fbpx
Wikipedia

Tertiary review

In software engineering, a tertiary review is a systematic review of systematic reviews.[1] It is also referred to as a tertiary study in the software engineering literature. However, Umbrella review is the term more commonly used in medicine.

Kitchenham et al.[1] suggest that methodologically there is no difference between a systematic review and a tertiary review. However, as the software engineering community has started performing tertiary reviews new concerns unique to tertiary reviews have surfaced. These include the challenge of quality assessment of systematic reviews,[2] search validation[3] and the additional risk of double counting.[4]

Examples of Tertiary reviews in software engineering literature edit

  • Test quality [5]
  • Machine Learning[6]
  • Test-driven development[7]

References edit

  1. ^ a b Kitchenham, B. A. (2016). Evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews. Boca Raton. ISBN 9781482228656.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  2. ^ Usman, Muhammad; Ali, Nauman Bin; Wohlin, Claes (2023). "A Quality Assessment Instrument for Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering". E-Informatica Software Engineering Journal. 17: 230105. arXiv:2109.10134. doi:10.37190/e-inf230105. S2CID 237581262.
  3. ^ Börstler, Jürgen; bin Ali, Nauman; Unterkalmsteiner, Michael (2022). "How good are my search strings? Reflections on using an existing review as a quasi-gold standard". E-Informatica Software Engineering Journal. 16 (1): 220103. arXiv:2402.11041. doi:10.37190/e-inf220103. S2CID 245255682.
  4. ^ Börstler, Jürgen; bin Ali, Nauman; Petersen, Kai (2023-06-01). "Double-counting in software engineering tertiary studies — An overlooked threat to validity". Information and Software Technology. 158: 107174. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107174. ISSN 0950-5849. S2CID 257173845.
  5. ^ Tran, Huynh Khanh Vi; Unterkalmsteiner, Michael; Börstler, Jürgen; Ali, Nauman bin (November 2021). "Assessing test artifact quality—A tertiary study". Information and Software Technology. 139: 106620. arXiv:2402.09541. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106620.
  6. ^ Kotti, Zoe; Galanopoulou, Rafaila; Spinellis, Diomidis (2 March 2023). "Machine Learning for Software Engineering: A Tertiary Study". ACM Computing Surveys. 55 (12): 256:1–256:39. arXiv:2211.09425. doi:10.1145/3572905.
  7. ^ Munir, Hussan; Moayyed, Misagh; Petersen, Kai (1 April 2014). "Considering rigor and relevance when evaluating test driven development: A systematic review". Information and Software Technology. 56 (4): 375–394. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.01.002.

tertiary, review, software, engineering, tertiary, review, systematic, review, systematic, reviews, also, referred, tertiary, study, software, engineering, literature, however, umbrella, review, term, more, commonly, used, medicine, kitchenham, suggest, that, . In software engineering a tertiary review is a systematic review of systematic reviews 1 It is also referred to as a tertiary study in the software engineering literature However Umbrella review is the term more commonly used in medicine Kitchenham et al 1 suggest that methodologically there is no difference between a systematic review and a tertiary review However as the software engineering community has started performing tertiary reviews new concerns unique to tertiary reviews have surfaced These include the challenge of quality assessment of systematic reviews 2 search validation 3 and the additional risk of double counting 4 Examples of Tertiary reviews in software engineering literature editTest quality 5 Machine Learning 6 Test driven development 7 References edit a b Kitchenham B A 2016 Evidence based software engineering and systematic reviews Boca Raton ISBN 9781482228656 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint location missing publisher link Usman Muhammad Ali Nauman Bin Wohlin Claes 2023 A Quality Assessment Instrument for Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering E Informatica Software Engineering Journal 17 230105 arXiv 2109 10134 doi 10 37190 e inf230105 S2CID 237581262 Borstler Jurgen bin Ali Nauman Unterkalmsteiner Michael 2022 How good are my search strings Reflections on using an existing review as a quasi gold standard E Informatica Software Engineering Journal 16 1 220103 arXiv 2402 11041 doi 10 37190 e inf220103 S2CID 245255682 Borstler Jurgen bin Ali Nauman Petersen Kai 2023 06 01 Double counting in software engineering tertiary studies An overlooked threat to validity Information and Software Technology 158 107174 doi 10 1016 j infsof 2023 107174 ISSN 0950 5849 S2CID 257173845 Tran Huynh Khanh Vi Unterkalmsteiner Michael Borstler Jurgen Ali Nauman bin November 2021 Assessing test artifact quality A tertiary study Information and Software Technology 139 106620 arXiv 2402 09541 doi 10 1016 j infsof 2021 106620 Kotti Zoe Galanopoulou Rafaila Spinellis Diomidis 2 March 2023 Machine Learning for Software Engineering A Tertiary Study ACM Computing Surveys 55 12 256 1 256 39 arXiv 2211 09425 doi 10 1145 3572905 Munir Hussan Moayyed Misagh Petersen Kai 1 April 2014 Considering rigor and relevance when evaluating test driven development A systematic review Information and Software Technology 56 4 375 394 doi 10 1016 j infsof 2014 01 002 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Tertiary review amp oldid 1213127933, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.