fbpx
Wikipedia

Law of the wall

In fluid dynamics, the law of the wall (also known as the logarithmic law of the wall) states that the average velocity of a turbulent flow at a certain point is proportional to the logarithm of the distance from that point to the "wall", or the boundary of the fluid region. This law of the wall was first published in 1930 by Hungarian-American mathematician, aerospace engineer, and physicist Theodore von Kármán.[1] It is only technically applicable to parts of the flow that are close to the wall (<20% of the height of the flow), though it is a good approximation for the entire velocity profile of natural streams.[2]

law of the wall, horizontal velocity near the wall with mixing length model

General logarithmic formulation edit

The logarithmic law of the wall is a self similar solution for the mean velocity parallel to the wall, and is valid for flows at high Reynolds numbers — in an overlap region with approximately constant shear stress and far enough from the wall for (direct) viscous effects to be negligible:[3]

    with           and    

where

  is the wall coordinate: the distance y to the wall, made dimensionless with the friction velocity uτ and kinematic viscosity ν,
  is the dimensionless velocity: the velocity u parallel to the wall as a function of y (distance from the wall), divided by the friction velocity uτ,
  is the wall shear stress,
  is the fluid density,
  is called the friction velocity or shear velocity,
  is the Von Kármán constant,
  is a constant, and
  is the natural logarithm.

From experiments, the von Kármán constant is found to be   and   for a smooth wall.[3]

With dimensions, the logarithmic law of the wall can be written as:[4]

 

where y0 is the distance from the boundary at which the idealized velocity given by the law of the wall goes to zero. This is necessarily nonzero because the turbulent velocity profile defined by the law of the wall does not apply to the laminar sublayer. The distance from the wall at which it reaches zero is determined by comparing the thickness of the laminar sublayer with the roughness of the surface over which it is flowing. For a near-wall laminar sublayer of thickness   and a characteristic roughness length-scale  ,[2]

  : hydraulically smooth flow,
  : transitional flow,
  : hydraulically rough flow.

Intuitively, this means that if the roughness elements are hidden within the laminar sublayer, they have a much different effect on the turbulent law of the wall velocity profile than if they are sticking out into the main part of the flow.

This is also often more formally formulated in terms of a boundary Reynolds number,  , where

 

The flow is hydraulically smooth for  , hydraulically rough for  , and transitional for intermediate values.[2]

Values for   are given by:[2][5]

    for hydraulically smooth flow
  for hydraulically rough flow.

Intermediate values are generally given by the empirically derived Nikuradse diagram,[2] though analytical methods for solving for this range have also been proposed.[6]

For channels with a granular boundary, such as natural river systems,

 

where   is the average diameter of the 84th largest percentile of the grains of the bed material.[7]

Power law solutions edit

Works by Barenblatt and others have shown that besides the logarithmic law of the wall — the limit for infinite Reynolds numbers — there exist power-law solutions, which are dependent on the Reynolds number.[8][9] In 1996, Cipra submitted experimental evidence in support of these power-law descriptions.[10] This evidence itself has not been fully accepted by other experts.[11] In 2001, Oberlack claimed to have derived both the logarithmic law of the wall, as well as power laws, directly from the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations, exploiting the symmetries in a Lie group approach.[3][12] However, in 2014, Frewer et al.[13] refuted these results.

For scalars edit

For scalars (most notably temperature), the self-similar logarithmic law of the wall has been theorized (first formulated by B. A. Kader[14]) and observed in experimental and computational studies.[15][16][17][18] In many cases, extensions to the original law of the wall formulation (usually through integral transformations) are generally needed to account for compressibility, variable-property and real fluid effects.

Near the wall edit

Below the region where the law of the wall is applicable, there are other estimations for friction velocity.[19]

Viscous sublayer edit

In the region known as the viscous sublayer, below 5 wall units, the variation of   to   is approximately 1:1, such that:

For   
 

where,

  is the wall coordinate: the distance y to the wall, made dimensionless with the friction velocity   and kinematic viscosity  ,
  is the dimensionless velocity: the velocity u parallel to the wall as a function of y (distance from the wall), divided by the friction velocity  ,

This approximation can be used farther than 5 wall units, but by   the error is more than 25%.

Buffer layer edit

In the buffer layer, between 5 wall units and 30 wall units, neither law holds, such that:

For   
 
 

with the largest variation from either law occurring approximately where the two equations intersect, at  . That is, before 11 wall units the linear approximation is more accurate and after 11 wall units the logarithmic approximation should be used, though neither are relatively accurate at 11 wall units.

The mean streamwise velocity profile   is improved for   with an eddy viscosity formulation based on a near-wall turbulent kinetic energy   function and the van Driest mixing length equation. Comparisons with DNS data of fully developed turbulent channel flows for   showed good agreement.[20]

Notes edit

  1. ^ von Kármán, Th. (1930), "Mechanische Ähnlichkeit und Turbulenz", Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Fachgruppe 1 (Mathematik), 5: 58–76 (also as: “Mechanical Similitude and Turbulence”, Tech. Mem. NACA, no. 611, 1931).
  2. ^ a b c d e Mohrig, David (2004). "Conservation of Mass and Momentum" (PDF). 12.110: Sedimentary Geology, Fall 2004. MIT OCW. Retrieved 2009-03-27.
  3. ^ a b c Schlichting & Gersten (2000) pp. 522–524.
  4. ^ Schlichting & Gersten (2000) p. 530.
  5. ^ Whipple, Kelin (2004). "Hydraulic Roughness" (PDF). 12.163: Surface processes and landscape evolution. MIT OCW. Retrieved 2009-03-27.
  6. ^ Le Roux, J.P. (2004), "An integrated law of the wall for hydrodynamically transitional flow over plane beds", Sedimentary Geology, 163 (3–4): 311–321, Bibcode:2004SedG..163..311L, doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2003.07.005
  7. ^ Haws, Benjamin. "Equivalent sand roughness of Nikuradse (ks)". Retrieved 2009-03-27.[dead link]
  8. ^ Lynn Yarris. "A flaw in the law". Berkeley Lab: Highlights 97–98. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy.
  9. ^ Barenblatt, G.I. (1993), "Scaling laws for fully developed turbulent shear flows. Part 1. Basic hypotheses and analysis", Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 248: 513–520, Bibcode:1993JFM...248..513B, doi:10.1017/S0022112093000874, S2CID 123639410
    Barenblatt, G.I.; Prostokishin, V.M. (1993), "Scaling laws for fully developed turbulent shear flows. Part 2. Processing of experimental data", Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 248: 521–529, Bibcode:1993JFM...248..521B, doi:10.1017/S0022112093000886, S2CID 121328837
    Barenblatt, G.I.; Goldenfeld, N. (1995), "Does fully developed turbulence exist? Reynolds number independence versus asymptotic covariance", Physics of Fluids, 7 (12): 3078–3084, arXiv:cond-mat/9507132, Bibcode:1995PhFl....7.3078B, doi:10.1063/1.868685, S2CID 15138376
    Barenblatt, G. I.; Chorin, A. J. (1998), "Scaling laws and vanishing-viscosity limits for wall-bounded shear flows and for local structure in developed turbulence", Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 50 (4): 381–398, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0312(199704)50:4<381::AID-CPA5>3.0.CO;2-6
  10. ^ Cipra, Barry Arthur (May 1996), "A New Theory of Turbulence Causes a Stir Among Experts", Science, 272 (5264): 951, Bibcode:1996Sci...272..951C, doi:10.1126/science.272.5264.951, S2CID 117371905
  11. ^ Zagarola, M.V.; Perry, A.E.; Smits, A.J. (1997), "Log Laws or Power Laws: The Scaling in the Overlap Region", Physics of Fluids, 9 (7): 2094–2100, Bibcode:1997PhFl....9.2094Z, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.503.989, doi:10.1063/1.869328
  12. ^ Oberlack, Martin (2001), "A unified approach for symmetries in plane parallel turbulent shear flows", Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 427 (1): 299–328, Bibcode:2001JFM...427..299O, doi:10.1017/S0022112000002408, S2CID 122979735
  13. ^ Frewer, Michael; Khujadze, George; Foysi, Holger (2014), Is the log-law a first principle result from Lie-group invariance analysis?, pp. 1–32, arXiv:1412.3069, Bibcode:2014arXiv1412.3069F
  14. ^ Kader, B. A. (1981-09-01). "Temperature and concentration profiles in fully turbulent boundary layers". International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 24 (9): 1541–1544. doi:10.1016/0017-9310(81)90220-9. ISSN 0017-9310.
  15. ^ Simonich, J. C.; Bradshaw, P. (1978-11-01). "Effect of Free-Stream Turbulence on Heat Transfer through a Turbulent Boundary Layer". Journal of Heat Transfer. 100 (4): 671–677. doi:10.1115/1.3450875. ISSN 0022-1481.
  16. ^ Patel, Ashish; Boersma, Bendiks J.; Pecnik, Rene (2017-08-21). "Scalar statistics in variable property turbulent channel flows". Physical Review Fluids. 2 (8): 084604. Bibcode:2017PhRvF...2h4604P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.084604.
  17. ^ Toki, Takahiko; Teramoto, Susumu; Okamoto, Koji (2020-01-01). "Velocity and Temperature Profiles in Turbulent Channel Flow at Supercritical Pressure". Journal of Propulsion and Power. 36 (1): 3–13. doi:10.2514/1.B37381. S2CID 209963353.
  18. ^ Guo, J.; Yang, X. I. A.; Ihme, M. (March 2022). "Structure of the thermal boundary layer in turbulent channel flows at transcritical conditions". Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 934. Bibcode:2022JFM...934A..45G. doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.1157. ISSN 0022-1120.
  19. ^ Turbulent Flows (2000) pp. 273–274.Pope, Stephen (2000), Turbulent Flows (1st revised ed.), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-59125-2
  20. ^ Absi, Rafik (2009), "A simple eddy viscosity formulation for turbulent boundary layers near smooth walls", Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 337 (3): 158–165, arXiv:1106.0985, Bibcode:2009CRMec.337..158A, doi:10.1016/j.crme.2009.03.010, S2CID 40907005

References edit

  • Chanson, H. (2009), Applied Hydrodynamics: An Introduction to Ideal and Real Fluid Flows, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Leiden, The Netherlands, 478 pages, ISBN 978-0-415-49271-3
  • Schlichting, Hermann; Gersten, K. (2000), Boundary-layer Theory (8th revised ed.), Springer, ISBN 3-540-66270-7

Further reading edit

  • Buschmann, Matthias H.; Gad-el-Hak, Mohamed (2009), "Evidence of nonlogarithmic behavior of turbulent channel and pipe flow", AIAA Journal, 47 (3): 535, Bibcode:2009AIAAJ..47..535B, doi:10.2514/1.37032

External links edit

  • Definition from ScienceWorld
  • Formula on CFD Online

wall, fluid, dynamics, wall, also, known, logarithmic, wall, states, that, average, velocity, turbulent, flow, certain, point, proportional, logarithm, distance, from, that, point, wall, boundary, fluid, region, this, wall, first, published, 1930, hungarian, a. In fluid dynamics the law of the wall also known as the logarithmic law of the wall states that the average velocity of a turbulent flow at a certain point is proportional to the logarithm of the distance from that point to the wall or the boundary of the fluid region This law of the wall was first published in 1930 by Hungarian American mathematician aerospace engineer and physicist Theodore von Karman 1 It is only technically applicable to parts of the flow that are close to the wall lt 20 of the height of the flow though it is a good approximation for the entire velocity profile of natural streams 2 law of the wall horizontal velocity near the wall with mixing length model Contents 1 General logarithmic formulation 2 Power law solutions 3 For scalars 4 Near the wall 4 1 Viscous sublayer 4 2 Buffer layer 5 Notes 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External linksGeneral logarithmic formulation editThe logarithmic law of the wall is a self similar solution for the mean velocity parallel to the wall and is valid for flows at high Reynolds numbers in an overlap region with approximately constant shear stress and far enough from the wall for direct viscous effects to be negligible 3 u 1 k ln y C displaystyle u frac 1 kappa ln y C nbsp with y y u t n displaystyle y frac y u tau nu nbsp u t t w r displaystyle u tau sqrt frac tau w rho nbsp and u u u t displaystyle u frac u u tau nbsp where y displaystyle y nbsp is the wall coordinate the distance y to the wall made dimensionless with the friction velocity ut and kinematic viscosity n u displaystyle u nbsp is the dimensionless velocity the velocity u parallel to the wall as a function of y distance from the wall divided by the friction velocity ut t w displaystyle tau w nbsp is the wall shear stress r displaystyle rho nbsp is the fluid density u t displaystyle u tau nbsp is called the friction velocity or shear velocity k displaystyle kappa nbsp is the Von Karman constant C displaystyle C nbsp is a constant and ln displaystyle ln nbsp is the natural logarithm From experiments the von Karman constant is found to be k 0 41 displaystyle kappa approx 0 41 nbsp and C 5 0 displaystyle C approx 5 0 nbsp for a smooth wall 3 With dimensions the logarithmic law of the wall can be written as 4 u u t k ln y y 0 displaystyle u frac u tau kappa ln frac y y 0 nbsp where y0 is the distance from the boundary at which the idealized velocity given by the law of the wall goes to zero This is necessarily nonzero because the turbulent velocity profile defined by the law of the wall does not apply to the laminar sublayer The distance from the wall at which it reaches zero is determined by comparing the thickness of the laminar sublayer with the roughness of the surface over which it is flowing For a near wall laminar sublayer of thickness d n displaystyle delta nu nbsp and a characteristic roughness length scale k s displaystyle k s nbsp 2 k s lt d n displaystyle k s lt delta nu nbsp hydraulically smooth flow k s d n displaystyle k s approx delta nu nbsp transitional flow k s gt d n displaystyle k s gt delta nu nbsp hydraulically rough flow Intuitively this means that if the roughness elements are hidden within the laminar sublayer they have a much different effect on the turbulent law of the wall velocity profile than if they are sticking out into the main part of the flow This is also often more formally formulated in terms of a boundary Reynolds number R e w displaystyle Re w nbsp where R e w u t k s n displaystyle Re w frac u tau k s nu nbsp The flow is hydraulically smooth for R e w lt 3 displaystyle Re w lt 3 nbsp hydraulically rough for R e w gt 100 displaystyle Re w gt 100 nbsp and transitional for intermediate values 2 Values for y 0 displaystyle y 0 nbsp are given by 2 5 y 0 n 9 u t displaystyle y 0 frac nu 9u tau nbsp for hydraulically smooth flow y 0 k s 30 displaystyle y 0 frac k s 30 nbsp for hydraulically rough flow Intermediate values are generally given by the empirically derived Nikuradse diagram 2 though analytical methods for solving for this range have also been proposed 6 For channels with a granular boundary such as natural river systems k s 3 5 D 84 displaystyle k s approx 3 5D 84 nbsp where D 84 displaystyle D 84 nbsp is the average diameter of the 84th largest percentile of the grains of the bed material 7 Power law solutions editWorks by Barenblatt and others have shown that besides the logarithmic law of the wall the limit for infinite Reynolds numbers there exist power law solutions which are dependent on the Reynolds number 8 9 In 1996 Cipra submitted experimental evidence in support of these power law descriptions 10 This evidence itself has not been fully accepted by other experts 11 In 2001 Oberlack claimed to have derived both the logarithmic law of the wall as well as power laws directly from the Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes equations exploiting the symmetries in a Lie group approach 3 12 However in 2014 Frewer et al 13 refuted these results For scalars editFor scalars most notably temperature the self similar logarithmic law of the wall has been theorized first formulated by B A Kader 14 and observed in experimental and computational studies 15 16 17 18 In many cases extensions to the original law of the wall formulation usually through integral transformations are generally needed to account for compressibility variable property and real fluid effects Near the wall editBelow the region where the law of the wall is applicable there are other estimations for friction velocity 19 Viscous sublayer edit In the region known as the viscous sublayer below 5 wall units the variation of u displaystyle u nbsp to y displaystyle y nbsp is approximately 1 1 such that For y lt 5 displaystyle y lt 5 nbsp u y displaystyle u y nbsp where y displaystyle y nbsp is the wall coordinate the distance y to the wall made dimensionless with the friction velocity u t displaystyle u tau nbsp and kinematic viscosity n displaystyle nu nbsp u displaystyle u nbsp is the dimensionless velocity the velocity u parallel to the wall as a function of y distance from the wall divided by the friction velocity u t displaystyle u tau nbsp This approximation can be used farther than 5 wall units but by y 12 displaystyle y 12 nbsp the error is more than 25 Buffer layer edit In the buffer layer between 5 wall units and 30 wall units neither law holds such that For 5 lt y lt 30 displaystyle 5 lt y lt 30 nbsp u y displaystyle u neq y nbsp u 1 k ln y C displaystyle u neq frac 1 kappa ln y C nbsp with the largest variation from either law occurring approximately where the two equations intersect at y 11 displaystyle y 11 nbsp That is before 11 wall units the linear approximation is more accurate and after 11 wall units the logarithmic approximation should be used though neither are relatively accurate at 11 wall units The mean streamwise velocity profile u displaystyle u nbsp is improved for y lt 20 displaystyle y lt 20 nbsp with an eddy viscosity formulation based on a near wall turbulent kinetic energy k displaystyle kappa nbsp function and the van Driest mixing length equation Comparisons with DNS data of fully developed turbulent channel flows for 109 lt R e t lt 2003 displaystyle 109 lt Re tau lt 2003 nbsp showed good agreement 20 Notes edit von Karman Th 1930 Mechanische Ahnlichkeit und Turbulenz Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen Fachgruppe 1 Mathematik 5 58 76 also as Mechanical Similitude and Turbulence Tech Mem NACA no 611 1931 a b c d e Mohrig David 2004 Conservation of Mass and Momentum PDF 12 110 Sedimentary Geology Fall 2004 MIT OCW Retrieved 2009 03 27 a b c Schlichting amp Gersten 2000 pp 522 524 Schlichting amp Gersten 2000 p 530 Whipple Kelin 2004 Hydraulic Roughness PDF 12 163 Surface processes and landscape evolution MIT OCW Retrieved 2009 03 27 Le Roux J P 2004 An integrated law of the wall for hydrodynamically transitional flow over plane beds Sedimentary Geology 163 3 4 311 321 Bibcode 2004SedG 163 311L doi 10 1016 j sedgeo 2003 07 005 Haws Benjamin Equivalent sand roughness of Nikuradse ks Retrieved 2009 03 27 dead link Lynn Yarris A flaw in the law Berkeley Lab Highlights 97 98 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory U S Department of Energy Barenblatt G I 1993 Scaling laws for fully developed turbulent shear flows Part 1 Basic hypotheses and analysis Journal of Fluid Mechanics 248 513 520 Bibcode 1993JFM 248 513B doi 10 1017 S0022112093000874 S2CID 123639410 Barenblatt G I Prostokishin V M 1993 Scaling laws for fully developed turbulent shear flows Part 2 Processing of experimental data Journal of Fluid Mechanics 248 521 529 Bibcode 1993JFM 248 521B doi 10 1017 S0022112093000886 S2CID 121328837 Barenblatt G I Goldenfeld N 1995 Does fully developed turbulence exist Reynolds number independence versus asymptotic covariance Physics of Fluids 7 12 3078 3084 arXiv cond mat 9507132 Bibcode 1995PhFl 7 3078B doi 10 1063 1 868685 S2CID 15138376 Barenblatt G I Chorin A J 1998 Scaling laws and vanishing viscosity limits for wall bounded shear flows and for local structure in developed turbulence Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 50 4 381 398 doi 10 1002 SICI 1097 0312 199704 50 4 lt 381 AID CPA5 gt 3 0 CO 2 6 Cipra Barry Arthur May 1996 A New Theory of Turbulence Causes a Stir Among Experts Science 272 5264 951 Bibcode 1996Sci 272 951C doi 10 1126 science 272 5264 951 S2CID 117371905 Zagarola M V Perry A E Smits A J 1997 Log Laws or Power Laws The Scaling in the Overlap Region Physics of Fluids 9 7 2094 2100 Bibcode 1997PhFl 9 2094Z CiteSeerX 10 1 1 503 989 doi 10 1063 1 869328 Oberlack Martin 2001 A unified approach for symmetries in plane parallel turbulent shear flows Journal of Fluid Mechanics 427 1 299 328 Bibcode 2001JFM 427 299O doi 10 1017 S0022112000002408 S2CID 122979735 Frewer Michael Khujadze George Foysi Holger 2014 Is the log law a first principle result from Lie group invariance analysis pp 1 32 arXiv 1412 3069 Bibcode 2014arXiv1412 3069F Kader B A 1981 09 01 Temperature and concentration profiles in fully turbulent boundary layers International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 24 9 1541 1544 doi 10 1016 0017 9310 81 90220 9 ISSN 0017 9310 Simonich J C Bradshaw P 1978 11 01 Effect of Free Stream Turbulence on Heat Transfer through a Turbulent Boundary Layer Journal of Heat Transfer 100 4 671 677 doi 10 1115 1 3450875 ISSN 0022 1481 Patel Ashish Boersma Bendiks J Pecnik Rene 2017 08 21 Scalar statistics in variable property turbulent channel flows Physical Review Fluids 2 8 084604 Bibcode 2017PhRvF 2h4604P doi 10 1103 PhysRevFluids 2 084604 Toki Takahiko Teramoto Susumu Okamoto Koji 2020 01 01 Velocity and Temperature Profiles in Turbulent Channel Flow at Supercritical Pressure Journal of Propulsion and Power 36 1 3 13 doi 10 2514 1 B37381 S2CID 209963353 Guo J Yang X I A Ihme M March 2022 Structure of the thermal boundary layer in turbulent channel flows at transcritical conditions Journal of Fluid Mechanics 934 Bibcode 2022JFM 934A 45G doi 10 1017 jfm 2021 1157 ISSN 0022 1120 Turbulent Flows 2000 pp 273 274 Pope Stephen 2000 Turbulent Flows 1st revised ed Cambridge University Press ISBN 0 521 59125 2 Absi Rafik 2009 A simple eddy viscosity formulation for turbulent boundary layers near smooth walls Comptes Rendus Mecanique 337 3 158 165 arXiv 1106 0985 Bibcode 2009CRMec 337 158A doi 10 1016 j crme 2009 03 010 S2CID 40907005References editChanson H 2009 Applied Hydrodynamics An Introduction to Ideal and Real Fluid Flows CRC Press Taylor amp Francis Group Leiden The Netherlands 478 pages ISBN 978 0 415 49271 3 Schlichting Hermann Gersten K 2000 Boundary layer Theory 8th revised ed Springer ISBN 3 540 66270 7Further reading editBuschmann Matthias H Gad el Hak Mohamed 2009 Evidence of nonlogarithmic behavior of turbulent channel and pipe flow AIAA Journal 47 3 535 Bibcode 2009AIAAJ 47 535B doi 10 2514 1 37032External links editDefinition from ScienceWorld Formula on CFD Online Y estimator Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Law of the wall amp oldid 1191704271, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.