fbpx
Wikipedia

HPO formalism

The history projection operator (HPO) formalism is an approach to temporal quantum logic developed by Chris Isham. It deals with the logical structure of quantum mechanical propositions asserted at different points in time.

Introduction edit

In standard quantum mechanics a physical system is associated with a Hilbert space  . States of the system at a fixed time are represented by normalised vectors in the space and physical observables are represented by Hermitian operators on  .

A physical proposition   about the system at a fixed time can be represented by an orthogonal projection operator   on   (See quantum logic). This representation links together the lattice operations in the lattice of logical propositions and the lattice of projection operators on a Hilbert space (See quantum logic).

The HPO formalism is a natural extension of these ideas to propositions about the system that are concerned with more than one time.

History propositions edit

Homogeneous histories edit

A homogeneous history proposition   is a sequence of single-time propositions   specified at different times  . These times are called the temporal support of the history. We shall denote the proposition   as   and read it as

"  at time   is true and then   at time   is true and then   and then   at time   is true"

Inhomogeneous histories edit

Not all history propositions can be represented by a sequence of single-time propositions at different times. These are called inhomogeneous history propositions. An example is the proposition   OR   for two homogeneous histories  .

History projection operators edit

The key observation of the HPO formalism is to represent history propositions by projection operators on a history Hilbert space. This is where the name "History Projection Operator" (HPO) comes from.

For a homogeneous history   we can use the tensor product to define a projector

 

where   is the projection operator on   that represents the proposition   at time  .

This   is a projection operator on the tensor product "history Hilbert space"  

Not all projection operators on   can be written as the sum of tensor products of the form  . These other projection operators are used to represent inhomogeneous histories by applying lattice operations to homogeneous histories.

Temporal quantum logic edit

Representing history propositions by projectors on the history Hilbert space naturally encodes the logical structure of history propositions. The lattice operations on the set of projection operations on the history Hilbert space   can be applied to model the lattice of logical operations on history propositions.

If two homogeneous histories   and   don't share the same temporal support they can be modified so that they do. If   is in the temporal support of   but not   (for example) then a new homogeneous history proposition which differs from   by including the "always true" proposition at each time   can be formed. In this way the temporal supports of   can always be joined. We shall therefore assume that all homogeneous histories share the same temporal support.

We now present the logical operations for homogeneous history propositions   and   such that  

Conjunction (AND) edit

If   and   are two homogeneous histories then the history proposition "  and  " is also a homogeneous history. It is represented by the projection operator

   

Disjunction (OR) edit

If   and   are two homogeneous histories then the history proposition "  or  " is in general not a homogeneous history. It is represented by the projection operator

 

Negation (NOT) edit

The negation operation in the lattice of projection operators takes   to

 

where   is the identity operator on the Hilbert space. Thus the projector used to represent the proposition   (i.e. "not  ") is

 

Example: Two-time history edit

As an example, consider the negation of the two-time homogeneous history proposition  . The projector to represent the proposition   is

   

The terms which appear in this expression:

  •  
  •  
  •  .

can each be interpreted as follows:

  •   is false and   is true
  •   is true and   is false
  • both   is false and   is false

These three homogeneous histories, joined with the OR operation, include all the possibilities for how the proposition "  and then  " can be false. We therefore see that the definition of   agrees with what the proposition   should mean.

References edit

  • C.J. Isham, Quantum Logic and the Histories Approach to Quantum Theory, J. Math. Phys. 35 (1994) 2157–2185, arXiv:gr-qc/9308006v1

formalism, this, article, relies, largely, entirely, single, source, relevant, discussion, found, talk, page, please, help, improve, this, article, introducing, citations, additional, sources, find, sources, news, newspapers, books, scholar, jstor, september, . This article relies largely or entirely on a single source Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources Find sources HPO formalism news newspapers books scholar JSTOR September 2022 The history projection operator HPO formalism is an approach to temporal quantum logic developed by Chris Isham It deals with the logical structure of quantum mechanical propositions asserted at different points in time Contents 1 Introduction 2 History propositions 2 1 Homogeneous histories 2 2 Inhomogeneous histories 3 History projection operators 4 Temporal quantum logic 4 1 Conjunction AND 4 2 Disjunction OR 4 3 Negation NOT 4 4 Example Two time history 5 ReferencesIntroduction editIn standard quantum mechanics a physical system is associated with a Hilbert space H displaystyle mathcal H nbsp States of the system at a fixed time are represented by normalised vectors in the space and physical observables are represented by Hermitian operators on H displaystyle mathcal H nbsp A physical proposition P displaystyle P nbsp about the system at a fixed time can be represented by an orthogonal projection operator P displaystyle hat P nbsp on H displaystyle mathcal H nbsp See quantum logic This representation links together the lattice operations in the lattice of logical propositions and the lattice of projection operators on a Hilbert space See quantum logic The HPO formalism is a natural extension of these ideas to propositions about the system that are concerned with more than one time History propositions editHomogeneous histories edit A homogeneous history proposition a displaystyle alpha nbsp is a sequence of single time propositions ati displaystyle alpha t i nbsp specified at different times t1 lt t2 lt lt tn displaystyle t 1 lt t 2 lt ldots lt t n nbsp These times are called the temporal support of the history We shall denote the proposition a displaystyle alpha nbsp as a1 a2 an displaystyle alpha 1 alpha 2 ldots alpha n nbsp and read it as at1 displaystyle alpha t 1 nbsp at time t1 displaystyle t 1 nbsp is true and then at2 displaystyle alpha t 2 nbsp at time t2 displaystyle t 2 nbsp is true and then displaystyle ldots nbsp and then atn displaystyle alpha t n nbsp at time tn displaystyle t n nbsp is true Inhomogeneous histories edit Not all history propositions can be represented by a sequence of single time propositions at different times These are called inhomogeneous history propositions An example is the proposition a displaystyle alpha nbsp OR b displaystyle beta nbsp for two homogeneous histories a b displaystyle alpha beta nbsp History projection operators editThe key observation of the HPO formalism is to represent history propositions by projection operators on a history Hilbert space This is where the name History Projection Operator HPO comes from For a homogeneous history a a1 a2 an displaystyle alpha alpha 1 alpha 2 ldots alpha n nbsp we can use the tensor product to define a projectora a t1 a t2 a tn displaystyle hat alpha hat alpha t 1 otimes hat alpha t 2 otimes ldots otimes hat alpha t n nbsp where a ti displaystyle hat alpha t i nbsp is the projection operator on H displaystyle mathcal H nbsp that represents the proposition ati displaystyle alpha t i nbsp at time ti displaystyle t i nbsp This a displaystyle hat alpha nbsp is a projection operator on the tensor product history Hilbert space H H H H displaystyle H mathcal H otimes mathcal H otimes ldots otimes mathcal H nbsp Not all projection operators on H displaystyle H nbsp can be written as the sum of tensor products of the form a displaystyle hat alpha nbsp These other projection operators are used to represent inhomogeneous histories by applying lattice operations to homogeneous histories Temporal quantum logic editRepresenting history propositions by projectors on the history Hilbert space naturally encodes the logical structure of history propositions The lattice operations on the set of projection operations on the history Hilbert space H displaystyle H nbsp can be applied to model the lattice of logical operations on history propositions If two homogeneous histories a displaystyle alpha nbsp and b displaystyle beta nbsp don t share the same temporal support they can be modified so that they do If ti displaystyle t i nbsp is in the temporal support of a displaystyle alpha nbsp but not b displaystyle beta nbsp for example then a new homogeneous history proposition which differs from b displaystyle beta nbsp by including the always true proposition at each time ti displaystyle t i nbsp can be formed In this way the temporal supports of a b displaystyle alpha beta nbsp can always be joined We shall therefore assume that all homogeneous histories share the same temporal support We now present the logical operations for homogeneous history propositions a displaystyle alpha nbsp and b displaystyle beta nbsp such that a b b a displaystyle hat alpha hat beta hat beta hat alpha nbsp Conjunction AND edit If a displaystyle alpha nbsp and b displaystyle beta nbsp are two homogeneous histories then the history proposition a displaystyle alpha nbsp and b displaystyle beta nbsp is also a homogeneous history It is represented by the projection operatora b a b displaystyle widehat alpha wedge beta hat alpha hat beta nbsp b a displaystyle hat beta hat alpha nbsp Disjunction OR edit If a displaystyle alpha nbsp and b displaystyle beta nbsp are two homogeneous histories then the history proposition a displaystyle alpha nbsp or b displaystyle beta nbsp is in general not a homogeneous history It is represented by the projection operatora b a b a b displaystyle widehat alpha vee beta hat alpha hat beta hat alpha hat beta nbsp Negation NOT edit The negation operation in the lattice of projection operators takes P displaystyle hat P nbsp to P I P displaystyle neg hat P mathbb I hat P nbsp where I displaystyle mathbb I nbsp is the identity operator on the Hilbert space Thus the projector used to represent the proposition a displaystyle neg alpha nbsp i e not a displaystyle alpha nbsp is a I a displaystyle widehat neg alpha mathbb I hat alpha nbsp Example Two time history edit As an example consider the negation of the two time homogeneous history proposition a a1 a2 displaystyle alpha alpha 1 alpha 2 nbsp The projector to represent the proposition a displaystyle neg alpha nbsp is a I I a 1 a 2 displaystyle widehat neg alpha mathbb I otimes mathbb I hat alpha 1 otimes hat alpha 2 nbsp I a 1 a 2 a 1 I a 2 I a 1 I a 2 displaystyle mathbb I hat alpha 1 otimes hat alpha 2 hat alpha 1 otimes mathbb I hat alpha 2 mathbb I hat alpha 1 otimes mathbb I hat alpha 2 nbsp The terms which appear in this expression I a 1 a 2 displaystyle mathbb I hat alpha 1 otimes hat alpha 2 nbsp a 1 I a 2 displaystyle hat alpha 1 otimes mathbb I hat alpha 2 nbsp I a 1 I a 2 displaystyle mathbb I hat alpha 1 otimes mathbb I hat alpha 2 nbsp can each be interpreted as follows a1 displaystyle alpha 1 nbsp is false and a2 displaystyle alpha 2 nbsp is true a1 displaystyle alpha 1 nbsp is true and a2 displaystyle alpha 2 nbsp is false both a1 displaystyle alpha 1 nbsp is false and a2 displaystyle alpha 2 nbsp is falseThese three homogeneous histories joined with the OR operation include all the possibilities for how the proposition a1 displaystyle alpha 1 nbsp and then a2 displaystyle alpha 2 nbsp can be false We therefore see that the definition of a displaystyle widehat neg alpha nbsp agrees with what the proposition a displaystyle neg alpha nbsp should mean References editC J Isham Quantum Logic and the Histories Approach to Quantum Theory J Math Phys 35 1994 2157 2185 arXiv gr qc 9308006v1 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title HPO formalism amp oldid 1173326267, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.