This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources. Find sources: "Cut" archaeology – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR(October 2012)
In archaeology and archaeological stratification, a cut or truncation is a context that represents a moment in time when other archaeological deposits were removed for the creation of some feature, such as a ditch or pit. In layman's terms, a cut can be thought of as a hole that was dug in the past, though cut also applies to other parts of the archaeological record such as horizontal truncations like terraced ground. A cut context is sometimes referred to as a "negative context", as opposed to a "positive context". The term denotes that a cut has removed material from the archaeological record or natural[clarification needed] at the time of its creation, as opposed to a positive context, which adds material to the archaeological record. A cut has zero thickness and no material properties of its own and is defined by the limits of other contexts. Cuts are seen in the record by virtue of the difference between the material it was cut through and the material that back-fills it. This difference is seen as an "edge" by the archaeologists on site. This is shown in the picture (Fig. 1), where a half sectioned Saxon pit has had half its backfill removed and we can clearly see a difference between the ground the pit was cut into, and the material originally filling the pit. Sometimes these differences are not clear and an archaeologist must rely on experience and insight to discover cuts.
Fig. 2. Photographer takes a record shot of a horse burial in a Roman ditch re-cut.
Re-cuts are cuts made within the confines or near confines of other cuts, often to regain the function of the original cut or harvest material from the original fill. Re-cuts are considered quite valuable as a source of information because they can shed insight on function and attitude over time. An example of re-cutting would be a roadside ditch being re-cut and emptied of silt and detritus as a form of maintenance. Conversely, a roadside ditch that is never re-cut gives a certain impression about the attitude towards the investment in infrastructure the road represents. Re-cuts by their nature are hard to discern because the re-cut can truncate the original cut in part and be completely in the confines of the original fill in other parts. They can even be absent from the record. Cutting is the reason why not all past activity on a site leaves traces of its existence in the sequence.
Hypothetical ditch re-cuts shown in sectionEdit
Fig. 3. Section of ditch with at least two re-cuts.
The third image (Fig. 3) shows how a ditch cut with at least two re-cuts may appear when viewed in section. It is possible that numerous other re-cuts took place and were truncated out of the archaeological record by one or more of the re-cuts that has survived.
The MoLAS archaeological site manual MoLAS, London 1994. ISBN0-904818-40-3. Rb 128pp. bl/wh
August 28, 2023
archaeology, this, article, multiple, issues, please, help, improve, discuss, these, issues, talk, page, learn, when, remove, these, template, messages, this, article, includes, list, references, related, reading, external, links, sources, remain, unclear, bec. This article has multiple issues Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page Learn how and when to remove these template messages This article includes a list of references related reading or external links but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations October 2012 Learn how and when to remove this template message This article relies largely or entirely on a single source Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources Find sources Cut archaeology news newspapers books scholar JSTOR October 2012 Learn how and when to remove this template message In archaeology and archaeological stratification a cut or truncation is a context that represents a moment in time when other archaeological deposits were removed for the creation of some feature such as a ditch or pit In layman s terms a cut can be thought of as a hole that was dug in the past though cut also applies to other parts of the archaeological record such as horizontal truncations like terraced ground A cut context is sometimes referred to as a negative context as opposed to a positive context The term denotes that a cut has removed material from the archaeological record or natural clarification needed at the time of its creation as opposed to a positive context which adds material to the archaeological record A cut has zero thickness and no material properties of its own and is defined by the limits of other contexts Cuts are seen in the record by virtue of the difference between the material it was cut through and the material that back fills it This difference is seen as an edge by the archaeologists on site This is shown in the picture Fig 1 where a half sectioned Saxon pit has had half its backfill removed and we can clearly see a difference between the ground the pit was cut into and the material originally filling the pit Sometimes these differences are not clear and an archaeologist must rely on experience and insight to discover cuts Fig 1 Saxon pit half sectioned Contents 1 Re cuts 1 1 Hypothetical ditch re cuts shown in section 2 See also 3 ReferencesRe cuts Edit Fig 2 Photographer takes a record shot of a horse burial in a Roman ditch re cut Re cuts are cuts made within the confines or near confines of other cuts often to regain the function of the original cut or harvest material from the original fill Re cuts are considered quite valuable as a source of information because they can shed insight on function and attitude over time An example of re cutting would be a roadside ditch being re cut and emptied of silt and detritus as a form of maintenance Conversely a roadside ditch that is never re cut gives a certain impression about the attitude towards the investment in infrastructure the road represents Re cuts by their nature are hard to discern because the re cut can truncate the original cut in part and be completely in the confines of the original fill in other parts They can even be absent from the record Cutting is the reason why not all past activity on a site leaves traces of its existence in the sequence Hypothetical ditch re cuts shown in section Edit Fig 3 Section of ditch with at least two re cuts The third image Fig 3 shows how a ditch cut with at least two re cuts may appear when viewed in section It is possible that numerous other re cuts took place and were truncated out of the archaeological record by one or more of the re cuts that has survived See also EditAlignment archaeology Archaeological association Archaeological context Archaeological plan Archaeological section Cut earthmoving Feature archaeology Fill archaeology Harris matrix Relationship archaeology Single context recordingReferences EditThe MoLAS archaeological site manual MoLAS London 1994 ISBN 0 904818 40 3 Rb 128pp bl wh Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Cut archaeology amp oldid 1072393224, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
