fbpx
Wikipedia

Constructible set (topology)

In topology, constructible sets are a class of subsets of a topological space that have a relatively "simple" structure. They are used particularly in algebraic geometry and related fields. A key result known as Chevalley's theorem in algebraic geometry shows that the image of a constructible set is constructible for an important class of mappings (more specifically morphisms) of algebraic varieties (or more generally schemes). In addition, a large number of "local" geometric properties of schemes, morphisms and sheaves are (locally) constructible. Constructible sets also feature in the definition of various types of constructible sheaves in algebraic geometry and intersection cohomology.

Definitions edit

A simple definition, adequate in many situations, is that a constructible set is a finite union of locally closed sets. (A set is locally closed if it is the intersection of an open set and closed set.) However, a modification and another slightly weaker definition are needed to have definitions that behave better with "large" spaces:

Definitions: A subset   of a topological space   is called retrocompact if   is compact for every compact open subset  . A subset of   is constructible if it is a finite union of subsets of the form   where both   and   are open and retrocompact subsets of  . A subset   is locally constructible if there is a cover   of   consisting of open subsets with the property that each   is a constructible subset of  . [1][2]

Equivalently the constructible subsets of a topological space   are the smallest collection   of subsets of   that (i) contains all open retrocompact subsets and (ii) contains all complements and finite unions (and hence also finite intersections) of sets in it. In other words, constructible sets are precisely the Boolean algebra generated by retrocompact open subsets.

In a locally noetherian topological space, all subsets are retrocompact,[3] and so for such spaces the simplified definition given first above is equivalent to the more elaborate one. Most of the commonly met schemes in algebraic geometry (including all algebraic varieties) are locally Noetherian, but there are important constructions that lead to more general schemes.

In any (not necessarily noetherian) topological space, every constructible set contains a dense open subset of its closure.[4]

Terminology: The definition given here is the one used by the first edition of EGA and the Stacks Project. In the second edition of EGA constructible sets (according to the definition above) are called "globally constructible" while the word "constructible" is reserved for what are called locally constructible above. [5]

Chevalley's theorem edit

A major reason for the importance of constructible sets in algebraic geometry is that the image of a (locally) constructible set is also (locally) constructible for a large class of maps (or "morphisms"). The key result is:

Chevalley's theorem. If   is a finitely presented morphism of schemes and   is a locally constructible subset, then   is also locally constructible in  .[6][7][8]

In particular, the image of an algebraic variety need not be a variety, but is (under the assumptions) always a constructible set. For example, the map   that sends   to   has image the set  , which is not a variety, but is constructible.

Chevalley's theorem in the generality stated above would fail if the simplified definition of constructible sets (without restricting to retrocompact open sets in the definition) were used.[9]

Constructible properties edit

A large number of "local" properties of morphisms of schemes and quasicoherent sheaves on schemes hold true over a locally constructible subset. EGA IV § 9[10] covers a large number of such properties. Below are some examples (where all references point to EGA IV):

  • If   is an finitely presented morphism of schemes and   is a sequence of finitely presented quasi-coherent  -modules, then the set of   for which   is exact is locally constructible. (Proposition (9.4.4))
  • If   is an finitely presented morphism of schemes and   is a finitely presented quasi-coherent  -module, then the set of   for which   is locally free is locally constructible. (Proposition (9.4.7))
  • If   is an finitely presented morphism of schemes and   is a locally constructible subset, then the set of   for which   is closed (or open) in   is locally constructible. (Corollary (9.5.4))
  • Let   be a scheme and   a morphism of  -schemes. Consider the set   of   for which the induced morphism   of fibres over   has some property  . Then   is locally constructible if   is any of the following properties: surjective, proper, finite, immersion, closed immersion, open immersion, isomorphism. (Proposition (9.6.1))
  • Let   be an finitely presented morphism of schemes and consider the set   of   for which the fibre   has a property  . Then   is locally constructible if   is any of the following properties: geometrically irreducible, geometrically connected, geometrically reduced. (Theorem (9.7.7))
  • Let   be an locally finitely presented morphism of schemes and consider the set   of   for which the fibre   has a property  . Then   is locally constructible if   is any of the following properties: geometrically regular, geometrically normal, geometrically reduced. (Proposition (9.9.4))

One important role that these constructibility results have is that in most cases assuming the morphisms in questions are also flat it follows that the properties in question in fact hold in an open subset. A substantial number of such results is included in EGA IV § 12.[11]

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1961, Ch. 0III, Définitions (9.1.1), (9.1.2) and (9.1.11), pp. 12-14
  2. ^ "Definition 5.15.1 (tag 005G)". stacks.math.columbia.edu. Retrieved 2022-10-04.
  3. ^ Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1961, Ch. 0III, Sect. (9.1), p. 12
  4. ^ Jinpeng An (2012). "Rigid geometric structures, isometric actions, and algebraic quotients". Geom. Dedicata 157: 153–185.
  5. ^ Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1971, Ch. 0I, Définitions (2.3.1), (2.3.2) and (2.3.10), pp. 55-57
  6. ^ Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1964, Ch. I, Théorème (1.8.4), p. 239.
  7. ^ "Theorem 29.22.3 (Chevalley's Theorem) (tag 054K)". stacks.math.columbia.edu. Retrieved 2022-10-04.
  8. ^ Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1971, Ch. I, Théorème (7.1.4), p. 329.
  9. ^ "Section 109.24 Images of locally closed subsets (tag 0GZL)". stacks.math.columbia.edu. Retrieved 2022-10-04.
  10. ^ Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1966, Ch. IV, § 9 Propriétés constructibles, pp. 54-94.
  11. ^ Grothendieck & Dieudonné 1966, Ch. IV, § 12 Étude des fibres des morphismes plats de présentation finie, pp. 173-187.

References edit

External links edit

constructible, topology, gödel, constructive, constructible, universe, topology, constructible, sets, class, subsets, topological, space, that, have, relatively, simple, structure, they, used, particularly, algebraic, geometry, related, fields, result, known, . For a Godel constructive set see Constructible universe In topology constructible sets are a class of subsets of a topological space that have a relatively simple structure They are used particularly in algebraic geometry and related fields A key result known as Chevalley s theorem in algebraic geometry shows that the image of a constructible set is constructible for an important class of mappings more specifically morphisms of algebraic varieties or more generally schemes In addition a large number of local geometric properties of schemes morphisms and sheaves are locally constructible Constructible sets also feature in the definition of various types of constructible sheaves in algebraic geometry and intersection cohomology Contents 1 Definitions 2 Chevalley s theorem 3 Constructible properties 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 External linksDefinitions editA simple definition adequate in many situations is that a constructible set is a finite union of locally closed sets A set is locally closed if it is the intersection of an open set and closed set However a modification and another slightly weaker definition are needed to have definitions that behave better with large spaces Definitions A subset Z displaystyle Z nbsp of a topological space X displaystyle X nbsp is called retrocompact if Z U displaystyle Z cap U nbsp is compact for every compact open subset U X displaystyle U subset X nbsp A subset of X displaystyle X nbsp is constructible if it is a finite union of subsets of the form U X V displaystyle U cap X V nbsp where both U displaystyle U nbsp and V displaystyle V nbsp are open and retrocompact subsets of X displaystyle X nbsp A subset Z X displaystyle Z subset X nbsp is locally constructible if there is a cover U i i I displaystyle U i i in I nbsp of X displaystyle X nbsp consisting of open subsets with the property that each Z U i displaystyle Z cap U i nbsp is a constructible subset of U i displaystyle U i nbsp 1 2 Equivalently the constructible subsets of a topological space X displaystyle X nbsp are the smallest collection C displaystyle mathfrak C nbsp of subsets of X displaystyle X nbsp that i contains all open retrocompact subsets and ii contains all complements and finite unions and hence also finite intersections of sets in it In other words constructible sets are precisely the Boolean algebra generated by retrocompact open subsets In a locally noetherian topological space all subsets are retrocompact 3 and so for such spaces the simplified definition given first above is equivalent to the more elaborate one Most of the commonly met schemes in algebraic geometry including all algebraic varieties are locally Noetherian but there are important constructions that lead to more general schemes In any not necessarily noetherian topological space every constructible set contains a dense open subset of its closure 4 Terminology The definition given here is the one used by the first edition of EGA and the Stacks Project In the second edition of EGA constructible sets according to the definition above are called globally constructible while the word constructible is reserved for what are called locally constructible above 5 Chevalley s theorem editA major reason for the importance of constructible sets in algebraic geometry is that the image of a locally constructible set is also locally constructible for a large class of maps or morphisms The key result is Chevalley s theorem If f X Y displaystyle f X to Y nbsp is a finitely presented morphism of schemes and Z X displaystyle Z subset X nbsp is a locally constructible subset then f Z displaystyle f Z nbsp is also locally constructible in Y displaystyle Y nbsp 6 7 8 In particular the image of an algebraic variety need not be a variety but is under the assumptions always a constructible set For example the map A 2 A 2 displaystyle mathbf A 2 rightarrow mathbf A 2 nbsp that sends x y displaystyle x y nbsp to x x y displaystyle x xy nbsp has image the set x 0 x y 0 displaystyle x neq 0 cup x y 0 nbsp which is not a variety but is constructible Chevalley s theorem in the generality stated above would fail if the simplified definition of constructible sets without restricting to retrocompact open sets in the definition were used 9 Constructible properties editA large number of local properties of morphisms of schemes and quasicoherent sheaves on schemes hold true over a locally constructible subset EGA IV 9 10 covers a large number of such properties Below are some examples where all references point to EGA IV If f X S displaystyle f colon X rightarrow S nbsp is an finitely presented morphism of schemes and F F F displaystyle mathcal F rightarrow mathcal F rightarrow mathcal F nbsp is a sequence of finitely presented quasi coherent O X displaystyle mathcal O X nbsp modules then the set of s S displaystyle s in S nbsp for which F s F s F s displaystyle mathcal F s rightarrow mathcal F s rightarrow mathcal F s nbsp is exact is locally constructible Proposition 9 4 4 If f X S displaystyle f colon X rightarrow S nbsp is an finitely presented morphism of schemes and F displaystyle mathcal F nbsp is a finitely presented quasi coherent O X displaystyle mathcal O X nbsp module then the set of s S displaystyle s in S nbsp for which F s displaystyle mathcal F s nbsp is locally free is locally constructible Proposition 9 4 7 If f X S displaystyle f colon X rightarrow S nbsp is an finitely presented morphism of schemes and Z X displaystyle Z subset X nbsp is a locally constructible subset then the set of s S displaystyle s in S nbsp for which f 1 s Z displaystyle f 1 s cap Z nbsp is closed or open in f 1 s displaystyle f 1 s nbsp is locally constructible Corollary 9 5 4 Let S displaystyle S nbsp be a scheme and f X Y displaystyle f colon X rightarrow Y nbsp a morphism of S displaystyle S nbsp schemes Consider the set P S displaystyle P subset S nbsp of s S displaystyle s in S nbsp for which the induced morphism f s X s Y s displaystyle f s colon X s rightarrow Y s nbsp of fibres over s displaystyle s nbsp has some property P displaystyle mathbf P nbsp Then P displaystyle P nbsp is locally constructible if P displaystyle mathbf P nbsp is any of the following properties surjective proper finite immersion closed immersion open immersion isomorphism Proposition 9 6 1 Let f X S displaystyle f colon X rightarrow S nbsp be an finitely presented morphism of schemes and consider the set P S displaystyle P subset S nbsp of s S displaystyle s in S nbsp for which the fibre f 1 s displaystyle f 1 s nbsp has a property P displaystyle mathbf P nbsp Then P displaystyle P nbsp is locally constructible if P displaystyle mathbf P nbsp is any of the following properties geometrically irreducible geometrically connected geometrically reduced Theorem 9 7 7 Let f X S displaystyle f colon X rightarrow S nbsp be an locally finitely presented morphism of schemes and consider the set P X displaystyle P subset X nbsp of x X displaystyle x in X nbsp for which the fibre f 1 f x displaystyle f 1 f x nbsp has a property P displaystyle mathbf P nbsp Then P displaystyle P nbsp is locally constructible if P displaystyle mathbf P nbsp is any of the following properties geometrically regular geometrically normal geometrically reduced Proposition 9 9 4 One important role that these constructibility results have is that in most cases assuming the morphisms in questions are also flat it follows that the properties in question in fact hold in an open subset A substantial number of such results is included in EGA IV 12 11 See also editConstructible topology Constructible sheafNotes edit Grothendieck amp Dieudonne 1961 Ch 0III Definitions 9 1 1 9 1 2 and 9 1 11 pp 12 14 Definition 5 15 1 tag 005G stacks math columbia edu Retrieved 2022 10 04 Grothendieck amp Dieudonne 1961 Ch 0III Sect 9 1 p 12 Jinpeng An 2012 Rigid geometric structures isometric actions and algebraic quotients Geom Dedicata 157 153 185 Grothendieck amp Dieudonne 1971 Ch 0I Definitions 2 3 1 2 3 2 and 2 3 10 pp 55 57 Grothendieck amp Dieudonne 1964 Ch I Theoreme 1 8 4 p 239 Theorem 29 22 3 Chevalley s Theorem tag 054K stacks math columbia edu Retrieved 2022 10 04 Grothendieck amp Dieudonne 1971 Ch I Theoreme 7 1 4 p 329 Section 109 24 Images of locally closed subsets tag 0GZL stacks math columbia edu Retrieved 2022 10 04 Grothendieck amp Dieudonne 1966 Ch IV 9 Proprietes constructibles pp 54 94 Grothendieck amp Dieudonne 1966 Ch IV 12 Etude des fibres des morphismes plats de presentation finie pp 173 187 References editAllouche Jean Paul Note on the constructible sets of a topological space Andradas Carlos Brocker Ludwig Ruiz Jesus M 1996 Constructible sets in real geometry Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 3 Results in Mathematics and Related Areas 3 Vol 33 Berlin Springer Verlag pp x 270 ISBN 3 540 60451 0 MR 1393194 Borel Armand Linear algebraic groups Grothendieck Alexandre Dieudonne Jean 1961 Elements de geometrie algebrique III Etude cohomologique des faisceaux coherents Premiere partie Publications Mathematiques de l IHES 11 doi 10 1007 bf02684274 MR 0217085 Grothendieck Alexandre Dieudonne Jean 1964 Elements de geometrie algebrique IV Etude locale des schemas et des morphismes de schemas Premiere partie Publications Mathematiques de l IHES 20 doi 10 1007 bf02684747 MR 0173675 Grothendieck Alexandre Dieudonne Jean 1966 Elements de geometrie algebrique IV Etude locale des schemas et des morphismes de schemas Troisieme partie Publications Mathematiques de l IHES 28 doi 10 1007 bf02684343 MR 0217086 Grothendieck Alexandre Dieudonne Jean 1971 Elements de geometrie algebrique I Le langage des schemas Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften in French Vol 166 2nd ed Berlin New York Springer Verlag ISBN 978 3 540 05113 8 Mostowski A 1969 Constructible sets with applications Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics Amsterdam Warsaw North Holland Publishing Co PWN Polish Scientific Publishers pp ix 269 MR 0255390 External links edithttps stacks math columbia edu tag 04ZC Topological definition of local constructibility https stacks math columbia edu tag 054H Constructibility properties of morphisms of schemes incl Chevalley s theorem Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Constructible set topology amp oldid 1125941430, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.