fbpx
Wikipedia

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt, 598 U.S. 39 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt
Argued October 12, 2022
Decided February 22, 2023
Full case nameHelix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., et al. v. Michael J. Hewitt
Docket no.21-984
Citations598 U.S. 39 (more)
ArgumentOral argument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinions
MajorityKagan, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Sotomayor, Barrett, Jackson
DissentGorsuch
DissentKavanaugh, joined by Alito
Laws applied
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

Background edit

Michael Hewitt was a toolpusher (a supervisor) on oil rigs for Helix Energy Solutions Group from 2014 to 2017. He was paid over $200,000 each year he worked for the company, at a flat daily rate. Hewitt was fired from the company in 2017, and the reasons are in dispute. He then filed a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) against Helix, asserting he was entitled to overtime pay. Various FLSA regulations exempt employees from overtime if they (1) perform managerial duties, (2) earn $100,000 or more each year, and (3) receive a weekly salary of $455 or higher on a salary basis. Hewitt fulfilled the first two conditions, but not the third, as he was paid daily. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas rejected Hewitt's claim, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed in a 2–1 opinion. The court later granted rehearing en banc and again reversed, this time in a 12–6 vote.

Helix filed a petition for a writ of certiorari.[1]

Supreme Court edit

Certiorari was granted in the case on May 2, 2022. Oral arguments were held on October 12, 2022. On February 22, 2023, the Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit in a 6–3 decision.

References edit

  1. ^ Howe, Amy (May 2, 2022). "Justices add new cases on bankruptcy, overtime pay, and federal civil rights claims". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved May 22, 2022.

External links edit

  • Text of Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt, 598 U.S. 39 (2023) is available from: Justia  Oyez (oral argument audio)  Supreme Court (slip opinion)  Supreme Court (preliminary print) 

helix, energy, solutions, group, hewitt, 2023, united, states, supreme, court, case, related, fair, labor, standards, 1938, supreme, court, united, statesargued, october, 2022decided, february, 2023full, case, namehelix, energy, solutions, group, michael, hewi. Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc v Hewitt 598 U S 39 2023 was a United States Supreme Court case related to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc v HewittSupreme Court of the United StatesArgued October 12 2022Decided February 22 2023Full case nameHelix Energy Solutions Group Inc et al v Michael J HewittDocket no 21 984Citations598 U S 39 more ArgumentOral argumentOpinion announcementOpinion announcementCourt membershipChief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor Elena Kagan Neil Gorsuch Brett Kavanaugh Amy Coney Barrett Ketanji Brown JacksonCase opinionsMajorityKagan joined by Roberts Thomas Sotomayor Barrett JacksonDissentGorsuchDissentKavanaugh joined by AlitoLaws appliedFair Labor Standards Act of 1938 Contents 1 Background 2 Supreme Court 3 References 4 External linksBackground editMichael Hewitt was a toolpusher a supervisor on oil rigs for Helix Energy Solutions Group from 2014 to 2017 He was paid over 200 000 each year he worked for the company at a flat daily rate Hewitt was fired from the company in 2017 and the reasons are in dispute He then filed a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act FLSA against Helix asserting he was entitled to overtime pay Various FLSA regulations exempt employees from overtime if they 1 perform managerial duties 2 earn 100 000 or more each year and 3 receive a weekly salary of 455 or higher on a salary basis Hewitt fulfilled the first two conditions but not the third as he was paid daily The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas rejected Hewitt s claim but the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed in a 2 1 opinion The court later granted rehearing en banc and again reversed this time in a 12 6 vote Helix filed a petition for a writ of certiorari 1 Supreme Court editCertiorari was granted in the case on May 2 2022 Oral arguments were held on October 12 2022 On February 22 2023 the Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit in a 6 3 decision References edit Howe Amy May 2 2022 Justices add new cases on bankruptcy overtime pay and federal civil rights claims SCOTUSblog Retrieved May 22 2022 External links editText of Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc v Hewitt 598 U S 39 2023 is available from Justia Oyez oral argument audio Supreme Court slip opinion Supreme Court preliminary print nbsp This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc v Hewitt amp oldid 1210353237, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.