fbpx
Wikipedia

Archer's paradox

The archer's paradox is the phenomenon of an arrow traveling in the direction it is pointed at full draw, when it seems that the arrow would have to pass through the starting position it was in before being drawn, where it was pointed to the side of the target.

Arrow direction when braced and when at full draw. A = bow riser/grip, B = median plane of the bow, C = arrow aiming line and trajectory
Arrow flexing both towards and away from the bow handle.

The bending of the arrow when released is the explanation for why the paradox occurs and should not be confused with the paradox itself.

Flexing of the arrow when shot from a modern 'centre shot' bow is still present and is caused by a variety of factors, mainly the way the string is deflected from the fingers as the arrow is released.

The term was first used by E. J. Rendtroff in 1913,[1] but detailed descriptions of the phenomenon appear in archery literature as early as Horace A. Ford's 1859 text "Archery: Its Theory and Practice". As understanding was gained about the arrow flexing around and out of the way of the bow as it is shot (as first filmed by Clarence Hickman)[2][3] and then experiencing oscillating back-and-forth bending as it travels toward the target,[4] this dynamic flexing has incorrectly become a common usage of the term. This misuse sometimes causes misunderstanding on the part of those only familiar with modern target bows, which often have risers with an eccentrically cutout "arrow window"; being "centre shot", these bows do not exhibit any paradoxical behaviour as the arrow is always pointing visually along its line of flight.[5][6][7]

Details edit

In order to be accurate, an arrow must have the correct stiffness, or "dynamic spine", to flex out of the way of the bow and to return to the correct path as it leaves the bow.[8] Incorrect dynamic spine results in unpredictable contact between the arrow and the bow, therefore unpredictable forces on the arrow as it leaves the bow, and therefore reduced accuracy.[9] Additionally, if an archer shoots several arrows with different dynamic spines, as they clear the bow they will be deflected on launch by different amounts and so will strike in different places. Competition archers therefore strive not only for arrows that have a spine within a suitable range for their bow, but also for highly consistent spine within sets of arrows.[10] This is done using a static spine tester.[11][12][13][14]

Choice of bow and spine edit

Less powerful bows require arrows with less dynamic spine. (Spine is the stiffness of the arrow.[14]) Less powerful bows have less effect in deforming the arrow as it is accelerated (see "Euler" buckling, case I) from the bow and the arrow must be "easier" to flex around the riser of the bow before settling to its path. Conversely, powerful bows need stiffer arrows with more spine, as the bow will have a much greater bending effect on the arrow as it is accelerated.[15] An arrow with too much dynamic spine for the bow will not flex and as the string comes closer to the bow stave, the arrow will be forced off to the side. Too little dynamic spine will result in the arrow deforming too much and being propelled off to the other side of the target. In extreme cases, the arrow may break before it can accelerate, which can be a safety hazard.[16][17][18]

Calibration edit

Dynamic spine is largely determined by shaft length, head weight, and static spine. Static spine is the stiffness of the center portion of the shaft under static conditions.[19] The Archery Trade Association (ATA) (formerly the Archery Manufacturers and Merchants Organization (AMO)) static spine test method hangs a 2-pound (0.91 kg) weight from the center of a 26-inch (0.66 m) suspended section of the arrow shaft.[20][21] The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) F2031-05 ("Standard Test Method for Measurement of Arrow Shaft Static Spine (Stiffness)") hangs an 880-gram (1.94 lb) weight from the center of a 28-inch (0.71 m) suspended section of the arrow shaft.[22] The (obsolete) British Grand National Archery Society (GNAS) system used a 1.5-pound (0.68 kg) weight and a variable length with the arrow supported just behind the head and just in front of the nock.[citation needed] Because of this, GNAS cannot be directly converted to ATA or ASTM.

The primary unit of measurement for spine is deflection in thousandths of an inch (a deflection of 500 equals 0.500 in or 12.7 mm) Deflection is sometimes converted to pounds of bow weight by dividing 26 by the deflection in inches. (26 in⋅lb divided by 0.500 in equals a spine of 52 lb)[23]

Solutions edit

Some modern bows have a cutout in the direct center of the body or riser that the arrow flies through; this allows the arrow to always move with the string.[citation needed] However, dynamic spine arrows are still used.

References edit

  1. ^ "The Toxophilist's Paradox". Forest and Stream. 8 February 1913.
  2. ^ Rheingans, W. R. (March–April 1936). "Exterior and Interior Ballistics of Bows and Arrows - Review". Archery Review: 236 ff.
  3. ^ Rheingans, W. R.; Nagler, F. (June–August 1937). "Spine and Arrow Design". American Bowman Review: 226–232.
  4. ^ Park, James L. (8 September 2013) [9 November 2012]. "Arrow behaviour in the lateral plane during and immediately following the power stroke of a recurve archery bow". Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 227 (3): 172–183. doi:10.1177/1754337112464844. S2CID 111439189.
  5. ^ Kooi, B. W.; Sparenberg, J. A. (1997). "On the Mechanics of the Arrow: Archer's Paradox" (PDF). Journal of Engineering Mathematics. 31 (4): 285–306. doi:10.1023/A:1004262424363. S2CID 122605918. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  6. ^ Kooi, B. W. (1998). "The Archer's Paradox and Modelling, a Review" (PDF). In Hollister-Short, Graham (ed.). History of Technology. Vol. 20. pp. 125–137. ISBN 9780720123760.
  7. ^ Kooi, B. W. (1998). "Bow-arrow interaction in archery" (PDF). Journal of Sports Sciences. 16 (8): 721–731. doi:10.1080/026404198366353. PMID 10189077. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  8. ^ Park, James L. (June 2013) [1 June 2012]. "High-speed video analysis of arrow behaviour during the power stroke of a recurve archery bow". Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 227 (2): 128–136. doi:10.1177/1754337112446406. S2CID 108701325.
  9. ^ Carmichael, A. Ron (24 June 2001). . texasarchery.org. Texas State Archery Association. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  10. ^ "The Archer's Paradox". Bega Valley Traditional Archers. February 2013. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  11. ^ "Spine-O-Meter Mark II Instruction Manual" (PDF). oakcreekarchery.com. Oak Creek Archery. 2010. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  12. ^ "How To Make a Spine Tester". poorfolkbows.com. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  13. ^ "Spine-O-Meter Appendix A: Translating Arrow Spine Test Methods" (PDF). oakcreekarchery.com. Oak Creek Archery. 2010. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  14. ^ a b . texasarchery.org. Texas State Archery Association. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  15. ^ "Carbon Arrow University". Hunter's Friend LLC. 2011. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  16. ^ (PDF). Arrow Trade Magazine. July 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  17. ^ Rieckmann, Marianne; Park, James L.; Codrington, John; Cazzolato, Ben (June 2012) [3 April 2012]. (PDF). Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 226 (2): 114–122. doi:10.1177/1754337112442273. S2CID 110116671. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  18. ^ Yononindo, Daniel (2 February 2012). Archers Paradox up to the Limit !!! Extended Version. Event occurs at 6m15s – via YouTube. The breaking of the arrow at the end of the video was NOT due to a lack of knowledge on my part !!! IT WAS QUITE DELIBERATE !!!
  19. ^ (PDF). yeoldedelphbowmen.com. December 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  20. ^ "AMO Standards (1987)" (PDF). Archery Manufacturers and Merchants Organization. 1987. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  21. ^ "AMO Standards (2001)" (PDF). Archery Manufacturers and Merchants Organization. 2001. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  22. ^ "ASTM F2031 - 05(2010) Standard Test Method for Measurement of Arrow Shaft Static Spine (Stiffness)". American Society for Testing and Materials. 2010. Retrieved 13 February 2013.
  23. ^ Cosgrove, Gabriela (1994). "Wooden Arrows". The Traditional Bowyer's Bible. Vol. Three. Guilford: The Lyons Press. p. 228. ISBN 1-58574-087-X.

External links edit

  •   Media related to Archer's paradox at Wikimedia Commons
  • The Archer's Paradox in SLOW MOTION - video

archer, paradox, confused, with, zeno, arrow, paradox, archer, paradox, phenomenon, arrow, traveling, direction, pointed, full, draw, when, seems, that, arrow, would, have, pass, through, starting, position, before, being, drawn, where, pointed, side, target, . Not to be confused with Zeno s arrow paradox The archer s paradox is the phenomenon of an arrow traveling in the direction it is pointed at full draw when it seems that the arrow would have to pass through the starting position it was in before being drawn where it was pointed to the side of the target Arrow direction when braced and when at full draw A bow riser grip B median plane of the bow C arrow aiming line and trajectory Arrow flexing both towards and away from the bow handle The bending of the arrow when released is the explanation for why the paradox occurs and should not be confused with the paradox itself Flexing of the arrow when shot from a modern centre shot bow is still present and is caused by a variety of factors mainly the way the string is deflected from the fingers as the arrow is released The term was first used by E J Rendtroff in 1913 1 but detailed descriptions of the phenomenon appear in archery literature as early as Horace A Ford s 1859 text Archery Its Theory and Practice As understanding was gained about the arrow flexing around and out of the way of the bow as it is shot as first filmed by Clarence Hickman 2 3 and then experiencing oscillating back and forth bending as it travels toward the target 4 this dynamic flexing has incorrectly become a common usage of the term This misuse sometimes causes misunderstanding on the part of those only familiar with modern target bows which often have risers with an eccentrically cutout arrow window being centre shot these bows do not exhibit any paradoxical behaviour as the arrow is always pointing visually along its line of flight 5 6 7 Contents 1 Details 2 Choice of bow and spine 3 Calibration 4 Solutions 5 References 6 External linksDetails editIn order to be accurate an arrow must have the correct stiffness or dynamic spine to flex out of the way of the bow and to return to the correct path as it leaves the bow 8 Incorrect dynamic spine results in unpredictable contact between the arrow and the bow therefore unpredictable forces on the arrow as it leaves the bow and therefore reduced accuracy 9 Additionally if an archer shoots several arrows with different dynamic spines as they clear the bow they will be deflected on launch by different amounts and so will strike in different places Competition archers therefore strive not only for arrows that have a spine within a suitable range for their bow but also for highly consistent spine within sets of arrows 10 This is done using a static spine tester 11 12 13 14 Choice of bow and spine editLess powerful bows require arrows with less dynamic spine Spine is the stiffness of the arrow 14 Less powerful bows have less effect in deforming the arrow as it is accelerated see Euler buckling case I from the bow and the arrow must be easier to flex around the riser of the bow before settling to its path Conversely powerful bows need stiffer arrows with more spine as the bow will have a much greater bending effect on the arrow as it is accelerated 15 An arrow with too much dynamic spine for the bow will not flex and as the string comes closer to the bow stave the arrow will be forced off to the side Too little dynamic spine will result in the arrow deforming too much and being propelled off to the other side of the target In extreme cases the arrow may break before it can accelerate which can be a safety hazard 16 17 18 Calibration editDynamic spine is largely determined by shaft length head weight and static spine Static spine is the stiffness of the center portion of the shaft under static conditions 19 The Archery Trade Association ATA formerly the Archery Manufacturers and Merchants Organization AMO static spine test method hangs a 2 pound 0 91 kg weight from the center of a 26 inch 0 66 m suspended section of the arrow shaft 20 21 The American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM F2031 05 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Arrow Shaft Static Spine Stiffness hangs an 880 gram 1 94 lb weight from the center of a 28 inch 0 71 m suspended section of the arrow shaft 22 The obsolete British Grand National Archery Society GNAS system used a 1 5 pound 0 68 kg weight and a variable length with the arrow supported just behind the head and just in front of the nock citation needed Because of this GNAS cannot be directly converted to ATA or ASTM The primary unit of measurement for spine is deflection in thousandths of an inch a deflection of 500 equals 0 500 in or 12 7 mm Deflection is sometimes converted to pounds of bow weight by dividing 26 by the deflection in inches 26 in lb divided by 0 500 in equals a spine of 52 lb 23 Solutions editSome modern bows have a cutout in the direct center of the body or riser that the arrow flies through this allows the arrow to always move with the string citation needed However dynamic spine arrows are still used References edit The Toxophilist s Paradox Forest and Stream 8 February 1913 Rheingans W R March April 1936 Exterior and Interior Ballistics of Bows and Arrows Review Archery Review 236 ff Rheingans W R Nagler F June August 1937 Spine and Arrow Design American Bowman Review 226 232 Park James L 8 September 2013 9 November 2012 Arrow behaviour in the lateral plane during and immediately following the power stroke of a recurve archery bow Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology 227 3 172 183 doi 10 1177 1754337112464844 S2CID 111439189 Kooi B W Sparenberg J A 1997 On the Mechanics of the Arrow Archer s Paradox PDF Journal of Engineering Mathematics 31 4 285 306 doi 10 1023 A 1004262424363 S2CID 122605918 Retrieved 13 February 2013 Kooi B W 1998 The Archer s Paradox and Modelling a Review PDF In Hollister Short Graham ed History of Technology Vol 20 pp 125 137 ISBN 9780720123760 Kooi B W 1998 Bow arrow interaction in archery PDF Journal of Sports Sciences 16 8 721 731 doi 10 1080 026404198366353 PMID 10189077 Retrieved 13 February 2013 Park James L June 2013 1 June 2012 High speed video analysis of arrow behaviour during the power stroke of a recurve archery bow Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology 227 2 128 136 doi 10 1177 1754337112446406 S2CID 108701325 Carmichael A Ron 24 June 2001 Archer s Paradox texasarchery org Texas State Archery Association Archived from the original on 20 October 2013 Retrieved 13 February 2013 The Archer s Paradox Bega Valley Traditional Archers February 2013 Retrieved 13 February 2013 Spine O Meter Mark II Instruction Manual PDF oakcreekarchery com Oak Creek Archery 2010 Retrieved 13 February 2013 How To Make a Spine Tester poorfolkbows com Retrieved 13 February 2013 Spine O Meter Appendix A Translating Arrow Spine Test Methods PDF oakcreekarchery com Oak Creek Archery 2010 Retrieved 13 February 2013 a b Jim Hill s Spine Tester texasarchery org Texas State Archery Association Archived from the original on 20 October 2013 Retrieved 13 February 2013 Carbon Arrow University Hunter s Friend LLC 2011 Retrieved 13 February 2013 Controlling Dynamic Arrow Spine PDF Arrow Trade Magazine July 2006 Archived from the original PDF on 21 October 2013 Retrieved 13 February 2013 Rieckmann Marianne Park James L Codrington John Cazzolato Ben June 2012 3 April 2012 Modelling the three dimensional vibration of composite archery arrows under free free boundary conditions PDF Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology 226 2 114 122 doi 10 1177 1754337112442273 S2CID 110116671 Archived from the original PDF on 1 March 2021 Retrieved 13 February 2013 Yononindo Daniel 2 February 2012 Archers Paradox up to the Limit Extended Version Event occurs at 6m15s via YouTube The breaking of the arrow at the end of the video was NOT due to a lack of knowledge on my part IT WAS QUITE DELIBERATE Arrow Spine Information PDF yeoldedelphbowmen com December 2012 Archived from the original PDF on 20 October 2013 Retrieved 13 February 2013 AMO Standards 1987 PDF Archery Manufacturers and Merchants Organization 1987 Retrieved 13 February 2013 AMO Standards 2001 PDF Archery Manufacturers and Merchants Organization 2001 Retrieved 13 February 2013 ASTM F2031 05 2010 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Arrow Shaft Static Spine Stiffness American Society for Testing and Materials 2010 Retrieved 13 February 2013 Cosgrove Gabriela 1994 Wooden Arrows The Traditional Bowyer s Bible Vol Three Guilford The Lyons Press p 228 ISBN 1 58574 087 X External links edit nbsp Media related to Archer s paradox at Wikimedia Commons The Archer s Paradox in SLOW MOTION video Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Archer 27s paradox amp oldid 1167850388, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.