fbpx
Wikipedia

Scheme-theoretic intersection

In algebraic geometry, the scheme-theoretic intersection of closed subschemes X, Y of a scheme W is , the fiber product of the closed immersions . It is denoted by .

Locally, W is given as for some ring R and X, Y as for some ideals I, J. Thus, locally, the intersection is given as

Here, we used (for this identity, see tensor product of modules#Examples.)

Example: Let be a projective variety with the homogeneous coordinate ring S/I, where S is a polynomial ring. If is a hypersurface defined by some homogeneous polynomial f in S, then

If f is linear (deg = 1), it is called a hyperplane section. See also: Bertini's theorem.

Now, a scheme-theoretic intersection may not be a correct intersection, say, from the point of view of intersection theory. For example,[1] let = the affine 4-space and X, Y closed subschemes defined by the ideals and . Since X is the union of two planes, each intersecting with Y at the origin with multiplicity one, by the linearity of intersection multiplicity, we expect X and Y intersect at the origin with multiplicity two. On the other hand, one sees the scheme-theoretic intersection consists of the origin with multiplicity three. That is, a scheme-theoretic multiplicity of an intersection may differ from an intersection-theoretic multiplicity, the latter given by Serre's Tor formula. Solving this disparity is one of the starting points for derived algebraic geometry, which aims to introduce the notion of derived intersection.

Proper intersection edit

Let X be a regular scheme and V, W closed integral subschemes. Then an irreducible component P of   is called proper if the inequality (due to Serre):

 

is an equality.[2] The intersection   is proper if every irreducible component of it is proper (in particular, the empty intersection is considered proper.) Two algebraic cycles are said to intersect properly if the varieties in the cycles intersect properly.

For example, two divisors (codimension-one cycles) on a smooth variety intersect properly if and only if they share no common irreducible component. Chow's moving lemma (on a smooth variety) says that an intersection can be made proper after replacing a divisor by a suitable linearly equivalent divisor (cf. Kleiman's theorem.)

Serre's inequality above may fail in general for a non-regular ambient scheme. For example,[3] let  . Then   have codimension one, while   has codimension three.

Some authors such as Bloch define a proper intersection without assuming X is regular: in the notations as above, a component P is proper if

 

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Hartshorne 1977, Appendix A: Example 1.1.1.
  2. ^ Fulton 1998, § 20.4.
  3. ^ Fulton 1998, Example 7.1.6.
  • Fulton, William (1998), Intersection theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge., vol. 2 (2nd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-62046-4, MR 1644323
  • Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157

scheme, theoretic, intersection, algebraic, geometry, scheme, theoretic, intersection, closed, subschemes, scheme, displaystyle, times, fiber, product, closed, immersions, displaystyle, hookrightarrow, hookrightarrow, denoted, displaystyle, locally, given, spe. In algebraic geometry the scheme theoretic intersection of closed subschemes X Y of a scheme W is X W Y displaystyle X times W Y the fiber product of the closed immersions X W Y W displaystyle X hookrightarrow W Y hookrightarrow W It is denoted by X Y displaystyle X cap Y Locally W is given as Spec R displaystyle operatorname Spec R for some ring R and X Y as Spec R I Spec R J displaystyle operatorname Spec R I operatorname Spec R J for some ideals I J Thus locally the intersection X Y displaystyle X cap Y is given as Spec R I J displaystyle operatorname Spec R I J Here we used R I R R J R I J displaystyle R I otimes R R J simeq R I J for this identity see tensor product of modules Examples Example Let X P n displaystyle X subset mathbb P n be a projective variety with the homogeneous coordinate ring S I where S is a polynomial ring If H f 0 P n displaystyle H f 0 subset mathbb P n is a hypersurface defined by some homogeneous polynomial f in S then X H Proj S I f displaystyle X cap H operatorname Proj S I f If f is linear deg 1 it is called a hyperplane section See also Bertini s theorem Now a scheme theoretic intersection may not be a correct intersection say from the point of view of intersection theory For example 1 let W Spec k x y z w displaystyle W operatorname Spec k x y z w the affine 4 space and X Y closed subschemes defined by the ideals x y z w displaystyle x y cap z w and x z y w displaystyle x z y w Since X is the union of two planes each intersecting with Y at the origin with multiplicity one by the linearity of intersection multiplicity we expect X and Y intersect at the origin with multiplicity two On the other hand one sees the scheme theoretic intersection X Y displaystyle X cap Y consists of the origin with multiplicity three That is a scheme theoretic multiplicity of an intersection may differ from an intersection theoretic multiplicity the latter given by Serre s Tor formula Solving this disparity is one of the starting points for derived algebraic geometry which aims to introduce the notion of derived intersection Proper intersection editLet X be a regular scheme and V W closed integral subschemes Then an irreducible component P of V W V X W displaystyle V cap W V times X W nbsp is called proper if the inequality due to Serre codim P X codim V X codim W X displaystyle operatorname codim P X leq operatorname codim V X operatorname codim W X nbsp is an equality 2 The intersection V W displaystyle V cap W nbsp is proper if every irreducible component of it is proper in particular the empty intersection is considered proper Two algebraic cycles are said to intersect properly if the varieties in the cycles intersect properly For example two divisors codimension one cycles on a smooth variety intersect properly if and only if they share no common irreducible component Chow s moving lemma on a smooth variety says that an intersection can be made proper after replacing a divisor by a suitable linearly equivalent divisor cf Kleiman s theorem Serre s inequality above may fail in general for a non regular ambient scheme For example 3 let X Spec k x y z w x z y w V V x y W V z w displaystyle X operatorname Spec k x y z w xz yw V V overline x overline y W V overline z overline w nbsp Then V W displaystyle V W nbsp have codimension one while V W displaystyle V cap W nbsp has codimension three Some authors such as Bloch define a proper intersection without assuming X is regular in the notations as above a component P is proper if codim P X codim V X codim W X displaystyle operatorname codim P X geq operatorname codim V X operatorname codim W X nbsp See also editcomplete intersection Gysin homomorphismReferences edit Hartshorne 1977 Appendix A Example 1 1 1 Fulton 1998 20 4 Fulton 1998 Example 7 1 6 Fulton William 1998 Intersection theory Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 3 Folge vol 2 2nd ed Berlin New York Springer Verlag ISBN 978 3 540 62046 4 MR 1644323 Hartshorne Robin 1977 Algebraic Geometry Graduate Texts in Mathematics vol 52 New York Springer Verlag ISBN 978 0 387 90244 9 MR 0463157 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Scheme theoretic intersection amp oldid 1119807704, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.