fbpx
Wikipedia

Lifted condensation level

The lifted condensation level or lifting condensation level (LCL) is formally defined as the height at which the relative humidity (RH) of an air parcel will reach 100% with respect to liquid water when it is cooled by dry adiabatic lifting. The RH of air increases when it is cooled, since the amount of water vapor in the air (i.e., its specific humidity) remains constant, while the saturation vapor pressure decreases almost exponentially with decreasing temperature. If the air parcel is lifting further beyond the LCL, water vapor in the air parcel will begin condensing, forming cloud droplets. (In the real atmosphere, it is usually necessary for air to be slightly supersaturated, normally by around 0.5%, before condensation occurs; this translates into about 10 meters or so of additional lifting above the LCL.) The LCL is a good approximation of the height of the cloud base which will be observed on days when air is lifted mechanically from the surface to the cloud base (e.g., due to convergence of airmasses).

Schematic of the LCL in relation to the temperature and dew point and their vertical profiles; the moist adiabatic temperature curve above the LCL is also sketched for reference.

Determining the LCL edit

The LCL can be either computed or determined graphically using standard thermodynamic diagrams such as the skew-T log-P diagram or the tephigram. Nearly all of these formulations make use of the relationship between the LCL and the dew point, which is the temperature to which an air parcel needs to be cooled isobarically until its RH just reaches 100%. The LCL and dew point are similar, with one key difference: to find the LCL, an air parcel's pressure is decreased while it is lifted, causing it to expand, which in turn causes it to cool. To determine the dew point, in contrast, the pressure is kept constant, and the air parcel is cooled by bringing it into contact with a colder body (this is like the condensation you see on the outside of a glass full of a cold drink). Below the LCL, the dew point temperature is less than the actual ("dry bulb") temperature. As an air parcel is lifted, its pressure and temperature decrease. Its dew point temperature also decreases when the pressure is decreased, but not as quickly as its temperature decreases, so that if the pressure is decreased far enough, eventually the air parcel's temperature will be equal to the dew point temperature at that pressure. This point is the LCL; this is graphically depicted in the diagram.

Using this background, the LCL can be found on a standard thermodynamic diagram as follows:

  1. Start at the initial temperature (T) and pressure of the air parcel and follow the dry adiabatic lapse rate line upward (provided that the RH in the air parcel is less than 100%, otherwise it is already at or above LCL).
  2. From the initial dew point temperature (Td) of the parcel at its starting pressure, follow the line for the constant equilibrium mixing ratio (or "saturation mixing ratio") upward.
  3. The intersection of these two lines is the LCL.

Exact expression for the LCL edit

Until recently, it was thought that there was no exact, analytic formula for the LCL. In 2015, Yin et al. developed an analytical expression for LCL height using Lambert-W function under the assumption of constant latent heat of vaporization.[1] Separately, in 2017, David Romps derived the explicit and analytic expression for the LCL and the analogous lifting deposition level (LDL) assuming only constant heat capacities:[2]

 

where  ,  ,  , and   are the parcel's initial temperature, pressure, height, and relative humidity with respect to liquid water, and  ,  , and   are the temperature, pressure, and height of the parcel at its LCL. The function   is the   branch of the Lambert W function. The best fit to empirical measurements of saturation vapor pressure is given by  ,  ,  ,  ,    ,  ,  , and  . Defining   to be the mass fraction of water vapor in the air parcel, the parcel's specific gas constant and the specific heat capacity at constant volume are   and  , respectively. Computer programs to calculate these LCL values in R, Python, Matlab, and Fortran 90 are available for download.

Defining the lifting deposition level (LDL) as the height at which the air parcel becomes saturated with respect to ice, the analogous expression for the LDL is:

 

where the best-fit constants are as defined above plus also   and  . Here,   is the initial relative humidity of the air parcel with respect to solid water (i.e., ice).

Approximate expressions for the LCL edit

There are also many different ways to approximate the LCL, to various degrees of accuracy. The most well known and widely used among these is Espy's equation, which James Espy formulated already in the early 19th century.[3] His equation makes use of the relationship between the LCL and dew point temperature discussed above. In the Earth's atmosphere near the surface, the lapse rate for dry adiabatic lifting is about 9.8 K/km, and the lapse rate of the dew point is about 1.8 K/km (it varies from about 1.6-1.9 K/km). This gives the slopes of the curves shown in the diagram. The altitude where they intersect can be computed as the ratio between the difference in the initial temperature and initial dew point temperature   to the difference in the slopes of the two curves. Since the slopes are the two lapse rates, their difference is about 8 K/km. Inverting this gives 0.125 km/K, or 125 m/K. Recognizing this, Espy pointed out that the LCL can be approximated as:

 

where   is height of the LCL (in meters),   is temperature in degrees Celsius (or kelvins), and   is dew-point temperature (likewise in degrees Celsius or kelvins, whichever is used for T). This formula is accurate to within about 1% for the LCL height under normal atmospheric conditions, but requires knowing the dew-point temperature.

Relation with CCL edit

The convective condensation level (CCL) results when strong surface heating causes buoyant lifting of surface air and subsequent mixing of the planetary boundary layer, so that the layer near the surface ends up with a dry adiabatic lapse rate. As the mixing becomes deeper, it will get to the point where the LCL of an air parcel starting at the surface is at the top of the mixed region. When this occurs, then any further solar heating of the surface will cause a cloud to form topping the well-mixed boundary layer, and the level at which this occurs is called the CCL. If the boundary layer starts off with a stable temperature profile (that is, with a lapse rate less than the dry adiabatic lapse rate), then the CCL will be higher than the LCL. In nature, the actual cloud base is often initially somewhere between the LCL and the CCL. If a thunderstorm forms, then as it grows and matures, processes such as increased saturation at lower levels from precipitation and lower surface pressure usually lead to a lowering of the cloud base.

Finally, the LCL can also be considered in relation to the level of free convection (LFC). A smaller difference between the LCL and LFC (LCL-LFC) is conducive to the rapid formation of thunderstorms. One reason for this is that a parcel requires less work and time to pass through the layer of convective inhibition (CIN) to reach its level of free convection (LFC), after which deep, moist convection ensues and air parcels buoyantly rise in the positive area of a sounding, accumulating convective available potential energy (CAPE) until reaching the equilibrium level (EL).

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Yin, Jun; Albertson, John D.; Rigby, James R.; Porporato, Amilcare (2015). "Land and atmospheric controls on initiation and intensity of moist convection: CAPE dynamics and LCL crossings". Water Resources Research. 51 (10): 8476–8493. Bibcode:2015WRR....51.8476Y. doi:10.1002/2015WR017286. ISSN 1944-7973.
  2. ^ Romps DM (2017). "Exact expression for the lifting condensation level" (PDF). Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 74 (12): 3891–3900. Bibcode:2017JAtS...74.3891R. doi:10.1175/JAS-D-17-0102.1.
  3. ^ Espy JP (1836). "Essays on Meteorology, No. IV: North East Storms, Volcanoes, and Columnar Clouds". Journal of the Franklin Institute. 22 (4): 239–246. doi:10.1016/S0016-0032(36)91215-2.

Related reading edit

  • Bohren, C.F., and B. Albrecht, Atmospheric Thermodynamics, Oxford University Press, 1998. ISBN 0-19-509904-4
  • M K Yau and R.R. Rogers, Short Course in Cloud Physics, Third Edition, published by Butterworth-Heinemann, January 1, 1989, 304 pages. ISBN 9780750632157 ISBN 0-7506-3215-1

External links edit

  • LCL tutorial
  • SKEW-T: A LOOK AT SBLCL
  • (Glossary of Meteorology)

lifted, condensation, level, this, article, needs, additional, citations, verification, please, help, improve, this, article, adding, citations, reliable, sources, unsourced, material, challenged, removed, find, sources, news, newspapers, books, scholar, jstor. This article needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources Unsourced material may be challenged and removed Find sources Lifted condensation level news newspapers books scholar JSTOR August 2009 Learn how and when to remove this message The lifted condensation level or lifting condensation level LCL is formally defined as the height at which the relative humidity RH of an air parcel will reach 100 with respect to liquid water when it is cooled by dry adiabatic lifting The RH of air increases when it is cooled since the amount of water vapor in the air i e its specific humidity remains constant while the saturation vapor pressure decreases almost exponentially with decreasing temperature If the air parcel is lifting further beyond the LCL water vapor in the air parcel will begin condensing forming cloud droplets In the real atmosphere it is usually necessary for air to be slightly supersaturated normally by around 0 5 before condensation occurs this translates into about 10 meters or so of additional lifting above the LCL The LCL is a good approximation of the height of the cloud base which will be observed on days when air is lifted mechanically from the surface to the cloud base e g due to convergence of airmasses Schematic of the LCL in relation to the temperature and dew point and their vertical profiles the moist adiabatic temperature curve above the LCL is also sketched for reference Contents 1 Determining the LCL 2 Exact expression for the LCL 3 Approximate expressions for the LCL 4 Relation with CCL 5 See also 6 References 7 Related reading 8 External linksDetermining the LCL editThe LCL can be either computed or determined graphically using standard thermodynamic diagrams such as the skew T log P diagram or the tephigram Nearly all of these formulations make use of the relationship between the LCL and the dew point which is the temperature to which an air parcel needs to be cooled isobarically until its RH just reaches 100 The LCL and dew point are similar with one key difference to find the LCL an air parcel s pressure is decreased while it is lifted causing it to expand which in turn causes it to cool To determine the dew point in contrast the pressure is kept constant and the air parcel is cooled by bringing it into contact with a colder body this is like the condensation you see on the outside of a glass full of a cold drink Below the LCL the dew point temperature is less than the actual dry bulb temperature As an air parcel is lifted its pressure and temperature decrease Its dew point temperature also decreases when the pressure is decreased but not as quickly as its temperature decreases so that if the pressure is decreased far enough eventually the air parcel s temperature will be equal to the dew point temperature at that pressure This point is the LCL this is graphically depicted in the diagram Using this background the LCL can be found on a standard thermodynamic diagram as follows Start at the initial temperature T and pressure of the air parcel and follow the dry adiabatic lapse rate line upward provided that the RH in the air parcel is less than 100 otherwise it is already at or above LCL From the initial dew point temperature Td of the parcel at its starting pressure follow the line for the constant equilibrium mixing ratio or saturation mixing ratio upward The intersection of these two lines is the LCL Exact expression for the LCL editUntil recently it was thought that there was no exact analytic formula for the LCL In 2015 Yin et al developed an analytical expression for LCL height using Lambert W function under the assumption of constant latent heat of vaporization 1 Separately in 2017 David Romps derived the explicit and analytic expression for the LCL and the analogous lifting deposition level LDL assuming only constant heat capacities 2 T LCL c W 1 RH l 1 a c e c 1 T p LCL p T LCL T c p m R m z LCL z c p m g T T LCL a c p m R m c v l c p v R v b E 0 v c v v c v l T trip R v T c b a displaystyle begin alignedat 1 T text LCL amp c left W 1 left text RH l 1 a c e c right right 1 T p text LCL amp p left frac T text LCL T right c pm R m z text LCL amp z frac c pm g left T T text LCL right a amp frac c pm R m frac c vl c pv R v b amp frac E 0v c vv c vl T text trip R v T c amp b a end alignedat nbsp where T displaystyle T nbsp p displaystyle p nbsp z displaystyle z nbsp and RH l displaystyle text RH l nbsp are the parcel s initial temperature pressure height and relative humidity with respect to liquid water and T LCL displaystyle T text LCL nbsp p LCL displaystyle p text LCL nbsp and z LCL displaystyle z text LCL nbsp are the temperature pressure and height of the parcel at its LCL The function W 1 displaystyle W 1 nbsp is the 1 displaystyle 1 nbsp branch of the Lambert W function The best fit to empirical measurements of saturation vapor pressure is given by R a 287 04 J kg K displaystyle R a 287 04 text J kg K nbsp c v a 719 J kg K displaystyle c va 719 text J kg K nbsp c v v 1418 J kg K displaystyle c vv 1418 text J kg K nbsp p trip 611 65 Pa displaystyle p text trip 611 65 text Pa nbsp T trip 273 16 displaystyle T text trip 273 16 nbsp K displaystyle text K nbsp E 0 v 2 3740 10 6 J kg displaystyle E 0v 2 3740 times 10 6 text J kg nbsp R v 461 J kg K displaystyle R v 461 text J kg K nbsp and c v l 4119 J kg K displaystyle c vl 4119 text J kg K nbsp Defining q v displaystyle q v nbsp to be the mass fraction of water vapor in the air parcel the parcel s specific gas constant and the specific heat capacity at constant volume are R m 1 q v R a q v R v displaystyle R m 1 q v R a q v R v nbsp and c p m 1 q v c p a q v c p v displaystyle c pm 1 q v c pa q v c pv nbsp respectively Computer programs to calculate these LCL values in R Python Matlab and Fortran 90 are available for download Defining the lifting deposition level LDL as the height at which the air parcel becomes saturated with respect to ice the analogous expression for the LDL is T LDL c W 1 RH s 1 a c e c 1 T p LDL p T LDL T c p m R m z LDL z c p m g T T LDL a c p m R m c v s c p v R v b E 0 v E 0 s c v v c v s T trip R v T c b a displaystyle begin alignedat 1 T text LDL amp c left W 1 left text RH s 1 a c e c right right 1 T p text LDL amp p left frac T text LDL T right c pm R m z text LDL amp z frac c pm g left T T text LDL right a amp frac c pm R m frac c vs c pv R v b amp frac E 0v E 0s c vv c vs T text trip R v T c amp b a end alignedat nbsp where the best fit constants are as defined above plus also E 0 s 0 3337 10 6 J kg displaystyle E 0s 0 3337 times 10 6 text J kg nbsp and c v s 1861 J kg K displaystyle c vs 1861 text J kg K nbsp Here RH s displaystyle text RH s nbsp is the initial relative humidity of the air parcel with respect to solid water i e ice Approximate expressions for the LCL editThere are also many different ways to approximate the LCL to various degrees of accuracy The most well known and widely used among these is Espy s equation which James Espy formulated already in the early 19th century 3 His equation makes use of the relationship between the LCL and dew point temperature discussed above In the Earth s atmosphere near the surface the lapse rate for dry adiabatic lifting is about 9 8 K km and the lapse rate of the dew point is about 1 8 K km it varies from about 1 6 1 9 K km This gives the slopes of the curves shown in the diagram The altitude where they intersect can be computed as the ratio between the difference in the initial temperature and initial dew point temperature T T d displaystyle T T d nbsp to the difference in the slopes of the two curves Since the slopes are the two lapse rates their difference is about 8 K km Inverting this gives 0 125 km K or 125 m K Recognizing this Espy pointed out that the LCL can be approximated as h L C L T T d G d G d e w 125 T T d displaystyle h LCL frac T T d Gamma d Gamma dew 125 T T d nbsp where h displaystyle h nbsp is height of the LCL in meters T displaystyle T nbsp is temperature in degrees Celsius or kelvins and T d displaystyle T d nbsp is dew point temperature likewise in degrees Celsius or kelvins whichever is used for T This formula is accurate to within about 1 for the LCL height under normal atmospheric conditions but requires knowing the dew point temperature Relation with CCL editThe convective condensation level CCL results when strong surface heating causes buoyant lifting of surface air and subsequent mixing of the planetary boundary layer so that the layer near the surface ends up with a dry adiabatic lapse rate As the mixing becomes deeper it will get to the point where the LCL of an air parcel starting at the surface is at the top of the mixed region When this occurs then any further solar heating of the surface will cause a cloud to form topping the well mixed boundary layer and the level at which this occurs is called the CCL If the boundary layer starts off with a stable temperature profile that is with a lapse rate less than the dry adiabatic lapse rate then the CCL will be higher than the LCL In nature the actual cloud base is often initially somewhere between the LCL and the CCL If a thunderstorm forms then as it grows and matures processes such as increased saturation at lower levels from precipitation and lower surface pressure usually lead to a lowering of the cloud base Finally the LCL can also be considered in relation to the level of free convection LFC A smaller difference between the LCL and LFC LCL LFC is conducive to the rapid formation of thunderstorms One reason for this is that a parcel requires less work and time to pass through the layer of convective inhibition CIN to reach its level of free convection LFC after which deep moist convection ensues and air parcels buoyantly rise in the positive area of a sounding accumulating convective available potential energy CAPE until reaching the equilibrium level EL See also editAtmospheric convection Atmospheric thermodynamicsReferences edit Yin Jun Albertson John D Rigby James R Porporato Amilcare 2015 Land and atmospheric controls on initiation and intensity of moist convection CAPE dynamics and LCL crossings Water Resources Research 51 10 8476 8493 Bibcode 2015WRR 51 8476Y doi 10 1002 2015WR017286 ISSN 1944 7973 Romps DM 2017 Exact expression for the lifting condensation level PDF Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 74 12 3891 3900 Bibcode 2017JAtS 74 3891R doi 10 1175 JAS D 17 0102 1 Espy JP 1836 Essays on Meteorology No IV North East Storms Volcanoes and Columnar Clouds Journal of the Franklin Institute 22 4 239 246 doi 10 1016 S0016 0032 36 91215 2 Related reading editBohren C F and B Albrecht Atmospheric Thermodynamics Oxford University Press 1998 ISBN 0 19 509904 4 M K Yau and R R Rogers Short Course in Cloud Physics Third Edition published by Butterworth Heinemann January 1 1989 304 pages ISBN 9780750632157 ISBN 0 7506 3215 1External links editLCL tutorial SKEW T A LOOK AT SBLCL Lifting condensation level LCL Glossary of Meteorology Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Lifted condensation level amp oldid 1170372190, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.