fbpx
Wikipedia

R v Soqokomashe

R v Soqokomashe[1] is an important case in South African law, heard in the Eastern Districts Local Division by Price JP and Jennett J on 2 March 1956, with judgment handed down on 9 March.

Facts edit

The appellants had pleaded guilty to a charge of arson, it being alleged that they had set fire to a rondavel classroom of a "native" school. The Crown evidence showed that the structure was immovable, but that there was no evidence to prove that it had been burned intentionally.

Judgment edit

In an appeal from convictions in a magistrate's court, the court held that, as long as an accidental burning had not been excluded by the evidence as a reasonable possibility, it could not be said that it had been proved aliunde beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime had been committed. The court held further that the case should not be remitted for further evidence.

See also edit

References edit

Case law edit

  • R v Soqokomashe 1956 (2) SA 142 (E).

Notes edit

  1. ^ 1956 (2) SA 142 (E).


soqokomashe, important, case, south, african, heard, eastern, districts, local, division, price, jennett, march, 1956, with, judgment, handed, down, march, contents, facts, judgment, also, references, case, notesfacts, editthe, appellants, pleaded, guilty, cha. R v Soqokomashe 1 is an important case in South African law heard in the Eastern Districts Local Division by Price JP and Jennett J on 2 March 1956 with judgment handed down on 9 March Contents 1 Facts 2 Judgment 3 See also 4 References 4 1 Case law 5 NotesFacts editThe appellants had pleaded guilty to a charge of arson it being alleged that they had set fire to a rondavel classroom of a native school The Crown evidence showed that the structure was immovable but that there was no evidence to prove that it had been burned intentionally Judgment editIn an appeal from convictions in a magistrate s court the court held that as long as an accidental burning had not been excluded by the evidence as a reasonable possibility it could not be said that it had been proved aliunde beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime had been committed The court held further that the case should not be remitted for further evidence See also editR v Mataung Arson Crime in South Africa Law of South AfricaReferences editCase law edit R v Soqokomashe 1956 2 SA 142 E Notes edit 1956 2 SA 142 E nbsp This article relating to case law in South Africa is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title R v Soqokomashe amp oldid 1212669840, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.