fbpx
Wikipedia

Stanford Law School Three Strikes Project

The Stanford Law School Three Strikes Project is one of the eleven Mills Legal Clinics at Stanford Law School. Founded in 2006, it provides legal representation to convicts serving life sentences under California's three strikes law for committing minor, non-violent felonies. Under the supervision of clinic instructors, students represent clients in both federal and state court. The Project is directed by attorney and lecturer Michael Romano.

In order to secure the release of its clients, the Project pursues resentencing hearings or constitutional challenges to the sentences imposed, either by direct appeal or post-conviction habeas petitions. Typical claims include ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment, cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment, and habeas petitions with newly discovered evidence under People v. Superior Court (Romero), 13 Cal.4th 497 (1996), and People v. Williams, 17 Cal.4th 148 (1998). Clinic students work in two-person teams representing a single client, visiting the client in prison, conducting factual investigations throughout California, and drafting court pleadings and briefs.

Despite facing difficult legal terrain under Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11 (2003), and Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003), in which the United States Supreme Court effectively foreclosed relief for the disproportionality of third-strike sentences under the federal Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause, the Project has been largely successful. To date, it has won the reversal or resentencing of over 150 people.[1] Previous clients had been sentenced to life in prison for minor crimes such as possession of less than a gram of narcotics, stealing a dollar's worth of change from a car, shoplifting three disposable cameras, writing bad checks, and stealing tools from a tow truck.

The Project has been featured in stories by the New York Times Magazine,[2] the Los Angeles Times,[3][4] The Economist,[5] and the BBC.[6]

References edit

  1. ^ "Three Strikes Project".
  2. ^ Bazelon, Emily (May 21, 2010). "Arguing Three Strikes". New York Times Magazine.
  3. ^ Leonard, Jack (May 13, 2009). "Law students help free three-strikes offenders". Los Angeles Times.
  4. ^ "Three strikes sanity". Los Angeles Times. May 16, 2009.
  5. ^ "Criminal law in California". The Economist. June 11, 2009.
  6. ^ "Assignment: Three Strike Lifers". BBC.

External links edit

  • Official site

See also edit

stanford, school, three, strikes, project, eleven, mills, legal, clinics, stanford, school, founded, 2006, provides, legal, representation, convicts, serving, life, sentences, under, california, three, strikes, committing, minor, violent, felonies, under, supe. The Stanford Law School Three Strikes Project is one of the eleven Mills Legal Clinics at Stanford Law School Founded in 2006 it provides legal representation to convicts serving life sentences under California s three strikes law for committing minor non violent felonies Under the supervision of clinic instructors students represent clients in both federal and state court The Project is directed by attorney and lecturer Michael Romano In order to secure the release of its clients the Project pursues resentencing hearings or constitutional challenges to the sentences imposed either by direct appeal or post conviction habeas petitions Typical claims include ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment and habeas petitions with newly discovered evidence under People v Superior Court Romero 13 Cal 4th 497 1996 and People v Williams 17 Cal 4th 148 1998 Clinic students work in two person teams representing a single client visiting the client in prison conducting factual investigations throughout California and drafting court pleadings and briefs Despite facing difficult legal terrain under Ewing v California 538 U S 11 2003 and Lockyer v Andrade 538 U S 63 2003 in which the United States Supreme Court effectively foreclosed relief for the disproportionality of third strike sentences under the federal Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause the Project has been largely successful To date it has won the reversal or resentencing of over 150 people 1 Previous clients had been sentenced to life in prison for minor crimes such as possession of less than a gram of narcotics stealing a dollar s worth of change from a car shoplifting three disposable cameras writing bad checks and stealing tools from a tow truck The Project has been featured in stories by the New York Times Magazine 2 the Los Angeles Times 3 4 The Economist 5 and the BBC 6 References edit Three Strikes Project Bazelon Emily May 21 2010 Arguing Three Strikes New York Times Magazine Leonard Jack May 13 2009 Law students help free three strikes offenders Los Angeles Times Three strikes sanity Los Angeles Times May 16 2009 Criminal law in California The Economist June 11 2009 Assignment Three Strike Lifers BBC External links editOfficial siteSee also editStanford Law School Legal clinic Defense legal Three strikes law Recidivism Habitual Offender Laws Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Stanford Law School Three Strikes Project amp oldid 1104929429, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.