Manchester Ship Canal Co Ltd claimed UUW plc should not be allowed to discharge surface water and treated effluent into its canals without consent under the Water Industry Act 1991 section 117(5).
Judgmentedit
The Supreme Court held that United Utilities Water plc was entitled to discharge water into the canals from the sewer outfall which was used from 1 December 1991 backwards.
Lord Sumption held that water going onto land was trespass unless authorised by statute. There is no express right in the WIA 1991. However, if necessary (not just convenient or reasonable), it could be implied to effectually achieve the statutory purpose, that could not otherwise be achieved. There was a case potentially analogous in Durrant v Branksome Urban District Council [1897] 2 Ch 291 but that has to be rejected. Also WIA 1991 section 159 contains a power to lay pipes, which would authorise a discharge. Earlier legislation is implied in the corresponding provision of the Water Industry Act 1991.
Lord Toulson concurred, but would have held if needed there was no trespass.
Lord Neuberger held there would be a right to compensation before 1991.
manchester, ship, canal, united, utilities, water, manchester, ship, canal, united, utilities, water, 2014, uksc, enterprise, case, concerning, water, manchester, ship, canal, united, utilities, water, plccourtuk, supreme, courtcitation, 2014, uksc, 40keywords. Manchester Ship Canal Co Ltd v United Utilities Water plc 2014 UKSC 40 is a UK enterprise law case concerning water in the UK Manchester Ship Canal Co Ltd v United Utilities Water plcCourtUK Supreme CourtCitation s 2014 UKSC 40KeywordsWater sewage Contents 1 Facts 2 Judgment 3 See also 4 Notes 5 ReferencesFacts edit nbsp Canals in Manchester Manchester Ship Canal Co Ltd claimed UUW plc should not be allowed to discharge surface water and treated effluent into its canals without consent under the Water Industry Act 1991 section 117 5 Judgment editThe Supreme Court held that United Utilities Water plc was entitled to discharge water into the canals from the sewer outfall which was used from 1 December 1991 backwards Lord Sumption held that water going onto land was trespass unless authorised by statute There is no express right in the WIA 1991 However if necessary not just convenient or reasonable it could be implied to effectually achieve the statutory purpose that could not otherwise be achieved There was a case potentially analogous in Durrant v Branksome Urban District Council 1897 2 Ch 291 but that has to be rejected Also WIA 1991 section 159 contains a power to lay pipes which would authorise a discharge Earlier legislation is implied in the corresponding provision of the Water Industry Act 1991 Lord Toulson concurred but would have held if needed there was no trespass Lord Neuberger held there would be a right to compensation before 1991 See also editUnited Kingdom enterprise lawNotes editReferences edit Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Manchester Ship Canal Co Ltd v United Utilities Water Plc amp oldid 1166481226, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
