Spontaneous parametric down-conversion

Spontaneous parametric down-conversion (also known as SPDC, parametric fluorescence or parametric scattering) is a nonlinear instant optical process that converts one photon of higher energy (namely, a pump photon), into a pair of photons (namely, a signal photon, and an idler photon) of lower energy, in accordance with the law of conservation of energy and law of conservation of momentum. It is an important process in quantum optics, for the generation of entangled photon pairs, and of single photons.

Schematic of SPDC process. Note that conservation laws are with respect to energy and momentum inside the crystal.

Basic process

 

An SPDC scheme with the Type I output

The video of an experiment showing vacuum fluctuations (in the red ring) amplified by SPDC (corresponding to the image above)

A nonlinear crystal is used to produce pairs of photons from a photon beam. In accordance with the law of conservation of energy and law of conservation of momentum, the pairs have combined energies and momenta equal to the energy and momentum of the original photon. Because the index of refraction changes with frequency (dispersion), only certain triplets of frequencies will be phase-matched so that simultaneous energy and momentum conservation can be achieved. Phase-matching is most commonly achieved using birefringent nonlinear materials, whose index of refraction changes with polarization. As a result of this, different types of SPDC are categorized by the polarizations of the input photon (the pump) and the two output photons (signal and idler). If the signal and idler photons share the same polarization with each other and with the destroyed pump photon it is deemed Type-0 SPDC;^[1] if the signal and idler photons share the same polarization to each other, but are orthogonal to the pump polarization, it is Type-I SPDC; and if the signal and idler photons have perpendicular polarizations, it is deemed Type II SPDC.^[2]

The conversion efficiency of SPDC is typically very low, with the highest efficiency obtained on the order of 4x10^-6 incoming photons for PPLN in waveguides.^[3] However, if one half of the pair is detected at any time then its partner is known to be present. The degenerate portion of the output of a Type I down converter is a squeezed vacuum that contains only even photon number terms. The nondegenerate output of the Type II down converter is a two-mode squeezed vacuum.

Example

 

An SPDC scheme with the Type II output

In a commonly used SPDC apparatus design, a strong laser beam, termed the "pump" beam, is directed at a BBO (beta-barium borate) or lithium niobate crystal. Most of the photons continue straight through the crystal. However, occasionally, some of the photons undergo spontaneous down-conversion with Type II polarization correlation, and the resultant correlated photon pairs have trajectories that are constrained along the sides of two cones whose axes are symmetrically arranged relative to the pump beam. Due to the conservation of momentum, the two photons are always symmetrically located on the sides of the cones, relative to the pump beam. In particular, the trajectories of a small proportion of photon pairs will lie simultaneously on the two lines where the surfaces of the two cones intersect. This results in entanglement of the polarizations of the pairs of photons emerging on those two lines. The photon pairs are in an equal weight quantum superposition of the unentangled states ${\displaystyle \vert H\rangle \vert V\rangle }$  and ${\displaystyle \vert V\rangle \vert H\rangle }$ , corresponding to polarizations of left-hand side photon, right-hand side photon. ^{[4][5]: 205}

Another crystal is KDP (potassium dihydrogen phosphate) which is mostly used in Type I down conversion, where both photons have the same polarization.^[6]

Some of the characteristics of effective parametric down-converting nonlinear crystals include:

1. Nonlinearity: The refractive index of the crystal changes with the intensity of the incident light. This is known as the nonlinear optical response.
2. Periodicity: The crystal has a regular, repeating structure. This is known as the lattice structure, which is responsible for the regular arrangement of the atoms in the crystal.
3. Optical anisotropy: The crystal has different refractive indices along different crystallographic axes.
4. Temperature and pressure sensitivity: The nonlinearity of the crystal can change with temperature and pressure, and thus the crystal should be kept in a stable temperature and pressure environment.
5. High nonlinear coefficient: Large nonlinear coefficient is desirable, this allow to generate a high number of entangled photons.
6. High optical damage threshold: Crystal with high optical damage threshold can endure high intensity of the pumping beam.
7. Transparency in the desired wavelength range: It is important for the crystal to be transparent in the wavelength range of the pump beam for efficient nonlinear interactions
8. High optical quality and low absorption: The crystal should be high optical quality and low absorption to minimize loss of the pump beam and the generated entangled photons.

History

SPDC was demonstrated as early as 1967 by S. E. Harris, M. K. Oshman, and R. L. Byer,^[7] as well as by D. Magde and H. Mahr.^[8] It was first applied to experiments related to coherence by two independent pairs of researchers in the late 1980s: Carroll Alley and Yanhua Shih, and Rupamanjari Ghosh and Leonard Mandel.^[9][10] The duality between incoherent (Van Cittert–Zernike theorem) and biphoton emissions was found.^[11]

Applications

SPDC allows for the creation of optical fields containing (to a good approximation) a single photon. As of 2005, this is the predominant mechanism for an experimenter to create single photons (also known as Fock states).^[12] The single photons as well as the photon pairs are often used in quantum information experiments and applications like quantum cryptography and Bell test experiments.

SPDC is widely used to create pairs of entangled photons with a high degree of spatial correlation.^[13] Such pairs are used in ghost imaging, in which information is combined from two light detectors: a conventional, multi-pixel detector that does not view the object, and a single-pixel (bucket) detector that does view the object.

Alternatives

The newly observed effect of two-photon emission from electrically driven semiconductors has been proposed as a basis for more efficient sources of entangled photon pairs.^[14] Other than SPDC-generated photon pairs, the photons of a semiconductor-emitted pair usually are not identical but have different energies.^[15] Until recently, within the constraints of quantum uncertainty, the pair of emitted photons were assumed to be co-located: they are born from the same location. However, a new nonlocalized mechanism for the production of correlated photon pairs in SPDC has highlighted that occasionally the individual photons that constitute the pair can be emitted from spatially separated points.^[16][17]

See also

• Photon upconversion

References

1. Lerch, Stefan; Bessire, Bänz; Bernhard, Christof; Feurer, Thomas; Stefanov, André (2013-04-01). "Tuning curve of type-0 spontaneous parametric down-conversion". Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 30 (4): 953–958. arXiv:1404.1192. Bibcode:2013JOSAB..30..953L. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.30.000953. ISSN 0740-3224. S2CID 149192.
2. Boyd, Robert (2008). Nonlinear Optics, Third Edition. New York: Academic Press. pp. 79–88. ISBN 978-0-12-369470-6.
3. Bock, Matthias; Lenhard, Andreas; Chunnilall, Christopher; Becher, Christoph (17 October 2016). "Highly efficient heralded single-photon source for telecom wavelengths based on a PPLN waveguide". Optics Express. 24 (21): 23992–24001. Bibcode:2016OExpr..2423992B. doi:10.1364/OE.24.023992. ISSN 1094-4087. PMID 27828232.
4. P. Kwiat; et al. (1995). "New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs". Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (24): 4337–4341. Bibcode:1995PhRvL..75.4337K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4337. PMID 10059884.
5. Anton Zeilinger (12 October 2010). "The super-source and closing the communication loophole". Dance of the Photons: From Einstein to Quantum Teleportation. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 978-1-4299-6379-4.
6. Reck, M H A, Quantum Interferometry with Multiports: Entangled Photons in Optical Fibers (page 115) (PDF), retrieved 16 February 2014
7. Harris, S. E.; Oshman, M. K.; Byer, R. L. (1967-05-01). "Observation of Tunable Optical Parametric Fluorescence". Physical Review Letters. 18 (18): 732–734. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.18.732.
8. Magde, Douglas; Mahr, Herbert (1967-05-22). "Study in Ammonium Dihydrogen Phosphate of Spontaneous Parametric Interaction Tunable from 4400 to 16 000 \AA{}". Physical Review Letters. 18 (21): 905–907. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.18.905.
9. Y. Shih and C. Alley, in Proceedings of the 2nd Int'l Symposium on Foundations of QM in Light of New Technology, Namiki et al., eds., Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1986.
10. Ghosh, R.; Mandel, L. (1987). "Observation of Nonclassical Effects in the Interference of Two Photons". Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (17): 1903–1905. Bibcode:1987PhRvL..59.1903G. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.1903. PMID 10035364.
11. http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v62/i4/e043816 - Duality between partial coherence and partial entanglement
12. Zavatta, Alessandro; Viciani, Silvia; Bellini, Marco (2004). "Tomographic reconstruction of the single-photon Fock state by high-frequency homodyne detection". Physical Review A. 70 (5): 053821. arXiv:quant-ph/0406090. Bibcode:2004PhRvA..70e3821Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.70.053821. S2CID 119387795.
13. Walborn, S.P.; Monken, C.H.; Pádua, S.; Souto Ribeiro, P.H. (2010). "Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion". Physics Reports. 495 (4–5): 87–139. arXiv:1010.1236. Bibcode:2010PhR...495...87W. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.06.003. ISSN 0370-1573. S2CID 119221135.
14. Hayat, Alex; Ginzburg, Pavel; Orenstein, Meir (2008-03-02). "Observation of two-photon emission from semiconductors". Nature Photonics. 2 (4). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 238–241. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2008.28. ISSN 1749-4885.
15. Chluba, J.; Sunyaev, R. A. (2006). "Induced two-photon decay of the 2s level and the rate of cosmological hydrogen recombination". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 446 (1): 39–42. arXiv:astro-ph/0508144. Bibcode:2006A&A...446...39C. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053988. S2CID 119526307.
16. Forbes, Kayn A.; Ford, Jack S.; Andrews, David L. (2017-03-30). "Nonlocalized Generation of Correlated Photon Pairs in Degenerate Down-Conversion" (PDF). Physical Review Letters. 118 (13): 133602. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.118m3602F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.133602. PMID 28409956.
17. Forbes, Kayn A.; Ford, Jack S.; Jones, Garth A.; Andrews, David L. (2017-08-23). "Quantum delocalization in photon-pair generation" (PDF). Physical Review A. 96 (2): 023850. Bibcode:2017PhRvA..96b3850F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.96.023850.