fbpx
Wikipedia

Independence of Smith-dominated alternatives

Independence of Smith-dominated alternatives (ISDA, also known as Smith-IIA) is a voting system criterion which says that the winner of an election should not be affected by candidates who are not in the Smith set.[1]

Say we classify all candidates in an election into two categories, Frontrunners and non-Frontrunners, where every candidate in the group of Frontrunners defeats every candidate in the group of non-Frontrunners. Then, independence of Smith-dominated alternatives says it is always possible to eliminate all candidates in the group of non-Frontrunners without changing the outcome of the election.

Another way of defining ISDA is to say that adding a new candidate should not change the winner of an election, unless that new candidate beats the original winner, either directly or indirectly (by beating a candidate who beats a candidate who... who beats the winner).

Complying methods edit

Schulze and Ranked Pairs are independent of Smith-dominated alternatives. Any voting system can be forced to satisfy ISDA by first eliminating all candidates outside the Smith set, then running the full algorithm.

Ambiguity edit

Smith-IIA can sometimes be taken to mean independence of non-Smith irrelevant alternatives, i.e. that no losing candidate outside the Smith set can affect the result.[citation needed] This differs slightly from the above definition, in that methods passing independence of irrelevant alternatives (but not the Smith criterion) also satisfy this definition of Smith-IIA.

If the criterion is taken to mean independence of non-Smith alternatives, regardless of whether they are relevant (i.e. winners) or not, Smith-independence requires passing the Smith criterion.

References edit

  1. ^ Green-Armytage, J. (2011). "Four Condorcet-Hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections" (PDF). Voting Matters (29): 1–14. S2CID 15220771. Smith-IIA [ISDA] Definition: Removing a candidate from the ballot who is not a member of the Smith set will not change the result of the election. ('IIA' here stands for 'independence of irrelevant alternatives'.)

independence, smith, dominated, alternatives, this, article, needs, additional, citations, verification, please, help, improve, this, article, adding, citations, reliable, sources, this, article, unsourced, material, challenged, removed, find, sources, news, n. This article needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this article Unsourced material may be challenged and removed Find sources Independence of Smith dominated alternatives news newspapers books scholar JSTOR August 2019 Learn how and when to remove this message Independence of Smith dominated alternatives ISDA also known as Smith IIA is a voting system criterion which says that the winner of an election should not be affected by candidates who are not in the Smith set 1 Say we classify all candidates in an election into two categories Frontrunners and non Frontrunners where every candidate in the group of Frontrunners defeats every candidate in the group of non Frontrunners Then independence of Smith dominated alternatives says it is always possible to eliminate all candidates in the group of non Frontrunners without changing the outcome of the election Another way of defining ISDA is to say that adding a new candidate should not change the winner of an election unless that new candidate beats the original winner either directly or indirectly by beating a candidate who beats a candidate who who beats the winner Complying methods editSchulze and Ranked Pairs are independent of Smith dominated alternatives Any voting system can be forced to satisfy ISDA by first eliminating all candidates outside the Smith set then running the full algorithm Ambiguity editSmith IIA can sometimes be taken to mean independence of non Smith irrelevant alternatives i e that no losing candidate outside the Smith set can affect the result citation needed This differs slightly from the above definition in that methods passing independence of irrelevant alternatives but not the Smith criterion also satisfy this definition of Smith IIA If the criterion is taken to mean independence of non Smith alternatives regardless of whether they are relevant i e winners or not Smith independence requires passing the Smith criterion References edit Green Armytage J 2011 Four Condorcet Hare hybrid methods for single winner elections PDF Voting Matters 29 1 14 S2CID 15220771 Smith IIA ISDA Definition Removing a candidate from the ballot who is not a member of the Smith set will not change the result of the election IIA here stands for independence of irrelevant alternatives Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Independence of Smith dominated alternatives amp oldid 1219372195, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.