fbpx
Wikipedia

Pollaczek–Khinchine formula

In queueing theory, a discipline within the mathematical theory of probability, the Pollaczek–Khinchine formula states a relationship between the queue length and service time distribution Laplace transforms for an M/G/1 queue (where jobs arrive according to a Poisson process and have general service time distribution). The term is also used to refer to the relationships between the mean queue length and mean waiting/service time in such a model.[1]

The formula was first published by Felix Pollaczek in 1930[2] and recast in probabilistic terms by Aleksandr Khinchin[3] two years later.[4][5] In ruin theory the formula can be used to compute the probability of ultimate ruin (probability of an insurance company going bankrupt).[6]

Mean queue length edit

The formula states that the mean number of customers in system L is given by[7]

 

where

  •   is the arrival rate of the Poisson process
  •   is the mean of the service time distribution S
  •   is the utilization
  • Var(S) is the variance of the service time distribution S.

For the mean queue length to be finite it is necessary that   as otherwise jobs arrive faster than they leave the queue. "Traffic intensity," ranges between 0 and 1, and is the mean fraction of time that the server is busy. If the arrival rate   is greater than or equal to the service rate  , the queuing delay becomes infinite. The variance term enters the expression due to Feller's paradox.[8]

Mean waiting time edit

If we write W for the mean time a customer spends in the system, then   where   is the mean waiting time (time spent in the queue waiting for service) and   is the service rate. Using Little's law, which states that

 

where

  • L is the mean number of customers in system
  •   is the arrival rate of the Poisson process
  • W is the mean time spent at the queue both waiting and being serviced,

so

 

We can write an expression for the mean waiting time as[9]

 

Queue length transform edit

Writing π(z) for the probability-generating function of the number of customers in the queue[10]

 

where g(s) is the Laplace transform of the service time probability density function.[11]

Waiting time transform edit

Writing W*(s) for the Laplace–Stieltjes transform of the waiting time distribution,[10]

 

where again g(s) is the Laplace transform of service time probability density function. nth moments can be obtained by differentiating the transform n times, multiplying by (−1)n and evaluating at s = 0.

References edit

  1. ^ Asmussen, S. R. (2003). "Random Walks". Applied Probability and Queues. Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability. Vol. 51. pp. 220–243. doi:10.1007/0-387-21525-5_8. ISBN 978-0-387-00211-8.
  2. ^ Pollaczek, F. (1930). "Über eine Aufgabe der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie". Mathematische Zeitschrift. 32: 64–100. doi:10.1007/BF01194620.
  3. ^ Khintchine, A. Y (1932). "Mathematical theory of a stationary queue". Matematicheskii Sbornik. 39 (4): 73–84. Retrieved 2011-07-14.
  4. ^ Takács, Lajos (1971). "Review: J. W. Cohen, The Single Server Queue". Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 42 (6): 2162–2164. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177693087.
  5. ^ Kingman, J. F. C. (2009). "The first Erlang century—and the next". Queueing Systems. 63: 3–4. doi:10.1007/s11134-009-9147-4.
  6. ^ Rolski, Tomasz; Schmidli, Hanspeter; Schmidt, Volker; Teugels, Jozef (2008). "Risk Processes". Stochastic Processes for Insurance & Finance. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. pp. 147–204. doi:10.1002/9780470317044.ch5. ISBN 9780470317044.
  7. ^ Haigh, John (2002). Probability Models. Springer. p. 192. ISBN 1-85233-431-2.
  8. ^ Cooper, Robert B.; Niu, Shun-Chen; Srinivasan, Mandyam M. (1998). "Some Reflections on the Renewal-Theory Paradox in Queueing Theory" (PDF). Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis. 11 (3): 355–368. Retrieved 2011-07-14.
  9. ^ Harrison, Peter G.; Patel, Naresh M. (1992). Performance Modelling of Communication Networks and Computer Architectures. Addison-Wesley. p. 228. ISBN 0-201-54419-9.
  10. ^ a b Daigle, John N. (2005). "The Basic M/G/1 Queueing System". Queueing Theory with Applications to Packet Telecommunication. pp. 159–223. doi:10.1007/0-387-22859-4_5. ISBN 0-387-22857-8.
  11. ^ Peterson, G. D.; Chamberlain, R. D. (1996). "Parallel application performance in a shared resource environment". Distributed Systems Engineering. 3: 9. doi:10.1088/0967-1846/3/1/003.

pollaczek, khinchine, formula, queueing, theory, discipline, within, mathematical, theory, probability, states, relationship, between, queue, length, service, time, distribution, laplace, transforms, queue, where, jobs, arrive, according, poisson, process, hav. In queueing theory a discipline within the mathematical theory of probability the Pollaczek Khinchine formula states a relationship between the queue length and service time distribution Laplace transforms for an M G 1 queue where jobs arrive according to a Poisson process and have general service time distribution The term is also used to refer to the relationships between the mean queue length and mean waiting service time in such a model 1 The formula was first published by Felix Pollaczek in 1930 2 and recast in probabilistic terms by Aleksandr Khinchin 3 two years later 4 5 In ruin theory the formula can be used to compute the probability of ultimate ruin probability of an insurance company going bankrupt 6 Contents 1 Mean queue length 2 Mean waiting time 3 Queue length transform 4 Waiting time transform 5 ReferencesMean queue length editThe formula states that the mean number of customers in system L is given by 7 L r r2 l2Var S 2 1 r displaystyle L rho frac rho 2 lambda 2 operatorname Var S 2 1 rho nbsp where l displaystyle lambda nbsp is the arrival rate of the Poisson process 1 m displaystyle 1 mu nbsp is the mean of the service time distribution S r l m displaystyle rho lambda mu nbsp is the utilization Var S is the variance of the service time distribution S For the mean queue length to be finite it is necessary that r lt 1 displaystyle rho lt 1 nbsp as otherwise jobs arrive faster than they leave the queue Traffic intensity ranges between 0 and 1 and is the mean fraction of time that the server is busy If the arrival rate l displaystyle lambda nbsp is greater than or equal to the service rate m displaystyle mu nbsp the queuing delay becomes infinite The variance term enters the expression due to Feller s paradox 8 Mean waiting time editIf we write W for the mean time a customer spends in the system then W W m 1 displaystyle W W mu 1 nbsp where W displaystyle W nbsp is the mean waiting time time spent in the queue waiting for service and m displaystyle mu nbsp is the service rate Using Little s law which states that L lW displaystyle L lambda W nbsp where L is the mean number of customers in system l displaystyle lambda nbsp is the arrival rate of the Poisson process W is the mean time spent at the queue both waiting and being serviced so W r lmVar S 2 m l m 1 displaystyle W frac rho lambda mu text Var S 2 mu lambda mu 1 nbsp We can write an expression for the mean waiting time as 9 W Ll m 1 r lmVar S 2 m l displaystyle W frac L lambda mu 1 frac rho lambda mu text Var S 2 mu lambda nbsp Queue length transform editWriting p z for the probability generating function of the number of customers in the queue 10 p z 1 z 1 r g l 1 z g l 1 z z displaystyle pi z frac 1 z 1 rho g lambda 1 z g lambda 1 z z nbsp where g s is the Laplace transform of the service time probability density function 11 Waiting time transform editWriting W s for the Laplace Stieltjes transform of the waiting time distribution 10 W s 1 r sg s s l 1 g s displaystyle W ast s frac 1 rho sg s s lambda 1 g s nbsp where again g s is the Laplace transform of service time probability density function nth moments can be obtained by differentiating the transform n times multiplying by 1 n and evaluating at s 0 References edit Asmussen S R 2003 Random Walks Applied Probability and Queues Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability Vol 51 pp 220 243 doi 10 1007 0 387 21525 5 8 ISBN 978 0 387 00211 8 Pollaczek F 1930 Uber eine Aufgabe der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Mathematische Zeitschrift 32 64 100 doi 10 1007 BF01194620 Khintchine A Y 1932 Mathematical theory of a stationary queue Matematicheskii Sbornik 39 4 73 84 Retrieved 2011 07 14 Takacs Lajos 1971 Review J W Cohen The Single Server Queue Annals of Mathematical Statistics 42 6 2162 2164 doi 10 1214 aoms 1177693087 Kingman J F C 2009 The first Erlang century and the next Queueing Systems 63 3 4 doi 10 1007 s11134 009 9147 4 Rolski Tomasz Schmidli Hanspeter Schmidt Volker Teugels Jozef 2008 Risk Processes Stochastic Processes for Insurance amp Finance Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics pp 147 204 doi 10 1002 9780470317044 ch5 ISBN 9780470317044 Haigh John 2002 Probability Models Springer p 192 ISBN 1 85233 431 2 Cooper Robert B Niu Shun Chen Srinivasan Mandyam M 1998 Some Reflections on the Renewal Theory Paradox in Queueing Theory PDF Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis 11 3 355 368 Retrieved 2011 07 14 Harrison Peter G Patel Naresh M 1992 Performance Modelling of Communication Networks and Computer Architectures Addison Wesley p 228 ISBN 0 201 54419 9 a b Daigle John N 2005 The Basic M G 1 Queueing System Queueing Theory with Applications to Packet Telecommunication pp 159 223 doi 10 1007 0 387 22859 4 5 ISBN 0 387 22857 8 Peterson G D Chamberlain R D 1996 Parallel application performance in a shared resource environment Distributed Systems Engineering 3 9 doi 10 1088 0967 1846 3 1 003 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Pollaczek Khinchine formula amp oldid 1034894017, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.