fbpx
Wikipedia

Center manifold

In the mathematics of evolving systems, the concept of a center manifold was originally developed to determine stability of degenerate equilibria. Subsequently, the concept of center manifolds was realised to be fundamental to mathematical modelling.

Center manifolds play an important role in bifurcation theory because interesting behavior takes place on the center manifold and in multiscale mathematics because the long time dynamics of the micro-scale often are attracted to a relatively simple center manifold involving the coarse scale variables.

Informal example

 
Saturn's rings sit in the center manifold defined by tidal forces.

Saturn's rings provide a rough example of the center manifold of the tidal forces acting on particles within the rings. Tidal forces have a characteristic "compress and stretch" action on bodies, with the compressing direction defining the stable manifold, the stretching direction defining the unstable manifold, and the neutral direction being the center manifold. In the case of Saturn, a particle in orbit above or below the rings will cross the rings, and, from the viewpoint of the rings, it will appear to oscillate from above to below the plane and back. Thus, it appears that the rings are "attractive". Friction, via collisions with other particles in the rings, will dampen those oscillations; thus they will decrease. Such converging trajectories are characteristic of the stable manifold: particles in the stable manifold come closer together. Particles within the ring will have an orbital radius that is a random walk: as they meet in close encounters with other particles in the ring, they will exchange energy in those encounters, and thus alter their radius. In this sense, the space where the rings lie is neutral: there are no further forces upwards or downwards (out of the plane of the rings), nor inwards or outwards (changing the radius within the rings).

This example is a bit confusing, as, properly speaking, the stable, unstable and neutral manifolds do not divide up the coordinate space; they divide up the phase space. In this case, the phase space has the structure of a tangent manifold: for every point in space (a 3D position), there is the collection of "tangent vectors": all possible velocities a particle might have. Some position-velocity pairs are driven towards the center manifold, others are flung away from it. Those that are in the center manifold are susceptible to small perturbations that generally push them about randomly, and often push them out of the center manifold. That is, small perturbations tend to destabilize points in the center manifold: the center manifold behaves like a saddle point, or rather, an extended collection of saddle points. There are dramatic counterexamples to this idea of instability at the center manifold; see Lagrangian coherent structure for detailed examples.

A much more sophisticated example is the Anosov flow on tangent bundles of Riemann surfaces. In that case, one can write a very explicit and precise splitting of the tangent space into three parts: the unstable and stable bundles, with the neutral manifold wedged in the middle between these two. This example is elegant, in the sense that it does not require any approximations or hand-waving: it is exactly solvable. It is a relatively straightforward and simple example for those acquainted with the general outline of Lie groups and Riemann surfaces.

Definition

 
Center (red) and unstable (green) manifolds of saddle-node equilibrium point of the system    .
 
Randomly selected points of the 2D phase space converge exponentially to a 1D center manifold on which dynamics are slow (non exponential). Studying dynamics of the center manifold determines the stability of the non-hyperbolic fixed point at the origin.

The center manifold of a dynamical system is based upon an equilibrium point of that system. A center manifold of the equilibrium then consists of those nearby orbits that neither decay exponentially quickly, nor grow exponentially quickly.

Mathematically, the first step when studying equilibrium points of dynamical systems is to linearize the system, and then compute its eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The eigenvectors (and generalized eigenvectors if they occur) corresponding to eigenvalues with negative real part form a basis for the stable eigenspace. The (generalized) eigenvectors corresponding to eigenvalues with positive real part form the unstable eigenspace. If the equilibrium point is hyperbolic (that is, all eigenvalues of the linearization have nonzero real part), then the Hartman-Grobman theorem guarantees that these eigenvalues and eigenvectors completely characterise the systems dynamics near the equilibrium.

However, if the equilibrium has eigenvalues whose real part is zero, then the corresponding (generalized) eigenvectors form the center eigenspace—for a ball, the center eigenspace is the entire set of unforced rigid body dynamics. [1] Going beyond the linearization, when we account for perturbations by nonlinearity or forcing in the dynamical system, the center eigenspace deforms to the nearby center manifold. [2] If the eigenvalues are precisely zero (as they are for the ball), rather than just real-part being zero, then the corresponding eigenspace more specifically gives rise to a slow manifold. The behavior on the center (slow) manifold is generally not determined by the linearization and thus may be difficult to construct.

Analogously, nonlinearity or forcing in the system perturbs the stable and unstable eigenspaces to a nearby stable manifold and nearby unstable manifold.[3] These three types of manifolds are three cases of an invariant manifold.

Algebraically, let   be a dynamical system with equilibrium point  . The linearization of the system near the equilibrium point is

 

The Jacobian matrix   defines three main subspaces:

  • the center subspace, which is spanned by the generalized eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalues   with   (more generally,[4]  );
  • the stable subspace, which is spanned by the generalized eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalues   with   (more generally,  );
  • the unstable subspace, which is spanned by the generalized eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalues   with   (more generally,  ).

Depending upon the application, other subspaces of interest include center-stable, center-unstable, sub-center, slow, and fast subspaces. These subspaces are all invariant subspaces of the linearized equation.

Corresponding to the linearized system, the nonlinear system has invariant manifolds, each consisting of sets of orbits of the nonlinear system.[5]

  • An invariant manifold tangent to the stable subspace and with the same dimension is the stable manifold.
  • The unstable manifold is of the same dimension and tangent to the unstable subspace.
  • A center manifold is of the same dimension and tangent to the center subspace. If, as is common, the eigenvalues of the center subspace are all precisely zero, rather than just real part zero, then a center manifold is often called a slow manifold.

Center manifold theorems

The center manifold existence theorem states that if the right-hand side function   is   (  times continuously differentiable), then at every equilibrium point there exists a neighborhood of some finite size in which there is at least one of [6]

  • a unique   stable manifold,
  • a unique   unstable manifold,
  • and a (not necessarily unique)   center manifold.

In example applications, a nonlinear coordinate transform to a normal form can clearly separate these three manifolds.[7] A web service [1] currently undertakes the necessary computer algebra for a range of finite-dimensional systems.

In the case when the unstable manifold does not exist, center manifolds are often relevant to modelling. The center manifold emergence theorem then says that the neighborhood may be chosen so that all solutions of the system staying in the neighborhood tend exponentially quickly to some solution   on the center manifold. That is,   for some rate  . [8] This theorem asserts that for a wide variety of initial conditions the solutions of the full system decay exponentially quickly to a solution on the relatively low dimensional center manifold.

A third theorem, the approximation theorem, asserts that if an approximate expression for such invariant manifolds, say  , satisfies the differential equation for the system to residuals   as  , then the invariant manifold is approximated by   to an error of the same order, namely  .

Center manifolds of infinite-D and/or of non-autonomous systems

However, some applications, such as to dispersion in tubes or channels, require an infinite-dimensional center manifold. [9] The most general and powerful theory was developed by Aulbach and Wanner. [10][11][12] They addressed non-autonomous dynamical systems   in infinite dimensions, with potentially infinite dimensional stable, unstable and center manifolds. Further, they usefully generalised the definition of the manifolds so that the center manifold is associated with eigenvalues such that  , the stable manifold with eigenvalues  , and unstable manifold with eigenvalues  . They proved existence of these manifolds, and the emergence of a center manifold, via nonlinear coordinate transforms.

Potzsche and Rasmussen established a corresponding approximation theorem for such infinite dimensional, non-autonomous systems. [13]

Alternative backwards theory

All the extant theory mentioned above seeks to establish invariant manifold properties of a specific given problem. In particular, one constructs a manifold that approximates an invariant manifold of the given system. An alternative approach is to construct exact invariant manifolds for a system that approximates the given system---called a backwards theory. The aim is to usefully apply theory to a wider range of systems, and to estimate errors and sizes of domain of validity. [14][15]

This approach is cognate to the well-established backward error analysis in numerical modeling.

Center manifold and the analysis of nonlinear systems

As the stability of the equilibrium correlates with the "stability" of its manifolds, the existence of a center manifold brings up the question about the dynamics on the center manifold. This is analyzed by the center manifold reduction, which, in combination with some system parameter μ, leads to the concepts of bifurcations.

Correspondingly, two web services currently undertake the necessary computer algebra to construct just the center manifold for a wide range of finite-dimensional systems (provided they are in multinomial form).

  • One web service [2] constructs slow manifolds for systems which are linearly diagonalised, but which may be non-autonomous or stochastic.[16]
  • Another web service [3] constructs center manifolds for systems with general linearisation, but only for autonomous systems.[17]

Examples

The Wikipedia entry on slow manifolds gives more examples.

A simple example

Consider the system

 

The unstable manifold at the origin is the y axis, and the stable manifold is the trivial set {(0, 0)}. Any orbit not on the stable manifold satisfies an equation of the form   for some real constant A. It follows that for any real A, we can create a center manifold by piecing together the curve   for x > 0 with the negative x axis (including the origin). Moreover, all center manifolds have this potential non-uniqueness, although often the non-uniqueness only occurs in unphysical complex values of the variables.

Delay differential equations often have Hopf bifurcations

Another example shows how a center manifold models the Hopf bifurcation that occurs for parameter   in the delay differential equation  . Strictly, the delay makes this DE infinite-dimensional.

Fortunately, we may approximate such delays by the following trick that keeps the dimensionality finite. Define   and approximate the time-delayed variable,  , by using the intermediaries   and  .

For parameter near critical,  , the delay differential equation is then approximated by the system

 

Copying and pasting the appropriate entries, the web service [4] finds that in terms of a complex amplitude   and its complex conjugate  , the center manifold

 

and the evolution on the center manifold is

 

This evolution shows the origin is linearly unstable for  , but the cubic nonlinearity then stabilises nearby limit cycles as in classic Hopf bifurcation.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Roberts, A.J. (1993). "The invariant manifold of beam deformations. Part 1: the simple circular rod". J. Elast. 30: 1–54. doi:10.1007/BF00041769. S2CID 123743932.
  2. ^ Carr, Jack (1981). Applications of centre manifold theory. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Vol. 35. Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5929-9. ISBN 978-0-387-90577-8.
  3. ^ Kelley, A. (1967). "The stable, center-stable, center, center-unstable and unstable manifolds". J. Differential Equations. 3 (4): 546–570. Bibcode:1967JDE.....3..546K. doi:10.1016/0022-0396(67)90016-2.
  4. ^ Aulbach, B.; Wanner, T. (2000). "The Hartman–Grobman theorem for Caratheodory-type differential equations in Banach spaces". Nonlinear Analysis. 40 (1–8): 91–104. doi:10.1016/S0362-546X(00)85006-3.
  5. ^ Guckenheimer & Holmes (1997), Section 3.2
  6. ^ Guckenheimer & Holmes (1997), Theorem 3.2.1
  7. ^ Murdock, James (2003). Normal forms and unfoldings for local dynamical systems. Springer-Verlag.
  8. ^ Iooss, G.; Adelmeyer, M. (1992). Topics in Bifurcation Theory. p. 7.
  9. ^ Roberts, A. J. (1988). "The application of centre manifold theory to the evolution of systems which vary slowly in space". J. Austral. Math. Soc. B. 29 (4): 480–500. doi:10.1017/S0334270000005968.
  10. ^ Aulbach, B.; Wanner, T. (1996). "Integral manifolds for Caratheodory type differential equations in Banach spaces". In Aulbach, B.; Colonius, F. (eds.). Six Lectures on Dynamical Systems. Singapore: World Scientific. pp. 45–119. ISBN 9789810225483.
  11. ^ Aulbach, B.; Wanner, T. (1999). "Invariant foliations for Caratheodory type differential equations in Banach spaces". In Lakshmikantham, V.; Martynyuk, A. A. (eds.). Advances of Stability Theory at the End of XX Century. Gordon & Breach.
  12. ^ Aulbach, B.; Wanner, T. (2000). "The Hartman–Grobman theorem for Caratheodory-type differential equations in Banach spaces". Nonlinear Analysis. 40 (1–8): 91–104. doi:10.1016/S0362-546X(00)85006-3.
  13. ^ Potzsche, C.; Rasmussen, M. (2006). "Taylor approximation of integral manifolds". Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations. 18 (2): 427–460. Bibcode:2006JDDE...18..427P. doi:10.1007/s10884-006-9011-8. S2CID 59366945.
  14. ^ Roberts, A.J. (2019). "Backwards theory supports modelling via invariant manifolds for non-autonomous dynamical systems". arXiv:1804.06998 [math.DS].
  15. ^ Hochs, Peter; Roberts, A.J. (2019). "Normal forms and invariant manifolds for nonlinear, non-autonomous PDEs, viewed as ODEs in infinite dimensions". J. Differential Equations. 267 (12): 7263–7312. arXiv:1906.04420. Bibcode:2019JDE...267.7263H. doi:10.1016/j.jde.2019.07.021. S2CID 184487247.
  16. ^ A.J. Roberts (2008). "Normal form transforms separate slow and fast modes in stochastic dynamical systems". Physica A. 387 (1): 12–38. arXiv:math/0701623. Bibcode:2008PhyA..387...12R. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2007.08.023. S2CID 13521020.
  17. ^ A.J. Roberts (1997). "Low-dimensional modelling of dynamics via computer algebra". Comput. Phys. Commun. 100 (3): 215–230. arXiv:chao-dyn/9604012. Bibcode:1997CoPhC.100..215R. doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(96)00162-2. S2CID 8344539.

References

External links

center, manifold, mathematics, evolving, systems, concept, center, manifold, originally, developed, determine, stability, degenerate, equilibria, subsequently, concept, center, manifolds, realised, fundamental, mathematical, modelling, play, important, role, b. In the mathematics of evolving systems the concept of a center manifold was originally developed to determine stability of degenerate equilibria Subsequently the concept of center manifolds was realised to be fundamental to mathematical modelling Center manifolds play an important role in bifurcation theory because interesting behavior takes place on the center manifold and in multiscale mathematics because the long time dynamics of the micro scale often are attracted to a relatively simple center manifold involving the coarse scale variables Contents 1 Informal example 2 Definition 3 Center manifold theorems 3 1 Center manifolds of infinite D and or of non autonomous systems 3 2 Alternative backwards theory 4 Center manifold and the analysis of nonlinear systems 5 Examples 5 1 A simple example 5 2 Delay differential equations often have Hopf bifurcations 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 9 External linksInformal example Edit Saturn s rings sit in the center manifold defined by tidal forces Saturn s rings provide a rough example of the center manifold of the tidal forces acting on particles within the rings Tidal forces have a characteristic compress and stretch action on bodies with the compressing direction defining the stable manifold the stretching direction defining the unstable manifold and the neutral direction being the center manifold In the case of Saturn a particle in orbit above or below the rings will cross the rings and from the viewpoint of the rings it will appear to oscillate from above to below the plane and back Thus it appears that the rings are attractive Friction via collisions with other particles in the rings will dampen those oscillations thus they will decrease Such converging trajectories are characteristic of the stable manifold particles in the stable manifold come closer together Particles within the ring will have an orbital radius that is a random walk as they meet in close encounters with other particles in the ring they will exchange energy in those encounters and thus alter their radius In this sense the space where the rings lie is neutral there are no further forces upwards or downwards out of the plane of the rings nor inwards or outwards changing the radius within the rings This example is a bit confusing as properly speaking the stable unstable and neutral manifolds do not divide up the coordinate space they divide up the phase space In this case the phase space has the structure of a tangent manifold for every point in space a 3D position there is the collection of tangent vectors all possible velocities a particle might have Some position velocity pairs are driven towards the center manifold others are flung away from it Those that are in the center manifold are susceptible to small perturbations that generally push them about randomly and often push them out of the center manifold That is small perturbations tend to destabilize points in the center manifold the center manifold behaves like a saddle point or rather an extended collection of saddle points There are dramatic counterexamples to this idea of instability at the center manifold see Lagrangian coherent structure for detailed examples A much more sophisticated example is the Anosov flow on tangent bundles of Riemann surfaces In that case one can write a very explicit and precise splitting of the tangent space into three parts the unstable and stable bundles with the neutral manifold wedged in the middle between these two This example is elegant in the sense that it does not require any approximations or hand waving it is exactly solvable It is a relatively straightforward and simple example for those acquainted with the general outline of Lie groups and Riemann surfaces Definition Edit Center red and unstable green manifolds of saddle node equilibrium point of the system x x 2 displaystyle dot x x 2 y y displaystyle dot y y Randomly selected points of the 2D phase space converge exponentially to a 1D center manifold on which dynamics are slow non exponential Studying dynamics of the center manifold determines the stability of the non hyperbolic fixed point at the origin The center manifold of a dynamical system is based upon an equilibrium point of that system A center manifold of the equilibrium then consists of those nearby orbits that neither decay exponentially quickly nor grow exponentially quickly Mathematically the first step when studying equilibrium points of dynamical systems is to linearize the system and then compute its eigenvalues and eigenvectors The eigenvectors and generalized eigenvectors if they occur corresponding to eigenvalues with negative real part form a basis for the stable eigenspace The generalized eigenvectors corresponding to eigenvalues with positive real part form the unstable eigenspace If the equilibrium point is hyperbolic that is all eigenvalues of the linearization have nonzero real part then the Hartman Grobman theorem guarantees that these eigenvalues and eigenvectors completely characterise the systems dynamics near the equilibrium However if the equilibrium has eigenvalues whose real part is zero then the corresponding generalized eigenvectors form the center eigenspace for a ball the center eigenspace is the entire set of unforced rigid body dynamics 1 Going beyond the linearization when we account for perturbations by nonlinearity or forcing in the dynamical system the center eigenspace deforms to the nearby center manifold 2 If the eigenvalues are precisely zero as they are for the ball rather than just real part being zero then the corresponding eigenspace more specifically gives rise to a slow manifold The behavior on the center slow manifold is generally not determined by the linearization and thus may be difficult to construct Analogously nonlinearity or forcing in the system perturbs the stable and unstable eigenspaces to a nearby stable manifold and nearby unstable manifold 3 These three types of manifolds are three cases of an invariant manifold Algebraically let d x d t f x displaystyle frac d textbf x dt textbf f textbf x be a dynamical system with equilibrium point x displaystyle textbf x The linearization of the system near the equilibrium point is d x d t A x where A d f d x x displaystyle frac d textbf x dt A textbf x quad text where A frac d textbf f d textbf x textbf x The Jacobian matrix A displaystyle A defines three main subspaces the center subspace which is spanned by the generalized eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalues l displaystyle lambda with Re l 0 displaystyle operatorname Re lambda 0 more generally 4 Re l a displaystyle operatorname Re lambda leq alpha the stable subspace which is spanned by the generalized eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalues l displaystyle lambda with Re l lt 0 displaystyle operatorname Re lambda lt 0 more generally Re l b lt r a displaystyle operatorname Re lambda leq beta lt r alpha the unstable subspace which is spanned by the generalized eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalues l displaystyle lambda with Re l gt 0 displaystyle operatorname Re lambda gt 0 more generally Re l b gt r a displaystyle operatorname Re lambda geq beta gt r alpha Depending upon the application other subspaces of interest include center stable center unstable sub center slow and fast subspaces These subspaces are all invariant subspaces of the linearized equation Corresponding to the linearized system the nonlinear system has invariant manifolds each consisting of sets of orbits of the nonlinear system 5 An invariant manifold tangent to the stable subspace and with the same dimension is the stable manifold The unstable manifold is of the same dimension and tangent to the unstable subspace A center manifold is of the same dimension and tangent to the center subspace If as is common the eigenvalues of the center subspace are all precisely zero rather than just real part zero then a center manifold is often called a slow manifold Center manifold theorems EditThe center manifold existence theorem states that if the right hand side function f x displaystyle textbf f textbf x is C r displaystyle C r r displaystyle r times continuously differentiable then at every equilibrium point there exists a neighborhood of some finite size in which there is at least one of 6 a unique C r displaystyle C r stable manifold a unique C r displaystyle C r unstable manifold and a not necessarily unique C r 1 displaystyle C r 1 center manifold In example applications a nonlinear coordinate transform to a normal form can clearly separate these three manifolds 7 A web service 1 currently undertakes the necessary computer algebra for a range of finite dimensional systems In the case when the unstable manifold does not exist center manifolds are often relevant to modelling The center manifold emergence theorem then says that the neighborhood may be chosen so that all solutions of the system staying in the neighborhood tend exponentially quickly to some solution y t displaystyle textbf y t on the center manifold That is x t y t O e b t as t displaystyle textbf x t textbf y t mathcal O e beta t quad text as t to infty for some rate b displaystyle beta 8 This theorem asserts that for a wide variety of initial conditions the solutions of the full system decay exponentially quickly to a solution on the relatively low dimensional center manifold A third theorem the approximation theorem asserts that if an approximate expression for such invariant manifolds say x X s displaystyle textbf x textbf X textbf s satisfies the differential equation for the system to residuals O s p displaystyle mathcal O textbf s p as s 0 displaystyle textbf s to textbf 0 then the invariant manifold is approximated by x X s displaystyle textbf x textbf X textbf s to an error of the same order namely O s p displaystyle mathcal O textbf s p Center manifolds of infinite D and or of non autonomous systems Edit However some applications such as to dispersion in tubes or channels require an infinite dimensional center manifold 9 The most general and powerful theory was developed by Aulbach and Wanner 10 11 12 They addressed non autonomous dynamical systems d x d t f x t displaystyle frac d textbf x dt textbf f textbf x t in infinite dimensions with potentially infinite dimensional stable unstable and center manifolds Further they usefully generalised the definition of the manifolds so that the center manifold is associated with eigenvalues such that Re l a displaystyle operatorname Re lambda leq alpha the stable manifold with eigenvalues Re l b lt r a displaystyle operatorname Re lambda leq beta lt r alpha and unstable manifold with eigenvalues Re l b gt r a displaystyle operatorname Re lambda geq beta gt r alpha They proved existence of these manifolds and the emergence of a center manifold via nonlinear coordinate transforms Potzsche and Rasmussen established a corresponding approximation theorem for such infinite dimensional non autonomous systems 13 Alternative backwards theory Edit All the extant theory mentioned above seeks to establish invariant manifold properties of a specific given problem In particular one constructs a manifold that approximates an invariant manifold of the given system An alternative approach is to construct exact invariant manifolds for a system that approximates the given system called a backwards theory The aim is to usefully apply theory to a wider range of systems and to estimate errors and sizes of domain of validity 14 15 This approach is cognate to the well established backward error analysis in numerical modeling Center manifold and the analysis of nonlinear systems EditAs the stability of the equilibrium correlates with the stability of its manifolds the existence of a center manifold brings up the question about the dynamics on the center manifold This is analyzed by the center manifold reduction which in combination with some system parameter m leads to the concepts of bifurcations Correspondingly two web services currently undertake the necessary computer algebra to construct just the center manifold for a wide range of finite dimensional systems provided they are in multinomial form One web service 2 constructs slow manifolds for systems which are linearly diagonalised but which may be non autonomous or stochastic 16 Another web service 3 constructs center manifolds for systems with general linearisation but only for autonomous systems 17 Examples EditThe Wikipedia entry on slow manifolds gives more examples A simple example Edit Consider the system x x 2 y y displaystyle dot x x 2 quad dot y y The unstable manifold at the origin is the y axis and the stable manifold is the trivial set 0 0 Any orbit not on the stable manifold satisfies an equation of the form y A e 1 x displaystyle y Ae 1 x for some real constant A It follows that for any real A we can create a center manifold by piecing together the curve y A e 1 x displaystyle y Ae 1 x for x gt 0 with the negative x axis including the origin Moreover all center manifolds have this potential non uniqueness although often the non uniqueness only occurs in unphysical complex values of the variables Delay differential equations often have Hopf bifurcations Edit Another example shows how a center manifold models the Hopf bifurcation that occurs for parameter a 4 displaystyle a approx 4 in the delay differential equation d x d t a x t 1 2 x 2 x 3 displaystyle dx dt ax t 1 2x 2 x 3 Strictly the delay makes this DE infinite dimensional Fortunately we may approximate such delays by the following trick that keeps the dimensionality finite Define u 1 t x t displaystyle u 1 t x t and approximate the time delayed variable x t 1 u 3 t displaystyle x t 1 approx u 3 t by using the intermediaries d u 2 d t 2 u 1 u 2 displaystyle du 2 dt 2 u 1 u 2 and d u 3 d t 2 u 2 u 3 displaystyle du 3 dt 2 u 2 u 3 For parameter near critical a 4 a displaystyle a 4 alpha the delay differential equation is then approximated by the system d u d t 0 0 4 2 2 0 0 2 2 u a u 3 2 u 1 2 u 1 3 0 0 displaystyle frac d textbf u dt left begin array ccc 0 amp 0 amp 4 2 amp 2 amp 0 0 amp 2 amp 2 end array right textbf u left begin array c alpha u 3 2u 1 2 u 1 3 0 0 end array right Copying and pasting the appropriate entries the web service 4 finds that in terms of a complex amplitude s t displaystyle s t and its complex conjugate s t displaystyle bar s t the center manifold u e i 2 t s e i 2 t s 1 i 2 e i 2 t s 1 i 2 e i 2 t s i 2 e i 2 t s i 2 e i 2 t s O a s 2 displaystyle textbf u left begin array c e i2t s e i2t bar s frac 1 i 2 e i2t s frac 1 i 2 e i2t bar s frac i 2 e i2t s frac i 2 e i2t bar s end array right O alpha s 2 and the evolution on the center manifold is d s d t 1 2 i 10 a s 3 16 i 15 s 2 s O a 2 s 4 displaystyle frac ds dt left frac 1 2i 10 alpha s frac 3 16i 15 s 2 s right O alpha 2 s 4 This evolution shows the origin is linearly unstable for a gt 0 a gt 4 displaystyle alpha gt 0 a gt 4 but the cubic nonlinearity then stabilises nearby limit cycles as in classic Hopf bifurcation See also EditInvariant manifold Stable manifold Lagrangian coherent structure Normally hyperbolic invariant manifoldNotes Edit Roberts A J 1993 The invariant manifold of beam deformations Part 1 the simple circular rod J Elast 30 1 54 doi 10 1007 BF00041769 S2CID 123743932 Carr Jack 1981 Applications of centre manifold theory Applied Mathematical Sciences Vol 35 Springer Verlag doi 10 1007 978 1 4612 5929 9 ISBN 978 0 387 90577 8 Kelley A 1967 The stable center stable center center unstable and unstable manifolds J Differential Equations 3 4 546 570 Bibcode 1967JDE 3 546K doi 10 1016 0022 0396 67 90016 2 Aulbach B Wanner T 2000 The Hartman Grobman theorem for Caratheodory type differential equations in Banach spaces Nonlinear Analysis 40 1 8 91 104 doi 10 1016 S0362 546X 00 85006 3 Guckenheimer amp Holmes 1997 Section 3 2 Guckenheimer amp Holmes 1997 Theorem 3 2 1 Murdock James 2003 Normal forms and unfoldings for local dynamical systems Springer Verlag Iooss G Adelmeyer M 1992 Topics in Bifurcation Theory p 7 Roberts A J 1988 The application of centre manifold theory to the evolution of systems which vary slowly in space J Austral Math Soc B 29 4 480 500 doi 10 1017 S0334270000005968 Aulbach B Wanner T 1996 Integral manifolds for Caratheodory type differential equations in Banach spaces In Aulbach B Colonius F eds Six Lectures on Dynamical Systems Singapore World Scientific pp 45 119 ISBN 9789810225483 Aulbach B Wanner T 1999 Invariant foliations for Caratheodory type differential equations in Banach spaces In Lakshmikantham V Martynyuk A A eds Advances of Stability Theory at the End of XX Century Gordon amp Breach Aulbach B Wanner T 2000 The Hartman Grobman theorem for Caratheodory type differential equations in Banach spaces Nonlinear Analysis 40 1 8 91 104 doi 10 1016 S0362 546X 00 85006 3 Potzsche C Rasmussen M 2006 Taylor approximation of integral manifolds Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations 18 2 427 460 Bibcode 2006JDDE 18 427P doi 10 1007 s10884 006 9011 8 S2CID 59366945 Roberts A J 2019 Backwards theory supports modelling via invariant manifolds for non autonomous dynamical systems arXiv 1804 06998 math DS Hochs Peter Roberts A J 2019 Normal forms and invariant manifolds for nonlinear non autonomous PDEs viewed as ODEs in infinite dimensions J Differential Equations 267 12 7263 7312 arXiv 1906 04420 Bibcode 2019JDE 267 7263H doi 10 1016 j jde 2019 07 021 S2CID 184487247 A J Roberts 2008 Normal form transforms separate slow and fast modes in stochastic dynamical systems Physica A 387 1 12 38 arXiv math 0701623 Bibcode 2008PhyA 387 12R doi 10 1016 j physa 2007 08 023 S2CID 13521020 A J Roberts 1997 Low dimensional modelling of dynamics via computer algebra Comput Phys Commun 100 3 215 230 arXiv chao dyn 9604012 Bibcode 1997CoPhC 100 215R doi 10 1016 S0010 4655 96 00162 2 S2CID 8344539 References EditGuckenheimer John Holmes Philip 1997 Nonlinear Oscillations Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vector Fields Applied Mathematical Sciences vol 42 Berlin New York Springer Verlag ISBN 978 0 387 90819 9 corrected fifth printing External links EditJack Carr ed Center manifold Scholarpedia Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Center manifold amp oldid 1106880670, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.