fbpx
Wikipedia

2000 Arizona Democratic presidential primary

In March 2000 the Arizona Democratic Party ran its Presidential Primary over the internet using the private company Election.com.[1] The announcement received significant press coverage around the world, covered in virtually every country and medium as a test of whether internet voting could actually work in a statewide election.[2]

2000 Arizona Democratic presidential primary

← 1996 March 11, 2000 (2000-03-11) 2004 →
← UT
MI →

29 delegates to the Democratic National Convention (24 pledged, 5 unpledged)
The number of pledged delegates received is determined by the popular vote
 
Candidate Al Gore Bill Bradley
(withdrawn)
Home state Tennessee New Jersey
Delegate count 40 7
Popular vote 67,582 16,383
Percentage 77.89% 18.88%

Voting Rights Act lawsuits edit

Several attempts were made to stop the election, including a lawsuit instigated by the Virginia-based Voting Integrity Project,[3] which claimed that Internet voting would disadvantage African Americans, Latinos, and Native Americans, all protected classes under the Voting Rights Act. The Voting Integrity Project, along with two African American and two Hispanic plaintiffs, claimed that by allowing Internet voting, minority groups, which at that time had less access to the internet, would have their collective voting power proportionately reduced.[4] The plaintiff's sought an injunction to stop the election.[5] The lawsuit, along with other factors, was depleting the resources of the Arizona Democratic Party. The court had to determine if the voting rights act applied, since this election was being conducted by the Democratic Party itself, not the state or country government; the plaintiff's argued it was. The court also had to decide if the election was unfairly diluting the minority vote, given the plaintiffs' claims that whites were more likely to vote over the internet than non-whites. Several organizations filed amicus briefs in support of the Democratic Party and the Internet election, including the Benjamin E. Mayes National Education Resource Center, the Center of Government Studies, and Professor Charles Nesson of Harvard Law School.[6] On March 2, 2000 Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt, of the United States District Court in Phoenix, issued its decision. While the court agreed with the plaintiffs that this was a public election,[7] it also noted in its decision that there were other ways to vote, including absentee ballot by mail, and voting at polling places, and thus there was no basis to stop the election. The court denied the request for an injunction to stop the election.[7][8]

Civil rights concerns edit

Serious concerns about internet were also raised by civil rights organizations around the United States.[9][10] Native American support is particularly important in Arizona, where they numbered more than 250,000.[11] The states two most prominent leaders were Apache leader John Lewis, president of the Inter-Tribal Counsel, and Kelsey A. Begaye President of the Navajo Nation. The outreach efforts by Election.com CEO, Joe Mohen, and the Arizona Democratic Party to Native Americans were particularly successful, such that the Voting Integrity Project was unable to recruit even one Native American to be a plaintiff in their case, and The Navajo leadership, including President Kelsey Begaye, prominent Native American leaders posed for Television Cameras when they later voted over the internet.[12]

On February 24, 2000, the Department of Justice granted pre-clearance for the election.[13][14]

Security threats edit

Many public threats by hackers were made that they would bring down the election. These threats ranged from to denial of service attacks[15] and voter identity theft. The election software was audited by KPMG.[16] While the original plan was to use VeriSign digital certificates,[17] though ultimately PINs were mailed to each voter and a challenge–response authentication system (such as birth date, place of birth, or social security number) was used as well.[18] One magazine columnist, Howard Mortman, even hired a computer hacker to attempt to disrupt the election.[19]

Voting period edit

The week of the election, online voting was allowed beginning Tuesday March 7 through Friday March 10.[20] The following Saturday March 11, voting would be allowed at Polling Places only, through personal computers.[21] There were some minor problems, in that a few polling places did not open on schedule, and some users with older browsers could not vote.[22] The election went off successfully, with voter turnout increasing more than 500%[23] over the 1996 Primary.[24] Contrary to expectations, Native American turnout also increased more than 500% and African American and Latino turnout both went up more than 800%,[citation needed] defying those who claimed that minorities would not use the internet to cast votes. The results were certified by the State Board of Elections.[25] There were many other "firsts"; news footage showing a middle-aged quadriplegic man in Arizona who cast his first unassisted, secret ballot using the Internet.[26] election.com reported no hacking during the election.[27][28] Shortly after, Mohen was featured on the cover of the Industry Standard Magazine.[29]

Results edit

2000 Arizona Democratic presidential primary
Candidate Vote[30] Pledged
delegates[31]
# %
Al Gore 67,582 77.89% 40
Bill Bradley (withdrawn) 16,383 18.88% 7
Uncommitted 1,439 1.66% 0
Heather A. Harder 1,358 1.57% 0
Total valid votes 86,762 100% 47

Ongoing debate edit

The Arizona Democratic primary has been called the "first legally binding public election to offer internet voting".[32][33] However, the Arizona Democratic Party and the private company administering the election argued in federal court that it was a private election outside of federal jurisdiction.[34] Still others, such as the Internet Policy Institute, have classified the primary, as a "hybrid between public and private elections... not run by state election officials, but were still subject to some aspects of state and federal election law."[35] And there were some glitches such as that certain Macintosh browsers did not work.[36] Nonetheless, the 2000 Arizona Internet vote was hailed worldwide as a landmark case of using the Internet at a major election.[37]

References edit

  1. ^ "Arizona Democratic Party Selects Votation.com to Hold World's First Legally-Binding Public Election Over the Internet". Business Wire. December 16, 1999. Retrieved 2009-05-21.
  2. ^ Berman, Dennis (February 28, 2000). . BusinessWeek. Archived from the original on October 11, 2008. Retrieved May 22, 2009.
  3. ^ Fairley Raney, Rebecca (January 22, 2000). "Suit Seeks to Block Net Vote in Arizona". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  4. ^ . Reuters. CNN. November 1, 2000. Archived from the original on April 12, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  5. ^ U.S. Department of State Web Site Report to Congress
  6. ^ Memorandum and Order by Judge Paul Rosenblatt, March 2, 2000, Voting Integrity Project, Lucious Bain, et al, vs. Mark Fleisher and the Arizona Democratic Party, US District Court, District of Arizona, Page 17
  7. ^ a b Memorandum and Order by Judge Paul Rosenblatt, March 2, 2000, Voting Integrity Project, Lucious Bain, et al, vs. Mark Fleisher and the Arizona Democratic Party, US District Court, District of Arizona
  8. ^ Fairley Raney, Rebecca (March 1, 2000). "Judge Lets Internet Primary in Arizona Proceed". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  9. ^ Wilhelm, Anthony, Digital Nation: Towards and Inclusive Society, MIT Press, 2004, pages 67-73
  10. ^ De la Garza, Rodolfo, and DeSipio, Louis, Muted Voices, Latinos and the 2000 Elections, Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, pages 151-153
  11. ^ References 2000 Census 2009-05-31 at the Wayback Machine
  12. ^ Jones, Jeff (March 10, 2000). . Gallup Independent. Archived from the original on October 7, 2008. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  13. ^ Jacobus, Patricia (February 25, 2000). "DOJ gives OK to Arizona online primary vote". CNET Networks. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  14. ^ Letter from Joseph Rich, Chief of the Voting Section of the Department of Justice, to Joseph Sandler, Sandler and Reiff, and the Arizona Democratic Party, dated February 24,2 2000
  15. ^ PBS NewsHour
  16. ^ Anderiesz, Mike; SA Mathieson (June 7, 2001). "Click here for your candidate". The Guardian. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  17. ^ Jack, Jack (December 16, 1999). . Jack. PC World. Archived from the original on June 6, 2011. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  18. ^ Mohen, Joe. "The Fine Points of Online Voting". BusinessWeek. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  19. ^ Ledbetter, James (2000-03-10). . The Industry Standard. Archived from the original on 25 June 2001. Retrieved 17 March 2017.
  20. ^ Wilhelm, Anthony, Digital Nation: Toward and Inclusive Information Society, MIT Press 2004, pages 67-73
  21. ^ Avaliktos, Neal (2004). The Election Process Revisited. New York: Nova Publishers. ISBN 1-59454-054-3.
  22. ^ Slate
  23. ^ BNET Australia
  24. ^ Lee, Lydia (March 20, 2000). . Salon.com. Archived from the original on May 13, 2008. Retrieved May 22, 2009.
  25. ^ Garson, David, Handbook of Public Information Systems, CRC Press, 2005 Page 266
  26. ^ Info Sentry
  27. ^ University of Vermont Legislative Research
  28. ^ Mohen, Joe; Julia Glidden (January 2001). "The case for internet voting" (PDF). Communications of the ACM. 44 (1): 72. doi:10.1145/357489.357511. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  29. ^ Ledbetter, James (2000-03-27). "Net Out the Vote". The Industry Standard. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  30. ^ "2000 Presidential Democratic Primary Election Results - Arizona". uselectionatlas.org. Retrieved September 7, 2020.
  31. ^ "Arizona Democrat Delegation 2000". www.thegreenpapers.com. Retrieved 2020-09-07.
  32. ^ Thinking Outside the Ballot Box, Lippert and Ojumu, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing page 60
  33. ^ World Almanac for Kids
  34. ^ Voting Integrity Project v Fleisher, cv 00-109-PHX
  35. ^ Report of the National Workshop for Internet Voting, sponsored by the National Science Foundation[permanent dead link]
  36. ^ Internet Voting in Practice 2010-01-25 at the Wayback Machine University of North Carolina
  37. ^ Australian Electoral Commission

2000, arizona, democratic, presidential, primary, further, information, electronic, voting, online, voting, electronic, voting, united, states, 2000, united, states, presidential, election, march, 2000, arizona, democratic, party, presidential, primary, over, . Further information Electronic voting Online voting Electronic voting in the United States and 2000 United States presidential election In March 2000 the Arizona Democratic Party ran its Presidential Primary over the internet using the private company Election com 1 The announcement received significant press coverage around the world covered in virtually every country and medium as a test of whether internet voting could actually work in a statewide election 2 2000 Arizona Democratic presidential primary 1996 March 11 2000 2000 03 11 2004 UTMI 29 delegates to the Democratic National Convention 24 pledged 5 unpledged The number of pledged delegates received is determined by the popular vote Candidate Al Gore Bill Bradley withdrawn Home state Tennessee New JerseyDelegate count 40 7Popular vote 67 582 16 383Percentage 77 89 18 88 Contents 1 Voting Rights Act lawsuits 2 Civil rights concerns 3 Security threats 4 Voting period 5 Results 6 Ongoing debate 7 ReferencesVoting Rights Act lawsuits editSeveral attempts were made to stop the election including a lawsuit instigated by the Virginia based Voting Integrity Project 3 which claimed that Internet voting would disadvantage African Americans Latinos and Native Americans all protected classes under the Voting Rights Act The Voting Integrity Project along with two African American and two Hispanic plaintiffs claimed that by allowing Internet voting minority groups which at that time had less access to the internet would have their collective voting power proportionately reduced 4 The plaintiff s sought an injunction to stop the election 5 The lawsuit along with other factors was depleting the resources of the Arizona Democratic Party The court had to determine if the voting rights act applied since this election was being conducted by the Democratic Party itself not the state or country government the plaintiff s argued it was The court also had to decide if the election was unfairly diluting the minority vote given the plaintiffs claims that whites were more likely to vote over the internet than non whites Several organizations filed amicus briefs in support of the Democratic Party and the Internet election including the Benjamin E Mayes National Education Resource Center the Center of Government Studies and Professor Charles Nesson of Harvard Law School 6 On March 2 2000 Judge Paul G Rosenblatt of the United States District Court in Phoenix issued its decision While the court agreed with the plaintiffs that this was a public election 7 it also noted in its decision that there were other ways to vote including absentee ballot by mail and voting at polling places and thus there was no basis to stop the election The court denied the request for an injunction to stop the election 7 8 Civil rights concerns editSerious concerns about internet were also raised by civil rights organizations around the United States 9 10 Native American support is particularly important in Arizona where they numbered more than 250 000 11 The states two most prominent leaders were Apache leader John Lewis president of the Inter Tribal Counsel and Kelsey A Begaye President of the Navajo Nation The outreach efforts by Election com CEO Joe Mohen and the Arizona Democratic Party to Native Americans were particularly successful such that the Voting Integrity Project was unable to recruit even one Native American to be a plaintiff in their case and The Navajo leadership including President Kelsey Begaye prominent Native American leaders posed for Television Cameras when they later voted over the internet 12 On February 24 2000 the Department of Justice granted pre clearance for the election 13 14 Security threats editMany public threats by hackers were made that they would bring down the election These threats ranged from to denial of service attacks 15 and voter identity theft The election software was audited by KPMG 16 While the original plan was to use VeriSign digital certificates 17 though ultimately PINs were mailed to each voter and a challenge response authentication system such as birth date place of birth or social security number was used as well 18 One magazine columnist Howard Mortman even hired a computer hacker to attempt to disrupt the election 19 Voting period editThe week of the election online voting was allowed beginning Tuesday March 7 through Friday March 10 20 The following Saturday March 11 voting would be allowed at Polling Places only through personal computers 21 There were some minor problems in that a few polling places did not open on schedule and some users with older browsers could not vote 22 The election went off successfully with voter turnout increasing more than 500 23 over the 1996 Primary 24 Contrary to expectations Native American turnout also increased more than 500 and African American and Latino turnout both went up more than 800 citation needed defying those who claimed that minorities would not use the internet to cast votes The results were certified by the State Board of Elections 25 There were many other firsts news footage showing a middle aged quadriplegic man in Arizona who cast his first unassisted secret ballot using the Internet 26 election com reported no hacking during the election 27 28 Shortly after Mohen was featured on the cover of the Industry Standard Magazine 29 Results edit2000 Arizona Democratic presidential primary Candidate Vote 30 Pledgeddelegates 31 Al Gore 67 582 77 89 40Bill Bradley withdrawn 16 383 18 88 7Uncommitted 1 439 1 66 0Heather A Harder 1 358 1 57 0Total valid votes 86 762 100 47Ongoing debate editThe Arizona Democratic primary has been called the first legally binding public election to offer internet voting 32 33 However the Arizona Democratic Party and the private company administering the election argued in federal court that it was a private election outside of federal jurisdiction 34 Still others such as the Internet Policy Institute have classified the primary as a hybrid between public and private elections not run by state election officials but were still subject to some aspects of state and federal election law 35 And there were some glitches such as that certain Macintosh browsers did not work 36 Nonetheless the 2000 Arizona Internet vote was hailed worldwide as a landmark case of using the Internet at a major election 37 References edit Arizona Democratic Party Selects Votation com to Hold World s First Legally Binding Public Election Over the Internet Business Wire December 16 1999 Retrieved 2009 05 21 Berman Dennis February 28 2000 We the E People BusinessWeek Archived from the original on October 11 2008 Retrieved May 22 2009 Fairley Raney Rebecca January 22 2000 Suit Seeks to Block Net Vote in Arizona The New York Times Retrieved 2009 05 22 Online voting debate rages in run up to election Reuters CNN November 1 2000 Archived from the original on April 12 2009 Retrieved 2009 05 22 U S Department of State Web Site Report to Congress Memorandum and Order by Judge Paul Rosenblatt March 2 2000 Voting Integrity Project Lucious Bain et al vs Mark Fleisher and the Arizona Democratic Party US District Court District of Arizona Page 17 a b Memorandum and Order by Judge Paul Rosenblatt March 2 2000 Voting Integrity Project Lucious Bain et al vs Mark Fleisher and the Arizona Democratic Party US District Court District of Arizona Fairley Raney Rebecca March 1 2000 Judge Lets Internet Primary in Arizona Proceed The New York Times Retrieved 2009 05 22 Wilhelm Anthony Digital Nation Towards and Inclusive Society MIT Press 2004 pages 67 73 De la Garza Rodolfo and DeSipio Louis Muted Voices Latinos and the 2000 Elections Rowman amp Littlefield 2004 pages 151 153 References 2000 Census Archived 2009 05 31 at the Wayback Machine Jones Jeff March 10 2000 Photo Gallup Independent Archived from the original on October 7 2008 Retrieved 2009 05 22 Jacobus Patricia February 25 2000 DOJ gives OK to Arizona online primary vote CNET Networks Retrieved 2009 05 22 Letter from Joseph Rich Chief of the Voting Section of the Department of Justice to Joseph Sandler Sandler and Reiff and the Arizona Democratic Party dated February 24 2 2000 PBS NewsHour Anderiesz Mike SA Mathieson June 7 2001 Click here for your candidate The Guardian Retrieved 2009 05 22 Jack Jack December 16 1999 Arizona Democrats Will Vote Online Jack PC World Archived from the original on June 6 2011 Retrieved 2009 05 22 Mohen Joe The Fine Points of Online Voting BusinessWeek Retrieved 2009 05 22 Ledbetter James 2000 03 10 Arizona Democrats and Online Voting Just Click The Industry Standard Archived from the original on 25 June 2001 Retrieved 17 March 2017 Wilhelm Anthony Digital Nation Toward and Inclusive Information Society MIT Press 2004 pages 67 73 Avaliktos Neal 2004 The Election Process Revisited New York Nova Publishers ISBN 1 59454 054 3 Slate BNET Australia Lee Lydia March 20 2000 Vote naked in the privacy of your own home Salon com Archived from the original on May 13 2008 Retrieved May 22 2009 Garson David Handbook of Public Information Systems CRC Press 2005 Page 266 Info Sentry University of Vermont Legislative Research Mohen Joe Julia Glidden January 2001 The case for internet voting PDF Communications of the ACM 44 1 72 doi 10 1145 357489 357511 Retrieved 2009 05 22 Ledbetter James 2000 03 27 Net Out the Vote The Industry Standard Retrieved 2009 05 22 2000 Presidential Democratic Primary Election Results Arizona uselectionatlas org Retrieved September 7 2020 Arizona Democrat Delegation 2000 www thegreenpapers com Retrieved 2020 09 07 Thinking Outside the Ballot Box Lippert and Ojumu Journal of Organizational and End User Computing page 60 World Almanac for Kids Voting Integrity Project v Fleisher cv 00 109 PHX Report of the National Workshop for Internet Voting sponsored by the National Science Foundation permanent dead link Internet Voting in Practice Archived 2010 01 25 at the Wayback Machine University of North Carolina Australian Electoral Commission Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title 2000 Arizona Democratic presidential primary amp oldid 1175755705, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.