fbpx
Wikipedia

Arakaki v. State of Hawai'i

Arakaki v. State of Hawai'i, 314 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2002),[1] was a lawsuit challenging the requirement that candidates for election to the Office of Hawaiian Affairs board of trustees be Native Hawaiians.

Arakaki v. State of Hawai'i
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Full case nameEarl F. Arakaki, Evelyn C. Arakaki, Patrick Barrett, Sandra P. Burgess, Edward U. Bugarin, Patricia A. Carroll, Robert M. Chapman, Brian Clarke, Kenneth R. Conklin, Michael Y. Garcia, Toby M. Kravet, Thurston Twigg-smith, and Jean Yokoyama v. State of Hawaii, Benjamin J. Cayetano, in His Official Capacity As the Governor of the State of Hawaii, Dwayne D. Yoshina, in His Official Capacity As Chief Election Officer of the State of Hawaii
ArguedMay 6, 2002
DecidedDecember 31, 2002
Citation(s)314 F.3d 1091
Case history
Prior historyNo. 00-cv-514 (D. Haw.)
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingJ. Clifford Wallace, A. Wallace Tashima, Richard C. Tallman
Case opinions
MajorityTashima, joined by Tallman
ConcurrenceWallace

In 2000, after being barred from applying for nomination papers in June because he was not of Hawaiian ancestry, Kenneth R. Conklin was one of 13 plaintiffs in a controversial lawsuit Arakaki v. State of Hawai'i challenging the requirement that candidates for election to the Office of Hawaiian Affairs board of trustees be Hawaiian. The suit, argued by attorneys H. William Burgess and co-counsel Patrick W. Hanifin, claimed the restriction violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fifteenth Amendment, and the Voting Rights Act. In August, U.S. District Judge Helen Gillmor issued a judgment allowing non-Hawaiians to run for OHA trustee. Conklin then ran unsuccessfully for OHA trustee in November 2000, placing 4th out of 20 candidates for one "at large" seat. (The winner, Haunani Apoliona, took 58,264 votes or 15.7%, and Conklin took 18,115 votes or 4.9% - there were also 117,597 blank votes or 31.7%)

References edit

  1. ^ Arakaki v. State of Hawai'i, 314 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2002).

External links edit

  • Link to essay where Conklin identifies himself as opponent of Hawaiian movement


arakaki, state, hawai, this, article, needs, additional, citations, verification, please, help, improve, this, article, adding, citations, reliable, sources, unsourced, material, challenged, removed, find, sources, news, newspapers, books, scholar, jstor, febr. This article needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources Unsourced material may be challenged and removed Find sources Arakaki v State of Hawai i news newspapers books scholar JSTOR February 2018 Learn how and when to remove this message Arakaki v State of Hawai i 314 F 3d 1091 9th Cir 2002 1 was a lawsuit challenging the requirement that candidates for election to the Office of Hawaiian Affairs board of trustees be Native Hawaiians Arakaki v State of Hawai iCourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFull case nameEarl F Arakaki Evelyn C Arakaki Patrick Barrett Sandra P Burgess Edward U Bugarin Patricia A Carroll Robert M Chapman Brian Clarke Kenneth R Conklin Michael Y Garcia Toby M Kravet Thurston Twigg smith and Jean Yokoyama v State of Hawaii Benjamin J Cayetano in His Official Capacity As the Governor of the State of Hawaii Dwayne D Yoshina in His Official Capacity As Chief Election Officer of the State of HawaiiArguedMay 6 2002DecidedDecember 31 2002Citation s 314 F 3d 1091Case historyPrior historyNo 00 cv 514 D Haw Court membershipJudge s sittingJ Clifford Wallace A Wallace Tashima Richard C TallmanCase opinionsMajorityTashima joined by TallmanConcurrenceWallace In 2000 after being barred from applying for nomination papers in June because he was not of Hawaiian ancestry Kenneth R Conklin was one of 13 plaintiffs in a controversial lawsuit Arakaki v State of Hawai i challenging the requirement that candidates for election to the Office of Hawaiian Affairs board of trustees be Hawaiian The suit argued by attorneys H William Burgess and co counsel Patrick W Hanifin claimed the restriction violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment the Fifteenth Amendment and the Voting Rights Act In August U S District Judge Helen Gillmor issued a judgment allowing non Hawaiians to run for OHA trustee Conklin then ran unsuccessfully for OHA trustee in November 2000 placing 4th out of 20 candidates for one at large seat The winner Haunani Apoliona took 58 264 votes or 15 7 and Conklin took 18 115 votes or 4 9 there were also 117 597 blank votes or 31 7 References edit Arakaki v State of Hawai i 314 F 3d 1091 9th Cir 2002 External links editLink to essay where Conklin identifies himself as opponent of Hawaiian movement nbsp This article relating to case law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Arakaki v State of Hawai 27i amp oldid 1175138513, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.