fbpx
Wikipedia

1920 United States presidential election in Tennessee

The 1920 United States presidential election in Tennessee took place on November 2, 1920, as part of the 1920 United States presidential election. Tennessee voters chose 12 representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

1920 United States presidential election in Tennessee

← 1916 November 2, 1920 1924 →

All 12 Tennessee votes to the Electoral College
 
Nominee Warren G. Harding James M. Cox
Party Republican Democratic
Home state Ohio Ohio
Running mate Calvin Coolidge Franklin D. Roosevelt
Electoral vote 12 0
Popular vote 219,829 206,558
Percentage 51.29% 48.19%

County Results

President before election

Woodrow Wilson
Democratic

Elected President

Warren G. Harding
Republican

Background

For over a century after the Civil War, Tennessee was divided according to political loyalties established in that war. Unionist regions covering almost all of East Tennessee, Kentucky Pennyroyal-allied Macon County, and the five West Tennessee Highland Rim counties of Carroll, Henderson, McNairy, Hardin and Wayne[1] voted Republican – generally by landslide margins – as they saw the Democratic Party as the “war party” who had forced them into a war they did not wish to fight.[2] Contrariwise, the rest of Middle and West Tennessee who had supported and driven the state’s secession was equally fiercely Democratic as it associated the Republicans with Reconstruction.[3] After the disfranchisement of the state’s African-American population by a poll tax was largely complete in the 1890s,[4] the Democratic Party was certain of winning statewide elections if united,[5] although unlike the Deep South Republicans would almost always gain thirty to forty percent of the statewide vote from mountain and Highland Rim support. When the Democratic Party was bitterly divided, the Republicans did win the governorship in 1910 and 1912, but did not gain at other levels.

During the period before the 1920 presidential election, Tennessee was the center of bitter debate over the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment, which the state – with its Democratic Party still seriously divided[6] – ultimately passed by a very close margin, 50 to 46, in the House of Representatives.[7]

Although most of the Republicans in the state legislature had supported the Nineteenth Amendment,[7] outgoing Democratic President Woodrow Wilson’s League of Nations was deeply unpopular in the isolationist and fundamentalist[8] Appalachian regions,[9] and the President was thus stigmatized for his advocacy of that organization. Democratic nominee James M. Cox also supported American participation in the League,[10] whereas his rival Warren Harding was largely opposed to the League and was helped in the South by racial and labor unrest elsewhere in the country.[11]

Vote

At the end of October, opinions were divided on whether Harding could break the “Solid South” in Tennessee – which had had the strongest Republican Party in the region ever since Reconstruction was overthrown – with some suggesting he could make a challenge in North Carolina[12] whose poll tax was being abolished at this time.[a] Claims continued to be divisive until even after the polls in the Volunteer State had closed.[13]

Ultimately a late swing to Harding ensured the “Solid South” was broken for the first time since 1876, and Harding became only the second Republican to carry Tennessee after Ulysses S. Grant in 1868. Harding’s victory did not see a major change in partisan alignments, but was due to gains in normally Democratic rural white counties of Middle Tennessee[14] – where he was the only Republican to carry Perry County[b] until John McCain in 2008[15] and the solitary GOP victor in Jackson County until Mitt Romney in 2012[15] – plus abnormally high voter turnout amongst isolationist mountaineers in rock-ribbed Republican East Tennessee.[9] Harding also gained important help through overwhelming support from the few blacks able to vote – all residing within the state’s largest cities – due to his public support for civil rights for African-Americans.[14]

Results

Presidential Candidate Running Mate Party Electoral Vote (EV) Popular Vote (PV)
Warren G. Harding of Ohio Calvin Coolidge Republican 12[16] 219,829 51.29%
James M. Cox Franklin D. Roosevelt Democratic 0 206,558 48.19%
Eugene Debs Seymour Stedman Socialist 0 2,239 0.52%

Results by county

County Warren Gamaliel Harding
Republican
James Middleton Cox
Democratic
Eugene Victor Debs
Socialist
Margin Total votes cast
# % # % # % # %
Anderson 3,127 80.30% 748 19.21% 19 0.49% 2,379 61.09% 3,894
Bedford 2,056 48.51% 2,182 51.49% 0 0.00% -126 -2.97% 4,238
Benton 1,514 44.04% 1,914 55.67% 10 0.29% -400 -11.63% 3,438
Bledsoe 1,198 71.31% 482 28.69% 0 0.00% 716 42.62% 1,680
Blount 5,540 78.09% 1,550 21.85% 4 0.06% 3,990 56.24% 7,094
Bradley 2,255 67.33% 1,058 31.59% 36 1.07% 1,197 35.74% 3,349
Campbell 3,368 83.82% 650 16.18% 0 0.00% 2,718 67.65% 4,018
Cannon 687 47.15% 770 52.85% 0 0.00% -83 -5.70% 1,457
Carroll 4,141 56.29% 3,215 43.71% 0 0.00% 926 12.59% 7,356
Carter 6,059 89.99% 674 10.01% 0 0.00% 5,385 79.98% 6,733
Cheatham 569 31.77% 1,219 68.06% 3 0.17% -650 -36.29% 1,791
Chester 1,088 48.81% 1,105 49.57% 36 1.62% -17 -0.76% 2,229
Claiborne 2,612 67.88% 1,236 32.12% 0 0.00% 1,376 35.76% 3,848
Clay 1,044 57.14% 772 42.26% 11 0.60% 272 14.89% 1,827
Cocke 3,283 77.36% 929 21.89% 32 0.75% 2,354 55.47% 4,244
Coffee 822 28.69% 2,043 71.31% 0 0.00% -1,221 -42.62% 2,865
Crockett 2,326 50.81% 2,252 49.19% 0 0.00% 74 1.62% 4,578
Cumberland 1,485 72.69% 557 27.26% 1 0.05% 928 45.42% 2,043
Davidson 6,811 33.48% 13,354 65.63% 181 0.89% -6,543 -32.16% 20,346
Decatur 1,608 57.84% 1,149 41.33% 23 0.83% 459 16.51% 2,780
DeKalb 2,572 56.47% 1,983 43.53% 0 0.00% 589 12.93% 4,555
Dickson 1,412 39.70% 2,145 60.30% 0 0.00% -733 -20.61% 3,557
Dyer 1,166 26.76% 3,181 73.01% 10 0.23% -2,015 -46.25% 4,357
Fayette 346 13.11% 2,294 86.89% 0 0.00% -1,948 -73.79% 2,640
Fentress 1,808 71.66% 694 27.51% 21 0.83% 1,114 44.15% 2,523
Franklin 1,558 30.77% 3,504 69.19% 2 0.04% -1,946 -38.43% 5,064
Gibson 3,209 34.99% 5,942 64.80% 19 0.21% -2,733 -29.80% 9,170
Giles 2,224 41.50% 3,129 58.39% 6 0.11% -905 -16.89% 5,359
Grainger 2,158 70.66% 895 29.31% 1 0.03% 1,263 41.36% 3,054
Greene 5,677 65.97% 2,924 33.98% 5 0.06% 2,753 31.99% 8,606
Grundy 447 32.99% 745 54.98% 163 12.03% -298 -21.99% 1,355
Hamblen 1,571 53.86% 1,301 44.60% 45 1.54% 270 9.26% 2,917
Hamilton 10,793 51.30% 9,910 47.11% 334 1.59% 883 4.20% 21,037
Hancock 1,740 81.92% 384 18.08% 0 0.00% 1,356 63.84% 2,124
Hardeman 895 28.59% 2,212 70.67% 23 0.73% -1,317 -42.08% 3,130
Hardin 3,077 68.58% 1,398 31.16% 12 0.27% 1,679 37.42% 4,487
Hawkins 2,650 65.11% 1,381 33.93% 39 0.96% 1,269 31.18% 4,070
Haywood 101 4.64% 2,068 95.04% 7 0.32% -1,967 -90.40% 2,176
Henderson 3,112 71.61% 1,217 28.00% 17 0.39% 1,895 43.60% 4,346
Henry 1,957 29.50% 4,613 69.55% 63 0.95% -2,656 -40.04% 6,633
Hickman 1,470 51.63% 1,362 47.84% 15 0.53% 108 3.79% 2,847
Houston 385 32.27% 790 66.22% 18 1.51% -405 -33.95% 1,193
Humphreys 674 30.21% 1,534 68.76% 23 1.03% -860 -38.55% 2,231
Jackson 1,187 51.97% 1,097 48.03% 0 0.00% 90 3.94% 2,284
Jefferson 3,583 81.58% 741 16.87% 68 1.55% 2,842 64.71% 4,392
Johnson 3,627 92.57% 291 7.43% 0 0.00% 3,336 85.15% 3,918
Knox 12,005 63.41% 6,801 35.93% 125 0.66% 5,204 27.49% 18,931
Lake 352 22.68% 1,192 76.80% 8 0.52% -840 -54.12% 1,552
Lauderdale 1,190 33.97% 2,313 66.03% 0 0.00% -1,123 -32.06% 3,503
Lawrence 3,843 59.55% 2,610 40.45% 0 0.00% 1,233 19.11% 6,453
Lewis 446 52.29% 403 47.25% 4 0.47% 43 5.04% 853
Lincoln 1,091 30.65% 2,463 69.19% 6 0.17% -1,372 -38.54% 3,560
Loudon 1,872 72.70% 686 26.64% 17 0.66% 1,186 46.06% 2,575
Macon 3,208 75.02% 1,066 24.93% 2 0.05% 2,142 50.09% 4,276
Madison 2,665 33.54% 5,280 66.46% 0 0.00% -2,615 -32.91% 7,945
Marion 2,662 58.12% 1,874 40.92% 44 0.96% 788 17.21% 4,580
Marshall 753 29.01% 1,828 70.42% 15 0.58% -1,075 -41.41% 2,596
Maury 1,379 33.53% 2,693 65.48% 41 1.00% -1,314 -31.95% 4,113
McMinn 2,800 62.63% 1,636 36.59% 35 0.78% 1,164 26.03% 4,471
McNairy 3,212 63.29% 1,863 36.71% 0 0.00% 1,349 26.58% 5,075
Meigs 915 56.24% 712 43.76% 0 0.00% 203 12.48% 1,627
Monroe 2,575 58.26% 1,845 41.74% 0 0.00% 730 16.52% 4,420
Montgomery 1,780 40.60% 2,564 58.49% 40 0.91% -784 -17.88% 4,384
Moore 90 15.33% 497 84.67% 0 0.00% -407 -69.34% 587
Morgan 2,248 73.18% 816 26.56% 8 0.26% 1,432 46.61% 3,072
Obion 1,307 22.25% 4,547 77.41% 20 0.34% -3,240 -55.16% 5,874
Overton 1,939 51.91% 1,779 47.63% 17 0.46% 160 4.28% 3,735
Perry 747 51.91% 692 48.09% 0 0.00% 55 3.82% 1,439
Pickett 896 59.61% 607 40.39% 0 0.00% 289 19.23% 1,503
Polk 1,018 56.21% 775 42.79% 18 0.99% 243 13.42% 1,811
Putnam 2,132 41.58% 2,996 58.42% 0 0.00% -864 -16.85% 5,128
Rhea 1,341 55.57% 1,051 43.56% 21 0.87% 290 12.02% 2,413
Roane 1,974 70.20% 838 29.80% 0 0.00% 1,136 40.40% 2,812
Robertson 1,191 28.04% 3,046 71.70% 11 0.26% -1,855 -43.67% 4,248
Rutherford 1,881 35.58% 3,406 64.42% 0 0.00% -1,525 -28.84% 5,287
Scott 2,537 90.54% 221 7.89% 44 1.57% 2,316 82.66% 2,802
Sequatchie 509 48.16% 545 51.56% 3 0.28% -36 -3.41% 1,057
Sevier 6,006 93.60% 404 6.30% 7 0.11% 5,602 87.30% 6,417
Shelby 8,597 34.61% 15,986 64.35% 260 1.05% -7,389 -29.74% 24,843
Smith 1,981 38.61% 3,150 61.39% 0 0.00% -1,169 -22.78% 5,131
Stewart 849 26.17% 2,366 72.93% 29 0.89% -1,517 -46.76% 3,244
Sullivan 3,593 45.37% 4,327 54.63% 0 0.00% -734 -9.27% 7,920
Sumner 1,268 25.55% 3,674 74.03% 21 0.42% -2,406 -48.48% 4,963
Tipton 906 23.99% 2,816 74.58% 54 1.43% -1,910 -50.58% 3,776
Trousdale 574 37.52% 955 62.42% 1 0.07% -381 -24.90% 1,530
Unicoi 2,584 82.42% 547 17.45% 4 0.13% 2,037 64.98% 3,135
Union 2,607 85.98% 423 13.95% 2 0.07% 2,184 72.03% 3,032
Van Buren 223 38.32% 351 60.31% 8 1.37% -128 -21.99% 582
Warren 1,010 33.53% 1,986 65.94% 16 0.53% -976 -32.40% 3,012
Washington 4,858 68.21% 2,260 31.73% 4 0.06% 2,598 36.48% 7,122
Wayne 2,617 79.69% 654 19.91% 13 0.40% 1,963 59.77% 3,284
Weakley 2,741 38.25% 4,395 61.33% 30 0.42% -1,654 -23.08% 7,166
White 1,456 39.81% 2,201 60.19% 0 0.00% -745 -20.37% 3,657
Williamson 946 32.07% 2,004 67.93% 0 0.00% -1,058 -35.86% 2,950
Wilson 1,532 41.45% 2,160 58.44% 4 0.11% -628 -16.99% 3,696
Totals 219,829[c] 51.29% 206,558[c] 48.19% 2,239[c] 0.52% 13,271 3.10% 428,626

Notes

  1. ^ Tennessee would not abolish its own poll tax until 1951, though this was proposed as early as 1943.
  2. ^ In 1968, Perry County voted for then-former and future Governor of Alabama George Wallace, who was the nominee of the American Party in Tennessee.
  3. ^ a b c These totals for all three candidates as officially listed are not the sum of the county totals.

References

  1. ^ Wright, John K.; ‘Voting Habits in the United States: A Note on Two Maps’; Geographical Review, vol. 22, no. 4 (October 1932), pp. 666-672
  2. ^ Key (Jr.), Valdimer Orlando; Southern Politics in State and Nation (New York, 1949), pp. 282-283
  3. ^ Lyons, William; Scheb (II), John M. and Stair Billy; Government and Politics in Tennessee, pp. 183-184 ISBN 1572331410
  4. ^ Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, pp. 208, 210 ISBN 9780691163246
  5. ^ Grantham, Dewey W.; ‘Tennessee and Twentieth-Century American Politics’; Tennessee Historical Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 3 (Fall 1995), pp. 210-229
  6. ^ Marcellus, Jane; ‘Southern Myths and the Nineteenth Amendment: The Participation of Nashville Newspaper Publishers in the Final State’s Ratification’; Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly; Volume 87, Issue 2, (Summer 2010), pp. 241-262
  7. ^ a b ‘Woman Suffrage Wins as Tennessee Ratifies: Close Vote of 50 to 46 in House May Still Be Upset Upon Reconsideration’; Boston Daily Globe, August 19, 1920, p. 1
  8. ^ Ruotsila, Markku; ‘Conservative American Protestantism in the League of Nations controversy’; Church History, vol. 72, issue 3, pp. 593-616
  9. ^ a b Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 211 ISBN 9780691163246
  10. ^ Faykosh, Joseph D.; ‘A party in peril: Franklin Roosevelt, the Democratic Party, and the Circular Letter of 1924’, p. 43. Published 2016 by Bowling Green State University
  11. ^ Faykosh, ‘A Party in Peril’, p. 42
  12. ^ ‘Victory is Claimed by Rival Chairmen: Hays Sees 368 Electoral Votes for Harding’; The Washington Post, October 31, 1920, p. 1
  13. ^ ‘Diverse Claims as to Teneessee: Memphis Says Cox Is Carrying State – Knoxville Reports Harding Ahead’; The New York Times
  14. ^ a b Reichard, Gary W.; ‘The Aberration of 1920: An Analysis of Harding's Victory in Tennessee’; The Journal of Southern History, Vol. 36, No. 1 (February 1970), pp. 33-49
  15. ^ a b Menendez, Albert J.; The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004, pp. 298-303 ISBN 0786422173
  16. ^ "1920 Presidential General Election Results – Tennessee". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.

1920, united, states, presidential, election, tennessee, main, article, 1920, united, states, presidential, election, took, place, november, 1920, part, 1920, united, states, presidential, election, tennessee, voters, chose, representatives, electors, electora. Main article 1920 United States presidential election The 1920 United States presidential election in Tennessee took place on November 2 1920 as part of the 1920 United States presidential election Tennessee voters chose 12 representatives or electors to the Electoral College who voted for president and vice president 1920 United States presidential election in Tennessee 1916 November 2 1920 1924 All 12 Tennessee votes to the Electoral College Nominee Warren G Harding James M CoxParty Republican DemocraticHome state Ohio OhioRunning mate Calvin Coolidge Franklin D RooseveltElectoral vote 12 0Popular vote 219 829 206 558Percentage 51 29 48 19 County Results Harding 50 60 60 70 70 80 80 90 90 100 Cox 40 50 50 60 60 70 70 80 80 90 90 100 President before electionWoodrow WilsonDemocratic Elected President Warren G HardingRepublican Contents 1 Background 2 Vote 3 Results 3 1 Results by county 4 Notes 5 ReferencesBackground EditFor over a century after the Civil War Tennessee was divided according to political loyalties established in that war Unionist regions covering almost all of East Tennessee Kentucky Pennyroyal allied Macon County and the five West Tennessee Highland Rim counties of Carroll Henderson McNairy Hardin and Wayne 1 voted Republican generally by landslide margins as they saw the Democratic Party as the war party who had forced them into a war they did not wish to fight 2 Contrariwise the rest of Middle and West Tennessee who had supported and driven the state s secession was equally fiercely Democratic as it associated the Republicans with Reconstruction 3 After the disfranchisement of the state s African American population by a poll tax was largely complete in the 1890s 4 the Democratic Party was certain of winning statewide elections if united 5 although unlike the Deep South Republicans would almost always gain thirty to forty percent of the statewide vote from mountain and Highland Rim support When the Democratic Party was bitterly divided the Republicans did win the governorship in 1910 and 1912 but did not gain at other levels During the period before the 1920 presidential election Tennessee was the center of bitter debate over the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment which the state with its Democratic Party still seriously divided 6 ultimately passed by a very close margin 50 to 46 in the House of Representatives 7 Although most of the Republicans in the state legislature had supported the Nineteenth Amendment 7 outgoing Democratic President Woodrow Wilson s League of Nations was deeply unpopular in the isolationist and fundamentalist 8 Appalachian regions 9 and the President was thus stigmatized for his advocacy of that organization Democratic nominee James M Cox also supported American participation in the League 10 whereas his rival Warren Harding was largely opposed to the League and was helped in the South by racial and labor unrest elsewhere in the country 11 Vote EditAt the end of October opinions were divided on whether Harding could break the Solid South in Tennessee which had had the strongest Republican Party in the region ever since Reconstruction was overthrown with some suggesting he could make a challenge in North Carolina 12 whose poll tax was being abolished at this time a Claims continued to be divisive until even after the polls in the Volunteer State had closed 13 Ultimately a late swing to Harding ensured the Solid South was broken for the first time since 1876 and Harding became only the second Republican to carry Tennessee after Ulysses S Grant in 1868 Harding s victory did not see a major change in partisan alignments but was due to gains in normally Democratic rural white counties of Middle Tennessee 14 where he was the only Republican to carry Perry County b until John McCain in 2008 15 and the solitary GOP victor in Jackson County until Mitt Romney in 2012 15 plus abnormally high voter turnout amongst isolationist mountaineers in rock ribbed Republican East Tennessee 9 Harding also gained important help through overwhelming support from the few blacks able to vote all residing within the state s largest cities due to his public support for civil rights for African Americans 14 Results EditPresidential Candidate Running Mate Party Electoral Vote EV Popular Vote PV Warren G Harding of Ohio Calvin Coolidge Republican 12 16 219 829 51 29 James M Cox Franklin D Roosevelt Democratic 0 206 558 48 19 Eugene Debs Seymour Stedman Socialist 0 2 239 0 52 Results by county Edit County Warren Gamaliel HardingRepublican James Middleton CoxDemocratic Eugene Victor DebsSocialist Margin Total votes cast Anderson 3 127 80 30 748 19 21 19 0 49 2 379 61 09 3 894Bedford 2 056 48 51 2 182 51 49 0 0 00 126 2 97 4 238Benton 1 514 44 04 1 914 55 67 10 0 29 400 11 63 3 438Bledsoe 1 198 71 31 482 28 69 0 0 00 716 42 62 1 680Blount 5 540 78 09 1 550 21 85 4 0 06 3 990 56 24 7 094Bradley 2 255 67 33 1 058 31 59 36 1 07 1 197 35 74 3 349Campbell 3 368 83 82 650 16 18 0 0 00 2 718 67 65 4 018Cannon 687 47 15 770 52 85 0 0 00 83 5 70 1 457Carroll 4 141 56 29 3 215 43 71 0 0 00 926 12 59 7 356Carter 6 059 89 99 674 10 01 0 0 00 5 385 79 98 6 733Cheatham 569 31 77 1 219 68 06 3 0 17 650 36 29 1 791Chester 1 088 48 81 1 105 49 57 36 1 62 17 0 76 2 229Claiborne 2 612 67 88 1 236 32 12 0 0 00 1 376 35 76 3 848Clay 1 044 57 14 772 42 26 11 0 60 272 14 89 1 827Cocke 3 283 77 36 929 21 89 32 0 75 2 354 55 47 4 244Coffee 822 28 69 2 043 71 31 0 0 00 1 221 42 62 2 865Crockett 2 326 50 81 2 252 49 19 0 0 00 74 1 62 4 578Cumberland 1 485 72 69 557 27 26 1 0 05 928 45 42 2 043Davidson 6 811 33 48 13 354 65 63 181 0 89 6 543 32 16 20 346Decatur 1 608 57 84 1 149 41 33 23 0 83 459 16 51 2 780DeKalb 2 572 56 47 1 983 43 53 0 0 00 589 12 93 4 555Dickson 1 412 39 70 2 145 60 30 0 0 00 733 20 61 3 557Dyer 1 166 26 76 3 181 73 01 10 0 23 2 015 46 25 4 357Fayette 346 13 11 2 294 86 89 0 0 00 1 948 73 79 2 640Fentress 1 808 71 66 694 27 51 21 0 83 1 114 44 15 2 523Franklin 1 558 30 77 3 504 69 19 2 0 04 1 946 38 43 5 064Gibson 3 209 34 99 5 942 64 80 19 0 21 2 733 29 80 9 170Giles 2 224 41 50 3 129 58 39 6 0 11 905 16 89 5 359Grainger 2 158 70 66 895 29 31 1 0 03 1 263 41 36 3 054Greene 5 677 65 97 2 924 33 98 5 0 06 2 753 31 99 8 606Grundy 447 32 99 745 54 98 163 12 03 298 21 99 1 355Hamblen 1 571 53 86 1 301 44 60 45 1 54 270 9 26 2 917Hamilton 10 793 51 30 9 910 47 11 334 1 59 883 4 20 21 037Hancock 1 740 81 92 384 18 08 0 0 00 1 356 63 84 2 124Hardeman 895 28 59 2 212 70 67 23 0 73 1 317 42 08 3 130Hardin 3 077 68 58 1 398 31 16 12 0 27 1 679 37 42 4 487Hawkins 2 650 65 11 1 381 33 93 39 0 96 1 269 31 18 4 070Haywood 101 4 64 2 068 95 04 7 0 32 1 967 90 40 2 176Henderson 3 112 71 61 1 217 28 00 17 0 39 1 895 43 60 4 346Henry 1 957 29 50 4 613 69 55 63 0 95 2 656 40 04 6 633Hickman 1 470 51 63 1 362 47 84 15 0 53 108 3 79 2 847Houston 385 32 27 790 66 22 18 1 51 405 33 95 1 193Humphreys 674 30 21 1 534 68 76 23 1 03 860 38 55 2 231Jackson 1 187 51 97 1 097 48 03 0 0 00 90 3 94 2 284Jefferson 3 583 81 58 741 16 87 68 1 55 2 842 64 71 4 392Johnson 3 627 92 57 291 7 43 0 0 00 3 336 85 15 3 918Knox 12 005 63 41 6 801 35 93 125 0 66 5 204 27 49 18 931Lake 352 22 68 1 192 76 80 8 0 52 840 54 12 1 552Lauderdale 1 190 33 97 2 313 66 03 0 0 00 1 123 32 06 3 503Lawrence 3 843 59 55 2 610 40 45 0 0 00 1 233 19 11 6 453Lewis 446 52 29 403 47 25 4 0 47 43 5 04 853Lincoln 1 091 30 65 2 463 69 19 6 0 17 1 372 38 54 3 560Loudon 1 872 72 70 686 26 64 17 0 66 1 186 46 06 2 575Macon 3 208 75 02 1 066 24 93 2 0 05 2 142 50 09 4 276Madison 2 665 33 54 5 280 66 46 0 0 00 2 615 32 91 7 945Marion 2 662 58 12 1 874 40 92 44 0 96 788 17 21 4 580Marshall 753 29 01 1 828 70 42 15 0 58 1 075 41 41 2 596Maury 1 379 33 53 2 693 65 48 41 1 00 1 314 31 95 4 113McMinn 2 800 62 63 1 636 36 59 35 0 78 1 164 26 03 4 471McNairy 3 212 63 29 1 863 36 71 0 0 00 1 349 26 58 5 075Meigs 915 56 24 712 43 76 0 0 00 203 12 48 1 627Monroe 2 575 58 26 1 845 41 74 0 0 00 730 16 52 4 420Montgomery 1 780 40 60 2 564 58 49 40 0 91 784 17 88 4 384Moore 90 15 33 497 84 67 0 0 00 407 69 34 587Morgan 2 248 73 18 816 26 56 8 0 26 1 432 46 61 3 072Obion 1 307 22 25 4 547 77 41 20 0 34 3 240 55 16 5 874Overton 1 939 51 91 1 779 47 63 17 0 46 160 4 28 3 735Perry 747 51 91 692 48 09 0 0 00 55 3 82 1 439Pickett 896 59 61 607 40 39 0 0 00 289 19 23 1 503Polk 1 018 56 21 775 42 79 18 0 99 243 13 42 1 811Putnam 2 132 41 58 2 996 58 42 0 0 00 864 16 85 5 128Rhea 1 341 55 57 1 051 43 56 21 0 87 290 12 02 2 413Roane 1 974 70 20 838 29 80 0 0 00 1 136 40 40 2 812Robertson 1 191 28 04 3 046 71 70 11 0 26 1 855 43 67 4 248Rutherford 1 881 35 58 3 406 64 42 0 0 00 1 525 28 84 5 287Scott 2 537 90 54 221 7 89 44 1 57 2 316 82 66 2 802Sequatchie 509 48 16 545 51 56 3 0 28 36 3 41 1 057Sevier 6 006 93 60 404 6 30 7 0 11 5 602 87 30 6 417Shelby 8 597 34 61 15 986 64 35 260 1 05 7 389 29 74 24 843Smith 1 981 38 61 3 150 61 39 0 0 00 1 169 22 78 5 131Stewart 849 26 17 2 366 72 93 29 0 89 1 517 46 76 3 244Sullivan 3 593 45 37 4 327 54 63 0 0 00 734 9 27 7 920Sumner 1 268 25 55 3 674 74 03 21 0 42 2 406 48 48 4 963Tipton 906 23 99 2 816 74 58 54 1 43 1 910 50 58 3 776Trousdale 574 37 52 955 62 42 1 0 07 381 24 90 1 530Unicoi 2 584 82 42 547 17 45 4 0 13 2 037 64 98 3 135Union 2 607 85 98 423 13 95 2 0 07 2 184 72 03 3 032Van Buren 223 38 32 351 60 31 8 1 37 128 21 99 582Warren 1 010 33 53 1 986 65 94 16 0 53 976 32 40 3 012Washington 4 858 68 21 2 260 31 73 4 0 06 2 598 36 48 7 122Wayne 2 617 79 69 654 19 91 13 0 40 1 963 59 77 3 284Weakley 2 741 38 25 4 395 61 33 30 0 42 1 654 23 08 7 166White 1 456 39 81 2 201 60 19 0 0 00 745 20 37 3 657Williamson 946 32 07 2 004 67 93 0 0 00 1 058 35 86 2 950Wilson 1 532 41 45 2 160 58 44 4 0 11 628 16 99 3 696Totals 219 829 c 51 29 206 558 c 48 19 2 239 c 0 52 13 271 3 10 428 626Notes Edit Tennessee would not abolish its own poll tax until 1951 though this was proposed as early as 1943 In 1968 Perry County voted for then former and future Governor of Alabama George Wallace who was the nominee of the American Party in Tennessee a b c These totals for all three candidates as officially listed are not the sum of the county totals References Edit Wright John K Voting Habits in the United States A Note on Two Maps Geographical Review vol 22 no 4 October 1932 pp 666 672 Key Jr Valdimer Orlando Southern Politics in State and Nation New York 1949 pp 282 283 Lyons William Scheb II John M and Stair Billy Government and Politics in Tennessee pp 183 184 ISBN 1572331410 Phillips Kevin P The Emerging Republican Majority pp 208 210 ISBN 9780691163246 Grantham Dewey W Tennessee and Twentieth Century American Politics Tennessee Historical Quarterly Vol 54 No 3 Fall 1995 pp 210 229 Marcellus Jane Southern Myths and the Nineteenth Amendment The Participation of Nashville Newspaper Publishers in the Final State s Ratification Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly Volume 87 Issue 2 Summer 2010 pp 241 262 a b Woman Suffrage Wins as Tennessee Ratifies Close Vote of 50 to 46 in House May Still Be Upset Upon Reconsideration Boston Daily Globe August 19 1920 p 1 Ruotsila Markku Conservative American Protestantism in the League of Nations controversy Church History vol 72 issue 3 pp 593 616 a b Phillips The Emerging Republican Majority p 211 ISBN 9780691163246 Faykosh Joseph D A party in peril Franklin Roosevelt the Democratic Party and the Circular Letter of 1924 p 43 Published 2016 by Bowling Green State University Faykosh A Party in Peril p 42 Victory is Claimed by Rival Chairmen Hays Sees 368 Electoral Votes for Harding The Washington Post October 31 1920 p 1 Diverse Claims as to Teneessee Memphis Says Cox Is Carrying State Knoxville Reports Harding Ahead The New York Times a b Reichard Gary W The Aberration of 1920 An Analysis of Harding s Victory in Tennessee The Journal of Southern History Vol 36 No 1 February 1970 pp 33 49 a b Menendez Albert J The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States 1868 2004 pp 298 303 ISBN 0786422173 1920 Presidential General Election Results Tennessee Dave Leip s U S Election Atlas Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title 1920 United States presidential election in Tennessee amp oldid 1118369360, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.