The main steps in this process are the production of chlorobenzene from benzene, hydrochloric acid and oxygen, and the subsequent hydrolysis of chlorobenzene to phenol.[4] The first step uses either a copper or iron chloride catalyst and exposes the materials to air at 200–250℃.[5][6][7][8] In the second step, the resulting chlorobenzene is introduced to steam at 450℃ over a silicon catalyst that hydrolyses the chlorobenzene, giving phenol and hydrogen chloride that can then be recycled back to the first step.[6][7] Due to the two step nature, the Raschig–Hooker process can be used to produce either chlorobenzene or phenol.
Reaction scheme of the Raschig-Hooker process
The Raschig–Hooker process's ability to make phenol makes it comparable to other methods, such as the Dow and Bayer process, which also converts benzene into phenol. In fact, the ability to recycle the hydrogen chloride made the Raschig–Hooker process preferable to the Dow and Bayer process, which requires its sodium chloride product to be converted into chlorine and sodium hydroxide. The reaction, however, takes place at very high temperatures in a very acidic environment with hydrogen chloride vapor and therefore the industrial setting must use highly corrosion resistant equipment for the reaction. While the Raschig–Hooker process does recycle the hydrogen chloride it produces, its catalyst experiences carbon deposition and must be frequently regenerated. The harsh chemical environment, use of catalysts, and large energy consumption has made it a target for green chemistry alternatives.[6]
The Raschig–Hooker process suffers from selectivity issues in both steps. In the first step, the reaction is only run to 10% to 15% conversion to prevent the second addition of a chlorine atom to the desired chlorobenzene. Despite this, the overall selectivity of the reaction is 70% to 85%. This second addition can be reversed using the Hooker modification, though it is also costly. The second step shares the low conversion rate and high selectivity of the first step. The small amount conversion per reaction offsets the monetary benefit of recycling the hydrogen chloride due to the large initial cost of the reaction. Therefore, the Raschig–Hooker process needed to be run at high concentrations in large reactors to be industrially economical.[6]
Due to its low productivity, this process is largely unused today. As of 1997[update], every plant in the United States that was using the Raschig–Hooker process has been shut down, though it was still used by some plants in countries such as Argentina, India, Italy, and Poland. Rather than using the Raschig–Hooker process, some companies use the Hock or cumene process, which instead synthesizes acetone and phenol from benzene and propylene. This preferred process has dominated the market, especially as acetone is also a highly desired substance.[6]
raschig, hooker, process, chemical, process, production, chlorobenzene, phenol, patented, friedrich, raschig, german, chemist, politician, also, known, raschig, process, olin, raschig, process, raschig, ring, first, begun, this, reaction, 1891, order, manufact. The Raschig Hooker process is a chemical process for the production of chlorobenzene and phenol 1 2 The Raschig Hooker process was patented by Friedrich Raschig a German chemist and politician also known for the Raschig process the Olin Raschig process and the Raschig ring 3 He first begun to use this reaction in 1891 in order to manufacture phenol Overview of the Raschig Hooker process The main steps in this process are the production of chlorobenzene from benzene hydrochloric acid and oxygen and the subsequent hydrolysis of chlorobenzene to phenol 4 The first step uses either a copper or iron chloride catalyst and exposes the materials to air at 200 250 5 6 7 8 In the second step the resulting chlorobenzene is introduced to steam at 450 over a silicon catalyst that hydrolyses the chlorobenzene giving phenol and hydrogen chloride that can then be recycled back to the first step 6 7 Due to the two step nature the Raschig Hooker process can be used to produce either chlorobenzene or phenol Reaction scheme of the Raschig Hooker process The Raschig Hooker process s ability to make phenol makes it comparable to other methods such as the Dow and Bayer process which also converts benzene into phenol In fact the ability to recycle the hydrogen chloride made the Raschig Hooker process preferable to the Dow and Bayer process which requires its sodium chloride product to be converted into chlorine and sodium hydroxide The reaction however takes place at very high temperatures in a very acidic environment with hydrogen chloride vapor and therefore the industrial setting must use highly corrosion resistant equipment for the reaction While the Raschig Hooker process does recycle the hydrogen chloride it produces its catalyst experiences carbon deposition and must be frequently regenerated The harsh chemical environment use of catalysts and large energy consumption has made it a target for green chemistry alternatives 6 The Raschig Hooker process suffers from selectivity issues in both steps In the first step the reaction is only run to 10 to 15 conversion to prevent the second addition of a chlorine atom to the desired chlorobenzene Despite this the overall selectivity of the reaction is 70 to 85 This second addition can be reversed using the Hooker modification though it is also costly The second step shares the low conversion rate and high selectivity of the first step The small amount conversion per reaction offsets the monetary benefit of recycling the hydrogen chloride due to the large initial cost of the reaction Therefore the Raschig Hooker process needed to be run at high concentrations in large reactors to be industrially economical 6 Due to its low productivity this process is largely unused today As of 1997 update every plant in the United States that was using the Raschig Hooker process has been shut down though it was still used by some plants in countries such as Argentina India Italy and Poland Rather than using the Raschig Hooker process some companies use the Hock or cumene process which instead synthesizes acetone and phenol from benzene and propylene This preferred process has dominated the market especially as acetone is also a highly desired substance 6 References Edit Weber Manfred Weber Markus Kleine Boymann Michael 2004 Phenol Ullmann s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry doi 10 1002 14356007 a19 299 pub2 ISBN 3527306730 Kropf H 1964 Moderne technische Phenol Synthesen I Chemie Ingenieur Technik 36 7 759 768 doi 10 1002 cite 330360707 Dr Friedrich Raschig Obituary PDF Lidner G Nyberg K 2012 12 06 Environmental Engineering A Chemical Engineering Discipline p 37 ISBN 9789401026086 Losch P Kolb J F Astafan A Daou T J Pinard L Pale P Louis B 2016 Eco compatible zeolite catalysed continuous halogenation of aromatics Green Chemistry 18 17 4714 4724 doi 10 1039 C6GC00731G a b c d e Weissermel Klaus Arpe Hans Jrgen eds 2003 05 27 Benzene Derivatives Industrial Organic Chemistry Weinheim Germany Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH pp 351 352 doi 10 1002 9783527619191 ch13 ISBN 978 3 527 61919 1 retrieved 2022 12 20 a b Wittcoff Harold Reuben Bryan Plotkin Jeffrey 2012 12 10 Industrial Organic Chemicals p 327 ISBN 9781280556692 Tyman J H P 1996 08 21 Synthetic and Natural Phenols p 7 ISBN 9780080542195 This chemical reaction article is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Raschig Hooker process amp oldid 1128530036, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
