Activists associated with Lyndon LaRouche formed the "Prevent AIDS Now Initiative Committee" (PANIC) to place what became "Proposition 64" on the California state ballot. The initiative was written by Khushro Ghandhi,[1] who was also the president of PANIC. Brian Lantz was vice-president[2] and Ted Andromidas was treasurer.[3]
Proponents argued that the measures would merely return AIDS to the list of communicable diseases under the public health laws. The ballot argument in favor of the proposition were pathologist John Grauerholz, psychiatrist Nancy T. Mullan, and former Centers for Disease Control advisor Gus S. Sermos.[4] Congressman William E. Dannemeyer was also a proponent.
Opponents characterized it as an effort to force HIV-positive individuals out of their jobs and into quarantine. Said Helen Miramontes, R.N., president of the California Nurses Association:
Health professionals believe that Proposition 64 would seriously hurt their ability to treat and find a cure for AIDS. Current medical efforts based on years of research will be undermined by the fear generated by this irrational proposition.
The ballot argument against the measure was signed by Gladden V. Elliott, president of the California Medical Association, Congressman Ed Zschau, and Senator Alan Cranston. The submitted supporting argument included claims that AIDS could be transmitted by insects, respiratory means and casual contact.[4] These claims were challenged in a suit by California Secretary of State March Fong Eu, based on the argument that they had no scientific support.[4]
The initiative was opposed by the Catholic Bishops of California.[5]
In 1986, the text of Proposition 64 was re-introduced in California by the "Prevent AIDS Now In California" (also PANIC) committee and appeared on the November 1986 ballot as "Proposition 69." It was also defeated.
Related controversiesedit
The gathering of signatures to qualify the initiative was handled in part by a paid contractor. The fee was paid with a contribution by the Caucus Distributors Inc, a key part of the LaRouche movement.[6] The political consultant who was hired by the LaRouche organization to collect signatures for the PANIC initiative was convicted of fraud in October 1988. The consultant, Stanley I. Dale, used out-of-state signature-collectors and claimed they were California residents.[7]March Fong Eu, Secretary of State of California, notified the committee that her office had received numerous complaints of harassment by signature gatherers, including "outrageous verbal abuse for mere failure to sign petitions". She warned them that further complaints would result in legal action.[8]
LaRouche activists accused official agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control of "criminal malfeasance" for refusing to back measures such as mandatory testing.[9]
^"The State AIDS Test Measure Near OK for Ballot", Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, Calif.: Jun 23, 1986. pg. 2
^"Probe of LaRouche Initiative On AIDS Turns to East Bay;" Edward Iwata. San Francisco Chronicle (pre-1997 Fulltext). San Francisco, Calif.: Jul 25, 1986. pg. 14
^"Backers of AIDS quarantine boost initiative drive," Bill Callahan. The Tribune. San Diego, Calif.: Feb 6, 1986. pg. B.12.3.
^ abc(PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-16. Retrieved 2009-05-23.
^Hyer, Marorie (October 31, 1986). "Bishop Urges Church Action On AIDS Care". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 25, 2020.
^"Strange Twists Mark Prop. 64 Campaign;" KEVIN RODERICK. Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, Calif.: Oct 30, 1986. pg. 25
^"Jail for Promoter of 1986 AIDS Initiative" 2012-02-05 at the Wayback Machine United Press International (10/31/88)
^"AIDS-Control Backers Get Warning From Eu;" San Francisco Chronicle.San Francisco, Calif.: May 20, 1986. pg. 11
^. Archived from the original on 2005-02-09. Retrieved 2005-01-18.
America's Hitler? Behind the California AIDS Initiative November 3, 1986 (Dennis King compares LaRouche's writings on AIDS with Hitler's on syphilis)
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
California Proposition 64 (1986)
May 04, 2024
1986, california, proposition, panic, redirects, here, sensation, fear, panic, other, uses, panic, disambiguation, proposition, proposition, state, california, november, 1986, ballot, initiative, statute, that, would, have, restored, acquired, immune, deficien. PANIC redirects here For the sensation of fear see Panic For other uses see Panic disambiguation Proposition 64 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 4 1986 ballot It was an initiative statute that would have restored Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome AIDS to the list of communicable diseases The measure was defeated by a margin of 71 to 29 Activists associated with Lyndon LaRouche formed the Prevent AIDS Now Initiative Committee PANIC to place what became Proposition 64 on the California state ballot The initiative was written by Khushro Ghandhi 1 who was also the president of PANIC Brian Lantz was vice president 2 and Ted Andromidas was treasurer 3 Contents 1 The initiative 2 Related controversies 3 See also 4 References 5 Further readingThe initiative editProponents argued that the measures would merely return AIDS to the list of communicable diseases under the public health laws The ballot argument in favor of the proposition were pathologist John Grauerholz psychiatrist Nancy T Mullan and former Centers for Disease Control advisor Gus S Sermos 4 Congressman William E Dannemeyer was also a proponent Opponents characterized it as an effort to force HIV positive individuals out of their jobs and into quarantine Said Helen Miramontes R N president of the California Nurses Association Health professionals believe that Proposition 64 would seriously hurt their ability to treat and find a cure for AIDS Current medical efforts based on years of research will be undermined by the fear generated by this irrational proposition The ballot argument against the measure was signed by Gladden V Elliott president of the California Medical Association Congressman Ed Zschau and Senator Alan Cranston The submitted supporting argument included claims that AIDS could be transmitted by insects respiratory means and casual contact 4 These claims were challenged in a suit by California Secretary of State March Fong Eu based on the argument that they had no scientific support 4 The initiative was opposed by the Catholic Bishops of California 5 In 1986 the text of Proposition 64 was re introduced in California by the Prevent AIDS Now In California also PANIC committee and appeared on the November 1986 ballot as Proposition 69 It was also defeated Related controversies editThe gathering of signatures to qualify the initiative was handled in part by a paid contractor The fee was paid with a contribution by the Caucus Distributors Inc a key part of the LaRouche movement 6 The political consultant who was hired by the LaRouche organization to collect signatures for the PANIC initiative was convicted of fraud in October 1988 The consultant Stanley I Dale used out of state signature collectors and claimed they were California residents 7 March Fong Eu Secretary of State of California notified the committee that her office had received numerous complaints of harassment by signature gatherers including outrageous verbal abuse for mere failure to sign petitions She warned them that further complaints would result in legal action 8 LaRouche activists accused official agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control of criminal malfeasance for refusing to back measures such as mandatory testing 9 See also editList of California ballot propositions 1980 1989References edit The State AIDS Test Measure Near OK for Ballot Los Angeles Times Los Angeles Calif Jun 23 1986 pg 2 Probe of LaRouche Initiative On AIDS Turns to East Bay Edward Iwata San Francisco Chronicle pre 1997 Fulltext San Francisco Calif Jul 25 1986 pg 14 Backers of AIDS quarantine boost initiative drive Bill Callahan The Tribune San Diego Calif Feb 6 1986 pg B 12 3 a b c Proposition 64 Text analysis and arguments PDF Archived from the original PDF on 2011 07 16 Retrieved 2009 05 23 Hyer Marorie October 31 1986 Bishop Urges Church Action On AIDS Care The Washington Post Retrieved May 25 2020 Strange Twists Mark Prop 64 Campaign KEVIN RODERICK Los Angeles Times Los Angeles Calif Oct 30 1986 pg 25 Jail for Promoter of 1986 AIDS Initiative Archived 2012 02 05 at the Wayback Machine United Press International 10 31 88 AIDS Control Backers Get Warning From Eu San Francisco Chronicle San Francisco Calif May 20 1986 pg 11 LaRouche s Program for a War on AIDS Archived from the original on 2005 02 09 Retrieved 2005 01 18 Further reading editLos Angeles Times coverage Medical Experts Assail Initiative on AIDS Officials Dismiss Claims Made by Supporters of Larouche backed Prop 64 August 3 1986 Questions on Prop 64 Clearing the Confusion October 29 1986 EDITORIAL New Risk on AIDS July 15 1987 LaRouche media coverage The LaRouche Bevel Program to Save the Nation Chapter 13 LaRouche s Program for a War on AIDS HIV AIDS Can Be Stopped Executive Intelligence Review August 11 2000 Does not mention Prop 64 but argues for the same approach Other Unclean unclean the plague mentality New Internationalist March 1987 Prop 22 Causes Ballot Box Deja Vu The History of HIV and AIDS Timeline permanent dead link PDF America s Hitler Behind the California AIDS Initiative November 3 1986 Dennis King compares LaRouche s writings on AIDS with Hitler s on syphilis nbsp Wikisource has original text related to this article California Proposition 64 1986 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title 1986 California Proposition 64 amp oldid 1220370643, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
