Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi Co Ltd [1983] 1 AC 520 was a House of Lords judgment on whether a duty of care in delict exists between a contractor or sub-contractor and an employer.[1]
Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi Co Ltd
Citation(s)
[1983] 1 AC 520
Transcript(s)
judgment
This Scottish case initially caused some excitement amongst English academic lawyers who thought it heralded the fusion of contract and tort into a single "law of obligations". Although textbooks were written with such a title,[2] the idea did not generally catch on, and Junior Books has since become "a very distinguished case".[3]
Veitchi was a specialist flooring company which was nominated as a subcontractor to lay flooring at Junior Books' factory. The floor proved defective but as there was a contract only between Junior Books and the main contractor, there was no contractual relationship whereby Junior Books could sue Veitchi, the subcontractor. Accordingly, Junior Books was obliged to bring an action in delict, arguing that Veitchi owed Junior Books a non-contractual duty of care.
It was not explained why Junior Books did not sue the main contractor in contract.
Judgmentedit
The House of Lords ruled that there was a sufficient degree of proximity between the parties to allow Junior Books to sue in delict.
The decision was not followed by the House of Lords in D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners for England [1989] AC 177, where Junior Books was described as a "unique" case which could not be regarded as laying down any principle of general application.
^Such as The Law of Obligations by Simon Whittaker
^"A very distinguished case" : a lawyer's joke - see Glanville Williams' Learning the Law. The "joke" is when courts dislike a precedent, rather than applying it, they distinguish it, so that the case becomes "very distinguished".
junior, books, veitchi, 1983, house, lords, judgment, whether, duty, care, delict, exists, between, contractor, contractor, employer, citation, 1983, 520transcript, judgmentthis, scottish, case, initially, caused, some, excitement, amongst, english, academic, . Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi Co Ltd 1983 1 AC 520 was a House of Lords judgment on whether a duty of care in delict exists between a contractor or sub contractor and an employer 1 Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi Co LtdCitation s 1983 1 AC 520Transcript s judgmentThis Scottish case initially caused some excitement amongst English academic lawyers who thought it heralded the fusion of contract and tort into a single law of obligations Although textbooks were written with such a title 2 the idea did not generally catch on and Junior Books has since become a very distinguished case 3 Contents 1 Facts 2 Judgment 3 See also 4 ReferencesFacts editVeitchi was a specialist flooring company which was nominated as a subcontractor to lay flooring at Junior Books factory The floor proved defective but as there was a contract only between Junior Books and the main contractor there was no contractual relationship whereby Junior Books could sue Veitchi the subcontractor Accordingly Junior Books was obliged to bring an action in delict arguing that Veitchi owed Junior Books a non contractual duty of care It was not explained why Junior Books did not sue the main contractor in contract Judgment editThe House of Lords ruled that there was a sufficient degree of proximity between the parties to allow Junior Books to sue in delict The decision was not followed by the House of Lords in D amp F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners for England 1989 AC 177 where Junior Books was described as a unique case which could not be regarded as laying down any principle of general application See also editPure economic loss in English Law Delict Norwich City Council v Harvey 1989 1 WLR 828 4 References edit Law Teacher Such as The Law of Obligations by Simon Whittaker A very distinguished case a lawyer s joke see Glanville Williams Learning the Law The joke is when courts dislike a precedent rather than applying it they distinguish it so that the case becomes very distinguished Cambridge Journal nbsp nbsp This article relating to law in the United Kingdom or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Junior Books Ltd v Veitchi Co Ltd amp oldid 1149463388, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
