020 primary ballot and passed with 53 27 of the vote 1 Following similar successful ballot initiatives in other states Republican lawmakers added work requirements to Medicaid expansions which supporters aimed to prevent through proposing state constitutional amendments for future Medicaid expansions Opponents sued to prevent the measure from being voted on but courts ruled in favor of it The measure was supported most in urban areas and opposed by conservatives After a delay due to a lack of funding and resulting litigation the initiative was implemented in October 2021 Implementation was slow and Republican lawmakers attempted to roll back the program and add a work requirement through a state constitutional amendment which failed after a related Supreme Court decision seemed to prevent its implementation Constitutional Amendment 2Medicaid Expansion InitiativeResultsChoice Votes Yes 676 687 53 27 No 593 491 46 73 Total votes 1 270 178 100 00 Yes 80 90 70 80 60 70 50 60 No 80 90 70 80 60 70 50 60 Source Missouri Secretary of State 1 The New York Times 2 Contents 1 Background 2 Contents 3 Campaign 4 Results 5 Aftermath 6 See also 7 References 8 External linksBackground EditThe Affordable Care Act passed in 2010 initially required states to expand Medicaid coverage to continue receiving federal Medicaid funding but the Supreme Court ruled in National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius that it would be unconstitutional to remove funding from states which did not wish to opt in 3 In 2018 the Fairness Project supported successful ballot initiatives to expand Medicaid in conservative states such as Nebraska Utah and Idaho where Republican leaders were unwilling to However Nebraska and Utah added a work requirement despite such a requirement not being part of the ballot initiative 4 5 Due to such resistance from Republican lawmakers Medicaid expansion supporters began supporting constitutional amendment proposals to prevent similar restrictions from being implemented 4 After a petition gained 346 000 signatures Governor Mike Parson scheduled the initiative to appear on the August primary ballot 6 United for Missouri and the Missouri branch of Americans for Prosperity filed lawsuits to prevent the expansion from appearing on the ballot arguing the initiative violated a constitutional requirement to cite a funding source in ballot initiatives The Cole County Circuit Court ruled in favor of the proposal stating the initiative itself does not fund anything 6 7 They appealed the decision additionally arguing that it violated a constitutional requirement that all petitions for ballot initiatives must contain the initiative s full text On June 8 2020 the Western District Missouri Court of Appeals unanimously upheld the lower court s ruling allowing the initiative to remain on the ballot 6 7 Contents EditThe amendment appeared on the ballot as follows 8 Do you want to amend the Missouri Constitution to adopt Medicaid Expansion for persons 19 to 64 years old with an income level at or below 133 of the federal poverty level as set forth in the Affordable Care Act prohibit placing greater or additional burdens on eligibility or enrollment standards methodologies or practices on persons covered under Medicaid Expansion than on any other population eligible for Medicaid and require state agencies to take all actions necessary to maximize federal financial participation in funding medical assistance under Medicaid Expansion State government entities are estimated to have one time costs of approximately 6 4 million and an unknown annual net fiscal impact by 2026 ranging from increased costs of at least 200 million to savings of 1 billion Local governments expect costs to decrease by an unknown amount The deadline for the state to implement the specified Medicaid expansion would be July 1 2021 6 Campaign EditThe initiative was campaigned for by YES on 2 which was supported by the Missouri Chamber of Commerce the Missouri Hospital Association the NAACP the AARP the AFL CIO and Catholic Charities of St Louis among others 5 The YES on 2 campaign rarely mentioned Obamacare a law unpopular in the state and some campaign material did not refer to a Medicaid expansion 5 Instead supporters noted the federal funding the state s rural hospitals would receive as a result of the proposal s passage and stated it would prevent more hospitals from closing as 15 in the state had done since 2014 6 9 Supporters said most hospital closures were in states which did not opt into the Medicaid expansion 6 No on 2 in August campaigned against the initiative The initiative was opposed by state Republican politicians such as Governor Mike Parson who stated that the state could not afford its share of the Medicaid expansion s cost 9 Other groups opposing the initiative included Missouri Right to Life the Missouri Farm Bureau and Americans for Prosperity 5 Other conservatives and opponents said that at the time Medicaid had taken up 40 percent of the state budget and noted that the state requires its budget to be balanced so the cost of the expansion would need to come from other state programs such as education 5 6 Prior to the vote No on 2 in August mailed campaign material suggesting illegal immigrants would come to the state looking for Medicaid coverage despite them not being elgible for Medicaid 5 Democrats accused Governor Parson of scheduling the vote for the August primary elections instead of the higher turnout general election to prevent the proposal from passing Parson stated he scheduled it in August to allow the state to understand as soon as possible whether it would need to account for extra spending in its budget assuming the initiative passes 6 9 Results EditThe measure was approved with 53 of the vote Support was most heavily concentrated in urban areas while conservative rural areas voted against the measure including in counties with large numbers of uninsured residents 5 It has been cited as an example of the popularity of Medicaid expansion occurring weeks following the success of a similar ballot initiative in Oklahoma 9 Constitutional Amendment 2 1 Choice Votes Yes 676 687 53 27No 593 491 46 73Total votes 1 270 178 100 00Aftermath EditIn 2021 Governor Parson claimed the state legislature refused to fund the expansion in that year s state budget so it would not be implemented by the July 1 deadline 10 11 The state was then sued for not complying with the results of the ballot initiative The initiative itself was ruled unconstitutional by a Cole County Circuit Court judge before being appealed to the Missouri Supreme Court which overturned the lower court s ruling in a 7 0 decision 11 12 Enrollment in the Medicaid expansion began in October 2021 with Missouri becoming the 38th state to opt into the Medicaid expansion 13 Implementation was slow with only 7 of newly eligible Missourians enrolling in the expansion s first month compared to about half in Idaho and Montana The state s outreach efforts regarding the expansion had been much slower than in other states such as Oklahoma 14 In early 2022 the state found it was taking 70 days to process an average Medicaid application even though federal law mandated wait times be under 45 days 15 In 2022 state Republican lawmakers proposed a constitutional amendment to allow the state legislature to decide how much it could fund the expansion and to implement a work requirement for it claiming increases in the state s Medicaid budget following the passage of the initiative are unsustainable 16 17 However after a Supreme Court decision which seemed to prevent the state from being allowed to enforce a work requirement Republicans gave up on the proposed amendment 18 See also EditList of Missouri ballot measures 2020 Missouri electionsReferences Edit a b c All Results 2020 Primary 8 4 2020 PDF Missouri Secretary of State Archived PDF from the original on November 26 2020 Retrieved December 3 2020 Live Results Missouri Medicaid Expansion Amendment The New York Times August 7 2020 Archived from the original on November 27 2020 Retrieved December 3 2020 Edquist David J Mark Jeffrey E June 29 2012 Analysis U S Supreme Court Upholds the Affordable Care Act Roberts Rules National Law Review National Law Forum Archived from the original on April 6 2023 Retrieved May 7 2023 a b Kiff Sarah August 4 2020 How Progressives Flipped the Script on Medicaid Expansion The New York Times Archived from the original on April 10 2023 Retrieved May 7 2023 a b c d e f g Smith Alex August 5 2020 Missouri Voters Approve Medicaid Expansion Despite Resistance From Republican Leaders NPR Archived from the original on November 15 2020 Retrieved May 7 2023 a b c d e f g h Gerber Cameron August 3 2020 Amendment 2 Medicaid expansion explained The Missouri Times Archived from the original on May 25 2022 Retrieved May 7 2023 a b Greber Cameron June 8 2020 Medicaid expansion ballot measure allowed to continue after appeals court ruling The Missouri Times Archived from the original on June 29 2022 Retrieved May 7 2023 Ashcroft John R June 13 2019 2020 Initiative Petitions Approved for Circulation in Missouri Missouri Secretary of State Missouri Secretary of State Archived from the original on November 20 2020 Retrieved December 3 2020 a b c d Rouebin Rachel August 5 2020 Missouri voters latest to approve Medicaid expansion Politico Archived from the original on February 3 2023 Retrieved May 7 2023 McCausland Phil May 13 2021 Missouri governor won t fund Medicaid expansion flouting state Constitution and voters NBC News NBCUniversal Archived from the original on December 23 2022 Retrieved May 7 2023 a b Luhby Tami June 23 2021 Judge blocks Medicaid expansion in Missouri CNN Cable News Network Archived from the original on August 14 2022 Retrieved May 7 2023 Luhby Tami July 22 2021 Missouri Supreme Court rules in favor of Medicaid expansion CNN Cable News Network Archived from the original on August 8 2022 Retrieved May 7 2023 Desjardins Lisa October 15 2021 Missouri s Medicaid expansion aims to benefit low income workers but sign ups still lag PBS Newshour Public Broadcasting Service Archived from the original on May 7 2023 Retrieved May 7 2023 Kaiser Health News December 3 2021 A Tale of Two Medicaid Expansions Oklahoma Jumps in While Missouri Lags U S News amp World Report Archived from the original on January 23 2023 Retrieved May 7 2023 Sable Smith Baram Galewitz Phil February 18 2022 Missouri takes months to process Medicaid applications longer than federal law allows St Louis Public Radio National Public Radio Archived from the original on February 6 2023 Retrieved May 7 2023 Duclos Danielle February 7 2022 Proposed constitutional amendment could reverse Medicaid expansion The Columbia Missourian Archived from the original on March 10 2022 Retrieved May 7 2023 Keller Rudi April 13 2022 Senate committee approves bill that could overturn Missouri Medicaid expansion The Missouri Independent Archived from the original on May 7 2023 Retrieved May 7 2023 Erickson Kurt April 18 2022 Supreme Court decision may kill Missouri GOP attempt to dump Medicaid expansion St Louis Post Dispatch Archived from the original on May 12 2022 Retrieved May 7 2023 External links EditYES on 2 archived which campaigned in favor of the initiative No on 2 in August archived which campaigned against the initiative 2020 Missouri Amendment 2 at Ballotpedia Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title 2020 Missouri Amendment 2 amp oldid 1154843688, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.