fbpx
Wikipedia

Environmental Working Group

December 18, 2023

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) is an American activist group that specializes in research and advocacy in the areas of agricultural subsidies, toxic chemicals, drinking water pollutants, and corporate accountability. EWG is a nonprofit organization (501(c)(3)).

Environmental Working Group
Founded1993 (30 years ago) (1993)
FoundersKen Cook, Richard Wiles[1]
Type501(c)(3)
FocusEnvironmentalism
Location
Websitewww.ewg.org

History edit

In 1993, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) was founded by Ken Cook and Richard Wiles.[1] EWG is headquartered in Washington, D.C., in the United States.[2]

In 2002, a lobbying organization, the EWG Action Fund (a 501(c)(4) organization) was founded.[3]

EWG has been criticized for exaggerating the risks of chemicals.[4][5][6]

EWG partners with companies to certify their products, and its reports are influential with the public.[4]

According to EWG co-founder Ken Cook, the EWG advocates for organic food and farming.[7]

Activities edit

Dirty Dozen edit

The EWG promotes an annual list ranking pesticide residues on fruits and vegetables called the "Dirty Dozen", though it does not give readers context on what amounts regulatory agencies consider safe. The list cautions consumers to avoid conventional produce and promotes organic foods.[8][9]

Scientists have stated that the list significantly overstates the risk to consumers of the listed items, the methodology employed in constructing the list "lacks scientific credibility" and "may be intentionally misleading."[8][10] A 2011 study showed that the items on the list had safe levels of chemical residue or none at all.[11][8] A 2011 analysis of the USDA's PDP data[12] by Steve Savage found that 99.33% of the detectable residues were below the EPA tolerance and half of the samples were more than 100 times below.[13]

As You Sow publishes a similar report on pesticides in agriculture.[14]

PFAS regulation advocacy edit

Since the early 2000s, EWG has been advocating for increasing regulations on the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).[15][16][17] EWG has collaborated with the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute (SSEHRI) at Northeastern University to publish a map showing detections of PFAS in water samples across the USA.[15][16]

Sunscreens edit

In July 2008, the EWG published an analysis of over 900 sunscreens. The report concluded that only 15% of the sunscreens met the group's criteria for safety and effectiveness.[18] It called on the FDA to require that manufacturers provide more detailed information about the level of sun protection provided for both the UVA and UVB radiation.[18] Representatives of the sunscreen industry called the 2008 sunscreen report inaccurate.[18] Commenting on the 2010 sunscreen report, Zoe Draelos, of Duke University and spokesperson for the American Academy of Dermatology, said the group made unfair "sweeping generalizations" about newer chemicals (such as oxybenzone) in its report and that their recommended products were based only on "very old technology" such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.[19]

Vaccines edit

In 2004, the EWG authored a report titled "Overloaded? New science, new insights about mercury and autism in children" promoting an unfounded link between mercury preservatives in vaccines and autism.[6]

Genetically modified food edit

The EWG has made statements opposing the scientific consensus on the safety of genetically modified (GM) food claiming long-term safety has not been proven.[20][21] The group started a campaign supported by funding from the organic industry to require labeling of GM food and promote organic food.[22][23]

Tap water edit

In 2005, from data compiled by "state environment and health agencies",[24][25] the EWG released its Tap Water Database[26] that contains data collected from approximately 48,500 water utilities across the US.[27][28][29] The City of Everett, described by the report as exceeding public health guidelines for drinking water, has criticized the report, contending that the EWG selectively chose the guidelines used to assess water quality.[30]

Finances and funding edit

For the fiscal year ending December 2021, ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer Form 990 archive reported that, EWG raised circa $16.1 million and spent circa $12.6 million.[31]

Activist Facts reported that, from ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer[32] Form 990 archive,[31] for the fiscal year ending December 2017, EWG raised more than $10.4 million and spent more than $9.3 million.[2]

For the fiscal year ending December 2015, EWG raised nearly $13.7 million and spent $12.5 million.[33][34] Over 84 cents out of every dollar go toward EWG's program expenses.[34] President Ken Cook earned $289,022 in reportable income in 2015.[34]

Critics edit

The EWG issues various product safety warnings; the accuracy of EWG reports and statements have been criticized for exaggerating the risks of chemicals as has its funding by the organic food industry.[6][35][36][37][38]

EWG warnings have been labeled "alarmist", "scaremongering" and "misleading".[39][40][41] Brian Dunning of Skeptoid describes the EWG's activities as "a political lobbying group for the organic industry."[6]

According to a 2009 survey of 937 members of the Society of Toxicology conducted by George Mason University, 79% of respondents thought EWG overstated the risks of chemicals, while only 3% thought they underestimated the risks and 18% thought they were accurate.[5][42] Quackwatch has included EWG in its list of "questionable organisations".[43] They describes EWG as one of "[t]he key groups that have wrong things to say about cosmetic products".[44]

Environmental historian James McWilliams has described EWG warnings as fear mongering and misleading, and wrote that there is little evidence to support the claims made by the EWG.[45] "The transparency of the USDA’s program in providing the detailed data is good because it reveals how insignificant these residues are from a health perspective. Unfortunately, the EWG misuses that transparency in a manipulative way to drive their fear-based, organic marketing agenda."[46]

According to Kavin Senapathy of Science Moms, the EWG "frightens consumers about chemicals and their safety, cloaking fear mongering in a clever disguise of caring and empowerment." Senapathy included two main areas of criticism for the organization: the use of methodologies for food, cosmetics, children’s products and more that are "fundamentally flawed", and that EWG is "largely funded by organic companies" that its shopping recommendations help.[36]

References edit

  1. ^ a b "Studies Point Up Contamination of Drinking Water : Environment: Two groups report that 45 million Americans have been exposed to pollutants such as lead, pesticides and cryptosporidium". Los Angeles Times. June 2, 1995. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
  2. ^ a b c "Environmental Working Group (EWG)". Activist Facts. January 8, 2013. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
  3. ^ "About the Environmental Working Group". EWG.org. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
  4. ^ a b Kary, Tiffany (December 12, 2018). . Bloomberg. Archived from the original on May 29, 2019. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  5. ^ a b "The Media and Chemical Risk: Toxicologists' Opinions on Chemical Risk and Media Coverage" (PDF). 2009. Retrieved June 2, 2023.
  6. ^ a b c d Dunning, Brian (May 15, 2018). "Environmental Working Group and the Dirty Dozen". Skeptoid. from the original on December 18, 2018. Retrieved June 7, 2022.
  7. ^ Cook, Ken (January 17, 2017). "It's Time We Get Serious About Organic Farming". Food Tank. Retrieved July 20, 2023.
  8. ^ a b c Winter, C. K.; Katz, J. M. (2011). "Dietary Exposure to Pesticide Residues from Commodities Alleged to Contain the Highest Contamination Levels". Journal of Toxicology. 2011: 589674. doi:10.1155/2011/589674. PMC 3135239. PMID 21776262.
  9. ^ "Understanding Pesticide Residues on Fruit and Vegetables: Fact vs. Fiction" (PDF). University of Arkansas Extension. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  10. ^ Cato, Sarah; McWhirt, Amanda; Herrera, Lizzy (August 2022). "Combating Horticultural Misinformation through Integrated Online Campaigns Using Social Media, Graphics Interchange Format, and Blogs". HortTechnology. 32 (4): 342–347. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH05009-22. S2CID 249901606.
  11. ^ "How Dirty Are Your Fruits and Veggies?". Center for Accountability in Science. April 10, 2018. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  12. ^ "PDP Databases and Annual Summaries". USDA. Retrieved May 17, 2018.
  13. ^ Savage, S. (May 20, 2013). "How Wrong Is The Latest "Dirty Dozen List?"". Biology Fortified. Retrieved May 17, 2018.
  14. ^
    • . As You Sow. Berkeley, CA. Archived from the original on November 15, 2023. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
  15. ^ a b Renfrew, Daniel; Pearson, Thomas W. (September 1, 2021). "The Social Life of the "Forever Chemical": PFAS Pollution Legacies and Toxic Events". Environment and Society. 12 (1): 146–163. doi:10.3167/ares.2021.120109. ISSN 2150-6779.
  16. ^ a b "Drinking water may be contaminated with chemicals in 43 states according to new study by Environmental Working Group - CBS News". www.cbsnews.com. May 7, 2019. Retrieved November 2, 2023.
  17. ^ Zimmer, Carl (August 18, 2022). "Forever Chemicals No More? PFAS Are Destroyed With New Technique". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 2, 2023.
  18. ^ a b c Boyles, Salynn (July 2, 2008). "Many Sunscreens Ineffective, Group Says". WebMD. CBS News. Retrieved June 21, 2015.
  19. ^ CafeMom (May 27, 2010). "EWG Sunscreen Report Misleading, Skin Expert Says (Go Ahead, Slather It On)". The Huffington Post. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  20. ^ Resnik, David B. (August 2015). "Retracting Inconclusive Research: Lessons from the Séralini GM Maize Feeding Study". Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28 (4): 621–633. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9546-y. PMC 4524344. PMID 26251636.
  21. ^ "Five things you should know about GMOs | Environmental Working Group". www.ewg.org. August 21, 2012. Retrieved June 7, 2023.
  22. ^ It, Just Label. "About Just Label It | Just Label It". www.justlabelit.org. Retrieved June 7, 2023.
  23. ^ "Congress Just Passed A GMO Labeling Bill. Nobody's Super Happy About It". NPR News. Retrieved June 7, 2023.
  24. ^ "Data Sources". mytapwater.org. Retrieved November 15, 2023. The short answer is that the United States government mandates that vast amounts of water data is made publicly available. MyTapWater.org downloads that data, warehouses it, and finally makes it available on this website.
  25. ^ "AWWA Comments On EWG's Online Database Of Tap Water Quality Testing And Violations". wateronline.com. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
  26. ^ . ewg.org. Environmental Working Group. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
  27. ^ "Tap Water Database". awwa.org. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  28. ^ "How safe is your tap water? This database can tell you". Yahoo Life. October 23, 2019. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  29. ^ "EWG tap water database shows arsenic and chromium in all 50 states". Business Insider. 2019. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  30. ^ "Everett statement on Environmental Working Group (EWG)". www.everettwa.gov. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  31. ^ a b Suozzo, Andrea; Glassford, Alec; Ngu, Ash; Roberts, Brandon (May 9, 2013). "Environmental Working Group". Nonprofit Explorer. ProPublica. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
  32. ^ Suozzo, Andrea; Glassford, Alec; Ngu, Ash; Roberts, Brandon (May 9, 2013). "Nonprofit Explorer". ProPublica. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
  33. ^ "EWG 2015 Annual Report" (PDF). ewg.org. December 31, 2015. p. 12. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
  34. ^ a b c "Charity Navigator Rating – Environmental Working Group". Charitynavigator.org. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
  35. ^ Meyer, David (October 25, 2018). . Fortune. Archived from the original on October 25, 2018. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  36. ^ a b Senapathy, Kavin (July 12, 2016). "Would You Rather Buy Organic Or Poison Your Family? EWG Wants You To Pick One". Forbes. US. from the original on July 13, 2016. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  37. ^ "An Apple A Day..." Office for Science and Society. McGill University. Retrieved June 7, 2023.
  38. ^ "Fruit Leathers Have Detectable Pesticides: Report". WebMD. Retrieved July 20, 2023.
  39. ^ Miller, Henry (December 26, 2010). "Diluting the 'chromium-6 in water' panic". The Guardian. from the original on September 20, 2013. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  40. ^ Corcoran, Terence (June 13, 2011). "Junk Science Week: Lipstick, apples & sperm counts". Financial Post. from the original on January 9, 2021. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  41. ^ Hogberg, David (July 25, 2005). "Soaking in Chemical Stews". The American Spectator. from the original on August 20, 2019. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  42. ^ . stats.org. Archived from the original on May 5, 2012. Retrieved June 2, 2023.
  43. ^ "Questionable Organizations: An Overview | Quackwatch". February 5, 2022. Retrieved June 2, 2023.
  44. ^ "Scientific Activism for Cosmetic Chemists (and Others)". Quackwatch. May 17, 2015. Retrieved September 7, 2020.
  45. ^ McWilliams, James (September 3, 2014). "How the Environmental Working Group Sells Its Message Short". Pacific Standard. from the original on April 5, 2018. Retrieved March 29, 2022.
  46. ^ Savage, Steven (April 10, 2018). "The Truth About Pesticide Residues On Produce: All Encouraging, Some Inconvenient". Forbes. Retrieved October 19, 2019.

External links edit

  • Environmental Working Group

December 18, 2023
environmental, working, group, american, activist, group, that, specializes, research, advocacy, areas, agricultural, subsidies, toxic, chemicals, drinking, water, pollutants, corporate, accountability, nonprofit, organization, founded1993, years, 1993, founde. The Environmental Working Group EWG is an American activist group that specializes in research and advocacy in the areas of agricultural subsidies toxic chemicals drinking water pollutants and corporate accountability EWG is a nonprofit organization 501 c 3 Environmental Working GroupFounded1993 30 years ago 1993 FoundersKen Cook Richard Wiles 1 Type501 c 3 FocusEnvironmentalismLocationWashington D C United States 2 Websitewww wbr ewg wbr org Contents 1 History 2 Activities 2 1 Dirty Dozen 2 2 PFAS regulation advocacy 2 3 Sunscreens 2 4 Vaccines 2 5 Genetically modified food 2 6 Tap water 3 Finances and funding 4 Critics 5 References 6 External linksHistory editIn 1993 the Environmental Working Group EWG was founded by Ken Cook and Richard Wiles 1 EWG is headquartered in Washington D C in the United States 2 In 2002 a lobbying organization the EWG Action Fund a 501 c 4 organization was founded 3 EWG has been criticized for exaggerating the risks of chemicals 4 5 6 EWG partners with companies to certify their products and its reports are influential with the public 4 According to EWG co founder Ken Cook the EWG advocates for organic food and farming 7 Activities editDirty Dozen edit The EWG promotes an annual list ranking pesticide residues on fruits and vegetables called the Dirty Dozen though it does not give readers context on what amounts regulatory agencies consider safe The list cautions consumers to avoid conventional produce and promotes organic foods 8 9 Scientists have stated that the list significantly overstates the risk to consumers of the listed items the methodology employed in constructing the list lacks scientific credibility and may be intentionally misleading 8 10 A 2011 study showed that the items on the list had safe levels of chemical residue or none at all 11 8 A 2011 analysis of the USDA s PDP data 12 by Steve Savage found that 99 33 of the detectable residues were below the EPA tolerance and half of the samples were more than 100 times below 13 As You Sow publishes a similar report on pesticides in agriculture 14 PFAS regulation advocacy edit Since the early 2000s EWG has been advocating for increasing regulations on the use of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances PFAS 15 16 17 EWG has collaborated with the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute SSEHRI at Northeastern University to publish a map showing detections of PFAS in water samples across the USA 15 16 Sunscreens edit In July 2008 the EWG published an analysis of over 900 sunscreens The report concluded that only 15 of the sunscreens met the group s criteria for safety and effectiveness 18 It called on the FDA to require that manufacturers provide more detailed information about the level of sun protection provided for both the UVA and UVB radiation 18 Representatives of the sunscreen industry called the 2008 sunscreen report inaccurate 18 Commenting on the 2010 sunscreen report Zoe Draelos of Duke University and spokesperson for the American Academy of Dermatology said the group made unfair sweeping generalizations about newer chemicals such as oxybenzone in its report and that their recommended products were based only on very old technology such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide 19 Vaccines edit In 2004 the EWG authored a report titled Overloaded New science new insights about mercury and autism in children promoting an unfounded link between mercury preservatives in vaccines and autism 6 Genetically modified food edit The EWG has made statements opposing the scientific consensus on the safety of genetically modified GM food claiming long term safety has not been proven 20 21 The group started a campaign supported by funding from the organic industry to require labeling of GM food and promote organic food 22 23 Tap water edit In 2005 from data compiled by state environment and health agencies 24 25 the EWG released its Tap Water Database 26 that contains data collected from approximately 48 500 water utilities across the US 27 28 29 The City of Everett described by the report as exceeding public health guidelines for drinking water has criticized the report contending that the EWG selectively chose the guidelines used to assess water quality 30 Finances and funding editFor the fiscal year ending December 2021 ProPublica s Nonprofit Explorer Form 990 archive reported that EWG raised circa 16 1 million and spent circa 12 6 million 31 Activist Facts reported that from ProPublica s Nonprofit Explorer 32 Form 990 archive 31 for the fiscal year ending December 2017 EWG raised more than 10 4 million and spent more than 9 3 million 2 For the fiscal year ending December 2015 EWG raised nearly 13 7 million and spent 12 5 million 33 34 Over 84 cents out of every dollar go toward EWG s program expenses 34 President Ken Cook earned 289 022 in reportable income in 2015 34 Critics editThe EWG issues various product safety warnings the accuracy of EWG reports and statements have been criticized for exaggerating the risks of chemicals as has its funding by the organic food industry 6 35 36 37 38 EWG warnings have been labeled alarmist scaremongering and misleading 39 40 41 Brian Dunning of Skeptoid describes the EWG s activities as a political lobbying group for the organic industry 6 According to a 2009 survey of 937 members of the Society of Toxicology conducted by George Mason University 79 of respondents thought EWG overstated the risks of chemicals while only 3 thought they underestimated the risks and 18 thought they were accurate 5 42 Quackwatch has included EWG in its list of questionable organisations 43 They describes EWG as one of t he key groups that have wrong things to say about cosmetic products 44 Environmental historian James McWilliams has described EWG warnings as fear mongering and misleading and wrote that there is little evidence to support the claims made by the EWG 45 The transparency of the USDA s program in providing the detailed data is good because it reveals how insignificant these residues are from a health perspective Unfortunately the EWG misuses that transparency in a manipulative way to drive their fear based organic marketing agenda 46 According to Kavin Senapathy of Science Moms the EWG frightens consumers about chemicals and their safety cloaking fear mongering in a clever disguise of caring and empowerment Senapathy included two main areas of criticism for the organization the use of methodologies for food cosmetics children s products and more that are fundamentally flawed and that EWG is largely funded by organic companies that its shopping recommendations help 36 References edit a b Studies Point Up Contamination of Drinking Water Environment Two groups report that 45 million Americans have been exposed to pollutants such as lead pesticides and cryptosporidium Los Angeles Times June 2 1995 Retrieved November 15 2023 a b c Environmental Working Group EWG Activist Facts January 8 2013 Retrieved November 15 2023 About the Environmental Working Group EWG org Retrieved March 30 2011 a b Kary Tiffany December 12 2018 Revenge of the Chemistry Nerds P amp G Teams With Health Watchdog Bloomberg Archived from the original on May 29 2019 Retrieved March 29 2022 a b The Media and Chemical Risk Toxicologists Opinions on Chemical Risk and Media Coverage PDF 2009 Retrieved June 2 2023 a b c d Dunning Brian May 15 2018 Environmental Working Group and the Dirty Dozen Skeptoid Archived from the original on December 18 2018 Retrieved June 7 2022 Cook Ken January 17 2017 It s Time We Get Serious About Organic Farming Food Tank Retrieved July 20 2023 a b c Winter C K Katz J M 2011 Dietary Exposure to Pesticide Residues from Commodities Alleged to Contain the Highest Contamination Levels Journal of Toxicology 2011 589674 doi 10 1155 2011 589674 PMC 3135239 PMID 21776262 Understanding Pesticide Residues on Fruit and Vegetables Fact vs Fiction PDF University of Arkansas Extension Retrieved June 6 2023 Cato Sarah McWhirt Amanda Herrera Lizzy August 2022 Combating Horticultural Misinformation through Integrated Online Campaigns Using Social Media Graphics Interchange Format and Blogs HortTechnology 32 4 342 347 doi 10 21273 HORTTECH05009 22 S2CID 249901606 How Dirty Are Your Fruits and Veggies Center for Accountability in Science April 10 2018 Retrieved March 29 2022 PDP Databases and Annual Summaries USDA Retrieved May 17 2018 Savage S May 20 2013 How Wrong Is The Latest Dirty Dozen List Biology Fortified Retrieved May 17 2018 2023 Pesticides in the Pantry Report As You Sow Berkeley CA Archived from the original on November 15 2023 Retrieved November 15 2023 AsYouSow2023 PesticidesScorecard2023 v4 FIN 20231102 1 pdf a b Renfrew Daniel Pearson Thomas W September 1 2021 The Social Life of the Forever Chemical PFAS Pollution Legacies and Toxic Events Environment and Society 12 1 146 163 doi 10 3167 ares 2021 120109 ISSN 2150 6779 a b Drinking water may be contaminated with chemicals in 43 states according to new study by Environmental Working Group CBS News www cbsnews com May 7 2019 Retrieved November 2 2023 Zimmer Carl August 18 2022 Forever Chemicals No More PFAS Are Destroyed With New Technique The New York Times ISSN 0362 4331 Retrieved November 2 2023 a b c Boyles Salynn July 2 2008 Many Sunscreens Ineffective Group Says WebMD CBS News Retrieved June 21 2015 CafeMom May 27 2010 EWG Sunscreen Report Misleading Skin Expert Says Go Ahead Slather It On The Huffington Post Retrieved March 29 2022 Resnik David B August 2015 Retracting Inconclusive Research Lessons from the Seralini GM Maize Feeding Study Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 4 621 633 doi 10 1007 s10806 015 9546 y PMC 4524344 PMID 26251636 Five things you should know about GMOs Environmental Working Group www ewg org August 21 2012 Retrieved June 7 2023 It Just Label About Just Label It Just Label It www justlabelit org Retrieved June 7 2023 Congress Just Passed A GMO Labeling Bill Nobody s Super Happy About It NPR News Retrieved June 7 2023 Data Sources mytapwater org Retrieved November 15 2023 The short answer is that the United States government mandates that vast amounts of water data is made publicly available MyTapWater org downloads that data warehouses it and finally makes it available on this website AWWA Comments On EWG s Online Database Of Tap Water Quality Testing And Violations wateronline com Retrieved November 15 2023 EWG s Tap Water Database 2021 Update ewg org Environmental Working Group Archived from the original on November 14 2023 Retrieved November 15 2023 Tap Water Database awwa org Retrieved July 19 2023 How safe is your tap water This database can tell you Yahoo Life October 23 2019 Retrieved July 19 2023 EWG tap water database shows arsenic and chromium in all 50 states Business Insider 2019 Retrieved July 19 2023 Everett statement on Environmental Working Group EWG www everettwa gov Retrieved July 19 2023 a b Suozzo Andrea Glassford Alec Ngu Ash Roberts Brandon May 9 2013 Environmental Working Group Nonprofit Explorer ProPublica Retrieved November 15 2023 Suozzo Andrea Glassford Alec Ngu Ash Roberts Brandon May 9 2013 Nonprofit Explorer ProPublica Retrieved November 15 2023 EWG 2015 Annual Report PDF ewg org December 31 2015 p 12 Retrieved October 12 2017 a b c Charity Navigator Rating Environmental Working Group Charitynavigator org Retrieved March 30 2011 Meyer David October 25 2018 A New Study Found Weedkiller in 28 Cereals and Other Kids Foods Why Parents Shouldn t Freak Out Just Yet Fortune Archived from the original on October 25 2018 Retrieved March 29 2022 a b Senapathy Kavin July 12 2016 Would You Rather Buy Organic Or Poison Your Family EWG Wants You To Pick One Forbes US Archived from the original on July 13 2016 Retrieved March 29 2022 An Apple A Day Office for Science and Society McGill University Retrieved June 7 2023 Fruit Leathers Have Detectable Pesticides Report WebMD Retrieved July 20 2023 Miller Henry December 26 2010 Diluting the chromium 6 in water panic The Guardian Archived from the original on September 20 2013 Retrieved March 29 2022 Corcoran Terence June 13 2011 Junk Science Week Lipstick apples amp sperm counts Financial Post Archived from the original on January 9 2021 Retrieved March 29 2022 Hogberg David July 25 2005 Soaking in Chemical Stews The American Spectator Archived from the original on August 20 2019 Retrieved March 29 2022 Table 3 RATING RISK PORTRAYALS stats org Archived from the original on May 5 2012 Retrieved June 2 2023 Questionable Organizations An Overview Quackwatch February 5 2022 Retrieved June 2 2023 Scientific Activism for Cosmetic Chemists and Others Quackwatch May 17 2015 Retrieved September 7 2020 McWilliams James September 3 2014 How the Environmental Working Group Sells Its Message Short Pacific Standard Archived from the original on April 5 2018 Retrieved March 29 2022 Savage Steven April 10 2018 The Truth About Pesticide Residues On Produce All Encouraging Some Inconvenient Forbes Retrieved October 19 2019 External links editEnvironmental Working Group Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Environmental Working Group amp oldid 1186034010, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.