This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. You can help. The talk page may contain suggestions.(November 2022)
Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States "[held] that searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule".[1] This simply means that if law enforcement officers conduct a search in a reasonable manner with respect to established legal precedent any evidence found may not be excluded from trial based on the exclusionary rule.
United States v. Davis, No. 2:07-cr-0248-WKW, 2008 WL 1927377 (M.D. Ala. 2008) (denying motion to suppress), aff'd, 598 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2010), cert. granted, 131 S. Ct. 502 (2010).
Holding
Searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule.
davis, united, states, 2011, other, uses, davis, united, states, disambiguation, this, article, need, rewritten, comply, with, wikipedia, quality, standards, help, talk, page, contain, suggestions, november, 2022, davis, united, states, 2011, case, which, supr. For other uses see Davis v United States disambiguation This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia s quality standards You can help The talk page may contain suggestions November 2022 Davis v United States 564 U S 229 2011 was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule 1 This simply means that if law enforcement officers conduct a search in a reasonable manner with respect to established legal precedent any evidence found may not be excluded from trial based on the exclusionary rule Davis v United StatesSupreme Court of the United StatesArgued March 21 2011Decided June 16 2011Full case nameWillie Gene Davis v United StatesDocket no 09 11328Citations564 U S 229 more 131 S Ct 2419 180 L Ed 2d 285ArgumentOral argumentCase historyPriorUnited States v Davis No 2 07 cr 0248 WKW 2008 WL 1927377 M D Ala 2008 denying motion to suppress aff d 598 F 3d 1259 11th Cir 2010 cert granted 131 S Ct 502 2010 HoldingSearches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule Court membershipChief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Antonin Scalia Anthony KennedyClarence Thomas Ruth Bader GinsburgStephen Breyer Samuel AlitoSonia Sotomayor Elena KaganCase opinionsMajorityAlito joined by Roberts Scalia Kennedy Thomas and KaganConcurrenceSotomayorDissentBreyer joined by GinsburgLaws appliedU S Const amend IVSee also editAppellate Court PrecedentReferences edit Davis v U S 564 US 229 2011 External links editText of Davis v United States 564 U S 229 2011 is available from Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez oral argument audio nbsp This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Davis v United States 2011 amp oldid 1189348078, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
