fbpx
Wikipedia

Frohwerk v. United States

Frohwerk v. United States, 249 U.S. 204 (1919), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the conviction of a newspaperman for violating the Espionage Act of 1917 in connection with criticism of U.S. involvement in foreign wars.

Frohwerk v. United States
Argued January 27, 1919
Decided March 10, 1919
Full case nameFrohwerk v. United States
Citations249 U.S. 204 (more)
39 S. Ct. 249; 63 L. Ed. 561; 1919 U.S. LEXIS 2193
Case history
PriorError to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri
Court membership
Chief Justice
Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Case opinion
MajorityHolmes, joined by unanimous

In a unanimous decision written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, the Court found that this criticism constituted the "willful obstruction" of America's recruitment efforts and was not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

As in Schenck v. United States, also decided in 1919, the speech might have been protected were the country not at war.[1]

References edit

  1. ^ Parker, Richard (December 15, 2023). . Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University. Archived from the original on February 2, 2024. Retrieved February 2, 2024.

External links edit

Text of Frohwerk v. United States, 249 U.S. 204 (1919) is available from: Findlaw  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio) 

frohwerk, united, states, 1919, united, states, supreme, court, case, which, court, upheld, conviction, newspaperman, violating, espionage, 1917, connection, with, criticism, involvement, foreign, wars, supreme, court, united, statesargued, january, 1919decide. Frohwerk v United States 249 U S 204 1919 was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the conviction of a newspaperman for violating the Espionage Act of 1917 in connection with criticism of U S involvement in foreign wars Frohwerk v United StatesSupreme Court of the United StatesArgued January 27 1919Decided March 10 1919Full case nameFrohwerk v United StatesCitations249 U S 204 more 39 S Ct 249 63 L Ed 561 1919 U S LEXIS 2193Case historyPriorError to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of MissouriCourt membershipChief Justice Edward D White Associate Justices Joseph McKenna Oliver W Holmes Jr William R Day Willis Van DevanterMahlon Pitney James C McReynoldsLouis Brandeis John H ClarkeCase opinionMajorityHolmes joined by unanimousIn a unanimous decision written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes the Court found that this criticism constituted the willful obstruction of America s recruitment efforts and was not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution As in Schenck v United States also decided in 1919 the speech might have been protected were the country not at war 1 References edit Parker Richard December 15 2023 Frohwerk v United States 1919 Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University Archived from the original on February 2 2024 Retrieved February 2 2024 External links editText of Frohwerk v United States 249 U S 204 1919 is available from Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez oral argument audio Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Frohwerk v United States amp oldid 1203292036, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.