fbpx
Wikipedia

R v Mavros

R v Mavros[1] is an important case in South African law. It was heard in the Appellate Division in Bloemfontein in November 1920. Innes CJ, Solomon JA and Juta JA were the presiding officers.

Facts edit

The term "arson" in South African practice is used to denote the corresponding, but somewhat wider, crime of brandstichting, which is committed by a man who sets fire to his own house wrongfully, maliciously and with intent to injure or defraud another person. Mavros in the present case had been convicted of the crime of arson, in that he had wrongfully and maliciously set alight his own store with intent to burn it and defraud a certain insurance company of the money for which it had insured the store and its goods.

Judgment edit

Departing from the decision in R v Enslin[2] the court held, on a point of law reserved, that the facts as alleged constituted the crime charged.

See also edit

References edit

Case law edit

  • R v Enslin 2 AC 69.
  • R v Mavros 1921 AD 19.

Notes edit

  1. ^ 1921 AD 19.
  2. ^ 2 AC 69.


mavros, important, case, south, african, heard, appellate, division, bloemfontein, november, 1920, innes, solomon, juta, were, presiding, officers, contents, facts, judgment, also, references, case, notesfacts, editthe, term, arson, south, african, practice, u. R v Mavros 1 is an important case in South African law It was heard in the Appellate Division in Bloemfontein in November 1920 Innes CJ Solomon JA and Juta JA were the presiding officers Contents 1 Facts 2 Judgment 3 See also 4 References 4 1 Case law 5 NotesFacts editThe term arson in South African practice is used to denote the corresponding but somewhat wider crime of brandstichting which is committed by a man who sets fire to his own house wrongfully maliciously and with intent to injure or defraud another person Mavros in the present case had been convicted of the crime of arson in that he had wrongfully and maliciously set alight his own store with intent to burn it and defraud a certain insurance company of the money for which it had insured the store and its goods Judgment editDeparting from the decision in R v Enslin 2 the court held on a point of law reserved that the facts as alleged constituted the crime charged See also editArson Crime in South Africa Indictment Law of South Africa South African criminal lawReferences editCase law edit R v Enslin 2 AC 69 R v Mavros 1921 AD 19 Notes edit 1921 AD 19 2 AC 69 nbsp This article relating to case law in South Africa is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title R v Mavros amp oldid 1212669793, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.