fbpx
Wikipedia

Thompson v T Lohan (Plant Hire) Ltd

Thompson v T Lohan (Plant Hire) Ltd [1987] 2 All ER 631 is an English contract law case on the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

Thompson v T Lohan (Plant Hire) Ltd
CourtCourt of Appeal
Citation(s)[1987] 2 All ER 631
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingFox LJ
Keywords
Unfair terms

It is usually read with Phillips Products Ltd v Hyland and Hamstead Plant Hire Co Ltd[1] where a similar contract clause (an older version of the same standard industry term) was held to be unreasonable, but where the liability being shifted had the effect of leaving a victim of loss without a remedy. In Thompson there was no exclusion of liability to the victim of the accident.

Facts edit

T Lohan hired out a JCB excavator and driver, Mr Hill, to JW Hurdiss Ltd, the owners of a quarry. Condition 8 of the contract said the driver was employed by JW Hurdiss Ltd. The driver caused Mr Thompson’s death. Mrs Thompson got damages from T Lohan for her husband's life. T Lohan sought to recover the cost of compensation from JW Hurdiss Ltd. JW Hurdiss argued that condition 8 was caught by UCTA 1977 section 2(1).

Judgment edit

Fox LJ held that condition 8 was not caught by UCTA 1977 and was effective to transfer liability to the hirers. Section 2(1) had no effect because liability was not excluded towards the victim of the negligent act, Mr Thompson. It only excluded liability towards T Lohan themselves. It transferred liability. This distinguished the case from Phillips Products Ltd v Hyland and Hamstead Plant Hire Co Ltd.[2] So there is a distinction between an exclusion and transfer of liability. In particular he noted the following.

In my opinion, section 2(1) is concerned with protecting the victim of negligence and, of course, those who claim under him. It is not concerned with arrangements made by the wrongdoer with other persons as to the sharing or bearing of the burden of compensating the victim. In such a case it seems to me there is no exclusion or restriction of the liability at all.

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ [1987] 2 All ER 620
  2. ^ [1987] 2 All ER 620

thompson, lohan, plant, hire, 1987, english, contract, case, unfair, contract, terms, 1977, courtcourt, appealcitation, 1987, 631court, membershipjudge, sittingfox, ljkeywordsunfair, terms, usually, read, with, phillips, products, hyland, hamstead, plant, hire. Thompson v T Lohan Plant Hire Ltd 1987 2 All ER 631 is an English contract law case on the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 Thompson v T Lohan Plant Hire LtdCourtCourt of AppealCitation s 1987 2 All ER 631Court membershipJudge s sittingFox LJKeywordsUnfair terms It is usually read with Phillips Products Ltd v Hyland and Hamstead Plant Hire Co Ltd 1 where a similar contract clause an older version of the same standard industry term was held to be unreasonable but where the liability being shifted had the effect of leaving a victim of loss without a remedy In Thompson there was no exclusion of liability to the victim of the accident Contents 1 Facts 2 Judgment 3 See also 4 NotesFacts editT Lohan hired out a JCB excavator and driver Mr Hill to JW Hurdiss Ltd the owners of a quarry Condition 8 of the contract said the driver was employed by JW Hurdiss Ltd The driver caused Mr Thompson s death Mrs Thompson got damages from T Lohan for her husband s life T Lohan sought to recover the cost of compensation from JW Hurdiss Ltd JW Hurdiss argued that condition 8 was caught by UCTA 1977 section 2 1 Judgment editFox LJ held that condition 8 was not caught by UCTA 1977 and was effective to transfer liability to the hirers Section 2 1 had no effect because liability was not excluded towards the victim of the negligent act Mr Thompson It only excluded liability towards T Lohan themselves It transferred liability This distinguished the case from Phillips Products Ltd v Hyland and Hamstead Plant Hire Co Ltd 2 So there is a distinction between an exclusion and transfer of liability In particular he noted the following In my opinion section 2 1 is concerned with protecting the victim of negligence and of course those who claim under him It is not concerned with arrangements made by the wrongdoer with other persons as to the sharing or bearing of the burden of compensating the victim In such a case it seems to me there is no exclusion or restriction of the liability at all See also editEnglish contract lawNotes edit 1987 2 All ER 620 1987 2 All ER 620 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Thompson v T Lohan Plant Hire Ltd amp oldid 1149076653, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.