fbpx
Wikipedia

Vickers hardness test

The Vickers hardness test was developed in 1921 by Robert L. Smith and George E. Sandland at Vickers Ltd as an alternative to the Brinell method to measure the hardness of materials.[1] The Vickers test is often easier to use than other hardness tests since the required calculations are independent of the size of the indenter, and the indenter can be used for all materials irrespective of hardness. The basic principle, as with all common measures of hardness, is to observe a material's ability to resist plastic deformation from a standard source. The Vickers test can be used for all metals and has one of the widest scales among hardness tests. The unit of hardness given by the test is known as the Vickers Pyramid Number (HV) or Diamond Pyramid Hardness (DPH). The hardness number can be converted into units of pascals, but should not be confused with pressure, which uses the same units. The hardness number is determined by the load over the surface area of the indentation and not the area normal to the force, and is therefore not pressure.

A Vickers hardness tester

Implementation

 
Vickers test scheme
 
The pyramidal diamond indenter of a Vickers hardness tester
 
An indentation left in case-hardened steel after a Vickers hardness test. The difference in length of both diagonals and the illumination gradient, are both classic indications of an out-of-level sample. This is not a good indentation.
 
This is a good indentation.

It was decided that the indenter shape should be capable of producing geometrically similar impressions, irrespective of size; the impression should have well-defined points of measurement; and the indenter should have high resistance to self-deformation. A diamond in the form of a square-based pyramid satisfied these conditions. It had been established that the ideal size of a Brinell impression was 38 of the ball diameter. As two tangents to the circle at the ends of a chord 3d/8 long intersect at 136°, it was decided to use this as the included angle between plane faces of the indenter tip. This gives an angle from each face normal to the horizontal plane normal of 22° on each side. The angle was varied experimentally and it was found that the hardness value obtained on a homogeneous piece of material remained constant, irrespective of load.[2] Accordingly, loads of various magnitudes are applied to a flat surface, depending on the hardness of the material to be measured. The HV number is then determined by the ratio F/A, where F is the force applied to the diamond in kilograms-force and A is the surface area of the resulting indentation in square millimeters. A can be determined by the formula.

 

which can be approximated by evaluating the sine term to give,

 

where d is the average length of the diagonal left by the indenter in millimeters. Hence,[3]

 ,

where F is in kgf and d is in millimeters.

The corresponding unit of HV is then the kilogram-force per square millimeter (kgf/mm2) or HV number. In the above equation, F could be in N and d in mm, giving HV in the SI unit of MPa. To calculate Vickers hardness number (VHN) using SI units one needs to convert the force applied from newtons to kilogram-force by dividing by 9.806 65 (standard gravity). This leads to the following equation:[4]

 

where F is in N and d is in millimeters. A common error is that the above formula to calculate the HV number does not result in a number with the unit newton per square millimeter (N/mm2), but results directly in the Vickers hardness number (usually given without units), which is in fact one kilogram-force per square millimeter (1 kgf/mm2).

Vickers hardness numbers are reported as xxxHVyy, e.g. 440HV30, or xxxHVyy/zz if duration of force differs from 10 s to 15 s, e.g. 440HV30/20, where:

  • 440 is the hardness number,
  • HV gives the hardness scale (Vickers),
  • 30 indicates the load used in kgf.
  • 20 indicates the loading time if it differs from 10 s to 15 s
Examples of HV values for various materials[5]
Material Value
316L stainless steel 140HV30
347L stainless steel 180HV30
Carbon steel 55–120HV5
Iron 30–80HV5
Martensite 1000HV
Diamond 10000HV

Precautions

When doing the hardness tests, the minimum distance between indentations and the distance from the indentation to the edge of the specimen must be taken into account to avoid interaction between the work-hardened regions and effects of the edge. These minimum distances are different for ISO 6507-1 and ASTM E384 standards.

Standard Distance between indentations Distance from the center of the indentation to the edge of the specimen
ISO 6507-1 > 3·d for steel and copper alloys and > 6·d for light metals 2.5·d for steel and copper alloys and > 3·d for light metals
ASTM E384 2.5·d 2.5·d

Vickers values are generally independent of the test force: they will come out the same for 500 gf and 50 kgf, as long as the force is at least 200 gf.[6] However, lower load indents often display a dependence of hardness on indent depth known as the indentation size effect (ISE).[7] Small indent sizes will also have microstructure-dependent hardness values.

For thin samples indentation depth can be an issue due to substrate effects. As a rule of thumb the sample thickness should be kept greater than 2.5 times the indent diameter. Alternatively indent depth,  , can be calculated according to:

 

Conversion to SI units

To convert the Vickers hardness number to SI units the hardness number in kilograms-force per square millimeter (kgf/mm2) has to be multiplied with the standard gravity,  , to get the hardness in MPa (N/mm2) and furthermore divided by 1000 to get the hardness in GPa.

 

Vickers hardness can also be converted to an SI hardness based on the projected area of the indent rather than the surface area. The projected area,  , is defined as the following for a Vickers indenter geometry:[8]

 

This hardness is sometimes referred to as the mean contact area or Meyer hardness, and ideally can be directly compared with other hardness tests also defined using projected area. Care must be used when comparing other hardness tests due to various size scale factors which can impact the measured hardness.

 

Estimating tensile strength

If HV is first expressed in N/mm2 (MPa), or otherwise by converting from kgf/mm2, then the tensile strength (in MPa) of the material can be approximated as σu ≈ HV/c , where c is a constant determined by yield strength, Poisson's ratio, work-hardening exponent and geometrical factors – usually ranging between 2 and 4.[9] In other words, if HV is expressed in N/mm2 (i.e. in MPa) then the tensile strength (in MPa) ≈ HV/3. This empirical law depends variably on the work-hardening behavior of the material.[10]

Application

The fin attachment pins and sleeves in the Convair 580 airliner were specified by the aircraft manufacturer to be hardened to a Vickers Hardness specification of 390HV5, the '5' meaning five kiloponds. However, on the aircraft flying Partnair Flight 394 the pins were later found to have been replaced with sub-standard parts, leading to rapid wear and finally loss of the aircraft. On examination, accident investigators found that the sub-standard pins had a hardness value of only some 200–230HV5.[11]

See also

References

  1. ^ R.L. Smith & G.E. Sandland, "An Accurate Method of Determining the Hardness of Metals, with Particular Reference to Those of a High Degree of Hardness," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. I, 1922, p 623–641.
  2. ^ The Vickers Hardness Testing Machine. UKcalibrations.co.uk. Retrieved on 2016-06-03.
  3. ^ ASTM E384-10e2
  4. ^ ISO 6507-1:2005(E)
  5. ^ Smithells Metals Reference Book, 8th Edition, ch. 22
  6. ^ Vickers Test 21 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine. Instron website.
  7. ^ Nix, William D.; Gao, Huajian (1 March 1998). "Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: A law for strain gradient plasticity". Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 46 (3): 411–425. Bibcode:1998JMPSo..46..411N. doi:10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0. ISSN 0022-5096.
  8. ^ Fischer-Cripps, Anthony C. (2007). Introduction to contact mechanics (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. pp. 212–213. ISBN 9780387681887. OCLC 187014877.
  9. ^ "Hardness". matter.org.uk.
  10. ^ Zhang, P. (September 2011). "General relationship between strength and hardness". Materials Science and Engineering A. 529: 62. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.061.
  11. ^ Report on the Convair 340/580 LN-PAA aircraft accident North of Hirtshals, Denmark on September 8, 1989 | aibn. Aibn.no. Retrieved on 2016-06-03.

Further reading

  • Meyers and Chawla (1999). "Section 3.8". Mechanical Behavior of Materials. Prentice Hall, Inc.
  • ASTM E92: Standard method for Vickers hardness of metallic materials (withdrawn and replaced by E384-10e2)
  • ASTM E384: Standard Test Method for Knoop and Vickers Hardness of Materials
  • ISO 6507-1: Metallic materials – Vickers hardness test – Part 1: Test method
  • ISO 6507-2: Metallic materials – Vickers hardness test – Part 2: Verification and calibration of testing machines
  • ISO 6507-3: Metallic materials – Vickers hardness test – Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks
  • ISO 6507-4: Metallic materials – Vickers hardness test – Part 4: Tables of hardness values
  • ISO 18265: Metallic materials – Conversion of Hardness Values

External links

  • Video on the Vickers hardness test
  • Vickers hardness test
  • Conversion table – Vickers, Brinell, and Rockwell scales

vickers, hardness, test, developed, 1921, robert, smith, george, sandland, vickers, alternative, brinell, method, measure, hardness, materials, vickers, test, often, easier, than, other, hardness, tests, since, required, calculations, independent, size, indent. The Vickers hardness test was developed in 1921 by Robert L Smith and George E Sandland at Vickers Ltd as an alternative to the Brinell method to measure the hardness of materials 1 The Vickers test is often easier to use than other hardness tests since the required calculations are independent of the size of the indenter and the indenter can be used for all materials irrespective of hardness The basic principle as with all common measures of hardness is to observe a material s ability to resist plastic deformation from a standard source The Vickers test can be used for all metals and has one of the widest scales among hardness tests The unit of hardness given by the test is known as the Vickers Pyramid Number HV or Diamond Pyramid Hardness DPH The hardness number can be converted into units of pascals but should not be confused with pressure which uses the same units The hardness number is determined by the load over the surface area of the indentation and not the area normal to the force and is therefore not pressure A Vickers hardness tester Contents 1 Implementation 2 Precautions 3 Conversion to SI units 4 Estimating tensile strength 5 Application 6 See also 7 References 8 Further reading 9 External linksImplementation Edit Vickers test scheme The pyramidal diamond indenter of a Vickers hardness tester An indentation left in case hardened steel after a Vickers hardness test The difference in length of both diagonals and the illumination gradient are both classic indications of an out of level sample This is not a good indentation This is a good indentation It was decided that the indenter shape should be capable of producing geometrically similar impressions irrespective of size the impression should have well defined points of measurement and the indenter should have high resistance to self deformation A diamond in the form of a square based pyramid satisfied these conditions It had been established that the ideal size of a Brinell impression was 3 8 of the ball diameter As two tangents to the circle at the ends of a chord 3d 8 long intersect at 136 it was decided to use this as the included angle between plane faces of the indenter tip This gives an angle from each face normal to the horizontal plane normal of 22 on each side The angle was varied experimentally and it was found that the hardness value obtained on a homogeneous piece of material remained constant irrespective of load 2 Accordingly loads of various magnitudes are applied to a flat surface depending on the hardness of the material to be measured The HV number is then determined by the ratio F A where F is the force applied to the diamond in kilograms force and A is the surface area of the resulting indentation in square millimeters A can be determined by the formula A d 2 2 sin 136 2 displaystyle A frac d 2 2 sin 136 circ 2 which can be approximated by evaluating the sine term to give A d 2 1 8544 displaystyle A approx frac d 2 1 8544 where d is the average length of the diagonal left by the indenter in millimeters Hence 3 H V F A 1 8544 F d 2 kgf mm 2 displaystyle mathrm HV frac F A approx frac 1 8544F d 2 quad textrm kgf mm 2 where F is in kgf and d is in millimeters The corresponding unit of HV is then the kilogram force per square millimeter kgf mm2 or HV number In the above equation F could be in N and d in mm giving HV in the SI unit of MPa To calculate Vickers hardness number VHN using SI units one needs to convert the force applied from newtons to kilogram force by dividing by 9 806 65 standard gravity This leads to the following equation 4 H V 0 1891 F d 2 N mm 2 displaystyle mathrm HV approx 0 1891 frac F d 2 quad textrm N mm 2 where F is in N and d is in millimeters A common error is that the above formula to calculate the HV number does not result in a number with the unit newton per square millimeter N mm2 but results directly in the Vickers hardness number usually given without units which is in fact one kilogram force per square millimeter 1 kgf mm2 Vickers hardness numbers are reported as xxxHVyy e g 440HV30 or xxxHVyy zz if duration of force differs from 10 s to 15 s e g 440HV30 20 where 440 is the hardness number HV gives the hardness scale Vickers 30 indicates the load used in kgf 20 indicates the loading time if it differs from 10 s to 15 sExamples of HV values for various materials 5 Material Value316L stainless steel 140HV30347L stainless steel 180HV30Carbon steel 55 120HV5Iron 30 80HV5Martensite 1000HVDiamond 10000HVPrecautions EditWhen doing the hardness tests the minimum distance between indentations and the distance from the indentation to the edge of the specimen must be taken into account to avoid interaction between the work hardened regions and effects of the edge These minimum distances are different for ISO 6507 1 and ASTM E384 standards Standard Distance between indentations Distance from the center of the indentation to the edge of the specimenISO 6507 1 gt 3 d for steel and copper alloys and gt 6 d for light metals 2 5 d for steel and copper alloys and gt 3 d for light metalsASTM E384 2 5 d 2 5 dVickers values are generally independent of the test force they will come out the same for 500 gf and 50 kgf as long as the force is at least 200 gf 6 However lower load indents often display a dependence of hardness on indent depth known as the indentation size effect ISE 7 Small indent sizes will also have microstructure dependent hardness values For thin samples indentation depth can be an issue due to substrate effects As a rule of thumb the sample thickness should be kept greater than 2 5 times the indent diameter Alternatively indent depth t displaystyle t can be calculated according to t d a v g 2 2 tan 8 2 d a v g 7 0006 displaystyle t frac d rm avg 2 sqrt 2 tan frac theta 2 approx frac d rm avg 7 0006 Conversion to SI units EditTo convert the Vickers hardness number to SI units the hardness number in kilograms force per square millimeter kgf mm2 has to be multiplied with the standard gravity g 0 displaystyle g 0 to get the hardness in MPa N mm2 and furthermore divided by 1000 to get the hardness in GPa surface area hardness GPa g 0 1000 H V 9 80665 1000 H V displaystyle text surface area hardness GPa frac g 0 1000 HV frac 9 80665 1000 HV Vickers hardness can also be converted to an SI hardness based on the projected area of the indent rather than the surface area The projected area A p displaystyle A rm p is defined as the following for a Vickers indenter geometry 8 A p d a v g 2 2 1 854 2 A s displaystyle A rm p frac d rm avg 2 2 frac 1 854 2 A s This hardness is sometimes referred to as the mean contact area or Meyer hardness and ideally can be directly compared with other hardness tests also defined using projected area Care must be used when comparing other hardness tests due to various size scale factors which can impact the measured hardness projected area hardness GPa g 0 1000 2 1 854 H V H V 94 5 displaystyle text projected area hardness GPa frac g 0 1000 frac 2 1 854 HV approx frac HV 94 5 Estimating tensile strength EditIf HV is first expressed in N mm2 MPa or otherwise by converting from kgf mm2 then the tensile strength in MPa of the material can be approximated as su HV c where c is a constant determined by yield strength Poisson s ratio work hardening exponent and geometrical factors usually ranging between 2 and 4 9 In other words if HV is expressed in N mm2 i e in MPa then the tensile strength in MPa HV 3 This empirical law depends variably on the work hardening behavior of the material 10 Application EditThe fin attachment pins and sleeves in the Convair 580 airliner were specified by the aircraft manufacturer to be hardened to a Vickers Hardness specification of 390HV5 the 5 meaning five kiloponds However on the aircraft flying Partnair Flight 394 the pins were later found to have been replaced with sub standard parts leading to rapid wear and finally loss of the aircraft On examination accident investigators found that the sub standard pins had a hardness value of only some 200 230HV5 11 See also EditIndentation hardness Leeb Rebound Hardness Test Hardness comparison Knoop hardness test Meyer hardness test Rockwell scale Vickers toughness test of ceramics Superhard materialReferences Edit R L Smith amp G E Sandland An Accurate Method of Determining the Hardness of Metals with Particular Reference to Those of a High Degree of Hardness Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Vol I 1922 p 623 641 The Vickers Hardness Testing Machine UKcalibrations co uk Retrieved on 2016 06 03 ASTM E384 10e2 ISO 6507 1 2005 E Smithells Metals Reference Book 8th Edition ch 22 Vickers Test Archived 21 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine Instron website Nix William D Gao Huajian 1 March 1998 Indentation size effects in crystalline materials A law for strain gradient plasticity Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 46 3 411 425 Bibcode 1998JMPSo 46 411N doi 10 1016 S0022 5096 97 00086 0 ISSN 0022 5096 Fischer Cripps Anthony C 2007 Introduction to contact mechanics 2nd ed New York Springer pp 212 213 ISBN 9780387681887 OCLC 187014877 Hardness matter org uk Zhang P September 2011 General relationship between strength and hardness Materials Science and Engineering A 529 62 doi 10 1016 j msea 2011 08 061 Report on the Convair 340 580 LN PAA aircraft accident North of Hirtshals Denmark on September 8 1989 aibn Aibn no Retrieved on 2016 06 03 Further reading EditMeyers and Chawla 1999 Section 3 8 Mechanical Behavior of Materials Prentice Hall Inc ASTM E92 Standard method for Vickers hardness of metallic materials withdrawn and replaced by E384 10e2 ASTM E384 Standard Test Method for Knoop and Vickers Hardness of Materials ISO 6507 1 Metallic materials Vickers hardness test Part 1 Test method ISO 6507 2 Metallic materials Vickers hardness test Part 2 Verification and calibration of testing machines ISO 6507 3 Metallic materials Vickers hardness test Part 3 Calibration of reference blocks ISO 6507 4 Metallic materials Vickers hardness test Part 4 Tables of hardness values ISO 18265 Metallic materials Conversion of Hardness ValuesExternal links EditVideo on the Vickers hardness test Vickers hardness test Conversion table Vickers Brinell and Rockwell scales Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Vickers hardness test amp oldid 1145223670, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.