fbpx
Wikipedia

Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.

Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that an ordinance prohibiting all "First Amendment activities" in the Los Angeles International Airport was facially unconstitutional due to its overbreadth.[1][2][3]

Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.
Argued March 3, 1987
Decided June 15, 1987
Full case nameBoard of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.
Citations482 U.S. 569 (more)
107 S. Ct. 2568; 96 L. Ed. 2d 500; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2619; 55 U.S.L.W. 4855
Case history
PriorCert. to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Holding
A resolution banning all "First Amendment activities" at Los Angeles International Airport violates the First Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor · Antonin Scalia
Case opinions
MajorityO'Connor, joined by unanimous
ConcurrenceWhite, joined by Rehnquist
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I

The unanimous opinion of the Court was written by Justice O'Connor. O'Connor wrote that the ordinance "reaches the universe of expressive activity, and, by prohibiting all protected expression, purports to create a virtual 'First Amendment Free Zone' at LAX". The Airport Commissioners argued that the ordinance would only be applied against activities that were related to the airport, but O'Connor pointed out that "wearing of a T-shirt or button that contains a political message" would still fall within the prohibition.

In a brief concurrence, Justice White expressed his concern that the decision did not address the question of whether the airport constituted a public forum.

References edit

  1. ^ "L.A. Airport's Free Speech Curb Upset by High Court : 'Jews for Jesus' Win Rights Case". Los Angeles Times. June 15, 1987. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
  2. ^ Sekulow, Jay; Zimmerman, Erik (2012–2013). "Reflections on Jews for Jesus: Twenty-Five Years Later" (PDF). Regent University Law Review. 25 (1): 1–23. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
  3. ^ Savage, David (June 16, 1987). "LAX Ban on Soliciting Rejected by High Court : Justices Say Rule Goes Too Far in Limiting Free Speech; Larger Question of Exclusion Ignored". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 16, 2020.

External links edit

  • Text of Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987) is available from: Cornell  CourtListener  Findlaw  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio) 


board, airport, commissioners, angeles, jews, jesus, 1987, case, which, united, states, supreme, court, held, that, ordinance, prohibiting, first, amendment, activities, angeles, international, airport, facially, unconstitutional, overbreadth, supreme, court, . Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v Jews for Jesus Inc 482 U S 569 1987 was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that an ordinance prohibiting all First Amendment activities in the Los Angeles International Airport was facially unconstitutional due to its overbreadth 1 2 3 Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v Jews for Jesus Inc Supreme Court of the United StatesArgued March 3 1987Decided June 15 1987Full case nameBoard of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v Jews for Jesus Inc Citations482 U S 569 more 107 S Ct 2568 96 L Ed 2d 500 1987 U S LEXIS 2619 55 U S L W 4855Case historyPriorCert to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitHoldingA resolution banning all First Amendment activities at Los Angeles International Airport violates the First Amendment Court membershipChief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices William J Brennan Jr Byron WhiteThurgood Marshall Harry BlackmunLewis F Powell Jr John P StevensSandra Day O Connor Antonin ScaliaCase opinionsMajorityO Connor joined by unanimousConcurrenceWhite joined by RehnquistLaws appliedU S Const amend IThe unanimous opinion of the Court was written by Justice O Connor O Connor wrote that the ordinance reaches the universe of expressive activity and by prohibiting all protected expression purports to create a virtual First Amendment Free Zone at LAX The Airport Commissioners argued that the ordinance would only be applied against activities that were related to the airport but O Connor pointed out that wearing of a T shirt or button that contains a political message would still fall within the prohibition In a brief concurrence Justice White expressed his concern that the decision did not address the question of whether the airport constituted a public forum References edit L A Airport s Free Speech Curb Upset by High Court Jews for Jesus Win Rights Case Los Angeles Times June 15 1987 Retrieved July 16 2020 Sekulow Jay Zimmerman Erik 2012 2013 Reflections on Jews for Jesus Twenty Five Years Later PDF Regent University Law Review 25 1 1 23 Retrieved July 16 2020 Savage David June 16 1987 LAX Ban on Soliciting Rejected by High Court Justices Say Rule Goes Too Far in Limiting Free Speech Larger Question of Exclusion Ignored Los Angeles Times Retrieved July 16 2020 External links editText of Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v Jews for Jesus Inc 482 U S 569 1987 is available from Cornell CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez oral argument audio nbsp This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v Jews for Jesus Inc amp oldid 1175139200, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.