fbpx
Wikipedia

Mixed Hodge module

In mathematics, mixed Hodge modules are the culmination of Hodge theory, mixed Hodge structures, intersection cohomology, and the decomposition theorem yielding a coherent framework for discussing variations of degenerating mixed Hodge structures through the six functor formalism. Essentially, these objects are a pair of a filtered D-module together with a perverse sheaf such that the functor from the Riemann–Hilbert correspondence sends to . This makes it possible to construct a Hodge structure on intersection cohomology, one of the key problems when the subject was discovered. This was solved by Morihiko Saito who found a way to use the filtration on a coherent D-module as an analogue of the Hodge filtration for a Hodge structure.[1] This made it possible to give a Hodge structure on an intersection cohomology sheaf, the simple objects in the Abelian category of perverse sheaves.

Abstract structure edit

Before going into the nitty gritty details of defining Mixed hodge modules, which is quite elaborate, it is useful to get a sense of what the category of Mixed Hodge modules actually provides. Given a complex algebraic variety   there is an abelian category  [2]pg 339 with the following functorial properties

  1. There is a faithful functor   called the rationalization functor. This gives the underlying rational perverse sheaf of a mixed Hodge module.
  2. There is a faithful functor   sending a mixed Hodge module to its underlying D-module
  3. These functors behave well with respect to the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence  , meaning for every mixed Hodge module   there is an isomorphism  .

In addition, there are the following categorical properties

  1. The category of mixed Hodge modules over a point is isomorphic to the category of Mixed hodge structures,  
  2. Every object   in   admits a weight filtration   such that every morphism in   preserves the weight filtration strictly, the associated graded objects   are semi-simple, and in the category of mixed Hodge modules over a point, this corresponds to the weight filtration of a Mixed hodge structure.
  3. There is a dualizing functor   lifting the Verdier dualizing functor in   which is an involution on  .

For a morphism   of algebraic varieties, the associated six functors on   and   have the following properties

  1.   don't increase the weights of a complex   of mixed Hodge modules.
  2.   don't decrease the weights of a complex   of mixed Hodge modules.

Relation between derived categories edit

The derived category of mixed Hodge modules   is intimately related to the derived category of constructuctible sheaves   equivalent to the derived category of perverse sheaves. This is because of how the rationalization functor is compatible with the cohomology functor   of a complex   of mixed Hodge modules. When taking the rationalization, there is an isomorphism

 

for the middle perversity  . Note[2]pg 310 this is the function   sending  , which differs from the case of pseudomanifolds where the perversity is a function   where  . Recall this is defined as taking the composition of perverse truncations with the shift functor, so[2]pg 341

 

This kind of setup is also reflected in the derived push and pull functors   and with nearby and vanishing cycles  , the rationalization functor takes these to their analogous perverse functors on the derived category of perverse sheaves.

Tate modules and cohomology edit

Here we denote the canonical projection to a point by  . One of the first mixed Hodge modules available is the weight 0 Tate object, denoted   which is defined as the pullback of its corresponding object in  , so

 

It has weight zero, so   corresponds to the weight 0 Tate object   in the category of mixed Hodge structures. This object is useful because it can be used to compute the various cohomologies of   through the six functor formalism and give them a mixed Hodge structure. These can be summarized with the table

 

Moreover, given a closed embedding   there is the local cohomology group

 

Variations of Mixed Hodge structures edit

For a morphism of varieties   the pushforward maps   and   give degenerating variations of mixed Hodge structures on  . In order to better understand these variations, the decomposition theorem and intersection cohomology are required.

Intersection cohomology edit

One of the defining features of the category of mixed Hodge modules is the fact intersection cohomology can be phrased in its language. This makes it possible to use the decomposition theorem for maps   of varieties. To define the intersection complex, let   be the open smooth part of a variety  . Then the intersection complex of   can be defined as

 

where

 

as with perverse sheaves[2]pg 311. In particular, this setup can be used to show the intersection cohomology groups

 

have a pure weight   Hodge structure.

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ "Hodge structure via filtered $\mathcal{D}$-modules". www.numdam.org. Retrieved 2020-08-16.
  2. ^ a b c d Peters, C. (Chris) (2008). Mixed Hodge Structures. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-540-77017-6. OCLC 1120392435.

mixed, hodge, module, mathematics, mixed, hodge, modules, culmination, hodge, theory, mixed, hodge, structures, intersection, cohomology, decomposition, theorem, yielding, coherent, framework, discussing, variations, degenerating, mixed, hodge, structures, thr. In mathematics mixed Hodge modules are the culmination of Hodge theory mixed Hodge structures intersection cohomology and the decomposition theorem yielding a coherent framework for discussing variations of degenerating mixed Hodge structures through the six functor formalism Essentially these objects are a pair of a filtered D module M F displaystyle M F bullet together with a perverse sheaf F displaystyle mathcal F such that the functor from the Riemann Hilbert correspondence sends M F displaystyle M F bullet to F displaystyle mathcal F This makes it possible to construct a Hodge structure on intersection cohomology one of the key problems when the subject was discovered This was solved by Morihiko Saito who found a way to use the filtration on a coherent D module as an analogue of the Hodge filtration for a Hodge structure 1 This made it possible to give a Hodge structure on an intersection cohomology sheaf the simple objects in the Abelian category of perverse sheaves Contents 1 Abstract structure 1 1 Relation between derived categories 1 2 Tate modules and cohomology 1 3 Variations of Mixed Hodge structures 1 4 Intersection cohomology 2 See also 3 ReferencesAbstract structure editBefore going into the nitty gritty details of defining Mixed hodge modules which is quite elaborate it is useful to get a sense of what the category of Mixed Hodge modules actually provides Given a complex algebraic variety X displaystyle X nbsp there is an abelian category MHM X displaystyle textbf MHM X nbsp 2 pg 339 with the following functorial properties There is a faithful functor rat X D b MHM X D c s b X Q displaystyle text rat X D b textbf MHM X to D cs b X mathbb Q nbsp called the rationalization functor This gives the underlying rational perverse sheaf of a mixed Hodge module There is a faithful functor Dmod X D b MHM X D c o h b D X displaystyle text Dmod X D b textbf MHM X to D coh b mathcal D X nbsp sending a mixed Hodge module to its underlying D module These functors behave well with respect to the Riemann Hilbert correspondence D R X D C o h b D X D c s b X C displaystyle DR X D Coh b mathcal D X to D cs b X mathbb C nbsp meaning for every mixed Hodge module M displaystyle M nbsp there is an isomorphism a rat X M C DR X Dmod X M displaystyle alpha text rat X M otimes mathbb C xrightarrow sim text DR X text Dmod X M nbsp In addition there are the following categorical properties The category of mixed Hodge modules over a point is isomorphic to the category of Mixed hodge structures MHM p t MHS displaystyle textbf MHM pt cong text MHS nbsp Every object M displaystyle M nbsp in MHM X displaystyle textbf MHM X nbsp admits a weight filtration W displaystyle W nbsp such that every morphism in MHM X displaystyle textbf MHM X nbsp preserves the weight filtration strictly the associated graded objects Gr k W M displaystyle text Gr k W M nbsp are semi simple and in the category of mixed Hodge modules over a point this corresponds to the weight filtration of a Mixed hodge structure There is a dualizing functor D X displaystyle mathbb D X nbsp lifting the Verdier dualizing functor in D c s b X Q displaystyle D cs b X mathbb Q nbsp which is an involution on MHM X displaystyle textbf MHM X nbsp For a morphism f X Y displaystyle f X to Y nbsp of algebraic varieties the associated six functors on D b MHM X displaystyle D b textbf MHM X nbsp and D b MHM Y displaystyle D b textbf MHM Y nbsp have the following properties f f displaystyle f f nbsp don t increase the weights of a complex M displaystyle M bullet nbsp of mixed Hodge modules f f displaystyle f f nbsp don t decrease the weights of a complex M displaystyle M bullet nbsp of mixed Hodge modules Relation between derived categories editThe derived category of mixed Hodge modules D b MHM X displaystyle D b textbf MHM X nbsp is intimately related to the derived category of constructuctible sheaves D c s b X Q D b Perv X Q displaystyle D cs b X mathbb Q cong D b text Perv X mathbb Q nbsp equivalent to the derived category of perverse sheaves This is because of how the rationalization functor is compatible with the cohomology functor H k displaystyle H k nbsp of a complex M displaystyle M bullet nbsp of mixed Hodge modules When taking the rationalization there is an isomorphismrat X H k M p H k rat X M displaystyle text rat X H k M bullet text mathbf p H k text rat X M bullet nbsp for the middle perversity p displaystyle mathbb p nbsp Note 2 pg 310 this is the function p 2 N Z displaystyle mathbf p 2 mathbb N to mathbb Z nbsp sending p 2 k k displaystyle mathbf p 2k k nbsp which differs from the case of pseudomanifolds where the perversity is a function p 2 n Z 0 displaystyle mathbb p 2 n to mathbb Z geq 0 nbsp where p 2 k p 2 k 1 k 1 displaystyle mathbf p 2k mathbf p 2k 1 k 1 nbsp Recall this is defined as taking the composition of perverse truncations with the shift functor so 2 pg 341 p H k rat X M p t 0 p t 0 rat X M k displaystyle text mathbf p H k text rat X M bullet text mathbf p tau leq 0 text mathbf p tau geq 0 text rat X M bullet k nbsp This kind of setup is also reflected in the derived push and pull functors f f f f displaystyle f f f f nbsp and with nearby and vanishing cycles ps f ϕ f displaystyle psi f phi f nbsp the rationalization functor takes these to their analogous perverse functors on the derived category of perverse sheaves Tate modules and cohomology editHere we denote the canonical projection to a point by p X p t displaystyle p X to pt nbsp One of the first mixed Hodge modules available is the weight 0 Tate object denoted Q X H d g displaystyle underline mathbb Q X Hdg nbsp which is defined as the pullback of its corresponding object in Q H d g MHM p t displaystyle mathbb Q Hdg in textbf MHM pt nbsp soQ X H d g p Q H d g displaystyle underline mathbb Q X Hdg p mathbb Q Hdg nbsp It has weight zero so Q H d g displaystyle mathbb Q Hdg nbsp corresponds to the weight 0 Tate object Q 0 displaystyle mathbb Q 0 nbsp in the category of mixed Hodge structures This object is useful because it can be used to compute the various cohomologies of X displaystyle X nbsp through the six functor formalism and give them a mixed Hodge structure These can be summarized with the tableH k X Q H k p t p p Q H d g H c k X Q H k p t p p Q H d g H k X Q H k p t p p Q H d g H k B M X Q H k p t p p Q H d g displaystyle begin matrix H k X mathbb Q amp H k pt p p mathbb Q Hdg H c k X mathbb Q amp H k pt p p mathbb Q Hdg H k X mathbb Q amp H k pt p p mathbb Q Hdg H k BM X mathbb Q amp H k pt p p mathbb Q Hdg end matrix nbsp Moreover given a closed embedding i Z X displaystyle i Z to X nbsp there is the local cohomology groupH Z k X Q H k p t p i i Q X H d g displaystyle H Z k X mathbb Q H k pt p i i underline mathbb Q X Hdg nbsp Variations of Mixed Hodge structures edit For a morphism of varieties f X Y displaystyle f X to Y nbsp the pushforward maps f Q X H d g displaystyle f underline mathbb Q X Hdg nbsp and f Q X H d g displaystyle f underline mathbb Q X Hdg nbsp give degenerating variations of mixed Hodge structures on Y displaystyle Y nbsp In order to better understand these variations the decomposition theorem and intersection cohomology are required Intersection cohomology editOne of the defining features of the category of mixed Hodge modules is the fact intersection cohomology can be phrased in its language This makes it possible to use the decomposition theorem for maps f X Y displaystyle f X to Y nbsp of varieties To define the intersection complex let j U X displaystyle j U hookrightarrow X nbsp be the open smooth part of a variety X displaystyle X nbsp Then the intersection complex of X displaystyle X nbsp can be defined asI C X Q H d g j Q U H d g d X displaystyle IC X bullet mathbb Q Hdg j underline mathbb Q U Hdg d X nbsp wherej Q U H d g Image j Q U H d g j Q U H d g displaystyle j underline mathbb Q U Hdg operatorname Image j underline mathbb Q U Hdg to j underline mathbb Q U Hdg nbsp as with perverse sheaves 2 pg 311 In particular this setup can be used to show the intersection cohomology groupsI H k X H k p I C Q X displaystyle IH k X H k p IC bullet underline mathbb Q X nbsp have a pure weight k displaystyle k nbsp Hodge structure See also editMixed motives math Deligne cohomologyReferences edit Hodge structure via filtered mathcal D modules www numdam org Retrieved 2020 08 16 a b c d Peters C Chris 2008 Mixed Hodge Structures Springer Berlin Heidelberg ISBN 978 3 540 77017 6 OCLC 1120392435 A young person s guide to mixed Hodge modules Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Mixed Hodge module amp oldid 1034454383, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.