fbpx
Wikipedia

Chow group of a stack

In algebraic geometry, the Chow group of a stack is a generalization of the Chow group of a variety or scheme to stacks. For a quotient stack , the Chow group of X is the same as the G-equivariant Chow group of Y.

A key difference from the theory of Chow groups of a variety is that a cycle is allowed to carry non-trivial automorphisms and consequently intersection-theoretic operations must take this into account. For example, the degree of a 0-cycle on a stack need not be an integer but is a rational number (due to non-trivial stabilizers).

Definitions edit

Angelo Vistoli (1989) develops the basic theory (mostly over Q) for the Chow group of a (separated) Deligne–Mumford stack. There, the Chow group is defined exactly as in the classical case: it is the free abelian group generated by integral closed substacks modulo rational equivalence.

If a stack X can be written as the quotient stack   for some quasi-projective variety Y with a linearized action of a linear algebraic group G, then the Chow group of X is defined as the G-equivariant Chow group of Y. This approach is introduced and developed by Dan Edidin and William A. Graham, as well as Burt Totaro. Later Andrew Kresch (1999) extended the theory to a stack admitting a stratification by quotient stacks.

For higher Chow groups (precursor of motivic homologies) of algebraic stacks, see Roy Joshua's Intersection Theory on Stacks:I and II. [1]

Examples edit

The calculations depend on definitions. Thus, here, we proceed somehow axiomatically. Specifically, we assume: given an algebraic stack X locally of finite type over a base field k,

  1. (homotopy-invariance) if E is a rank-n vector bundle on X, then  .
  2. for each integral substack Z of dimension < p,  , a corollary of a localization sequence.

These properties are valid if X is Deligne–Mumford and are expected to hold for any other reasonable theory.

We take X to be the classifying stack  , the stack of principal G-bundles for a smooth linear algebraic group G. By definition, it is the quotient stack  , where * is viewed as the stack associated to * = Spec k. We approximate it as follows. Given an integer p, choose a representation   such that there is a G-invariant open subset U of V on which G acts freely and the complement   has codimension  . Let   be the quotient of   by the action  . Note the action is free and so   is a vector bundle over  . By Property 1 applied to this vector bundle,

 

Then, since  , by Property 2,

 

since  .

As a concrete example, let   and let it act on   by scaling. Then   acts freely on  . By the above calculation, for each pair of integers n, p such that  ,

 

In particular, for every integer p ≥ 0,  . In general,   for the hyperplane class h,   k-times self-intersection and   for negative k and so

 

where the right-hand side is independent of models used in the calculation (since different h's correspond under the projections between projective spaces.) For  , the class  , any n, may be thought of as the fundamental class of  .

Similarly, we have

 

where   is the first Chern class of h (and c and h are identified when Chow groups and Chow rings of projective spaces are identified). Since  , we have that   is the free  -module generated by  .

Virtual fundamental class edit

The notion originates in the Kuranishi theory in symplectic geometry.[1][2]

In § 2. of Behrend (2009), given a DM stack X and CX the intrinsic normal cone to X, K. Behrend defines the virtual fundamental class of X as

 

where s0 is the zero-section of the cone determined by the perfect obstruction theory and s0! is the refined Gysin homomorphism defined just as in Fulton's "Intersection theory". The same paper shows that the degree of this class, morally the integration over it, is equal to the weighted Euler characteristic of the Behrend function of X.

More recent (circa 2017) approaches do this type of construction in the context of derived algebraic geometry.[3]

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ Fukaya, Kenji; Ono, Kaoru (1999). "Arnold conjecture and Gromov-Witten invariant". Topology. 38 (5): 933–1048. doi:10.1016/s0040-9383(98)00042-1. MR 1688434.
  2. ^ Pardon, John (2016-04-28). "An algebraic approach to virtual fundamental cycles on moduli spaces of pseudo-holomorphic curves". Geometry & Topology. 20 (2): 779–1034. arXiv:1309.2370. doi:10.2140/gt.2016.20.779. ISSN 1364-0380. S2CID 119171219.
  3. ^ § 1.2.1. of Cisinski, Denis-Charles; Khan, Adeel A. (2017-05-09). "Brave new motivic homotopy theory II: Homotopy invariant K-theory". arXiv:1705.03340 [math.AT].

References edit

  • Behrend, Kai (2009), "Donaldson-Thomas type invariants via microlocal geometry", Annals of Mathematics, 2nd Ser., 170 (3): 1307–1338, arXiv:math/0507523, doi:10.4007/annals.2009.170.1307, MR 2600874
  • Ciocan-Fontanine, Ionuț; Kapranov, Mikhail (2009). "Virtual fundamental classes via dg–manifolds". Geometry & Topology. 13 (3): 1779–1804. arXiv:math/0703214. doi:10.2140/gt.2009.13.1779. MR 2496057. S2CID 1211344.
  • Fantechi, Barbara, Virtual pullbacks on algebraic stacks (PDF)
  • Kresch, Andrew (1999), "Cycle groups for Artin stacks", Inventiones Mathematicae, 138 (3): 495–536, arXiv:math/9810166, Bibcode:1999InMat.138..495K, doi:10.1007/s002220050351, S2CID 119617049
  • Totaro, Burt (1999), "The Chow ring of a classifying space, Algebraic K-theory", Proc. Sympos. Pure Math, vol. 67, American Mathematical Society, pp. 249–281, MR 1743244, Zbl 0967.14005
  • Vistoli, Angelo (1989), "Intersection theory on algebraic stacks and on their moduli spaces", Inventiones Mathematicae, 97 (3): 613–670, Bibcode:1989InMat..97..613V, doi:10.1007/BF01388892, MR 1005008, S2CID 122295050
  • Nabijou, Navid (2015), (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-05-16, retrieved 2017-07-20
  • Shen, Junliang (2014), Construction of the Virtual Fundamental Class and Applications (PDF)

External links edit

chow, group, stack, algebraic, geometry, generalization, chow, group, variety, scheme, stacks, quotient, stack, displaystyle, chow, group, same, equivariant, chow, group, difference, from, theory, chow, groups, variety, that, cycle, allowed, carry, trivial, au. In algebraic geometry the Chow group of a stack is a generalization of the Chow group of a variety or scheme to stacks For a quotient stack X Y G displaystyle X Y G the Chow group of X is the same as the G equivariant Chow group of Y A key difference from the theory of Chow groups of a variety is that a cycle is allowed to carry non trivial automorphisms and consequently intersection theoretic operations must take this into account For example the degree of a 0 cycle on a stack need not be an integer but is a rational number due to non trivial stabilizers Contents 1 Definitions 2 Examples 3 Virtual fundamental class 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 External linksDefinitions editAngelo Vistoli 1989 develops the basic theory mostly over Q for the Chow group of a separated Deligne Mumford stack There the Chow group is defined exactly as in the classical case it is the free abelian group generated by integral closed substacks modulo rational equivalence If a stack X can be written as the quotient stack X Y G displaystyle X Y G nbsp for some quasi projective variety Y with a linearized action of a linear algebraic group G then the Chow group of X is defined as the G equivariant Chow group of Y This approach is introduced and developed by Dan Edidin and William A Graham as well as Burt Totaro Later Andrew Kresch 1999 extended the theory to a stack admitting a stratification by quotient stacks For higher Chow groups precursor of motivic homologies of algebraic stacks see Roy Joshua s Intersection Theory on Stacks I and II 1 Examples editThe calculations depend on definitions Thus here we proceed somehow axiomatically Specifically we assume given an algebraic stack X locally of finite type over a base field k homotopy invariance if E is a rank n vector bundle on X then A p E A p n X displaystyle A p E A p n X nbsp for each integral substack Z of dimension lt p A p X Z A p X displaystyle A p X Z A p X nbsp a corollary of a localization sequence These properties are valid if X is Deligne Mumford and are expected to hold for any other reasonable theory We take X to be the classifying stack B G displaystyle BG nbsp the stack of principal G bundles for a smooth linear algebraic group G By definition it is the quotient stack G displaystyle G nbsp where is viewed as the stack associated to Spec k We approximate it as follows Given an integer p choose a representation G G L V displaystyle G to GL V nbsp such that there is a G invariant open subset U of V on which G acts freely and the complement Z V U displaystyle Z V U nbsp has codimension gt dim G p displaystyle gt operatorname dim G p nbsp Let G V displaystyle times G V nbsp be the quotient of V displaystyle times V nbsp by the action x v g x g g 1 v displaystyle x v cdot g xg g 1 v nbsp Note the action is free and so G V displaystyle times G V nbsp is a vector bundle over B G displaystyle BG nbsp By Property 1 applied to this vector bundle A p B G A p dim V G V displaystyle A p BG A p dim V times G V nbsp Then since G U U G displaystyle times G U U G nbsp by Property 2 A p dim V G V A p dim V U G displaystyle A p dim V times G V A p dim V U G nbsp since dim Z G dim Z dim G lt dim V p displaystyle dim Z G dim Z dim G lt dim V p nbsp As a concrete example let G G m displaystyle G mathbb G m nbsp and let it act on A n displaystyle mathbb A n nbsp by scaling Then G m displaystyle mathbb G m nbsp acts freely on U A n 0 displaystyle U mathbb A n 0 nbsp By the above calculation for each pair of integers n p such that n p 0 displaystyle n p geq 0 nbsp A p B G m A p n P n 1 displaystyle A p B mathbb G m A p n mathbb P n 1 nbsp In particular for every integer p 0 A p B G m 0 displaystyle A p B mathbb G m 0 nbsp In general A n k P n Q h k displaystyle A n k mathbb P n mathbb Q h k nbsp for the hyperplane class h h k displaystyle h k nbsp k times self intersection and h k 0 displaystyle h k 0 nbsp for negative k and so A p B G m Q h 1 p displaystyle A p B mathbb G m mathbb Q h 1 p nbsp where the right hand side is independent of models used in the calculation since different h s correspond under the projections between projective spaces For p 1 dim B G m displaystyle p 1 dim B mathbb G m nbsp the class h 0 P n displaystyle h 0 mathbb P n nbsp any n may be thought of as the fundamental class of B G m displaystyle B mathbb G m nbsp Similarly we have A B G m Q c displaystyle A B mathbb G m mathbb Q c nbsp where c c 1 h displaystyle c c 1 h nbsp is the first Chern class of h and c and h are identified when Chow groups and Chow rings of projective spaces are identified Since h k c h k 1 displaystyle h k c cdot h k 1 nbsp we have that A B G m displaystyle A B mathbb G m nbsp is the free Q c displaystyle mathbb Q c nbsp module generated by h 0 displaystyle h 0 nbsp Virtual fundamental class editThe notion originates in the Kuranishi theory in symplectic geometry 1 2 In 2 of Behrend 2009 given a DM stack X and CX the intrinsic normal cone to X K Behrend defines the virtual fundamental class of X as X vir s 0 C X displaystyle X text vir s 0 C X nbsp where s0 is the zero section of the cone determined by the perfect obstruction theory and s0 is the refined Gysin homomorphism defined just as in Fulton s Intersection theory The same paper shows that the degree of this class morally the integration over it is equal to the weighted Euler characteristic of the Behrend function of X More recent circa 2017 approaches do this type of construction in the context of derived algebraic geometry 3 See also editPerfect obstruction theory Gromov Witten invariant Cohomology of a stackNotes edit Fukaya Kenji Ono Kaoru 1999 Arnold conjecture and Gromov Witten invariant Topology 38 5 933 1048 doi 10 1016 s0040 9383 98 00042 1 MR 1688434 Pardon John 2016 04 28 An algebraic approach to virtual fundamental cycles on moduli spaces of pseudo holomorphic curves Geometry amp Topology 20 2 779 1034 arXiv 1309 2370 doi 10 2140 gt 2016 20 779 ISSN 1364 0380 S2CID 119171219 1 2 1 of Cisinski Denis Charles Khan Adeel A 2017 05 09 Brave new motivic homotopy theory II Homotopy invariant K theory arXiv 1705 03340 math AT References editBehrend Kai 2009 Donaldson Thomas type invariants via microlocal geometry Annals of Mathematics 2nd Ser 170 3 1307 1338 arXiv math 0507523 doi 10 4007 annals 2009 170 1307 MR 2600874 Ciocan Fontanine Ionuț Kapranov Mikhail 2009 Virtual fundamental classes via dg manifolds Geometry amp Topology 13 3 1779 1804 arXiv math 0703214 doi 10 2140 gt 2009 13 1779 MR 2496057 S2CID 1211344 Fantechi Barbara Virtual pullbacks on algebraic stacks PDF Kresch Andrew 1999 Cycle groups for Artin stacks Inventiones Mathematicae 138 3 495 536 arXiv math 9810166 Bibcode 1999InMat 138 495K doi 10 1007 s002220050351 S2CID 119617049 Totaro Burt 1999 The Chow ring of a classifying space Algebraic K theory Proc Sympos Pure Math vol 67 American Mathematical Society pp 249 281 MR 1743244 Zbl 0967 14005 Vistoli Angelo 1989 Intersection theory on algebraic stacks and on their moduli spaces Inventiones Mathematicae 97 3 613 670 Bibcode 1989InMat 97 613V doi 10 1007 BF01388892 MR 1005008 S2CID 122295050 Nabijou Navid 2015 Virtual Fundamental Classes in Gromov Witten Theory PDF archived from the original PDF on 2017 05 16 retrieved 2017 07 20 Shen Junliang 2014 Construction of the Virtual Fundamental Class and Applications PDF External links editVirtual classes for the working mathematician The classical number 2875 of lines on the quintic as a DT invariant What is the main failure in using Naive Chow group in Artin Stack Local model of virtual fundamental cycle https ncatlab org nlab show virtual fundamental class On the Virtual Fundamental Class a slide by Kai Behrend Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Chow group of a stack amp oldid 1160044174, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.